Published on in Vol 15, No 10 (2013): October

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Authors of this article:

Jeppe Agger Nielsen1 ;   Lars Mathiassen2

Journals

  1. Matthew-Maich N, Harris L, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Ibrahim S, Gafni A, Isaacs S. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2016;4(2):e29 View
  2. Rydenfält C, Holgersson C, Östlund B, Arvidsson I, Johansson G, Persson R. Picking low hanging fruit – A scoping review of work environment related interventions in the home care sector. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 2020;39(4):223 View
  3. Bally E, Cesuroglu T. Toward Integration of mHealth in Primary Care in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;7 View
  4. Kip H, Kelders S, Bouman Y, van Gemert-Pijnen L. The Importance of Systematically Reporting and Reflecting on eHealth Development: Participatory Development Process of a Virtual Reality Application for Forensic Mental Health Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e12972 View
  5. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen M. Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e10235 View
  6. Kip H, Kelders S, Weerink K, Kuiper A, Brüninghoff I, Bouman Y, Dijkslag D, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Identifying the Added Value of Virtual Reality for Treatment in Forensic Mental Health: A Scenario-Based, Qualitative Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 2019;10 View
  7. Sheng Z, Wang J, Sun K, Xu Q, Zhou H, Liu C, Hu J, Song X, Dong L, Yuan C. Nurses' Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Home Care. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(2):97 View
  8. Frennert S, Petersson L, Muhic M, Rydenfält C, Nymberg V, Ekman B, Erlingsdottir G. Materiality and the mediating roles of eHealth: A qualitative study and comparison of three cases. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211167 View
  9. Franke A, Nass E, Piereth A, Zettl A, Heidl C. Implementation of Assistive Technologies and Robotics in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Three-Stage Assessment Based on Acceptance, Ethics, and Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology 2021;12 View
  10. Mathijssen E, de Lange W, Bleijenberg N, van Houwelingen T, Jaarsma T, Trappenburg J, Westland H. Factors That Influence the Use of eHealth in Home Care: Scoping Review and Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41768 View
  11. Shao Q, Ma J, Zhu S. A System Dynamics Approach for Evaluating the Synergy Degree of Social Organizations Participating in Community and Home-Based Elderly Care Services. Buildings 2022;12(9):1491 View
  12. Munson A. What a mediminder does: Arranging autonomy through technology. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2022;2:100149 View
  13. Pandey J, Majumdarr S, Hassan Y, Benuyenah V. Role of Digital Leadership Capability in Shaping IT Innovation. Journal of Global Information Management 2023;31(8):1 View
  14. Kip H, Beerlage-de Jong N, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Kelders S. The CeHRes Roadmap 2.0: Update of a Holistic Framework for Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of eHealth Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025;27:e59601 View
  15. Hewage S, Kularatna S, Parsonage W, Walters T, McPhail S, Brain D, Allen M. Integrating a mobile application to enhance atrial fibrillation care: key insights from an implementation study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Kip H, Kelders S, Van Gemert-Pijnen L. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Putting the Value in VR View