Published on in Vol 16, No 12 (2014): December

Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review

Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review

Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Sven Alfonsson 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Pernilla Maathz 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Timo Hursti 3 Author Orcid Image


  1. van Ballegooijen W, Riper H, Cuijpers P, van Oppen P, Smit J. Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16(1) View
  2. Rodriguez F, Spilski J, Schneider A, Hekele F, Lachmann T, Ebert A, Rupprecht F. Relevance of the assessment mode in the digital assessment of processing speed. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2019;41(7):730 View
  3. Liang J, Xian D, Liu X, Fu J, Zhang X, Tang B, Lei J. Usability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale Evaluation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(11):e11066 View
  4. McKenzie K, Murray A, Murray K, O'Donnell M, Murray G, Metcalfe D, McCarty K. An evaluation of the distribution properties, factor structure, and item response profile of an assessment of emotion recognition. Heliyon 2020;6(3):e03572 View
  5. González-Robles A, Mira A, Miguel C, Molinari G, Díaz-García A, García-Palacios A, Bretón-López J, Quero S, Baños R, Botella C, Innamorati M. A brief online transdiagnostic measure: Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among Spanish patients with emotional disorders. PLOS ONE 2018;13(11):e0206516 View
  6. Laundy Frisenstam K, van den Bosch M, Chen Y, Friberg P, Osika W. Self-Reported Psychosomatic Complaints In Swedish Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Living in Rural and Urban Areas: An Internet-Based Survey. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2017;3(1):e9 View
  7. Morton E, Hou S, Fogarty O, Murray G, Barnes S, Depp C, Michalak E. A Web-Based Adaptation of the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation Study. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(4):e17497 View
  8. Castro-Calvo J, Ballester-Arnal R, Billieux J, Gil-Juliá B, Gil-Llario M. Spanish validation of the Sexual Addiction Screening Test. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2018;7(3):584 View
  9. Pelletier J, Lesage A, Boisvert C, Denis F, Bonin J, Kisely S. Feasibility and acceptability of patient partnership to improve access to primary care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illnesses: an interactive guide. International Journal for Equity in Health 2015;14(1) View
  10. Alfonsson S, Wallin E, Maathz P. Factor structure and validity of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in Swedish translation. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2017;24(2-3):154 View
  11. Schröder J, Jelinek L, Moritz S. A randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic Internet intervention for individuals with panic and phobias – One size fits all. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2017;54:17 View
  12. Peters S, Coppieters M, Ross M, Johnston V. Health-care providers' perspectives on factors influencing return-to-work after surgery for nontraumatic conditions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy 2020;33(1):87 View
  13. Langegård U, Fransson P, Johansson B, Ohlsson‐Nevo E, Sjövall K, Ahlberg K. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a radiotherapy‐related symptom assessment tool, based on data from patients with brain tumours undergoing proton beam therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2021;35(3):796 View
  14. Braekman E, Berete F, Charafeddine R, Demarest S, Drieskens S, Gisle L, Molenberghs G, Tafforeau J, Van der Heyden J, Van Hal G, Alamian A. Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the Belgian Health Interview Survey: Paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode. PLOS ONE 2018;13(5):e0197434 View
  15. Mcgeough J, Gallagher-Mitchell T, Clark D, Harrison N. A comparative study of the reliability and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a paper- versus app administered resilience scale in Scottish youths (Preprint). JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018 View
  16. Langegård U, Ahlberg K, Fransson P, Johansson B, Sjövall K, Bjork-Eriksson T, Ohlsson-Nevo E. Evaluation of quality of care in relation to health-related quality of life of patients diagnosed with brain tumor: a novel clinic for proton beam therapy. Supportive Care in Cancer 2019;27(7):2679 View
  17. Asensio-Cuesta S, Bresó A, Saez C, García-Gómez J. Robustness and Findings of a Web-Based System for Depression Assessment in a University Work Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(4):644 View
  18. Erbe D, Eichert H, Rietz C, Ebert D. Interformat reliability of the patient health questionnaire: Validation of the computerized version of the PHQ-9. Internet Interventions 2016;5:1 View
  19. Barrigón M, Rico-Romano A, Ruiz-Gomez M, Delgado-Gomez D, Barahona I, Aroca F, Baca-García E. Estudio comparativo de los formatos en lápiz y papel y electrónicos de los cuestionarios GHQ-12, WHO-5 y PHQ-9. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental 2017;10(3):160 View
  20. Díaz-García A, González-Robles A, Mor S, Mira A, Quero S, García-Palacios A, Baños R, Botella C. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2020;20(1) View
  21. Alfonsson S, Olsson E, Hursti T. The effects of therapist support and treatment presentation on the clinical outcomes of an Internet based applied relaxation program. Internet Interventions 2015;2(3):289 View
  22. Cludius B, Schröder J, Moritz S. Expectancy Effects in Self-Help Depression Treatment: First Evidence that the Rationale Given for an Online Study Impacts the Outcome. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018;46(2):195 View
