Published on in Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Jul-Sep

A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care

A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care

A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care

Journals

  1. Mowforth O, Davies B, Kotter M. Quality of Life Among Informal Caregivers of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2019;8(4):e12381 View
  2. O'Brien K, Solomon P, Worthington C, Ibáñez-Carrasco F, Baxter L, Nixon S, Baltzer-Turje R, Robinson G, Zack E. Considerations for Conducting Web-Based Survey Research With People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e81 View
  3. Koitsalu M, Eklund M, Adolfsson J, Grönberg H, Brandberg Y. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018;18(1) View
  4. Ebert J, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen M. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e24 View
  5. Berman D, Tan L, Cheng T. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics in Review 2015;36(8):364 View
  6. Brasel K, Haider A, Haukoos J. Practical Guide to Survey Research. JAMA Surgery 2020;155(4):351 View
  7. Anderson A, Carter M, Stephenson J. Perspectives of University Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2018;48(3):651 View
  8. De Rosis S, Cerasuolo D, Nuti S. Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy. BMC Health Services Research 2020;20(1) View
  9. Huppelschoten A, Aarts J, van Empel I, Cohlen B, Kremer J, Nelen W. Feedback to professionals on patient-centered fertility care is insufficient for improvement: a mixed-method study. Fertility and Sterility 2013;99(5):1419 View
  10. Olson K. Unpacking the black box of survey costs. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 2021;17(7):1342 View
  11. Sjetne I, Iversen H, Holmboe O, Helgeland J. Response probabilities and response-mode preferences in a self-administered survey. BMC Research Notes 2019;12(1) View
  12. Movsas T, Yechieli R, Movsas B, Darwish-Yassine M. Partner’s Perspective on Long-term Sexual Dysfunction After Prostate Cancer Treatment. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016;39(3):276 View
  13. Huppelschoten A, van Duijnhoven N, van Bommel P, Kremer J, Nelen W. Do infertile women and their partners have equal experiences with fertility care?. Fertility and Sterility 2013;99(3):832 View
  14. Balachandran A, Monga A, Duckett J. Management of female urinary incontinence: A survey of urogynaecologists’ view on the NICE guideline. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2016;36(4):487 View
  15. Daikeler J, Bošnjak M, Lozar Manfreda K. Web Versus Other Survey Modes: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2020;8(3):513 View
  16. Briet J, Bot A, Hageman M, Menendez M, Mudgal C, Ring D. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Validation of an Abbreviated Two-Item Questionnaire. Psychosomatics 2014;55(6):578 View
  17. Yang M, Tan E. Web-Based and Telephone Surveys to Assess Public Perception Toward the National Health Insurance in Taiwan: A Comparison of Cost and Results. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2015;4(2):e9 View
  18. Faleiros F, Käppler C, Pontes F, Silva S, Goes F, Cucick C. USE OF VIRTUAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND DISSEMINATION AS A DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY IN SCIENTIFIC STUDIES. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem 2016;25(4) View
  19. Helsten D, Ben Abdallah A, Avidan M, Wildes T, Winter A, McKinnon S, Bollini M, Candelario P, Burnside B, Sharma A. Methodologic Considerations for Collecting Patient-reported Outcomes from Unselected Surgical Patients. Anesthesiology 2016;125(3):495 View
  20. Horevoorts N, Vissers P, Mols F, Thong M, van de Poll-Franse L. Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(5):e111 View
  21. Moody C, Dewey C, Niel L. Cross-sectional survey of cat handling practices in veterinary clinics throughout Canada and the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2020;256(9):1020 View
  22. Mauz E, Hoffmann R, Houben R, Krause L, Kamtsiuris P, Gößwald A. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e64 View
  23. Ernst S, Brand T, Lhachimi S, Zeeb H. Combining Internet‐Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial. Health Services Research 2018;53(2):879 View
  24. Melnikov S, Ashkenazi T, Amara M, Peles Bortz A. Transcendental Spirituality and Acquaintance With the Activities of the Domestic National Transplant Center as Factors Shaping Attitudes Toward Organ Donation. Progress in Transplantation 2017;27(2):139 View
  25. Schougaard L, Larsen L, Jessen A, Sidenius P, Dorflinger L, de Thurah A, Hjollund N. AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases. Quality of Life Research 2016;25(3):525 View
  26. Gagné T, Agouri R, Cantinotti M, Boubaker A, Frohlich K. How important are paper copies of questionnaires? Testing invitations modes when studying social inequalities in smoking among young adults. International Journal of Public Health 2014;59(1):207 View
  27. Hjollund N, Larsen L, Biering K, Johnsen S, Riiskjær E, Schougaard L. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2014;3(1):e5 View
  28. Roos L, Taube W, Tuch C, Frei K, Wyss T. Factors That Influence the Rating of Perceived Exertion After Endurance Training. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2018;13(8):1042 View
