Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 02.01.19 in Vol 21, No 1 (2019): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11250, first published Jun 13, 2018.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Web-Based Exercise as an Effective Complementary Treatment for Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Intervention Study

    1Department of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation, Institute of Sports Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

    2I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

    Corresponding Author:

    Perikles Simon, MD, PhD

    Department of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation

    Institute of Sports Science

    Johannes Gutenberg University

    Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 31

    Mainz, 55099

    Germany

    Phone: 49 6131 ext 3923586

    Fax:49 613139235

    Email: simonpe@uni-mainz.de


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Physical inactivity is a major risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Exercise-based prevention interventions for improving cardiorespiratory fitness are a recommended complementary treatment for NAFLD. Achievement of minimally effective physical activity to improve cardiorespiratory fitness among patients typically involves high personal and financial expenses in face-to-face settings. We designed an eHealth approach for patients with NAFLD to improve the cardiorespiratory fitness and report the first results of the HELP (Hepatic Inflammation and Physical Performance in Patients With NASH [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis]) study.

    Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an 8-week, tailored, Web-based exercise intervention for cardiorespiratory fitness improvement, expressed as peak oxygen uptake (peak volume of oxygen [VO2peak]), in patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD.

    Methods: In a 24-month period, 44 patients were enrolled into an 8-week, prospective, single-arm study with 12 weeks of follow-up. After a medical examination and performance diagnostics, a sports therapist introduced the patients to a Web-based platform for individualized training support. Regular individual patient feedback was provided to systematically adapt the weekly exercise schedule, which allowed us to monitor and ensure patient adherence to strength and endurance training and optimize the step-wise progressive exercise load. Exercise progression was based on an a priori algorithm that considered the subjective rate for both perceived exhaustion and general physical discomfort. The VO2peak was assessed at baseline and at the end of the study by spiroergometry.

    Results: A total of 43 patients completed the intervention with no adverse events. The VO2peak increased significantly by 2.4 mL/kg/min (8.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-3.27; P<.001) accompanied by a reduction of 1.0 kg in a body weight (95% CI: 0.33-1.58; P=.004) and 1.3 kg in body fat mass (95% CI: 0.27-2.27; P=.01). In an exploratory analysis, step-wise logistic regression analysis revealed low body fat and VO2peak at baseline and the total minutes of endurance training during the intervention as main contributors to a positive change in VO2peak. Our predictive model indicated that the average patient with NAFLD needed 223 min for stabilization of VO2peak and 628 min for average improvement in VO2peak. However, in patients with a VO2peak approximately 20% higher than the average VO2peak, 628 min were only sufficient to stabilize the VO2peak and >40% reduction in the average fat mass would be required to achieve an average outcome.

    Conclusions: This is the first study to show that patients with NAFLD can be effectively supported by a Web-based approach, which can increase the VO2peak to a similar extent as face-to-face interventions. Patients with low body fat and low VO2peak benefited the most from our intervention. In terms of future treatment strategies, NAFLD patients with high body fat may particularly benefit from body-fat reduction through a strict nutritional intervention, subsequently enabling a more effective exercise intervention.

    Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02526732; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02526732 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74pXhXXfq)

    International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.8607

    J Med Internet Res 2019;21(1):e11250

    doi:10.2196/11250

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Sedentary behavior and an unhealthy diet are common in Western industrialized countries [1,2]. Modern lifestyle increases the risk for chronic diseases such as metabolic syndrome [2-5]. According to the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in adults, metabolic syndrome is defined by the presence of abdominal obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, hypertension, and impaired fasting glycemia [6]. In the last few years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gained attention, owing to its highest increase in the incidence among chronic liver diseases worldwide [3,4,7-9]. Some researchers consider NAFLD as a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, whereas others consider it a consequence of metabolic syndrome [3,10-13].

    Irrespective of age and ethnicity, 20%-30% of the general population shows fatty changes in the liver [8,11,14-17], and the prevalence of NAFLD is higher in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes [18]. NAFLD is a benign, preliminary-stage disease with the potential to progress from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and finally, hepatocellular carcinoma [9,19-22]. The pathways driving this progression are numerous and complex, [22,23] and not every patient with NAFLD develops cirrhosis-related complications [9,24]. However, patients with NAFLD have a higher mortality rate than the general population [9,24,25]. Most patients with NAFLD are asymptomatic [16,19,26], but some experience unspecific symptoms such as fatigue [26,27] and depression [28], which additionally affect the health-related quality of life [29,30]. If NAFLD is left untreated, most patients will develop diabetes in the long-term [9]. To improve the condition of the liver and reduce additional risk factors, changes towards a balanced nutrition and a more physically active lifestyle are recommended in daily life [21,26,31-34]. The Practice Guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends a loss of at least 3%-5% of body weight to improve steatosis [35]. The current recommendation for adult patients with NAFLD or NASH is a physical activity target of at least 150 min of moderate-intensity exercise per week or 75 min of vigorous-intensity exercise per week [36]. In addition, strengthening exercises should be performed twice a week [36]. Most people with NAFLD are unaware of the presence of the disease due to the absence of any specific symptoms. Therefore, NAFLD is occasionally self-caused [37] and develops and progresses over years. Studies showed a reduced physical activity level (intensity and amount) in patients with NAFLD compared to healthy individuals [12,27,38] and a suboptimal cardiorespiratory fitness, with <20% of patients meeting the recommended physical activity [39]. In a survey conducted by Kistler et al, 54% of participants were inactive, and 57% of them did not perform any recreational activity; although the remaining 43% performed some activity, it was not enough to achieve the goals recommended [40]. Besides the decreased activity level, prolonged sitting time is associated with a higher prevalence of NAFLD [41,42]. At diagnosis, patients are encouraged to immediately change many aspects of their daily routine, which requires them to overcome different barriers and obstacles; for example, time and place constraints are common hurdles in maintaining regular activity [4,37,43,44]. Changing one’s lifestyle is not easy, especially for patients with highly sedentary habits [45]. Consequently, regular motivational support from experts is needed [45]. Thus, advances in modern technologies should be considered for promoting health-conscious behavior [43]. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2015 showed that 84% of American adults have access to a computer and regularly use the internet [46]. In 2005, 75% of internet users searched for health information, and 42% of them searched for specific information about exercise and training [47]. The possibility to reach and support large numbers of patients via the internet [48] can thus be a cost-effective way to improve and maintain an active lifestyle [49]. Further, frequent issues like time and place constraints for joint exercise could be neglected with an eHealth approach. Web-based interventions with cancer patients were the first to report promising results [50,51]. The aim of our prospective, non-randomized, pilot study was to determine whether online support aids patients with NAFLD or NASH in establishing and maintaining a regular level of physical activity and whether individualized training recommendations improve the overall physical fitness determined by the peak oxygen uptake (peak volume of oxygen [VO2peak]) and body composition.


