Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 09.11.17 in Vol 19, No 11 (2017): November

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities"

Stuart McLennan, Daniel Strech, Andrea Meyer, Hannes Kahrass

J Med Internet Res 2017 (Nov 09); 19(11):e387 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.7581):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830
    CrossRef
  2. Han X, Qu J, Zhang T. Exploring the impact of review valence, disease risk, and trust on patient choice based on online physician reviews. Telematics and Informatics 2019;45:101276
    CrossRef
  3. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  4. Emmert M, Kast K, Sander U. Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study. Health Policy 2019;123(11):1061
    CrossRef
  5. . Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816
    CrossRef
  6. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243
    CrossRef
  7. Han X, Li B, Zhang T, Qu J. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(6):e14417
    CrossRef
  8. . Eine Trendanalyse von über 190 000 Onlinebewertungen von Orthopäden über die letzten 11 Jahre. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2021;26(03):141
    CrossRef
  9. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916
    CrossRef
  10. Langerhuizen DWG, Brown LE, Doornberg JN, Ring D, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Janssen SJ. Analysis of Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Practices Using Natural Language Processing. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2021;29(8):337
    CrossRef
  11. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Gupta N, Basu S. What ails physician review websites? A study of information needs of patients. Decision Support Systems 2023;166:113897
    CrossRef
  12. Chen T, Wu C, Chiu MP, Hsu J, Liao M, Hsueh YA, Su W. Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey. Healthcare 2022;10(10):1931
    CrossRef
  13. Guetz B, Bidmon S, Dür M. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria. PLOS ONE 2022;17(12):e0278510
    CrossRef
  14. Kalabikhina I, Moshkin V, Kolotusha A, Kashin M, Klimenko G, Kazbekova Z. Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews. Mathematics 2024;12(4):566
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.7581):

  1. . Advances in Advertising Research X. 2019. Chapter 2:15
    CrossRef