This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (866) Cross-Sectional Studies in Public Health (296) Epidemiologic Studies and Surveys in Child Health (24)

Published on in Vol 20, No 3 (2018): March

Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study

Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study

Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study

Authors of this article:

Elvira Mauz1 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Hoffmann1 Author Orcid Image ;   Robin Houben1 Author Orcid Image ;   Laura Krause1 Author Orcid Image ;   Panagiotis Kamtsiuris1 Author Orcid Image ;   Antje Gößwald1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (9) Metrics

Journals

  1. Colasante E, Benedetti E, Fortunato L, Scalese M, Potente R, Cutilli A, Molinaro S, Zeeb H. Paper-and-pencil versus computerized administration mode: Comparison of data quality and risk behavior prevalence estimates in the European school Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD). PLOS ONE 2019;14(11):e0225140 View
  2. Arafa A, Anzengruber F, Mostafa A, Navarini A. Perspectives of online surveys in dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2019;33(3):511 View
  3. van Selms M, Marpaung C, Pogosian A, Lobbezoo F. Geographical variation of parental-reported sleep bruxism among children: comparison between the Netherlands, Armenia and Indonesia. International Dental Journal 2019;69(3):237 View
  4. Jackson I, Etuk A, Jackson N, Osaghae I. Effect of nicotine, low nicotine, and e-cigarette beliefs on cigarette and e-cigarette use in the US population and cancer survivors. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(4):861 View
  5. Coombes L, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Aworinde J, Fraser L, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Chambers L, Murtagh F, Harding R. Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: a systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Quality of Life Research 2021;30(7):1803 View
  6. Braekman E, Demarest S, Charafeddine R, Drieskens S, Berete F, Gisle L, Van der Heyden J, Van Hal G. Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(1):e26299 View
  7. Fareed N, Swoboda C, Lawrence J, Griesenbrock T, Huerta T. Co-establishing an infrastructure for routine data collection to address disparities in infant mortality: planning and implementation. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  8. Coombes L, Harðardóttir D, Braybrook D, Roach A, Scott H, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Fraser L, Murtagh F, Harding R. Design and Administration of Patient-Centred Outcome Measures: The Perspectives of Children and Young People with Life-Limiting or Life-Threatening Conditions and Their Family Members. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2023;16(5):473 View
  9. Komanchuk J, Cameron J, Kurbatfinski S, Duffett-Leger L, Letourneau N. A realist review of digitally delivered child development assessment and screening tools: Psychometrics and considerations for future use. Early Human Development 2023;183:105818 View
  10. Bidonde J, Meneses-Echavez J, Hafstad E, Brunborg G, Bang L. Methods, strategies, and incentives to increase response to mental health surveys among adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2023;23(1) View
  11. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  12. Tran A, White A, Torok M, Jervis R, Albanese B, Scallan Walter E. Lessons Learned From a Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey Design to Recruit and Collect Data From Case-Control Study Participants: Formative Evaluation. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e56218 View
  13. Koschollek C, Gaertner B, Geerlings J, Kuhnert R, Mauz E, Hövener C. Recruiting people with selected citizenships for the health interview survey GEDA Fokus throughout Germany: evaluation of recruitment efforts and recommendations for future research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2024;24(1) View
  14. Edwards P, Perkins C. Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires – new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2024;24(1) View
  15. Bai Y, Dixon P, Saint-Maurice P, Hibbing P, McLoughlin G, da Silva M, Welk G, Macdonald H. The measurement reliability and equivalence of print versus online versions of the Youth Activity Profile. PLOS ONE 2025;20(1):e0312254 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Allen J, Schmich P. Forschungsmethoden in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. View