    Methods

    Participants

    The HELP (Hepatic Inflammation and Physical Performance in Patients With NASH) study is a prospective, single-arm study in patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD and explored the feasibility and effectivity of an individualized exercise intervention. A total of 46 patients were recruited from August 2015 to December 2017. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02526732).

    Before the study was initiated, a focus group was conducted at the Department of Sports Medicine. The team of experts tested the website over a period of 4 weeks. During this time, the distribution of roles, usability, and communication features were tested and revised. No changes in structure or content were made during the trial period. All study participants were monitored and supported by the same sports therapist. A 24-hour turn-around time was mandated for responses to requests from the participants.

    The inclusion criteria were age of 18-70 years and histologically proven NAFLD. Subjects were excluded if they had bariatric operation in the past 5 years; body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 or >45 kg/m2; instable coronary heart disease; coronary interventions in the past 6 months; stroke in the past 6 months; high-grade coronary artery disease (II-IV); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; renal or metabolic abnormalities; uncontrolled hypertension; other liver diseases such as hepatitis; decompensated liver cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; alcohol consumption >30 g/day in men and >20 g/day in women; pregnancy; medications that can cause secondary NASH, such as corticosteroids; other immunological or inflammatory diseases (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus); musculoskeletal disorders; and phenprocoumon therapy.

    Study Design

    The primary outcome was defined as a change in the VO2peak from the baseline. The secondary outcome measures included changes in body composition, lung function, and changes in performance parameters from the cardiopulmonary exercise test. Assessment of the primary and secondary outcomes was performed before and after the 8-week intervention. Particular attention was paid to the acceptance and safety of the Web-based support concept. From a physical intervention point of view, acceptance of the concept was assessed by the performed exercise recommendations, where completion of 80% of the recommended exercises indicated good adherence. Considering that this was an eHealth approach, acceptance was assessed on the basis of user behavior and consequent weekly feedback. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of overloading or injuries.

    Patients underwent physical examinations, laboratory tests, and an ultrasound prior to inclusion in the study. After providing informed consent, the patients performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test until exhaustion at the Department of Sports Medicine, University Mainz. In addition, the body composition was measured using a bio-impedance analyzer (InBody 3.0; Biospace, Seoul, South Korea). A standard 12-lead resting electrocardiogram and a pulmonary function test (spirometry by Body Box 5500; Medisoft, Sorinnes, Belgium) were also performed. Further details about the testing procedure are extensively described elsewhere [52,53]. After the exercise test, each patient was registered and trained by the administrator on the webpage. The registration and explanation process took approximately 1 hour. A detailed explanation, a manual for the homepage, a heart rate monitor, and three elastic tapes were provided to each patient. A detailed illustration on the measurements is available as a video clip in Multimedia Appendix 1. All patients underwent the abovementioned clinical and sports medical examinations at the start of the study and after 8 weeks of the intervention. The clinical examination was additionally performed 12 weeks after the end of the intervention (Figure 1).

    Intervention

    Patients received tailored exercise recommendations via internal messages on the system on a weekly basis [53]. Depending on the initial exercise test and the subjective feedback from the patients during the intervention period of 8 weeks, the exercise program was adjusted for each patient, considering the American College of Sports Medicine’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription [54]. To avoid early dropouts, moderate-intensity exercise for 3 sessions per week was chosen (endurance training twice [walking or running] and strength training once [major muscle groups]). The program was intensified after a 4-week familiarization to reach a frequency of 5 sessions per week (endurance training thrice and strength training twice) for the remaining 4 weeks.

    Figure 1. Study flow chart.
    View this figure

    In addition to the frequent interaction with a counselor, peer support is considered a cornerstone in this Web-based concept. Therefore, a discussion board and a chatroom were established to improve social support and adherence [55]. However, due to issues in data-protection regulations and the ethics protocol, activities were not controlled, stored, or analyzed.

    Strength Training

    A program of 10 strength exercises was carried out in a prescribed sequence to stimulate muscular strength in the major muscle groups. Detailed illustrated instruction and video files for the exercises were available on the website. Training individualization was achieved by varying the number of repetitions or number of sets.

    Endurance Training

    The individualized endurance training program was based on lactate measurements. The intensity of the jogging program was controlled by a heart rate monitor (FT1; Polar, Kempele, Finland). After an initial continuous method with a heart rate at the lactate threshold, the training followed the interval method (eg, 2 x 4 min, 2 x 3 min, 2 x 2 min with 2-min rest) at a higher heart rate. The intended intensity of training was achieved by adjusting the interval time or adding additional intervals.

    Training Progress

    Endurance training and strength training, consisting of bodyweight exercises and exercises with elastic tapes, were the main content of the training recommendations. Each training started with a 5-min warm up and was followed by a 5-min cool-down phase. A selection of relaxation and breathing exercises was also available on the website. At the end of each week, the patients sent in a filled schedule with important information such as average heart rate, resting heart rate, and training time. In addition, the following parameters were assessed to allow modification of the training intensity and duration for the following week: (1) The patient’s individual assessment of pain and training load using the modified Borg scale (score range, 1-10) [56] after each training session, and (2) the traffic light principle to regulate the intensity of the next week’s training. Depending on individual feedback, an increase or decrease in the training recommendations was possible, wherein the pain value was dominant for the decision [53]. The weekly feedback ensured appropriate load according to individual abilities and assessment of compliance. In addition, group training was offered biweekly at the sports center of the University Mainz.

