Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

1. Claesson I, Hultgren E, Blomberg M. Lifestyle habits and women's attitudes towards discussing them at a visit for contraceptive advice. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2015;6(3):114 View
2. Wilding S, Conner M, Sandberg T, Prestwich A, Lawton R, Wood C, Miles E, Godin G, Sheeran P. The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology 2016;27(1):196 View
3. Bendtsen P, Bendtsen M, Karlsson N, White I, McCambridge J. Online Alcohol Assessment and Feedback for Hazardous and Harmful Drinkers: Findings From the AMADEUS-2 Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Practice in Swedish Universities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(7):e170 View
4. Fazzino T, Raheel A, Peppercorn N, Forbush K, Kirby T, Sher K, Befort C. Motives for drinking alcohol and eating palatable foods: An evaluation of shared mechanisms and associations with drinking and binge eating. Addictive Behaviors 2018;85:113 View
5. Bendtsen M. Electronic Screening for Alcohol Use and Brief Intervention by Email for University Students: Reanalysis of Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Bayesian Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(11):e14419 View
6. McCambridge J, Bendtsen M, Karlsson N, White I, Nilsen P, Bendtsen P. Alcohol assessment and feedback by email for university students: main findings from a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 2013;203(5):334 View
7. Morris T, Kahan B, White I. Choosing sensitivity analyses for randomised trials: principles. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14(1) View
8. de Souza R, Eisen R, Perera S, Bantoto B, Bawor M, Dennis B, Samaan Z, Thabane L. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: sensitivity analyses in randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2016;103(1):5 View
9. Andrade A, de Lacerda R, Gomide H, Ronzani T, Sartes L, Martins L, Bedendo A, Souza-Formigoni M, Vromans I, Poznyak V, Fitzmaurice G, Rekve D, Martin Abello K, Kramer J, Rosier I, Tiburcio-Sainz M, Lara M, Andrade A, Padruchny D, Ambekar A, Dhal A, Yadav D, Singh Y, Schaub M. Web-based self-help intervention reduces alcohol consumption in both heavy-drinking and dependent alcohol users: A pilot study. Addictive Behaviors 2016;63:63 View
10. Bendtsen M. An Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Drinking Among Swedish University Students: Reanalysis of Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Bayesian Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e14420 View
11. Bendtsen M, McCambridge J. Reducing Alcohol Consumption Among Risky Drinkers in the General Population of Sweden Using an Interactive Mobile Health Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(4):e13119 View
12. Bendtsen M, Bendtsen P. Feasibility and User Perception of a Fully Automated Push-Based Multiple-Session Alcohol Intervention for University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2014;2(2):e30 View
13. Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Dennis B, Kosa D, Debono V, Dillenburg R, Fruci V, Bawor M, Lee J, Wells G, Goldsmith C. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13(1) View
14. Grace-Farfaglia P. Social Cognitive Theories and Electronic Health Design: Scoping Review. JMIR Human Factors 2019;6(3):e11544 View
15. McCambridge J, Kypri K, Bendtsen P, Porter J. Deception in Research Is Morally Problematic … and so too Is Not Using It Morally: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Use of Deception in Public Health Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Case Study of Three Online Alcohol Trials”. The American Journal of Bioethics 2014;14(1):W9 View
16. Müssener U, Bendtsen M, Karlsson N, White I, McCambridge J, Bendtsen P. SMS-based smoking cessation intervention among university students: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (NEXit trial). Trials 2015;16(1) View
17. Plotnikoff R, Costigan S, Kennedy S, Robards S, Germov J, Wild C. Efficacy of interventions targeting alcohol, drug and smoking behaviors in university and college students: A review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of American College Health 2019;67(1):68 View
18. Bendtsen M, Bendtsen P, Henriksson H, Henriksson P, Müssener U, Thomas K, Löf M. The Mobile Health Multiple Lifestyle Behavior Interventions Across the Lifespan (MoBILE) Research Program: Protocol for Development, Evaluation, and Implementation. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(4):e14894 View
19. Bedendo A, Andrade A, Noto A. Intervenções via Internet para redução do consumo de álcool entre universitários: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 2018;42 View
