Published on in Vol 20, No 5 (2018): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9717, first published .
Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Journals

  1. Guendelman S, Yon E, Pleasants E, Hubbard A, Prata N, Rice W. Shining the light on abortion: Drivers of online abortion searches across the United States in 2018. PLOS ONE 2020;15(5):e0231672 View
  2. Koenig S, Simi E, Goldenberg A, Magasi S, Wicklund C. Exploring prenatal genetic counselors' perceptions of abortion laws in restrictive states. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2019;28(4):790 View
  3. Barr-Walker J, Jayaweera R, Ramirez A, Gerdts C, Withers M. Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review. PLOS ONE 2019;14(4):e0209991 View
  4. Myers C, Jones R, Upadhyay U. Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world. Contraception 2019;100(5):367 View
  5. Kavanaugh M, Jerman J, Frohwirth L. “It's not something you talk about really”: information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care. Contraception 2019;100(1):79 View
  6. Calkin S, Freeman C. Trails and technology: social and cultural geographies of abortion access. Social & Cultural Geography 2019;20(9):1325 View
  7. Swartzendruber A, Lambert D. A Web-Based Geolocated Directory of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) in the United States: Description of CPC Map Methods and Design Features and Analysis of Baseline Data. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(1):e16726 View
  8. Zepecki A, Guendelman S, DeNero J, Prata N. Using Application Programming Interfaces to Access Google Data for Health Research: Protocol for a Methodological Framework. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(7):e16543 View
  9. Raymond E, Chong E, Winikoff B, Platais I, Mary M, Lotarevich T, Castillo P, Kaneshiro B, Tschann M, Fontanilla T, Baldwin M, Schnyer A, Coplon L, Mathieu N, Bednarek P, Keady M, Priegue E. TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States. Contraception 2019;100(3):173 View
  10. Swartz J, Rowe C, Morse J, Bryant A, Stuart G. Women's knowledge of their state's abortion regulations. A national survey. Contraception 2020;102(5):318 View
  11. Daniel S, Schulkin J, Grossman D. Abortion Referral Practices among a National Sample of Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Women's Health Issues 2020;30(6):446 View
  12. Dodge L, Phillips S, Neo D, Nippita S, Paul M, Hacker M. Quality of Information Available Online for Abortion Self-Referral. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132(6):1443 View
  13. Betstadt S, Heyrana K, Whaley N. Telemedicine for Medication Abortion: The Time Is Now. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2020;9(2):66 View
  14. Upadhyay U, Jovel I, McCuaig K, Cartwright A. Using Google Ads to recruit and retain a cohort considering abortion in the United States. Contraception: X 2020;2:100017 View
  15. Mavragani A. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e16206 View
  16. Kohn J, Snow J, Simons H, Seymour J, Thompson T, Grossman D. Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019;134(2):343 View
  17. Upadhyay U, Johns N, Barron R, Cartwright A, Tapé C, Mierjeski A, McGregor A. Abortion-related emergency department visits in the United States: An analysis of a national emergency department sample. BMC Medicine 2018;16(1) View
  18. Upadhyay U, Grossman D. Telemedicine for medication abortion. Contraception 2019;100(5):351 View
  19. Calkin S. Towards a political geography of abortion. Political Geography 2019;69:22 View
  20. Shapiro R, Erhardt-Ohren B, Rochat R. Comparison of Women from Georgia and Contiguous States Who Obtained Abortions in Georgia, 1994–2016. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2020;24(3):299 View
  21. Biggs M, Ralph L, Raifman S, Foster D, Grossman D. Support for and interest in alternative models of medication abortion provision among a national probability sample of U.S. women. Contraception 2019;99(2):118 View
  22. Kohn J, Snow J, Grossman D, Thompson T, Seymour J, Simons H. Introduction of telemedicine for medication abortion: Changes in service delivery patterns in two U.S. states. Contraception 2021;103(3):151 View