    Statistical Procedures

    Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Descriptive statistics were used for presenting baseline characteristics and the user behavior of the website. Variables were described using mean, median, and SD. Normal distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test due to the small sample size. In case of normal distribution, the paired student t test was used to determine within-group differences before and after (at 8 weeks) the intervention. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed, and the data were processed according to the last observation carried forward method. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

    For investigation of factors that contribute to changes in VO2peak, we employed a two-step procedure. We first computed a step-wise feed-forward logistic regression analysis. To ensure stringent inclusion criteria, we fed the model with the baseline data on anthropometrics, including body composition and performance data (Table 1), and data on endurance training (for 8 weeks) and the total exercise time (strength and endurance training in minutes for 8 weeks). Only 3 factors reached a significance level set at .05 for entering a single variable into the regression equation. These factors were then used to compute a logistic regression analysis. Fold-change in VO2peak was normalized by a normalization procedure using the inverse of the squared values, as suggested by Box-Cox analysis.


    Results

    Baseline Characteristics

    A total of 46 patients were screened. After exclusion of 2 patients, 44 patients were finally included in the study (Figure 2). One patient dropped out (2.3%) during the intervention period.

    With regard to the weight status, 3 (6.8%) patients had a normal weight status, 15 (34.1%) were overweight, and 26 (59.1%) were obese. All patient characteristics at the baseline are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of all patients was 42 (SD 10.9) years. Of the 44 patients, 41 (93.2%) had a BMI >25 kg/m² and >27% percent of body fat, and the mean BMI of all patients was 31.2 (SD 4.3) kg/m². In total, 1169 exercise recommendations (730 endurance and 439 strength) were performed, and 207 recommended workouts were cancelled due to different reasons.

    Primary Outcome

    At baseline, the mean VO2peak was 27.2 mL/kg/min. After the intervention, the VO2peak significantly increased by 8.8% (from 27.2 mL/kg/min [SD 5.1] to 29.6 mL/kg/min [SD 5.4]; 95% CI: –3.27 to –1.48; P<.001; Figure 3).

    We employed logistic regression analysis to assess the combined effects of the variables shown in Table 1 on the fold change in the maximum volume of oxygen (VO2max) by step-wise feed-forward logistic regression analysis. A multiple linear regression model with 3 independent predictors emerged on the basis of 43 total observations (df=3; F=8.03; r2=0.38; P<.001). All predictors had a significant influence and a corrected power of >80% with VO2peak at baseline (t=–3,77; standard effect size=–0.12; 95% CI: –0.18 to –0.05; P<.001), total minutes of endurance training during the intervention period (t=3.27; standard effect size=0.09; 95% CI: 0.04-0.15; P=.002), and body fat (%) at baseline (t=–3.22; standard effect size=–0.10; 95% CI: –0.17 to –0,04; P=.003). The model indicated that participants in the program with average body fat percentage (27.9%) and average VO2peak at baseline (27.1 mL/kg/min) would need approximately 223 minutes of training within the intervention period to maintain their baseline VO2peak (Figure 4a), but 628 minutes of training were required to reach the average improvement of basal VO2peak of approximately 8% (Figure 4b). However, a high VO2peak at baseline with the average fat mass would lead to a significantly lower outcome (Figure 4c) that could, in principle, be compensated by low fat mass with high baseline VO2peak (Figure 4d).

    Figure 2. Patient flow chart.
    View this figure
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the HELP study (N=44).
    View this table
    Figure 3. Individual changes in VO2peak from baseline to end of the study. VO2peak improved by 2.4 mL/kg/min.
    View this figure
    Figure 4. Predictive analysis for fold-change in VO2max. (a) According to this model, 222 min of endurance training is needed to stabilize VO2max in the collective for a person with an average VO2peak of 27 mL/kg/min and average body fat of 27.9%. (b) For an improvement of approximately 8% VO2max, an endurance training load of at least 600 min over 8 weeks is necessary. (c) A higher initial VO2peak leads to a reduced effect of the 628 min of endurance training within 8 weeks on the primary outcome, VO2max. (d) In principal, lower body fat (%) could compensate for a higher VO2peak at baseline (33.67 mL/kg/min) and yield an 8% improvement in VO2max with the same training load. Solid black regression lines indicate the linear effect of VO2peak at the start of the study, total minutes of endurance training during the intervention period of 8 weeks, and body fat percentage at the start of the study. Dashed blue lines indicate the respective upper and lower 95% confidence intervals for the regressions. *FC: Fold-change. **VO2max: maximum volume of oxygen. ***VO2peak: peak volume of oxygen. ****Pre: before the study.
    View this figure

    Secondary Outcomes

    Significant changes were observed in body weight and BMI (95% CI: 0.33-1.58; P=.004 and 95% CI: 0.14-0.54; P=.001, respectively). With regard to the body composition, there was a significant reduction in body fat (95% CI: 0.27-2.27; P=.01); a consequent reduction in the percentage of body fat (95% CI: 0.26-2.11; P=.01); and a slight, but not significant, increase in lean body mass (95% CI: –1.39 to 0.46; P=.31; Table 2). There was a trend towards a low resting heart rate (95% CI: –0.18 to 7.22; P=.06), but this result was not statistically significant. Further, no changes in lung function, expressed as forced expiratory volume (95% CI: –4.11 to 1.38; P=.32) and vital capacity (95% CI: –1.09 to 3.41; P=.31), were observed.

    Significant changes in the power, expressed as Watt max (95% CI: –18.46 to –10.17; P<.001) and Watt at the individual anaerobic threshold (95% CI: –7.00 to –2.05; P=.001) were observed (Figure 5). The maximum heart frequency remained unchanged, and the subjective perception of exhaustion, expressed as the Borg value, decreased significantly from baseline to the end point of the study (95% CI: –0.05 to 0.95; P=.02; Table 2).

