Published on in Vol 18, No 6 (2016): Jun

“The Record is Our Work Tool!”—Physicians’ Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden

“The Record is Our Work Tool!”—Physicians’ Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden

“The Record is Our Work Tool!”—Physicians’ Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden

Journals

  1. Kildea J, Battista J, Cabral B, Hendren L, Herrera D, Hijal T, Joseph A. Design and Development of a Person-Centered Patient Portal Using Participatory Stakeholder Co-Design. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e11371 View
  2. Wass S, Vimarlund V. Same, same but different: Perceptions of patients’ online access to electronic health records among healthcare professionals. Health Informatics Journal 2019;25(4):1538 View
  3. Metting E, Schrage A, Kocks J, Sanderman R, van der Molen T. Assessing the Needs and Perspectives of Patients With Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Patient Web Portals: Focus Group Study. JMIR Formative Research 2018;2(2):e22 View
  4. Grünloh C, Myreteg G, Cajander Å, Rexhepi H. “Why Do They Need to Check Me?” Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e11 View
  5. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(2):e15935 View
  6. Petersson L, Erlingsdóttir G. Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals. JMIR Mental Health 2018;5(1):e11 View
  7. Petersson L, Erlingsdóttir G. Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 2): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals. JMIR Mental Health 2018;5(2):e10521 View
  8. Ronda M, Dijkhorst-Oei L, Vos R, Rutten G. Diabetes care providers’ opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic. BMC Family Practice 2018;19(1) View
  9. Mesko B, Győrffy Z. The Rise of the Empowered Physician in the Digital Health Era: Viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e12490 View
  10. Grünloh C. Using technological frames as an analytic tool in value sensitive design. Ethics and Information Technology 2021;23(1):53 View
  11. Moll J, Rexhepi H, Cajander Å, Grünloh C, Huvila I, Hägglund M, Myreteg G, Scandurra I, Åhlfeldt R. Patients’ Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(11):e278 View
  12. Åkerstedt U, Cajander Å, Moll J, Ålander T, Topa G. On threats and violence for staff and patient accessible electronic health records. Cogent Psychology 2018;5(1):1518967 View
  13. Gulliksen J. Institutionalizing human-computer interaction for global health. Global Health Action 2017;10(sup3):1344003 View
  14. Huvila I, Enwald H, Eriksson-Backa K, Hirvonen N, Nguyen H, Scandurra I. Anticipating ageing: Older adults reading their medical records. Information Processing & Management 2018;54(3):394 View
  15. Essén A, Scandurra I, Gerrits R, Humphrey G, Johansen M, Kierkegaard P, Koskinen J, Liaw S, Odeh S, Ross P, Ancker J. Patient access to electronic health records: Differences across ten countries. Health Policy and Technology 2018;7(1):44 View
  16. Erlingsdóttir G, Petersson L, Jonnergård K. A Theoretical Twist on the Transparency of Open Notes: Qualitative Analysis of Health Care Professionals’ Free-Text Answers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14347 View
  17. Moll J, Cajander Å. Oncology health-care professionals’ perceived effects of patient accessible electronic health records 6 years after launch: A survey study at a major university hospital in Sweden. Health Informatics Journal 2020;26(2):1392 View
  18. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e18072 View
  19. Rexhepi H, Moll J, Huvila I. Online electronic healthcare records: Comparing the views of cancer patients and others. Health Informatics Journal 2020;26(4):2915 View
  20. Murungi D, Hirschheim R. THEORY THROUGH ARGUMENT: APPLYING ARGUMENT MAPPING TO FACILITATE THEORY BUILDING. European Journal of Information Systems 2022;31(4):437 View
  21. Huvila I, Cajander Å, Moll J, Enwald H, Eriksson-Backa K, Rexhepi H. Technological and informational frames: explaining age-related variation in the use of patient accessible electronic health records as technology and information. Information Technology & People 2022;35(8):1 View
  22. Avdagovska M, Menon D, Stafinski T. Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e24568 View
  23. Kruithof N, Spreeuwenberg M, Kleijkers S, Bruls B, Gurp E. Zorgen om online inzage in het eigen patiëntendossier. Huisarts en wetenschap 2020;63(12):62 View
  24. Thapa S, Nielsen J, Aldahmash A, Qadri F, Leppin A. Willingness to Use Digital Health Tools in Patient Care Among Health Care Professionals and Students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR Medical Education 2021;7(1):e18590 View
  25. Görges M, Rush K, Burton L, Mattei M, Davis S, Scott H, Smith M, Currie L. Preferred Functions of Personal Health Records in Rural Primary Health Clinics in Canada: Health Care Team Perspectives. Applied Clinical Informatics 2021;12(01):041 View
  26. Turvey C, Fuhrmeister L, Klein D, Moeckli J, Howren M, Chasco E. Patient and Provider Experience of Electronic Patient Portals and Secure Messaging in Mental Health Treatment. Telemedicine and e-Health 2022;28(2):189 View
  27. Blease C, Salmi L, Rexhepi H, Hägglund M, DesRoches C. Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice. Journal of Medical Ethics 2022;48(10):785 View
  28. Cijvat C, Cornet R, Hägglund M. Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records—A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands. Frontiers in Public Health 2021;9 View
  29. Blease C, McMillan B, Salmi L, Davidge G, Delbanco T. Adapting to transparent medical records: international experience with “open notes”. BMJ 2022:e069861 View
  30. Sergeeva A. Why developers matter: The case of patient portals. Health Informatics Journal 2023;29(1):146045822311527 View
  31. Cajander Å, Huvila I, Salminen-Karlsson M, Lind T, Scandurra I. Effects of patient accessible electronic health records on nurses’ work environment: a survey study on expectations in Sweden. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e059188 View
  32. Bernstein J. Not the Last Word: Seeing Ourselves as Doctors See Us. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 2022;480(9):1653 View
  33. Louch G, Albutt A, Smyth K, O’Hara J. What do primary care staff think about patients accessing electronic health records? A focus group study. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  34. Hägglund M, McMillan B, Whittaker R, Blease C. Patient empowerment through online access to health records. BMJ 2022:e071531 View
  35. Carboni C, Wehrens R, van der Veen R, de Bont A. Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Social Science & Medicine 2022;292:114572 View
  36. Kujala S, Hörhammer I, Väyrynen A, Holmroos M, Nättiaho-Rönnholm M, Hägglund M, Johansen M. Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(6):e37438 View
  37. Blease C, Torous J, Dong Z, Davidge G, DesRoches C, Kharko A, Turner A, Jones R, Hägglund M, McMillan B. Patient Online Record Access in English Primary Care: Qualitative Survey Study of General Practitioners’ Views. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43496 View
  38. Hägglund M, Scandurra I. Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(2):e37192 View
  39. Kremer L, Lipprandt M, Röhrig R, Breil B. Examining Mental Workload Relating to Digital Health Technologies in Health Care: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(10):e40946 View
  40. Keuper J, Batenburg R, van Tuyl L, Verheij R. General Practices’ Experiences With Patients’ Web-Based Access to Medical Records: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41832 View
  41. Mustapha B, Utulu S, Tyndall J. A smartphone‐based surveillance system for acute flaccid paralysis: A technology frames perspective. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 2024;90(1) View
  42. Lüchau E, Atherton H, Olesen F, Søndergaard J, Assing Hvidt E. Interpreting technology: Use and non-use of doctor-patient video consultations in Danish general practice. Social Science & Medicine 2023;334:116215 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Grünloh C, Hallewell Haslwanter J, Kane B, Lee E, Lind T, Moll J, Rexhepi H, Scandurra I. Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017. View