Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 30.05.12 in Vol 14, No 3 (2012): May-Jun

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Clinicians’ Perspectives on a Web-Based System for Routine Outcome Monitoring in Old-Age Psychiatry in the Netherlands"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1937):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Mackrill T, Sørensen KM. Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychosocial interventions – a systematic review. European Journal of Social Work 2019;:1
  2. Tasma M, Liemburg E, Knegtering H, Delespaul P, Boonstra A, Castelein S. Exploring the use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in the treatment of patients with a psychotic disorder. European Psychiatry 2017;42:89
  3. Thilarajah S, Clark RA, Williams G. Wearable sensors and Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies to assess and promote physical activity in stroke: a narrative review. Brain Impairment 2016;17(1):34
  4. Elfeddali I, van der Feltz-Cornelis C, van Os J, Knappe S, Vieta E, Wittchen H, Obradors-Tarragó C, Haro J. Horizon 2020 Priorities in Clinical Mental Health Research: Results of a Consensus-Based ROAMER Expert Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2014;11(10):10915
  5. Van den Berg I, Klip H, Boeschen Hospers M. Meten per sessie: Een kwestie van moeten?. Kind & Adolescent Praktijk 2014;13(2):82
  6. Veerbeek MA, Oude Voshaar RC, Pot AM. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for older adults (HoNOS 65+) in daily care. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2013;50(12):1711