    Acceptance of the Program From an EHealth Perspective

    During the intervention period, regular communication and feedback were easily achieved using the webpage. In some cases, the patients did not send the exercise feedback on time. Therefore, 2.8 (SD 3.8) reminders were sent to the participants to ask for the exercise feedback. The user behavior in terms of log-in duration and frequency is presented in Table 3. The participants’ average length of a visit was approximately 12 min, and the average login frequency was 13 times during the intervention period.

    The typical expected attrition in registration frequency and duration [57] was observed in this trial (Figures 6 and 7). Nevertheless, a timely response was achieved, even in patients who did not continue to use the webpage, by interacting via conventional email (Table 3).

    Table 2. Study results (N=44).
    View this table
    Figure 5. Fold changes for maximum Watt, maximum volume of oxygen (VO2max, body fat, and Watt at the individual anaerobic threshold (IAT). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
    View this figure
    Table 3. User behavior for the homepage during the intervention period (N=43).
    View this table
    Figure 6. Login frequency during the intervention period of 8 weeks. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
    View this figure
    Figure 7. Login duration in minutes during the intervention period of 8 weeks. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
    View this figure
    Figure 8. Development of the physical activity level, expressed as weekly endurance training in minutes. The dashed line indicates the recommended vigorous activity goal of 75 min per week by the World Health Organization. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
    View this figure
    Table 4. Exercise profile (N=43).
    View this table

    Acceptance of the Program From a Physical Intervention Point of View

    The online exercise concept was well accepted by the patients. The physical activity level increased steadily over the period of 8 weeks (Figure 8). After an initial familiarization period, the exercise recommendations increased progressively. In the second half of the intervention, the patients reached and exceeded the activity recommended by the World Health Organization [58]. The study participants performed 72 additional workouts (eg, hiking or playing volleyball or badminton; Table 4). However, the participants were not obliged to record other leisure time activities, and therefore, the additional exercises were not further examined. The adherence to the Web-based exercise concept, expressed as ≥80% of the endurance workouts, was good: 32 participants (74%) performed ≥80% of the recommended endurance workouts. Training interruptions were either documented in the weekly exercise schedule or in reply to a request from the sports therapist. Common reasons for breaks were deadlines (eg, congress participation or workshops), medical reasons (eg, cold, inflammation, blisters, headache, or food poisoning), external conditions (eg, high temperature or heavy rain), or private reasons.

    Safety

    The intervention in this group of patients with liver disease was safe. No serious adverse events occurred during the study period. Our traffic light principle for exercise modification protected the participants against overload. The weekly communication between the participant and the sports therapist was essential for the tailored feedback [53]. Neither the patients nor the attending physician reported injuries, physical overload, or serious concerns about the health status during the intervention period. Notably, due to physical discomfort, 2 patients had to be assigned to bicycle exercise instead of the prescribed exercise.


    Discussion

    Overview

    Current guidelines recommend lifestyle changes as the primary approach for treating obesity and NAFLD; however, only a few studies have focused on physical activity, and neither the type nor the intensity of appropriate exercise has been defined for NAFLD. In addition, it has been suggested that physical deconditioning of patients with NAFLD leads to the inability to adhere to exercise recommendations [12,38,39]. The HELP study explored the feasibility and efficiency of a Web-based and patient-centered exercise support concept.

    The Role of Weight Loss

    Weight loss is a major goal in the treatment of NAFLD [59]. The guidelines and experts in the field recommend a weight loss of at least 3%-5% to improve steatosis [35,60]. However, there are critical limits to the weight loss [61]: A weight loss of 1.6 kg per week should not be exceeded, as it could potentially provoke portal inflammation or portal fibrosis [60,61]. In our study, 3 patients showed a normal weight status; therefore, weight reduction was not needed. The term weight management is more accurate than weight loss in this context. We found a significant, but extremely low, weight change among the patients, which is in accordance with the findings of other exercise studies [62-64]. Weight gain is a result of a high energy intake and low energy expenditure [65]. Weight reduction is only possible if the energy expenditure persistently exceeds the energy intake [31]. Therefore, diet is a necessary aspect of weight reduction. Furthermore, our prediction model showed that a reduction in the fat mass percentage is crucial to significantly improve cardiorespiratory fitness with achievable physical activity. Regular exercise supports energy expenditure, but conscious nutrition is essential for control of energy intake. Moreover, the absence of weight loss might partly be explained by a moderate shift from fat mass to fat-free mass. Regular activity reduces body fat and increases lean body mass. Another explanation for not observing weight loss during the intervention is insufficient negative energy balance due to a low starting intensity [66]. For effective weight loss, a longer duration and increased intensity of exercise is required. Nevertheless, exercise studies show promising results in terms of decreased insulin and homeostasis model assessment index [63,67], improved cardiorespiratory fitness [62,68], reduced hepatic and visceral lipid levels [63,69], reduced liver enzyme levels, and modulated liver fat content [34], irrespective of the nutrition intake. Exercise combined with an adjusted diet shows strong effects on weight change, but exercise also has independent modes of action. Thus, physical activity or structured exercise recommendations should be strongly promoted due to their additional benefits in the absence of weight loss.