  23. Addante A, Eisenberg D, Valentine M, Leonard J, Maddox K, Hoofnagle M. The association between state-level abortion restrictions and maternal mortality in the United States, 1995-2017. Contraception 2021;104(5):496 View
  24. Brown B, Hebert L, Gilliam M, Kaestner R. Distance to an Abortion Provider and Its Association with the Abortion Rate: A Multistate Longitudinal Analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2020;52(4):227 View
  25. . Increasing Access to Abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2020;136(6):e107 View
  26. Daniel S, Schulkin J, Grossman D. Obstetrician-gynecologist willingness to provide medication abortion with removal of the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone. Contraception 2021;104(1):73 View
  27. Ralph L, Foster D, Raifman S, Biggs M, Samari G, Upadhyay U, Gerdts C, Grossman D. Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(12):e2029245 View
  28. Wingo E, Ralph L, Kaller S, Biggs M. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care. Contraception 2021;103(4):269 View
  29. Perritt J, Grossman D. The Health Consequences of Restrictive Abortion Laws. JAMA Internal Medicine 2021;181(5):713 View
  30. Upadhyay U, Schroeder R, Roberts S. Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19. Contraception: X 2020;2:100049 View
  31. Liu G, Li X, Hassanien A. Multidimensional Heterogeneous Medical Data Push in Intelligent Cloud Collaborative Management System. Complexity 2020;2020:1 View
  32. Wolfe T, van der Meulen Rodgers Y. Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2022;19(2):541 View
  33. Alspaugh A. Updates from the Literature, May/June 2021. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2021;66(3):407 View
  34. Turk J, Landy U, Preskill F, Adler A, Steinauer J. The integration of abortion into obstetrician-gynecologists’ practice after comprehensive family planning resident training. Contraception 2021;104(4):337 View
  35. Roberts S, Berglas N, Schroeder R, Lingwall M, Grossman D, White K. Disruptions to Abortion Care in Louisiana During Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Public Health 2021;111(8):1504 View
  36. Addante A, Paul R, Dorsey M, McNicholas C, Madden T. Differences in Financial and Social Burdens Experienced by Patients Traveling for Abortion Care. Women's Health Issues 2021;31(5):426 View
  37. Kaller S, Muñoz M, Sharma S, Tayel S, Ahlbach C, Cook C, Upadhyay U. Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.. Contraception: X 2021;3:100067 View
  38. Thompson K, Sturrock H, Foster D, Upadhyay U. Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion. JAMA Network Open 2021;4(7):e2115530 View
  39. Cartwright A, Tumlinson K, Upadhyay U, Vala-Haynes E. Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to crisis pregnancy centers among an abortion-seeking sample recruited online. PLOS ONE 2021;16(7):e0255152 View
  40. Judge-Golden C, Flink-Bochacki R. The Burden of Abortion Restrictions and Conservative Diagnostic Guidelines on Patient-Centered Care for Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021;138(3):467 View
  41. Hunt M, Jozkowski K, Cleland K, Crawford B, Lo W, Warren R, Vinti H. Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2022;19(3):870 View
  42. Engle O, Freeman C. ‘All this way, all this money, for a five-minute procedure’: barriers, mobilities, and representation on the US abortion road trip. Mobilities 2023;18(2):297 View
  43. Pleasants E, Cartwright A, Upadhyay U. Association Between Distance to an Abortion Facility and Abortion or Pregnancy Outcome Among a Prospective Cohort of People Seeking Abortion Online. JAMA Network Open 2022;5(5):e2212065 View
  44. Merz A, Janiak E, Mokashi M, Allen R, Jackson C, Berkowitz L, Steinauer J, Bartz D. “We're called upon to be nonjudgmental”: A qualitative exploration of United States medical students’ discussions of abortion as a reflection of their professionalism. Contraception 2022;106:57 View
  45. Crear-Perry J, Hassan A, Daniel S. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US. JAMA 2022;328(17):1689 View
  46. Chakraborty P, Murawsky S, Smith M, McGowan M, Norris A, Bessett D. How Ohio's proposed abortion bans would impact travel distance to access abortion care. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2022;54(2):54 View