20. Bonthuys A, Botha K. Tomatis® Method comparative efficacy in promoting self-regulation in tertiary students: A systematic review. Journal of Psychology in Africa 2016;26(1):92 View
21. Marcus B, Preben B. Feasibility of a Fully Automated Multiple Session Alcohol Intervention to University Students, Using Different Modes of Electronic Delivery—The TOPHAT 1 Study. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 2013;06(10):14 View
22. Kaner E, Beyer F, Garnett C, Crane D, Brown J, Muirhead C, Redmore J, O'Donnell A, Newham J, de Vocht F, Hickman M, Brown H, Maniatopoulos G, Michie S. Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;2017(9) View
23. Schulz D, Candel M, Kremers S, Reinwand D, Jander A, de Vries H. Effects of a Web-Based Tailored Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(9):e206 View
24. McCambridge J, Bendtsen M, Karlsson N, White I, Bendtsen P. Alcohol assessment & feedback by e-mail for university student hazardous and harmful drinkers: study protocol for the AMADEUS-2 randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1) View
25. Smedslund G, Wollscheid S, Fang L, Nilsen W, Steiro A, Larun L. Effects of early, computerized brief interventions on risky alcohol use and risky cannabis use among young people. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2017;13(1):1 View
26. McCambridge J, Wilson A, Attia J, Weaver N, Kypri K. Randomized trial seeking to induce the Hawthorne effect found no evidence for any effect on self-reported alcohol consumption online. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;108:102 View
27. Foxcroft D, Moreira M, Almeida Santimano N, Smith L. Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;2015(12) View
28. O⿿Rourke L, Humphris G, Baldacchino A. Electronic communication based interventions for hazardous young drinkers: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2016;68:880 View
29. Bedendo A, McCambridge J, Gaume J, Souza A, Formigoni M, Noto A. Components evaluation of a web‐based personalized normative feedback intervention for alcohol use among college students: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a dismantling design. Addiction 2020;115(6):1063 View
30. Bendtsen M, McCambridge J. Causal models accounted for research participation effects when estimating effects in a behavioral intervention trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2021;136:77 View
31. Bourne J, Martin Ginis K, Buchholz A, Schmidtke S, Jung M. Increasing dietary calcium intake of children and their parents: a randomised controlled trial. Public Health Nutrition 2021;24(10):3075 View
32. Åsberg K, Bendtsen M. Perioperative digital behaviour change interventions for reducing alcohol consumption, improving dietary intake, increasing physical activity and smoking cessation: a scoping review. Perioperative Medicine 2021;10(1) View
33. Bendtsen M, Ulfsdotter Gunnarsson K, McCambridge J. Effects of a waiting list control design on alcohol consumption among online help-seekers: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021;11(8):e049810 View
34. Emenyonu N, Kekibiina A, Woolf-King S, Kyampire C, Fatch R, Dawson-Rose C, Muyindike W, Hahn J. Digital Health Screening in People With HIV in Uganda to Increase Alcohol Use Reporting: Qualitative Study on the Development and Testing of the Self-administered Digital Screener for Health. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(9):e35015 View
35. Åsberg K, Lundgren O, Henriksson H, Henriksson P, Bendtsen P, Löf M, Bendtsen M. Multiple lifestyle behaviour mHealth intervention targeting Swedish college and university students: protocol for theBuddyrandomised factorial trial. BMJ Open 2021;11(12):e051044 View
36. Åsberg K, Bendtsen M. Evaluating the effectiveness of a brief digital procrastination intervention targeting university students in Sweden: study protocol for the Focus randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023;13(7):e072506 View
37. Åsberg K, Eldh A, Löf M, Bendtsen M. “Simply complicated”: Uncovering the processes of lifestyle behavior change among college and university students with access to a digital multiple lifestyle intervention. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
38. Andrade S, Greve J, Lesner R. Changing university students’ alcohol use with a web-based intervention: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Public Health 2024 View
39. Ulfsdotter Gunnarsson K, Henriksson M, McCambridge J, Bendtsen M. Effects of a waiting list control design on alcohol consumption among online help-seekers: A randomised controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2024;263:112409 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. Foxcroft D, Moreira M, Almeida Santimano N, Smith L, Foxcroft D. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. View