    Fitness Improvement

    Takahashi et al (2015) assessed the efficiency and safety of two simple resistance exercises in 53 patients with NAFLD [67]. After a 12-week period, patients in the intervention group had a significantly increased mean fat-free mass (–0.24 [SD 0.88] vs 0.30 [SD 0.67] kg; P=.01) and muscle (–0.24 [SD 0.82] vs 0.25 [SD 0.70] kg; P=.02) compared to the control group [67], which are in line with our findings. Another previous study reported a change of nearly 9% in VO2peak when participants in the intervention group trained 5 times per week for 16 weeks [70]. The subjects exercised under supervision once a week and were encouraged to perform the remaining 4 sessions at home. The endurance training was controlled by heart-rate measurement [70]. In our study, a combination of the heart rate, as an objective measure, and the Borg value, as a subjective measure, were used to determine the intensity. Borg values are considered an appropriate measure for monitoring and regulating exercise intensity [34,71,72]. The results of this study, with a short intervention period of 8 weeks, are consistent with those of recent face-to-face research studies with respect to changes in body composition and VO2peak, demonstrating the efficacy of our eHealth approach [34,63,64,67,70,73]. For instance, in a study by Keating et al (2015), the participants were supervised and monitored using Borg values and heart rate during the intervention period of 8 weeks [64]. Depending on the group allocation, the participants were instructed to perform 2 or 3 sessions of aerobic exercise training a week; the exercise quantity is comparable to that used in our study. With regard to the exercise quality, Keating et al (2015) compared 3 different training approaches in order to determine whether intensity or volume is more effective [64]. A total of 47 obese adults trained for 8 weeks with low-intensity and high-volume exercise, high-intensity and low-volume exercise, or low-intensity and low-volume exercise (or were prescribed a stretching and self-massage program as placebo); all intervention groups showed similar changes in VO2peak (by 2.29 [SD 0.77] mL/kg/min, P<.01; 2.99 [SD 0.48] mL/kg/min, P<.01; and 2.24 [SD 0.54] mL/kg/min, P<.01, respectively), which is comparable to our results. Therefore, the investigators concluded that volume and intensity were both efficient [64]. However, with respect to adherence, another study reported that high exercise frequency is better accepted than high exercise intensity [74]. Furthermore, high exercise intensity resulted in a higher percentage of exercise-related injuries [74]. Despite the positive effects of regular physical activity, independent of intensity and volume, the most important challenge is adherence to exercise [75].

    The Importance of Regular Support

    Physical activity for 5 days per week is recommended for the general population [58]. In addition, resistance training should be performed at least 2 days a week. In contrast to the findings of Perri et al [74], many study participants in this trial reported that they struggled with integration of the demanding volume in the second half of the intervention. Berzigotti et al (2016) summarized the beneficial effects of exercise on the health of patients with NAFLD, but also reported high dropout rates in physical activity trials among these patients [3]. There is an urgent need to counteract the sedentary habits of patients with NAFLD. Despite the proven positive effects of regular physical activity and a healthy diet, many people lack long-term motivation [76]. Engaging in less physical activity increases the risk of fatty changes in the liver [41,77,78]. In a previous study, the physically inactive group showed a significantly higher prevalence of fatty liver changes [78]. This finding is supported by the results of a study by Perseghin et al (2007), who showed an association between habitual physical activity and intrahepatic fat content [79]. Furthermore, a large cross-sectional study by Ryu et al (2015) fully supported this finding: They showed that prolonged sitting times are positively associated with the prevalence of NAFLD [42]. Therefore, supporting patients to achieve and sustain regular activity is a key issue in NAFLD management [12]. Due to the pronounced sedentary lifestyle, starting with a low training volume and intensity is recommended for motivational reasons. Self-chosen sitting times should be reduced, and barriers for regular exercise should be identified and eliminated [80]. Intensive-exercise interventions carried out under supervision in hospitals or fitness centers [32,34,68,70] impose an unnatural lifestyle on patients for a short period of time. After the intervention, patients quickly lose motivation and fall back into their old habits [45]. There is a strong need and a high potential for Web-based intervention designs [81,82]. Web-based interventions are essential to bridge the treatment gap between demand and supply [83,84]. In a previous study, patients with diabetes reported that they need a better strategy for transition to subsequent postintervention conditions of less support [85]. Furthermore, from the patient’s point of view, scheduling flexibility and geographical proximity are important factors, which should be taken into account [85]. Even the most-powerful individualized exercise program enhances the patient’s situation sustainably only if patients are able to adopt the regular activity in their daily routine [86]. Therefore, the main focus is to incorporate an exercise program into the daily routine of patients with NAFLD to promote long-term changes [87] and reverse sedentariness [88]. Regular feedback from a counselor seems to be an important aspect for patients to stay motivated [89,90]. Furthermore, it is important to integrate the patient in the decision-making process [86]. Thus, a change from compliance (implementation of prescription) to adherence (mutual agreement between patient and caregiver) should be achieved [82,86]. Growing interest in utilization of modern technologies such as computers and smartphones could encourage the use feasible ways to improve knowledge and care in a home-based setting. Web-based support allows a flexible scheduling of training and transfer of proper guidance through regular counseling and tailored feedback. In this study, common obstacles such as time constraints (eg, shift work or family responsibilities) or no access to a fitness center (eg, distance, high costs, or lack of sound advice) [37,43,45] could be circumvented by using additional training equipment like pulse watches and elastic bands. Furthermore, a regular, close communication with a team of experts was achieved by communication via the specially designed website. This approach reduced the aforementioned geographical and time-related barriers. In contrast to print-based interventions and face-to-face counseling, Web-based communication reduces costs and has a higher potential to reach a wide range of target groups with tailored support [43,49,91]. Individualized recommendations based on heart frequency and personal feedback, expressed as rating of perceived exertion, seem to be useful in this context [34].

    This trial tests the feasibility of a Web-based exercise program in a group of patients with liver disease. In line with the recommendations of guidelines, this is also one of the first investigations to support patients with NAFLD by providing a combined endurance and strength training program.