  47. Biggs M, Ehrenreich K, Morris N, Blanchard K, Bustamante C, Choimorrow S, Hauser D, Hernandez Y, Kapp N, Kromenaker T, Moayedi G, Perritt J, Ralph L, Raymond E, Valladares E, White K, Grossman D. Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2022;139(6):1111 View
  48. Berglas N, White K, Schroeder R, Roberts S. Geographic disparities in disruptions to abortion care in Louisiana at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contraception 2022;115:17 View
  49. Ehrenreich K, Biggs M, Grossman D. Making the case for advance provision of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion in the United States. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 2022;48(4):238 View
  50. Upadhyay U, Raymond E, Koenig L, Coplon L, Gold M, Kaneshiro B, Boraas C, Winikoff B. Outcomes and Safety of History-Based Screening for Medication Abortion. JAMA Internal Medicine 2022;182(5):482 View
  51. Samuels‐Kalow M, Agrawal P, Rodriguez G, Zeidan A, Love J, Monette D, Lin M, Cooper R, Madsen T, Dobiesz V. Post‐Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians. Academic Emergency Medicine 2022;29(12):1414 View
  52. Smith C, Kreitzer R, Kane K, Saunders T. Contraception Deserts: The Effects of Title X Rule Changes on Access to Reproductive Health Care Resources. Politics & Gender 2022;18(3):672 View
  53. Glazer K, Vieira L, Weber E, Stone J, Stern T, Bianco A, Wagner B, Nowlin S, Dolan S, Howell E, Janevic T. COVID-19 pandemic-related change in racial and ethnic disparities in exclusive breastmilk feeding during the delivery hospitalization: a differences-in-differences analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022;22(1) View
  54. Guilbert E, Bois G. Évaluation de l’accès à l’avortement médicamenteux dans les cliniques d'avortement du Québec en 2021 – Partie I. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2023;45(2):116 View
  55. Zahedi-Spung L, Huysman B, Madden T, Bebbington M, Raghuraman N, Stout M. Missouri’s Abortion law: Access to care for Patients with Lethal Fetal Anomalies at a Midwest Tertiary care Center. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2023;27(3):468 View
  56. Calkin S. Legal geographies of medication abortion in the USA. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2022;47(2):378 View
  57. Kimport K. Is third‐trimester abortion exceptional? Two pathways to abortion after 24 weeks of pregnancy in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2022;54(2):38 View
  58. Applequist W, Bridges M, Moerman D. North American Fertility–Regulating Botanicals: a Review. Economic Botany 2022;76(1):84 View
  59. Smith M, McGowan M, Chakraborty P, Hood R, Field M, Bessett D, Norwood C, Norris A. Kentucky's abortion landscape, 2010 to 2019: an analysis of pre-Dobbs abortion disparities in a rural, restrictive state. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas 2023;19:100441 View
  60. Smith M, Muzyczka Z, Chakraborty P, Johns-Wolfe E, Higgins J, Bessett D, Norris A. Abortion Travel Within the United States: An Analysis of Cross-State Movement to Obtain Abortion Care in 2018. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021 View
  61. Cowan S, Bruce T, Perry B, Ritz B, Perrett S, Anderson E. Discordant benevolence: How and why people help others in the face of conflicting values. Science Advances 2022;8(7) View
  62. Eagen‐Torkko M, Yanow S. The Critical Role of Midwives in Safe Self‐Managed Abortion. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2021;66(6):795 View
  63. Seymour J, Milechin D, Upadhyay U, Wise L, Rudolph A. Improving our estimates: assessing misclassification of abortion accessibility in the United States. Annals of Epidemiology 2022;76:98 View
  64. Kimport K, Littlejohn K. Abortion as obtainable: Insights into how pregnant people in the United States who considered abortion understand abortion availability,. Contraception 2022;106:45 View
  65. Upadhyay U, Ahlbach C, Kaller S, Cook C, Muñoz I. Trends In Self-Pay Charges And Insurance Acceptance For Abortion In The United States, 2017–20. Health Affairs 2022;41(4):507 View
  66. Upadhyay U, Cartwright A, Grossman D. Barriers to abortion care and incidence of attempted self-managed abortion among individuals searching Google for abortion care: A national prospective study. Contraception 2022;106:49 View