  23. Spangenberg L, Glaesmer H, Boecker M, Forkmann T. Differences in Patient Health Questionnaire and Aachen Depression Item Bank scores between tablet versus paper-and-pencil administration. Quality of Life Research 2015;24(12):3023 View
  24. Ballester-Arnal R, Castro-Calvo J, Gil-Julia B, Giménez-García C, Gil-Llario M. A Validation Study of the Spanish Version of the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI): Paper-and-Pencil Versus Online Administration. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 2019;45(4):283 View
  25. Olmert T, Cooper J, Han S, Barton-Owen G, Farrag L, Bell E, Friend L, Ozcan S, Rustogi N, Preece R, Eljasz P, Tomasik J, Cowell D, Bahn S. A Combined Digital and Biomarker Diagnostic Aid for Mood Disorders (the Delta Trial): Protocol for an Observational Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(8):e18453 View
  26. Mattsson S, Olsson E, Carlsson M, Johansson B. Identification of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Patients With Cancer: Comparison Between Short and Long Web-Based Questionnaires. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e11387 View
  27. Peters S, Coppieters M, Ross M, Johnston V. Perspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers’ Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2017;27(3):343 View
  28. Fairburn C, Patel V. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2017;88:19 View
  29. Barrigón M, Rico-Romano A, Ruiz-Gomez M, Delgado-Gomez D, Barahona I, Aroca F, Baca-García E. Comparative study of pencil-and-paper and electronic formats of GHQ-12, WHO-5 and PHQ-9 questionnaires. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition) 2017;10(3):160 View
  30. de Paula J. Propriedades psicométricas do Índice de Religiosidade de Duke aplicado em plataforma virtual. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva 2015;23(3):276 View
  31. Lundgren J, Dahlström Ö, Andersson G, Jaarsma T, Kärner Köhler A, Johansson P. The Effect of Guided Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Patients With Depressive Symptoms and Heart Failure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e194 View
  32. Berzins S, Bulloch A, Burton J, Dobson K, Fick G, Patten S. Determinants and incidence of depression in multiple sclerosis: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017;99:169 View
  33. Zeiler M, Peer S, Philipp J, Truttmann S, Wagner G, Karwautz A, Waldherr K. Web-Based Versus Paper-Pencil Assessment of Behavioral Problems Using the Youth Self-Report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2021;37(2):95 View
  34. Forbush K, Gould S, Chapa D, Bohrer B, Hagan K, Clark K, Sorokina D, Perko V. New Horizons in Measurement: a Review of Novel and Innovative Approaches to Eating-Disorder Assessment. Current Psychiatry Reports 2017;19(10) View
  35. Mira A, González-Robles A, Molinari G, Miguel C, Díaz-García A, Bretón-López J, García-Palacios A, Quero S, Baños R, Botella C. Capturing the Severity and Impairment Associated With Depression: The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) Validation in a Spanish Clinical Sample. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2019;10 View
  36. Werle D, Winters K, Byrd C. Preliminary study of self-perceived communication competence amongst adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2021;70:105848 View
  37. Baptista T, Vargas O, Colmenares R, Piñero J. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of a Venezuelan Spanish version in medical students. Investigación Clínica 2020;61(4):301 View
  38. Langegård U, Fransson P, Bjork-Eriksson T, Johansson B, Ohlsson-Nevo E, Sjövall K, Ahlberg K. Health-related quality of life in patients with primary brain tumors during and three months after treatment with proton beam therapy. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology 2021;17:5 View
  39. Goltermann J, Emden D, Leehr E, Dohm K, Redlich R, Dannlowski U, Hahn T, Opel N. Smartphone-Based Self-Reports of Depressive Symptoms Using the Remote Monitoring Application in Psychiatry (ReMAP): Interformat Validation Study. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(1):e24333 View
  40. Schröder J, Werkle N, Cludius B, Jelinek L, Moritz S, Westermann S. Unguided Internet‐based cognitive‐behavioral therapy for obsessive‐compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety 2020;37(12):1208 View
  41. Martin-Key N, Schei T, Barker E, Spadaro B, Funnell E, Benacek J, Tomasik J, Bahn S. The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(1):e25382 View
  42. Richter M, Storck M, Blitz R, Goltermann J, Seipp J, Dannlowski U, Baune B, Dugas M, Opel N. Repeated Digitized Assessment of Risk and Symptom Profiles During Inpatient Treatment of Affective Disorder: Observational Study. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(12):e24066 View
  43. Andriopoulos A, Olsson E, Hägg Sylvén Y, Sjöström J, Johansson B, von Essen L, Grönqvist H. Commencement of and Retention in Web-Based Interventions and Response to Prompts and Reminders: Longitudinal Observational Study Based on Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e24590 View
  44. Tanaka M, Saito M, Takahashi M, Adachi M, Nakamura K. Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2021;4(1):e20172 View
  45. Montoro M, Arrua-Duarte E, Peñalver-Argüeso B, Migoya-Borja M, Baca-Garcia E, Barrigón M. Comparative study of paper-and-pencil and electronic formats of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Journal of Health Psychology 2020:135910532096355 View
  46. Sequeira S, Morrow K, Silk J, Kolko D, Pilkonis P, Lindhiem O. National Norms and Correlates of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in Parents of School-age Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2021;30(9):2303 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Fouladi R. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. View
  2. Russell L, Hubley A. Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research. View