  29. Hagan T, Belcher S, Donovan H. Mind the Mode: Differences in Paper vs. Web-Based Survey Modes Among Women With Cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2017;54(3):368 View
  30. Nakano H, Ishii K, Goto A, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Fujimori K. Development and Implementation of an Internet Survey to Assess Community Health in the Face of a Health Crisis: Data from the Pregnancy and Birth Survey of the Fukushima Health Management Survey, 2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(11):1946 View
  31. Bot A, Menendez M, Neuhaus V, Mudgal C, Ring D. The Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Questionnaires in Patients with Hand and Upper Extremity Illness. HAND 2013;8(2):210 View
  32. Weigl K, Tikk K, Hoffmeister M, De Toni E, Hampe J, Kolligs F, Klug S, Mansmann U, Nasseh D, Radlovic J, Schwab M, Schweigler D, Stephan A, Brenner H. A Web-based survey among adults aged 40–54 years was time effective and yielded stable response patterns. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;105:10 View
  33. Feldman S, Lapidus N, Cosnes J, Tiret E, Fonquernie L, Cabane J, Chazouilleres O, Surgers L, Beaussier M, Valleron A, Carrat F, Hejblum G. Comparing Inpatient Satisfaction Collected via a Web-Based Questionnaire Self-Completion and Through a Telephone Interview: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e293 View
  34. Albers L, Haj Mohammad S, Husson O, Putter H, Pelger R, Elzevier H, Manten-Horst E. Exploring Communication About Intimacy and Sexuality: What Are the Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Health Care Professionals?. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology 2020;9(2):222 View
  35. Rutherford C, Costa D, Mercieca-Bebber R, Rice H, Gabb L, King M. Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research 2016;25(3):559 View
  36. Bjertnaes O, Iversen H, Skrivarhaug T. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018;18(1) View
  37. Zhou W, Wilson J. Questionnaire with Acupuncturists to Investigate the Relationship Between the Governor Vessel and Dementia. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2020;13(2):53 View
  38. Mlikotic R, Parker B, Rajapakshe R. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(3):e70 View
  39. Huppelschoten A, van Dongen A, Philipse I, Hamilton C, Verhaak C, Nelen W, Kremer J. Predicting dropout in fertility care: a longitudinal study on patient-centredness. Human Reproduction 2013;28(8):2177 View
  40. Kilsdonk E, Wendel E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van Leeuwen F, van den Berg M, Jaspers M. Participation rates of childhood cancer survivors to self-administered questionnaires: a systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care 2017;26(6):e12462 View
  41. Sa J, Samuel T, Chaput J, Chung J, Grigsby-Toussaint D, Lee J. Sex and racial/ethnic differences in sleep quality and its relationship with body weight status among US college students. Journal of American College Health 2020;68(7):704 View
  42. Krouwel E, Albers L, Nicolai M, Putter H, Osanto S, Pelger R, Elzevier H. Discussing Sexual Health in the Medical Oncologist’s Practice: Exploring Current Practice and Challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 2020;35(6):1072 View
  43. Ito H, Tamura K, Wada T, Yamamoto T, Morita S, Abu-Raddad L. Is the network of heterosexual contact in Japan scale free?. PLOS ONE 2019;14(8):e0221520 View
  44. Arafa A, Anzengruber F, Mostafa A, Navarini A. Perspectives of online surveys in dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2019;33(3):511 View
  45. Hohwü L, Lyshol H, Gissler M, Jonsson S, Petzold M, Obel C. Web-Based Versus Traditional Paper Questionnaires: A Mixed-Mode Survey With a Nordic Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e173 View
  46. Braekman E, Drieskens S, Charafeddine R, Demarest S, Berete F, Gisle L, Tafforeau J, Van der Heyden J, Van Hal G. Mixing mixed-mode designs in a national health interview survey: a pilot study to assess the impact on the self-administered questionnaire non-response. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019;19(1) View
  47. Jang M, Vorderstrasse A. Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(4):e11865 View
  48. Saramunee K, Krska J, Mackridge A, Richards J, Suttajit S, Phillips-Howard P. General public's views on pharmacy public health services: current situation and opportunities in the future. Public Health 2015;129(6):705 View
  49. Huppelschoten A, van Duijnhoven N, Hermens R, Verhaak C, Kremer J, Nelen W. Improving patient-centeredness of fertility care using a multifaceted approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13(1) View
  50. van Beusekom I, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer N, Dongelmans D, van der Schaaf M. Lessons learnt during the implementation of a web-based triage tool for Dutch intensive care follow-up clinics. BMJ Open 2018;8(9):e021249 View
  51. Zhang C, Sun Z, Yang J, Xu T, Zhu L, Lang J. Comparative validity and reliability of the WeChat-based electronic and paper-and-pencil versions of the PISQ-12 for collecting participant-reported data in Chinese. Menopause 2021;28(3):318 View