  67. Dodge L, Aguayo R, Dutton C, Hacker M. The influence of advertising policy on information available online for abortion self-referral. Contraception 2022;114:61 View
  68. Smith M, Muzyczka Z, Chakraborty P, Johns-Wolfe E, Higgins J, Bessett D, Norris A. Abortion travel within the United States: An observational study of cross-state movement to obtain abortion care in 2017. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas 2022;10:100214 View
  69. Heymann O, Odum T, Norris A, Bessett D. Selecting an Abortion Clinic: The Role of Social Myths and Risk Perception in Seeking Abortion Care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2022;63(1):90 View
  70. Seymour J, Thompson T, Milechin D, Wise L, Rudolph A. Potential Impact of Telemedicine for Medication Abortion Policy and Programming Changes on Abortion Accessibility in the United States. American Journal of Public Health 2022;112(8):1202 View
  71. Benson L, Magnusson S, Gray K, Quinley K, Kessler L, Callegari L. Early pregnancy loss in the emergency department, 2006–2016. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 2021;2(6) View
  72. Pomerantz T, Ponzini M, Wilson M, Creinin M. Complex Family Planning fellowship graduates’ intended practice plans and barriers to practicing in areas of unmet need. Contraception 2023;123:110005 View
  73. Engle O. Abortion mobilities. Geography Compass 2022;16(9) View
  74. McNamara B, Joudeh L, Corbetta-Rastelli C, Orlando M, Kerns J. Traveling to California from out of state to receive abortion services at a hospital-based clinic: A qualitative study of people’s experiences. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2022;34:100784 View
  75. Kimport K. Reducing the burdens of forced abortion travel: Referrals, financial and emotional support, and opportunities for positive experiences in traveling for third-trimester abortion care. Social Science & Medicine 2022;293:114667 View
  76. Zaręba K, Herman K, Kołb-Sielecka E, Jakiel G. Abortion in Countries with Restrictive Abortion Laws—Possible Directions and Solutions from the Perspective of Poland. Healthcare 2021;9(11):1594 View
  77. Vinekar K, Jarlenski M, Meyn L, Chen B, Achilles S, Tyberg S, Borrero S. Early pregnancy confirmation availability at crisis pregnancy centers and abortion facilities in the United States. Contraception 2023;117:30 View
  78. Brenner T, Stuart G, Rowe C, Diener Z. Distance Traveled for Abortion at a North Carolina Tertiary Care Center Following Restrictive Legislation. North Carolina Medical Journal 2023;84(3) View
  79. Sakthivel M, Wolff H, Monast K, McHugh A, Stulberg D, Janiak E. Mifepristone implementation in primary care: Clinician and staff insights from a pilot learning collaborative. Contraception 2024;130:110280 View
  80. Smith M, Broscoe M, Chakraborty P, Hill J, Hood R, McGowan M, Bessett D, Norris A. COVID‐19 and abortion in the Ohio River Valley: A case study of Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2023;55(3):178 View
  81. Koenig L, Becker A, Ko J, Upadhyay U. The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e45671 View
  82. Noonan A, Black K, Luscombe G, Tomnay J. “Almost like it was really underground”: a qualitative study of women’s experiences locating services for unintended pregnancy in a rural Australian health system. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 2023;31(1) View
  83. Keogh P. Recovering political knowledge in public health: learning from sexual and reproductive health work. Critical Public Health 2023;33(5):828 View
  84. Kimport K, Kreitzer R. Introduction: The Politics of Abortion 50 Years afterRoe. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2023;48(4):463 View
  85. Kolbe K, Abern L, Maguire K, Luther L, Staffa S, Grimstad F. Success in Accessing Fertility Preservation Appointments for Egg-Producing Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: A Mystery Caller Study. LGBT Health 2023;10(6):439 View
  86. Peart M, Cartwright A, Tadikonda A, Upadhyay U, Tang J, Morse J, Stuart G, Bryant A. Potential demand for and access to medication abortion among North Carolina college students. Journal of American College Health 2024:1 View