Published on in Vol 20 , No 5 (2018) :May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9717, first published .
Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search

Journals

  1. Guendelman S, Yon E, Pleasants E, Hubbard A, Prata N, Rice W. Shining the light on abortion: Drivers of online abortion searches across the United States in 2018. PLOS ONE 2020;15(5):e0231672 View
  2. Koenig S, Simi E, Goldenberg A, Magasi S, Wicklund C. Exploring prenatal genetic counselors' perceptions of abortion laws in restrictive states. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2019 View
  3. Barr-Walker J, Jayaweera R, Ramirez A, Gerdts C, Withers M. Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review. PLOS ONE 2019;14(4):e0209991 View
  4. Myers C, Jones R, Upadhyay U. Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world. Contraception 2019;100(5):367 View
  5. Kavanaugh M, Jerman J, Frohwirth L. “It's not something you talk about really”: information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care. Contraception 2019;100(1):79 View
  6. Calkin S, Freeman C. Trails and technology: social and cultural geographies of abortion access. Social & Cultural Geography 2019;20(9):1325 View
  7. Swartzendruber A, Lambert D. A Web-Based Geolocated Directory of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) in the United States: Description of CPC Map Methods and Design Features and Analysis of Baseline Data. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(1):e16726 View
  8. Zepecki A, Guendelman S, DeNero J, Prata N. Using Application Programming Interfaces to Access Google Data for Health Research: Protocol for a Methodological Framework. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(7):e16543 View
  9. Raymond E, Chong E, Winikoff B, Platais I, Mary M, Lotarevich T, Castillo P, Kaneshiro B, Tschann M, Fontanilla T, Baldwin M, Schnyer A, Coplon L, Mathieu N, Bednarek P, Keady M, Priegue E. TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States. Contraception 2019;100(3):173 View
  10. Swartz J, Rowe C, Morse J, Bryant A, Stuart G. Women's knowledge of their state's abortion regulations. A national survey. Contraception 2020;102(5):318 View
  11. Daniel S, Schulkin J, Grossman D. Abortion Referral Practices among a National Sample of Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Women's Health Issues 2020;30(6):446 View
  12. Dodge L, Phillips S, Neo D, Nippita S, Paul M, Hacker M. Quality of Information Available Online for Abortion Self-Referral. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132(6):1443 View
  13. Betstadt S, Heyrana K, Whaley N. Telemedicine for Medication Abortion: The Time Is Now. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2020;9(2):66 View
  14. Upadhyay U, Jovel I, McCuaig K, Cartwright A. Using Google Ads to recruit and retain a cohort considering abortion in the United States. Contraception: X 2020;2:100017 View
  15. Mavragani A. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e16206 View
  16. Kohn J, Snow J, Simons H, Seymour J, Thompson T, Grossman D. Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019;134(2):343 View
  17. Upadhyay U, Johns N, Barron R, Cartwright A, Tapé C, Mierjeski A, McGregor A. Abortion-related emergency department visits in the United States: An analysis of a national emergency department sample. BMC Medicine 2018;16(1) View
  18. Upadhyay U, Grossman D. Telemedicine for medication abortion. Contraception 2019;100(5):351 View
  19. Calkin S. Towards a political geography of abortion. Political Geography 2019;69:22 View
  20. Shapiro R, Erhardt-Ohren B, Rochat R. Comparison of Women from Georgia and Contiguous States Who Obtained Abortions in Georgia, 1994–2016. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2020;24(3):299 View
  21. Biggs M, Ralph L, Raifman S, Foster D, Grossman D. Support for and interest in alternative models of medication abortion provision among a national probability sample of U.S. women. Contraception 2019;99(2):118 View
  22. Kohn J, Snow J, Grossman D, Thompson T, Seymour J, Simons H. Introduction of telemedicine for medication abortion: Changes in service delivery patterns in two U.S. states. Contraception 2021;103(3):151 View
  23. Addante A, Eisenberg D, Valentine M, Leonard J, Maddox K, Hoofnagle M. The association between state-level abortion restrictions and maternal mortality in the United States, 1995-2017. Contraception 2021 View
  24. Brown B, Hebert L, Gilliam M, Kaestner R. Distance to an Abortion Provider and Its Association with the Abortion Rate: A Multistate Longitudinal Analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2020;52(4):227 View
  25. . Increasing Access to Abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2020;136(6):e107 View
  26. Daniel S, Schulkin J, Grossman D. Obstetrician-gynecologist willingness to provide medication abortion with removal of the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone. Contraception 2021;104(1):73 View
  27. Ralph L, Foster D, Raifman S, Biggs M, Samari G, Upadhyay U, Gerdts C, Grossman D. Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States. JAMA Network Open 2020;3(12):e2029245 View
  28. Wingo E, Ralph L, Kaller S, Biggs M. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care. Contraception 2021;103(4):269 View
  29. Perritt J, Grossman D. The Health Consequences of Restrictive Abortion Laws. JAMA Internal Medicine 2021;181(5):713 View
  30. Upadhyay U, Schroeder R, Roberts S. Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19. Contraception: X 2020;2:100049 View
  31. Liu G, Li X, Hassanien A. Multidimensional Heterogeneous Medical Data Push in Intelligent Cloud Collaborative Management System. Complexity 2020;2020:1 View
  32. Wolfe T, van der Meulen Rodgers Y. Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2021 View
  33. Alspaugh A. Updates from the Literature, May/June 2021. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2021;66(3):407 View
  34. Turk J, Landy U, Preskill F, Adler A, Steinauer J. The integration of abortion into obstetrician-gynecologists’ practice after comprehensive family planning resident training. Contraception 2021 View
  35. Roberts S, Berglas N, Schroeder R, Lingwall M, Grossman D, White K. Disruptions to Abortion Care in Louisiana During Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Public Health 2021:e1 View
  36. Addante A, Paul R, Dorsey M, McNicholas C, Madden T. Differences in Financial and Social Burdens Experienced by Patients Traveling for Abortion Care. Women's Health Issues 2021 View
  37. Kaller S, Muñoz M, Sharma S, Tayel S, Ahlbach C, Cook C, Upadhyay U. Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.. Contraception: X 2021;3:100067 View
  38. Thompson K, Sturrock H, Foster D, Upadhyay U. Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion. JAMA Network Open 2021;4(7):e2115530 View
  39. Cartwright A, Tumlinson K, Upadhyay U, Vala-Haynes E. Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to crisis pregnancy centers among an abortion-seeking sample recruited online. PLOS ONE 2021;16(7):e0255152 View
  40. Judge-Golden C, Flink-Bochacki R. The Burden of Abortion Restrictions and Conservative Diagnostic Guidelines on Patient-Centered Care for Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021;Publish Ahead of Print View
  41. Hunt M, Jozkowski K, Cleland K, Crawford B, Lo W, Warren R, Vinti H. Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2021 View