Published on in Vol 16, No 10 (2014): October

Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews

Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews

Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews

Journals

  1. Pezaro S, Lilley L. Digital voice recorders – A conceptual intervention to facilitate contemporaneous record keeping in midwifery practice. Women and Birth 2015;28(4):e171 View
  2. Janssens A, Gwinn M. Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: application to meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2015;15(1) View
  3. Sfakianaki E. Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 2019;30(1):176 View
  4. Lo Iacono G, Armstrong B, Fleming L, Elson R, Kovats S, Vardoulakis S, Nichols G, Remais J. Challenges in developing methods for quantifying the effects of weather and climate on water-associated diseases: A systematic review. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2017;11(6):e0005659 View
  5. Jaspers S, De Troyer E, Aerts M. Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA. EFSA Supporting Publications 2018;15(6) View
  6. Pezaro S, Clyne W, Turner A, Fulton E, Gerada C. ‘Midwives Overboard!’ Inside their hearts are breaking, their makeup may be flaking but their smile still stays on. Women and Birth 2016;29(3):e59 View
  7. Costa F, Lispi L, Staudacher A, Rossini M, Kundu K, Cifone F. How to foster Sustainable Continuous Improvement: A cause-effect relations map of Lean soft practices. Operations Research Perspectives 2019;6:100091 View
  8. Bashir R, Surian D, Dunn A. The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;110:42 View
  9. Pezaro S, Clyne W. Achieving Consensus for the Design and Delivery of an Online Intervention to Support Midwives in Work-Related Psychological Distress: Results From a Delphi Study. JMIR Mental Health 2016;3(3):e32 View
  10. Turki H. Citation analysis is also useful to assess the eligibility of biomedical research works for inclusion in living systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018;97:124 View
  11. Costa F, Denis Granja A, Fregola A, Picchi F, Portioli Staudacher A. Understanding Relative Importance of Barriers to Improving the Customer–Supplier Relationship within Construction Supply Chains Using DEMATEL Technique. Journal of Management in Engineering 2019;35(3):04019002 View
  12. Mostafa S, Chileshe N, Abdelhamid T. Lean and agile integration within offsite construction using discrete event simulation. Construction Innovation 2016;16(4):483 View
  13. Koc K, Gurgun A. Stakeholder-Associated Life Cycle Risks in Construction Supply Chain. Journal of Management in Engineering 2021;37(1):04020107 View
  14. Azizan F, Kiloes A, Astuti I, Abdul Aziz A. Application of Optical Remote Sensing in Rubber Plantations: A Systematic Review. Remote Sensing 2021;13(3):429 View
  15. Cernik C, Fife J, Thompson J, Harlan-Williams L, Mudaranthakam D. Publications search optimization: Comparison of a homegrown—API approach versus manual publication searches at an NCI designated cancer center. Health Informatics Journal 2020;26(4):3066 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Choong M, Thorning S, Tsafnat G. Trends and Applications in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. View