    Strengths and Limitations

    This study has several strengths and limitations. The strengths of this study include the performance of a liver biopsy, which is the gold standard for diagnosing liver diseases [7,92]. Furthermore, this is the first Web-based approach for a tailored exercise intervention in this patient group. In contrast to other studies, we had only 1 (2.3%) dropout; our study showed good adherence and tolerance in comparison to a recent review that reported dropout rates of 6%-45% with a similar intervention [75]. Possible advantages of the Web-based approach are the flexible design and exercise implementation in the home environment. This study had a few limitations. First, investigators had to rely, at least partially, on subjective feedback for training adherence without the possibility of visual control by the sports physician. Data on training adherence might be prone to social desirability bias as well as over- or underestimation. Studies have previously discussed the issue of over- or underestimation in home-based training settings [93,94]. To reduce such potential bias, we combined the subjective feedback (Borg rating for training sessions) with an objective measurement (average heart rate). An individual who tended to respond in a socially desirable fashion would need at least some in-depth knowledge in exercise physiology to trick the therapist or would most likely submit nonplausible data. Second, this study lacked a control group. Because of different comorbidities, some patients had to be excluded. Therefore, we do not present a typical NAFLD collective here. Third, missing features and confusing page layout of the website could have affected user behavior. Most patients demanded regular nutritional advice. Some of the participants stated that they neglected their common eating habits due to diverse changes during the intervention period (eg, marriage, job loss, or change of shift). These changes could explain minor changes in the weight status. Finally, the length of the intervention period (8 weeks) was probably too short to show further improvements in weight status or cardiorespiratory fitness.

    Conclusions

    The present study indicates that 8 weeks of a Web-based, highly individualized, supervised training is safe and feasible for patients with NAFLD. The program significantly improved the VO2peak and body composition. To influence the risk factor sedentariness sustainably and enable a long-term lifestyle change, an exercise program that can be integrated into everyday life is needed. Web-based communication as a connection between the patient and caregiver might be a useful and cost-effective monitoring tool. Close contact with the supervisor can immediately reduce sport-related doubts and anxieties as well as motivational barriers. The Web-based design is the first step to a new way of delivering services to patients with NAFLD and potentially, other diseases. Future studies are required to determine whether regular interaction between the patient and the study team can be maintained in long-term. Additionally, the intervention program presented here could be further supplemented with individualized, nutritional advice by a dietician to further improve the weight status. Finally, an expert should rework the page design and integrate missing features for a more pleasant experience with the webpage.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank all the participants of this study and the staff of the I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center and the Department of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, for recruiting, sample processing, and support.

    Authors' Contributions

    PS, JMS, YH, and DP developed the individual study concepts. DP designed the website. PS and DP designed the exercise components, and YH and JMS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final document.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Video clip of the Web-based exercise support concept.

