Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 14.06.18 in Vol 20, No 6 (2018): June

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis"

Fabia Rothenfluh, Peter J Schulz

J Med Internet Res 2018 (Jun 14); 20(6):e212 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.9105):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. . Webcare in healthcare: providers' responses to patients' online reviews. British Journal of Healthcare Management 2019;25(10):1
    CrossRef
  2. Strumann C, Flägel K, Emcke T, Steinhäuser J. Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany. BMC Family Practice 2018;19(1)
    CrossRef
  3. . The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14336
    CrossRef
  4. . Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816
    CrossRef
  5. . Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e18374
    CrossRef
  6. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830
    CrossRef
  7. Schulz PJ, Rothenfluh F. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e14134
    CrossRef
  8. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916
    CrossRef
  9. Yan Q, Jensen KJ, Thomas R, Field AR, Jiang Z, Goei C, Davies MG. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study. JMIR Cardio 2021;5(1):e22975
    CrossRef
  10. Zhao HH, Luu M, Spiegel B, Daskivich TJ. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e11258
    CrossRef
  11. . Eine Trendanalyse von über 190 000 Onlinebewertungen von Orthopäden über die letzten 11 Jahre. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2021;26(03):141
    CrossRef
  12. Basa K, Jabbour N, Rohlfing M, Schmoker S, Lawlor CM, Levi J, Sobin L, Tracy JC, Tracy LF. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 2021;130(12):1317
    CrossRef
  13. Shah AM, Naqvi RA, Jeong O. The Impact of Signals Transmission on Patients’ Choice through E-Consultation Websites: An Econometric Analysis of Secondary Datasets. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(10):5192
    CrossRef
  14. Emmert M, McLennan S. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e24229
    CrossRef
  15. . The healthcare hunger games. JAAPA 2022;35(2):8
    CrossRef
  16. Fang J, Wen L, Ren H, Wen C. The effect of technical and functional quality on online physician selection: Moderation effect of competition intensity. Information Processing & Management 2022;59(4):102969
    CrossRef
  17. Ninkov A, Sedig K. A Framework for Online Public Health Debates: Some Design Elements for Visual Analytics Systems. Information 2022;13(4):201
    CrossRef
  18. Mainard N, Le Van T, Saghbini E, Madkouri R, Grelat M, Chapon R. La e-réputation des chirurgiens du rachis français : quels sont les facteurs les plus fréquemment associés aux avis en ligne ?. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(6):826
    CrossRef
  19. Armbruster FAD, Brüggmann D, Groneberg DA, Bendels M. The Influence of Paid Memberships on Physician Rating Websites With the Example of the German Portal Jameda: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39259
    CrossRef
  20. Guetz B, Bidmon S. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy 2023;132:104821
    CrossRef
  21. Hussain A, Hakeem-ur-Rehman , Muhammad Usman Awan . Analyzing physicians ratings and reviews landscape of a developing country (Pakistan). Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight 2021;4(2):153
    CrossRef
  22. Mainard N, Pelletier Y, Baland O, Huneidi M, Le Petit L, Laine G, Finoco M, Chatelain L, Chapon R. Chirurgie du rachis : enquête sur la réputation en ligne du chirurgien auprès de 230 patients. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(6):831
    CrossRef
  23. Vasan V, Cheng CP, Lerner DK, Vujovic D, van Gerwen M, Iloreta AM. A natural language processing approach to uncover patterns among online ratings of otolaryngologists. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2023;137(12):1384
    CrossRef
  24. Bhaumik D, Schlesinger MJ, Clark MD. How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians. PLOS ONE 2023;18(12):e0295243
    CrossRef