Published on 10.04.12 in Vol 14, No 2 (2012): Mar-Apr
Works citing "Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?"
According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2005):
(note that this is only a small subset of citations)
- Goshtasbi K, Lehrich BM, Moshtaghi O, Abouzari M, Sahyouni R, Bagheri K, Moshtaghi A, Tajran SD, Lee L, Lin HW, Djalilian HR. Patients’ Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists. Otology & Neurotology 2019;40(1):139CrossRef
- Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243CrossRef
- Lu SF, Rui H. Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida. Management Science 2018;64(6):2557CrossRef
- Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Fuller G, Black JT, Kim HL, Spiegel B. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2018;25(4):401CrossRef
- Rivas R, Montazeri N, Le NX, Hristidis V. Automatic Classification of Online Doctor Reviews: Evaluation of Text Classifier Algorithms. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(11):e11141CrossRef
- Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212CrossRef
- Liu JJ, Matelski JJ, Bell CM. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e76CrossRef
- Emmert M, Meszmer N, Schlesinger M. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)CrossRef
- Vu AF, Espinoza GM, Perry JD, Chundury RV. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2017;33(6):466CrossRef
- Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275CrossRef
- Paul MJ, Dredze M. Social Monitoring for Public Health. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 2017;9(5):1CrossRef
- Fan Z, Che Y, Chen Z. Product sales forecasting using online reviews and historical sales data: A method combining the Bass model and sentiment analysis. Journal of Business Research 2017;74:90CrossRef
- Wang Z, Li H, Ye Q, Law R. Saliency effects of online reviews embedded in the description on sales: Moderating role of reputation. Decision Support Systems 2016;87:50CrossRef
- Kelly EC, Winick-Ng J, Welk B. Surgeon Experience and Complications of Transvaginal Prolapse Mesh. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016;128(1):65CrossRef
- Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e217CrossRef
- Wiley MT, Rivas RL, Hristidis V. Provider attributes correlation analysis to their referral frequency and awards. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16(1)CrossRef
- Okike K, Peter-Bibb TK, Xie KC, Okike ON. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(12):e324CrossRef
- Li S, Feng B, Chen M, Bell RA. Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor. Journal of Health Communication 2015;20(4):453CrossRef
- Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4):e257CrossRef
- Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276CrossRef
- Watkins I, Xie B. eHealth Literacy Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(11):e225CrossRef
- Wallace BC, Paul MJ, Sarkar U, Trikalinos TA, Dredze M. A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014;21(6):1098CrossRef
- Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56CrossRef
- Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269CrossRef
- Tzarnas CD. Advice to a Graduating Surgical Resident; Some New “A”s. Journal of Surgical Education 2012;69(5):676CrossRef
- Lee S, Chang D, Kang O, Kim H, Kim H, Lee H, Park H, Chae Y. Do Not Judge According to Appearance: Patients— Preference of a Doctor's Face Does Not Influence Their Assessment of the Patient–doctor Relationship. Acupuncture in Medicine 2012;30(4):261CrossRef
- Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, Millett C. Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(5):e146CrossRef
According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2005)
:- Taylor J, Xu T, Makary MA. Surgical Quality Improvement. 2017. Chapter 13:125CrossRef