    MP4 File (MP4 Video), 113MB

    References

    1. Finelli C, Tarantino G. Have guidelines addressing physical activity been established in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease? World J Gastroenterol 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6790-6800 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Gonçalves IO, Oliveira PJ, Ascensão A, Magalhães J. Exercise as a therapeutic tool to prevent mitochondrial degeneration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Eur J Clin Invest 2013 Nov;43(11):1184-1194. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Berzigotti A, Saran U, Dufour J. Physical activity and liver diseases. Hepatology 2016 Mar;63(3):1026-1040. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Whitsett M, VanWagner LB. Physical activity as a treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. World J Hepatol 2015 Aug 08;7(16):2041-2052 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol 2012 Apr;2(2):1143-1211 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001 May 16;285(19):2486-2497. [Medline]
    7. Adams LA, Angulo P. Treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Postgrad Med J 2006 May;82(967):315-322 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Masarone M, Federico A, Abenavoli L, Loguercio C, Persico M. Non alcoholic fatty liver: epidemiology and natural history. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2014;9(3):126-133. [Medline]
    9. Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4):865-873. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Wilkins T, Tadkod A, Hepburn I, Schade RR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2013 Jul 01;88(1):35-42 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    11. Bellentani S, Scaglioni F, Marino M, Bedogni G. Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis 2010 Dec;28(1):155-161. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Hallsworth K, Thoma C, Moore S, Ploetz T, Anstee QM, Taylor R, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with higher levels of measured sedentary behaviour and lower levels of physical activity than matched healthy controls. Frontline Gastroenterol 2015 Jan;6(1):44-51 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Kotronen A, Yki-Järvinen H. Fatty liver: a novel component of the metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008 Jan;28(1):27-38 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Wong VW, Chu WC, Wong GL, Chan RS, Chim AM, Ong A, et al. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in Hong Kong Chinese: a population study using proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and transient elastography. Gut 2012 Mar;61(3):409-415. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology 2004 Dec;40(6):1387-1395. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Satapathy SK, Sanyal AJ. Epidemiology and Natural History of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Semin Liver Dis 2015 Aug;35(3):221-235. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Koehler EM, Schouten JNL, Hansen BE, van RFJA, Hofman A, Stricker BH, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the elderly: results from the Rotterdam study. J Hepatol 2012 Dec;57(6):1305-1311. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla D, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol 2013 Mar;58(3):593-608 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Angulo P, Lindor KD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002 Feb;17 Suppl:S186-S190. [Medline]
    20. Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology 2010 May;51(5):1820-1832. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Nobili V, Carter-Kent C, Feldstein AE. The role of lifestyle changes in the management of chronic liver disease. BMC Med 2011 Jun 06;9:70 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Berlanga A, Guiu-Jurado E, Porras JA, Auguet T. Molecular pathways in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2014;7:221-239 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Ferreira DMS, Castro RE, Machado MV, Evangelista T, Silvestre A, Costa A, et al. Apoptosis and insulin resistance in liver and peripheral tissues of morbidly obese patients is associated with different stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetologia 2011 Jul;54(7):1788-1798. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Adams LA, Lymp JF, St SJ, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 2005 Jul;129(1):113-121. [Medline]
    25. Ong JP, Pitts A, Younossi ZM. Increased overall mortality and liver-related mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2008 Oct;49(4):608-612. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA 2015 Jun 09;313(22):2263-2273. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Newton JL, Jones DEJ, Henderson E, Kane L, Wilton K, Burt AD, et al. Fatigue in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is significant and associates with inactivity and excessive daytime sleepiness but not with liver disease severity or insulin resistance. Gut 2008 Jun;57(6):807-813. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Tomeno W, Kawashima K, Yoneda M, Saito S, Ogawa Y, Honda Y, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease comorbid with major depressive disorder: The pathological features and poor therapeutic efficacy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015 Jun;30(6):1009-1014. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Younossi ZM, Boparai N, Price LL, Kiwi ML, McCormick M, Guyatt G. Health-related quality of life in chronic liver disease: the impact of type and severity of disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 Jul;96(7):2199-2205. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Alt Y, Grimm A, Schlegel L, Grambihler A, Kittner JM, Wiltink J, et al. The Impact of Liver Cell Injury on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0151200 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Al-Jiffri O, Al-Sharif FM, Abd El-Kader SM, Ashmawy EM. Weight reduction improves markers of hepatic function and insulin resistance in type-2 diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. Afr Health Sci 2013 Sep;13(3):667-672 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Bacchi E, Negri C, Targher G, Faccioli N, Lanza M, Zoppini G, et al. Both resistance training and aerobic training reduce hepatic fat content in type 2 diabetic subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (the RAED2 Randomized Trial). Hepatology 2013 Oct;58(4):1287-1295. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Hannah WN, Harrison SA. Lifestyle and Dietary Interventions in the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci 2016 May;61(5):1365-1374. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Hallsworth K, Thoma C, Hollingsworth KG, Cassidy S, Anstee QM, Day CP, et al. Modified high-intensity interval training reduces liver fat and improves cardiac function in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Sci (Lond) 2015 Dec;129(12):1097-1105. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012 Jun;55(6):2005-2023. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol 2010 Aug;53(2):372-384 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Manson JE, Skerrett PJ, Greenland P, VanItallie TB. The escalating pandemics of obesity and sedentary lifestyle. A call to action for clinicians. Arch Intern Med 2004 Feb 9;164(3):249-258. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Gerber L, Otgonsuren M, Mishra A, Escheik C, Birerdinc A, Stepanova M, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with low level of physical activity: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012 Oct;36(8):772-781 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Krasnoff JB, Painter PL, Wallace JP, Bass NM, Merriman RB. Health-related fitness and physical activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2008 Apr;47(4):1158-1166 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Kistler KD, Brunt EM, Clark JM, Diehl AM, Sallis JF, Schwimmer JB, NASH CRN Research Group. Physical activity recommendations, exercise intensity, and histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2011 Mar;106(3):460-8; quiz 469 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Wei H, Qu H, Wang H, Deng H. Associations between sitting time and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases in Chinese male workers: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016 Dec 08;6(9):e011939 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Ryu S, Chang Y, Jung H, Yun KE, Kwon M, Choi Y, et al. Relationship of sitting time and physical activity with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2015 Nov;63(5):1229-1237. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Napolitano MA, Fotheringham M, Tate D, Sciamanna C, Leslie E, Owen N, et al. Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: a preliminary investigation. Ann Behav Med 2003;25(2):92-99. [Medline]
    44. Thomas N, Alder E, Leese GP. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 2004 May;80(943):287-291 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    45. Centis E, Marzocchi R, Di DS, Ciaravella MF, Marchesini G. The effect of lifestyle changes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis 2010;28(1):267-273. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans internet access - As internet use nears saturation for some groups, a look at patterns of adoption. 2000. Pew Research Center   URL: http:/​/assets.​pewresearch.org/​wp-content/​uploads/​sites/​14/​2015/​06/​2015-06-26_internet-usage-across-demographics-discover_FINAL.​pdf [accessed 2018-06-11] [WebCite Cache]
    47. Fox, S. 2005. Health Information Online   URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdf.pdf [accessed 2018-06-11] [WebCite Cache]
    48. Marcus BH, Nigg CR, Riebe D, Forsyth LH. Interactive communication strategies: implications for population-based physical-activity promotion. Am J Prev Med 2000 Aug;19(2):121-126. [Medline]