  52. Kuusio H, Seppänen A, Somersalo L, Jokela S, Castaneda A, Abdulhamed R, Lilja E. Response Activity in Mixed-Method Survey Data Collection—The Methods Used in a Survey among the Foreign-Born Population in Finland (FinMonik). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(6):3300 View
  53. Gandhi A, Duxbury P, Murphy J, Foden P, Lalloo F, Clancy T, Wisely J, Kirwan C, Howell A, Evans D. Patient reported outcome measures in a cohort of patients at high risk of breast cancer treated by bilateral risk reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2022;75(1):69 View
  54. Wong H, Brusseleers M, Hall K, Maiden M, Chapple L, Chapman M, Hodgson C, Gluck S. Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial. Australian Critical Care 2022;35(3):286 View
  55. Oliveri S, Lanzoni L, Petrocchi S, Janssens R, Schoefs E, Huys I, Smith M, Smith I, Veldwijk J, de Wit G, Pravettoni G. Opportunities and Challenges of Web-Based and Remotely Administered Surveys for Patient Preference Studies in a Vulnerable Population. Patient Preference and Adherence 2021;Volume 15:2509 View
  56. Berman D, Tan L, Cheng T. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics In Review 2015;36(8):364 View
  57. Riiskjær E, Schougaard L, Larsen L, Hjøllund N. Hvordan kan patientrapporterede oplysninger (PRO) bruges i klinisk praksis? – belyst med udgangspunkt i fire forskellige konsultationsmodeller. Nordisk sygeplejeforskning 2014;4(3):189 View
  58. Haupt J, Shah N, Fifolt M, Jorge E, Glaeser P, Zisette J, Pruitt C. Pain Assessment in Pediatric Emergency Departments. Pediatric Emergency Care 2021;37(12):e1145 View
  59. Berman D, Tan L, Cheng T. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics In Review 2015;36(8):364 View
  60. Nicholas H, Halfacree K, Mabbett I. Public Perceptions of Faecal Sludge Biochar and Biosolids Use in Agriculture. Sustainability 2022;14(22):15385 View
  61. Morris A, Ibrahim Z, Heslin M, Moghraby O, Stringaris A, Grant I, Zalewski L, Pritchard M, Stewart R, Hotopf M, Pickles A, Dobson R, Simonoff E, Downs J. Assessing the feasibility of a web‐based outcome measurement system in child and adolescent mental health services – myHealthE a randomised controlled feasibility pilot study. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2023;28(1):128 View
  62. Myles L, Church T. An industry survey of implementation strategies for clinical supply chain management of cell and gene therapies. Cytotherapy 2022;24(3):344 View
  63. Hagström J, Woodford J, von Essen A, Lähteenmäki P, von Essen L. Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e056758 View
  64. Neupert E, Gupta L, Holder T, Jobson S. Athlete monitoring practices in elite sport in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sports Sciences 2022;40(13):1450 View
  65. Stahl K, Groene O, Mockridge J. ASK ME!—Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey. PLOS ONE 2021;16(12):e0259252 View
  66. Xu A, Dunham A, Enumah Z, Humbyrd C. Patient understanding regarding opioid use in an orthopaedic trauma surgery population: a survey study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2021;16(1) View
  67. Frederigue-Lopes N, Soldera D, Silva J, Medina C, Moret A, de Souza Jacob R. Caderno de experiências: um recurso terapêutico na audiologia educacional. CoDAS 2022;34(1) View
  68. Hermans L, Braekman E, Drieskens S, Demarest S. Organizing the health interview survey at the local level: design of a pilot study. Archives of Public Health 2022;80(1) View
  69. Elis J, Goerres A, Mayer S, Spies D. Mobilising Immigrant-Origin Voters into Survey Participation: The Effect of In-Person Canvassing Versus Postal Reminders on Response Rates in a Longitudinal Election Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022 View
  70. Vimalananda V, Wormwood J, Sitter K, Fincke B, Qian S, Tait M, Meterko M. Adaptations for remote research work: a modified web-push strategy compared to a mail-only strategy for administering a survey of healthcare experiences. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2023;23(1) View
  71. Marilac Soalheiro L, de Jesus Brandão B, Paiva R, Dias Carvalho L, Menezes Paranhos R, Ribeiro Barbosa P, Guerrero-Vargas N, Tamura E. Familiarity of Brazilian psychologists with basic concepts in sleep science and chronobiology. Chronobiology International 2023;40(8):1072 View
  72. Disher N, Scott J, Tyzik A, Golden S, Baker G, Hynes D, Slatore C. Evaluation of survey delivery methods in a national study of Veteran’s healthcare preferences. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2023 View
  73. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  74. Klee B, Costa D, Frese T, Knoechelmann A, Meyer G, Meyer T, Purschke O, Schildmann J, Steckelberg A, Mikolajczyk R. To Remind or Not to Remind During Recruitment? An Analysis of an Online Panel in Germany. International Journal of Public Health 2024;69 View
  75. Heimel S, Medway R, Horwitz R. Should We Offer Web, Paper, or Both? A Comparison of Single- and Mixed-Response Mode Treatments in a Mail Survey. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Mutepfa M, Tapera R. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. View
  2. Mutepfa M, Tapera R. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. View
  3. Brasel K. Health Services Research. View
  4. Luzzi A, Fleischman A, Parvizi J. Rapid Recovery in Total Joint Arthroplasty. View
  5. Stoyanova R, Dimova R, Doykov I. Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors. View