Published on in Vol 18, No 5 (2016): May

Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients

Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients

Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients

Journals

  1. Van den Bulck S, Hermens R, Slegers K, Vandenberghe B, Goderis G, Vankrunkelsven P. Designing a Patient Portal for Patient-Centered Care: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e269 View
  2. Kreps G. Promoting patient comprehension of relevant health information. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 2018;7(1) View
  3. Kreps G. The relevance of health literacy to mHealth. Information Services & Use 2017;37(2):123 View
  4. Robinson S, Reed M, Quevillon T, Hirvi E. Patient perceptions and interactions with their web portal-based laboratory results. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 2019;26(1):e000012 View
  5. Alpert J, Morris B, Thomson M, Matin K, Brown R. Identifying How Patient Portals Impact Communication in Oncology. Health Communication 2019;34(12):1395 View
  6. Powell K. Patient-Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Electronic Portal Use. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2017;35(11):565 View
  7. Sadeghi M, Thomassie R, Sasangohar F. Objective Assessment of Functional Information Requirements for Patient Portals. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2017;61(1):1788 View
  8. Hazara A, Durrans K, Bhandari S. The role of patient portals in enhancing self-care in patients with renal conditions. Clinical Kidney Journal 2020;13(1):1 View
  9. Lyles C, Nelson E, Frampton S, Dykes P, Cemballi A, Sarkar U. Using Electronic Health Record Portals to Improve Patient Engagement: Research Priorities and Best Practices. Annals of Internal Medicine 2020;172(11_Supplement):S123 View
  10. Grossman L, Masterson Creber R, Benda N, Wright D, Vawdrey D, Ancker J. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019;26(8-9):855 View
  11. Hochheimer C, Sabo R, Krist A, Day T, Cyrus J, Woolf S. Methods for Evaluating Respondent Attrition in Web-Based Surveys. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(11):e301 View
  12. van Kuppenveld S, van Os-Medendorp H, Tiemessen N, van Delden J. Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Record via a Patient Portal: Is it Harmful? A Retrospective Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13622 View
  13. Hochheimer C, Sabo R, Perera R, Mukhopadhyay N, Krist A. Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e12811 View
  14. Laukka E, Huhtakangas M, Heponiemi T, Kujala S, Kaihlanen A, Gluschkoff K, Kanste O. Health Care Professionals’ Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e21623 View
  15. Zhang Z, Citardi D, Xing A, Luo X, Lu Y, He Z. Patient Challenges and Needs in Comprehending Laboratory Test Results: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e18725 View
  16. McLean B, Hossain N, Donison V, Gray M, Durbano S, Haase K, Alibhai S, Puts M. Providing Medical Information to Older Adults in a Web-Based Environment: Systematic Review. JMIR Aging 2021;4(1):e24092 View
  17. Zhang Z, Citardi D, Wang D, Genc Y, Shan J, Fan X. Patients’ perceptions of using artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology to comprehend radiology imaging data. Health Informatics Journal 2021;27(2) View
  18. Zhang Z, Genc Y, Wang D, Ahsen M, Fan X. Effect of AI Explanations on Human Perceptions of Patient-Facing AI-Powered Healthcare Systems. Journal of Medical Systems 2021;45(6) View
  19. Harahap N, Handayani P, Hidayanto A. Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e26236 View
  20. Zhang Z, Kmoth L, Luo X, He Z. User-Centered System Design for Communicating Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Design and Evaluation Study. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(4):e26017 View
  21. Krasowski M, Grieme C, Cassady B, Dreyer N, Wanat K, Hightower M, Nepple K. Variation in Results Release and Patient Portal Access to Diagnostic Test Results at an Academic Medical Center. Journal of Pathology Informatics 2017;8(1):45 View
  22. Hochheimer C, Sabo R. Testing for Phases of Dropout Attrition Using Change-Point Hazard Models. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2022;10(4):1079 View
  23. Griesser A, Bidmon S. A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients’ Perspective: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Systems 2022;47(1) View
  24. Bayard S, Fasano G, Tamimi R, Oh P. Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Address Breast Cancer Disparities. Current Breast Cancer Reports 2022;14(4):199 View
  25. Reynolds T, Zhang J, Zheng K, Chen Y. Unpacking the Use of Laboratory Test Results in an Online Health Community throughout the Medical Care Trajectory. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2022;6(CSCW2):1 View
  26. Reynolds T, Cobb J, Steitz B, Ancker J, Rosenbloom S. The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating. Applied Clinical Informatics 2023;14(04):654 View
  27. Franco J, Morris N, Fung M. Defining and identifying laboratory literacy as a component of health literacy: An assessment of existing health literacy tools. Academic Pathology 2023;10(4):100096 View
  28. Simola S, Hörhammer I, Xu Y, Bärkås A, Fagerlund A, Hagström J, Holmroos M, Hägglund M, Johansen M, Kane B, Kharko A, Scandurra I, Kujala S. Patients’ Experiences of a National Patient Portal and Its Usability: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e45974 View
  29. He Z, Bhasuran B, Jin Q, Tian S, Hanna K, Shavor C, Arguello L, Murray P, Lu Z. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e56655 View
  30. Zhong Y, Hahne J, Wang X, Wang X, Wu Y, Zhang X, Liu X. Telehealth Care Through Internet Hospitals in China: Qualitative Interview Study of Physicians’ Views on Access, Expectations, and Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e47523 View
  31. Griesser A, Mzoughi M, Bidmon S, Cherif E. How do opt-in versus opt-out settings nudge patients toward electronic health record adoption? An exploratory study of facilitators and barriers in Austria and France. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  32. Qingjie P, Wanyu H, Jingying Y, Ming Y, Linlin W, Qiyue M, Fan W, Minghao P. How to promote telemedicine in underdeveloped cities in central China? Qualitative interviews with medical personnel in tertiary A-level hospital of Xinyang City. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Kreps G, Alpert J. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. View
  2. Kreps G, Alpert J. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. View
  3. Kreps G. The Handbook of Applied Communication Research. View
  4. Tashiro J, Hung P, Martin M. Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success. View
  5. Tashiro J, Hebeler A. Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning. View
  6. Tashiro J, Hartman Q. Blended Learning : Lessons Learned and Ways Forward. View
  7. Tashiro J, Hung P. Blended Learning. Intelligent Computing in Education. View