    49. Williams DM, Matthews CE, Rutt C, Napolitano MA, Marcus BH. Interventions to increase walking behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S567-S573 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Frensham LJ, Zarnowiecki DM, Parfitt G, King S, Dollman J. The experiences of participants in an innovative online resource designed to increase regular walking among rural cancer survivors: a qualitative pilot feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 2014 Jul;22(7):1923-1929. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Lee MK, Yun YH, Park H, Lee ES, Jung KH, Noh D. A Web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2014 Dec;51(12):1557-1567. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Pfirrmann D, Tug S, Brosteanu O, Mehdorn M, Busse M, Grimminger PP, et al. Internet-based perioperative exercise program in patients with Barrett's carcinoma scheduled for esophagectomy [iPEP - study] a prospective randomized-controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2017 Jun 14;17(1):413 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Pfirrmann D, Haller N, Huber Y, Jung P, Lieb K, Gockel I, et al. Applicability of a Web-Based, Individualized Exercise Intervention in Patients With Liver Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Esophageal Cancer, and Psychiatric Disorders: Process Evaluation of 4 Ongoing Clinical Trials. JMIR Res Protoc 2018 May 22;7(5):e106 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. ACSM. In: Pescatello LS, Arena R, Riebe D, Thompson PD, editors. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
    55. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 1970;2(2):92-98. [Medline]
    57. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. World Health Organization 2010:1-60. [Medline]
    59. Johnson NA, George J. Fitness versus fatness: moving beyond weight loss in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010 Jul;52(1):370-381. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Cortez-Pinto H, Machado M. Impact of body weight, diet and lifestyle on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 Apr;2(2):217-231. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Andersen T, Gluud C, Franzmann MB, Christoffersen P. Hepatic effects of dietary weight loss in morbidly obese subjects. J Hepatol 1991 Mar;12(2):224-229. [Medline]
    62. Pugh CJA, Spring VS, Kemp GJ, Richardson P, Shojaee-Moradie F, Umpleby AM, et al. Exercise training reverses endothelial dysfunction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014 Nov 01;307(9):H1298-H1306 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Hallsworth K, Fattakhova G, Hollingsworth KG, Thoma C, Moore S, Taylor R, et al. Resistance exercise reduces liver fat and its mediators in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease independent of weight loss. Gut 2011 Sep;60(9):1278-1283 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Keating SE, Hackett DA, Parker HM, O'Connor HT, Gerofi JA, Sainsbury A, et al. Effect of aerobic exercise training dose on liver fat and visceral adiposity. J Hepatol 2015 Jul;63(1):174-182. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Levine JA, Eberhardt NL, Jensen MD. Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans. Science 1999 Jan 08;283(5399):212-214 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    66. Blair SN. Evidence for success of exercise in weight loss and control. Ann Intern Med 1993 Oct 01;119(7 Pt 2):702-706. [Medline]
    67. Takahashi A, Abe K, Usami K, Imaizumi H, Hayashi M, Okai K, et al. Simple Resistance Exercise helps Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Sports Med 2015 Oct;36(10):848-852. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Cuthbertson DJ, Shojaee-Moradie F, Sprung VS, Jones H, Pugh CJA, Richardson P, et al. Dissociation between exercise-induced reduction in liver fat and changes in hepatic and peripheral glucose homoeostasis in obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2016 Jan;130(2):93-104. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    69. Johnson NA, Sachinwalla T, Walton DW, Smith K, Armstrong A, Thompson MW, et al. Aerobic exercise training reduces hepatic and visceral lipids in obese individuals without weight loss. Hepatology 2009 Oct;50(4):1105-1112. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    70. Sullivan S, Kirk EP, Mittendorfer B, Patterson BW, Klein S. Randomized trial of exercise effect on intrahepatic triglyceride content and lipid kinetics in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2012 Jun;55(6):1738-1745 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    71. Dunbar CC, Robertson RJ, Baun R, Blandin MF, Metz K, Burdett R, et al. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992 Jan;24(1):94-99. [Medline]
    72. Scherr J, Wolfarth B, Christle JW, Pressler A, Wagenpfeil S, Halle M. Associations between Borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013 Jan;113(1):147-155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    73. Shamsoddini A, Sobhani V, Ghamar CME, Alavian SM, Zaree A. Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Training on Liver Enzymes and Hepatic Fat in Iranian Men With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepat Mon 2015 Oct;15(10):e31434 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    74. Perri MG, Anton SD, Durning PE, Ketterson TU, Sydeman SJ, Berlant NE, et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol 2002 Sep;21(5):452-458. [Medline]
    75. Golabi P, Locklear CT, Austin P, Afdhal S, Byrns M, Gerber L, et al. Effectiveness of exercise in hepatic fat mobilization in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2016 Jul 21;22(27):6318-6327 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    76. St George A, Bauman A, Johnston A, Farrell G, Chey T, George J. Independent effects of physical activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2009 Jul;50(1):68-76. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    77. Zelber-Sagi S, Nitzan-Kaluski D, Goldsmith R, Webb M, Zvibel I, Goldiner I, et al. Role of leisure-time physical activity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based study. Hepatology 2008 Dec;48(6):1791-1798. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    78. Hsieh SD, Yoshinaga H, Muto T, Sakurai Y. Regular physical activity and coronary risk factors in Japanese men. Circulation 1998 Feb 24;97(7):661-665 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    79. Perseghin G, Lattuada G, De Cobelli F, Ragogna F, Ntali G, Esposito A, et al. Habitual physical activity is associated with intrahepatic fat content in humans. Diabetes Care 2007 Mar;30(3):683-688. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    80. Trenell MI. Sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and NAFLD: Curse of the chair. J Hepatol 2015 Nov;63(5):1064-1065. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    81. Vandelanotte C, Sugiyama T, Gardiner P, Owen N. Associations of leisure-time internet and computer use with overweight and obesity, physical activity and sedentary behaviors: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2009 Jul 27;11(3):e28 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    82. Montesi L, Moscatiello S, Malavolti M, Marzocchi R, Marchesini G. Physical activity for the prevention and treatment of metabolic disorders. Intern Emerg Med 2013 Dec;8(8):655-666. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    83. Meyer B, Berger T, Caspar F, Beevers CG, Andersson G, Weiss M. Effectiveness of a novel integrative online treatment for depression (Deprexis): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e15 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    84. Ritterband LM, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clifton AD, West RW, Borowitz SM. Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 2003;34(5):527-534. [CrossRef]
    85. Casey D, De Civita M, Dasgupta K. Understanding physical activity facilitators and barriers during and following a supervised exercise programme in Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabet Med 2010 Jan;27(1):79-84. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    86. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-1359. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    87. Johnson NA, Keating SE, George J. Exercise and the liver: implications for therapy in fatty liver disorders. Semin Liver Dis 2012 Feb;32(1):65-79. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    88. Levine JA. Sick of sitting. Diabetologia 2015 Aug;58(8):1751-1758. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    89. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(15):1620-1625. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    90. Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e152 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    91. Marcus BH, Lewis BA, Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Jakicic JM, Whiteley JA, et al. A comparison of Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. Arch Intern Med 2007 May 14;167(9):944-949. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    92. Afdhal NH. Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 60-year-old man with probable nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: weight reduction, liver biopsy, or both? JAMA 2012 Aug 08;308(6):608-616. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    93. Bantum EO, Albright CL, White KK, Berenberg JL, Layi G, Ritter PL, et al. Surviving and thriving with cancer using a Web-based health behavior change intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e54 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    94. Hatchett A, Hallam JS, Ford MA. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer. Psychooncology 2013 Apr;22(4):829-836. [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    BMI: body mass index
    HELP: Hepatic Inflammation and Physical Performance in Patients With NASH
    NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
    VO 2max: maximum volume of oxygen
    VO 2peak: peak volume of oxygen


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 13.06.18; peer-reviewed by C Carrion, L Wesselman; comments to author 06.09.18; revised version received 25.09.18; accepted 04.10.18; published 02.01.19

    ©Daniel Pfirrmann, Yvonne Huber, Jörn Markus Schattenberg, Perikles Simon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.01.2019.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.