• Home
  • About
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Search
  • Upcoming
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Subscribe
  • Submit
  • Open Review
  • Become Member
  • Top Articles
  • Protocols
  • Mhealth
  • Feedback
  • Jobs
Home > Theme Issues and Ecollections > E-collection 'Corrigenda and Addenda'
Medicine 2.0 congress
Journal Content Current Issue Upcoming Issue
2013 (vol. 15)
2012 (vol. 14)
2011 (vol. 13)
2010 (vol. 12)
2009 (vol. 11)
2008 (vol. 10)
2007 (vol. 9)
2006 (vol. 8)
2005 (vol. 7)
2004 (vol. 6)
2003 (vol. 5)
2002 (vol. 4)
2001 (vol. 3)
2000 (vol. 2)
1999 (vol. 1)

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • By Theme
User Not logged in.
   Log In here
No account?
   Register for free
original feed Subscribe Feed

E-collection 'Corrigenda and Addenda'

2012

Correction: Development and Validation of Filters for the Retrieval of Studies of Clinical Examination From Medline

Robert Badgett, Nader Shaikh, Mini Pi, Nancy L Wilczynski, K. Ann McKibbon, Andrea M. Ketchum, R. Brian Haynes

J Med Internet Res 2012 (Aug 03); 14(4):e108

HTML PDF XML Abstract

.

Metadata Correction: Online Social Networks and Smoking Cessation: A Scientific Research Agenda

Nathan K. Cobb, Amanda L. Graham, M. Justin Byron, Raymond S. Niaura, David B. Abrams, Workshop Participants

J Med Internet Res 2012 (Jan 11); 14(1):e12

HTML PDF XML Abstract

.

Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

Gunther Eysenbach

J Med Internet Res 2012 (Jan 04); 14(1):e8

HTML PDF XML Abstract

An error in the CHERRIES statement has been corrected (J Med Internet Res 2004;6[3]:e34). In the original paper, in table 1, denominator and numerator were flipped in the recommendations on how response rates (view rate, participation rate, and completion rate) should be calculated. The view rate should be the ratio of unique survey visitors divided by unique site visitors. The participation rate should be the ratio of those who agreed to participate divided by unique first survey page...

Correction: Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Gunther Eysenbach

J Med Internet Res 2012 (Jan 04); 14(1):e7

HTML PDF XML Abstract

minor error in the references section in the originally published version of the editorial by Eysenbach (J Med Internet Res 2011;13[4]:e123) on the relationship between citations and tweetations has been corrected; in addition, references being part of the dataset are no longer cited as “references”. The now corrected problem with the references was a formatting problem only and had no impact on the study findings. The originally published article stated correctly that all 55 articles...