Published on in Vol 15, No 12 (2013): December

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Karen Lorimer 1 ;   Lisa McDaid 2

Journals

  1. Spence T, Kander I, Walsh J, Griffiths F, Ross J. Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e17667 View
  2. Dulai J, Salway T, Thomson K, Haag D, Lachowsky N, Grace D, Edward J, Grennan T, Trussler T, Gilbert M. Awareness of and intention to use an online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing service among gay and bisexual men in British Columbia, two years after implementation. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2021;112(1):78 View
  3. Fuller S, Mercer C, Copas A, Saunders J, Sutcliffe L, Cassell J, Hart G, Johnson A, Roberts T, Jackson L, Muniina P, Estcourt C. The SPORTSMART study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of sexually transmitted infection screening interventions targeting men in football club settings. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2015;91(2):106 View
  4. Barnard S, Free C, Bakolis I, Turner K, Looker K, Baraitser P. Comparing the characteristics of users of an online service for STI self-sampling with clinic service users: a cross-sectional analysis. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2018;94(5):377 View
  5. Moore Z, Angel D, Bjerregaard J, O'Connor T, McGuiness W, Kröger K, Rasmussen B, Yderstrœde K. eHealth in Wound Care: from conception to implementation. Journal of Wound Care 2015;24(Sup5):S1 View
  6. Eaton S, Biggerstaff D, Petrou S, Osipenko L, Gibbs J, Estcourt C, Sadiq T, Szczepura A. Young people’s preferences for the use of emerging technologies for asymptomatic regular chlamydia testing and management: a discrete choice experiment in England. BMJ Open 2019;9(1):e023663 View
  7. Wilson E, Free C, Morris T, Syred J, Ahamed I, Menon-Johansson A, Palmer M, Barnard S, Rezel E, Baraitser P, Broutet N. Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLOS Medicine 2017;14(12):e1002479 View
  8. Gkatzidou V, Hone K, Sutcliffe L, Gibbs J, Sadiq S, Szczepura A, Sonnenberg P, Estcourt C. User interface design for mobile-based sexual health interventions for young people: Design recommendations from a qualitative study on an online Chlamydia clinical care pathway. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2015;15(1) View
  9. Baraitser P, Syred J, Spencer-Hughes V, Howroyd C, Free C, Holdsworth G. How online sexual health services could work; generating theory to support development. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1) View
  10. Spencer-Hughes V, Syred J, Allison A, Holdsworth G, Baraitser P. Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e30 View
  11. Söderqvist J, Gullsby K, Stark L, Wikman M, Karlsson R, Herrmann B. Internet-based self-sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis testing: a national evaluation in Sweden. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020;96(3):160 View
  12. Lohan M, Aventin Á, Oliffe J, Han C, Bottorff J. Knowledge Translation in Men’s Health Research: Development and Delivery of Content for Use Online. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(1):e31 View
  13. Wilson E, Free C, Morris T, Kenward M, Syred J, Baraitser P. Can Internet-Based Sexual Health Services Increase Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI)? Protocol for a Randomized Evaluation of an Internet-Based STI Testing and Results Service. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(1):e9 View
  14. Mohiuddin S, Gardiner R, Crofts M, Muir P, Steer J, Turner J, Wheeler H, Hollingworth W, Horner P. Modelling patient flows and resource use within a sexual health clinic through discrete event simulation to inform service redesign. BMJ Open 2020;10(7):e037084 View
  15. Aicken C, Fuller S, Sutcliffe L, Estcourt C, Gkatzidou V, Oakeshott P, Hone K, Sadiq S, Sonnenberg P, Shahmanesh M. Young people’s perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health 2016;16(1) View
  16. Gilbert M, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Grennan T, Fairley C, Buchner C, Krajden M, Kendall P, Shoveller J, Ogilvie G. Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019;95(2):151 View
  17. van Liere G, Dukers-Muijrers N, van Bergen J, Götz H, Stals F, Hoebe C. The added value of chlamydia screening between 2008-2010 in reaching young people in addition to chlamydia testing in regular care; an observational study. BMC Infectious Diseases 2014;14(1) View
  18. Knight R, Chabot C, Carson A, Thomson K, Haag D, Gilbert M, Shoveller J. Qualitative analysis of the experiences of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men who use GetCheckedOnline.com: a comprehensive internet-based diagnostic service for HIV and other STIs. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019;95(2):145 View
  19. Jones L, Ricketts E, Town K, Rugman C, Lecky D, Folkard K, Nardone A, Hartney T, McNulty C. Chlamydia and HIV testing, contraception advice, and free condoms offered in general practice: a qualitative interview study of young adults’ perceptions of this initiative. British Journal of General Practice 2017;67(660):e490 View
  20. de Wilt T, Versluis A, Goedhart A, Talboom-Kamp E, van Delft S. General practitioners attitude towards the use of eHealth and online testing in primary care. Clinical eHealth 2020;3:16 View
  21. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell C, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair F. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016;16(1) View
  22. Wei Y, Zheng P, Deng H, Wang X, Li X, Fu H. Design Features for Improving Mobile Health Intervention User Engagement: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e21687 View
  23. Day S, Kinsella R, Jones S, Tittle V, Suchak T, Forbes K. Safeguarding outcomes of 16 and 17-year-old service users of Sexual Health London (SHL.uk), a pan-London online sexual health service. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2020;31(14):1373 View
  24. Gasmelsid N, Moran B, Nadarzynski T, Patel R, Foley E. Does online sexually transmitted infection screening compromise care? A service evaluation comparing the management of chlamydial infection diagnosed online and in clinic. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2021;32(6):528 View
  25. Grandahl M, Larsson M, Herrmann B. ‘To be on the safe side’: a qualitative study regarding users’ beliefs and experiences of internet-based self-sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing. BMJ Open 2020;10(12):e041340 View
  26. Day S, Singh G, Jones S, Kinsella R. Sexual assault reporting amongst users of online sexual health services. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2021;32(3):280 View