Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 07.09.11 in Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Jul-Sep

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Risk Estimates From an Online Risk Calculator Are More Believable and Recalled Better When Expressed as Integers"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1656):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Damman OC, Bogaerts NMM, van Dongen D, Timmermans DRM. Barriers in using cardiometabolic risk information among consumers with low health literacy. British Journal of Health Psychology 2016;21(1):135
    CrossRef
  2. . The Right Tool Is What They Need, Not What We Have. Medical Care Research and Review 2013;70(1_suppl):37S
    CrossRef
  3. Gavaruzzi T, Tasso A, Franiuk M, Varesco L, Lotto L. Letter to the Editor: Response to Cox (2018). Journal of Genetic Counseling 2018;27(5):1314
    CrossRef
  4. Peters E, Kunreuther H, Sagara N, Slovic P, Schley DR. Protective Measures, Personal Experience, and the Affective Psychology of Time. Risk Analysis 2012;32(12):2084
    CrossRef
  5. Killam HW, Han PK. Presenting Health Statistics on the Web. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care 2013;2(1):43
    CrossRef
  6. Bonner C, Jansen J, Newell BR, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Doust J, Dhillon H, McCaffery K. I Don't Believe It, But I'd Better Do Something About It: Patient Experiences of Online Heart Age Risk Calculators. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(5):e120
    CrossRef
  7. Damman OC, Bogaerts NMM, van den Haak MJ, Timmermans DRM. How lay people understand and make sense of personalized disease risk information. Health Expectations 2017;20(5):973
    CrossRef
  8. Wright DR, Lozano P, Dawson-Hahn E, Christakis DA, Haaland WL, Basu A. Parental optimism about childhood obesity-related disease risks. International Journal of Obesity 2017;41(10):1467
    CrossRef
  9. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Witteman HO, Dickson M, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Kahn VC, Exe NL, Valerio M, Holtzman LG, Scherer LD, Fagerlin A. Blocks, Ovals, or People? Icon Type Affects Risk Perceptions and Recall of Pictographs. Medical Decision Making 2014;34(4):443
    CrossRef
  10. Adonis MI, Díaz J, Miranda VR, Chahuan M, Zambrano A, Benitez HC, Campos M, Avaria P, Urzúa U, Marín P, Gohurdett M, Cisterna Y, Gil L. Biomarkers for screening of lung cancer and pre-neoplastic lesions in a high risk Chilean population. Biological Research 2014;47(1):62
    CrossRef
  11. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Crump RT. Decision Support for Patients. Medical Care Research and Review 2013;70(1_suppl):50S
    CrossRef
  12. Gavaruzzi T, Tasso A, Franiuk M, Varesco L, Lotto L. A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo‐Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2017;26(5):1144
    CrossRef
  13. Janssen E, Ruiter RAC, Waters EA. Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2018;41(3):318
    CrossRef
  14. Jenkins SC, Harris AJL, Lark RM. When unlikely outcomes occur: the role of communication format in maintaining communicator credibility. Journal of Risk Research 2019;22(5):537
    CrossRef
  15. Waters EA, Taber JM, McQueen A, Housten AJ, Studts JL, Scherer LD. Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2020;29(12):2389
    CrossRef
  16. Vromans RD, Pauws SC, Bol N, van de Poll-Franse LV, Krahmer EJ. Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers?. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1)
    CrossRef
  17. Gómez-Ramírez O, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Falasinnu T, Grennan T, Grace D, Gilbert M. “Mini Dial-A-Nurses” and “Good Brands“: What Are the Desirable Features of Online HIV/STI Risk Calculators?. AIDS Education and Prevention 2020;32(6):528
    CrossRef
  18. Gunn CM, Maschke A, Paasche-Orlow MK, Housten AJ, Kressin NR, Schonberg MA, Battaglia TA. Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy. MDM Policy & Practice 2021;6(2):238146832110332
    CrossRef
  19. Thompson CA, Taber JM, Fitzsimmons CJ, Sidney PG. Math predictors of numeric health and non-health decision-making problems. Journal of Numerical Cognition 2021;7(2):221
    CrossRef
  20. Huilgol YS, Keane H, Shieh Y, Hiatt RA, Tice JA, Madlensky L, Sabacan L, Fiscalini AS, Ziv E, Acerbi I, Che M, Anton-Culver H, Borowsky AD, Hunt S, Naeim A, Parker BA, van ‘T Veer LJ, Esserman LJ. Elevated risk thresholds predict endocrine risk-reducing medication use in the Athena screening registry. npj Breast Cancer 2021;7(1)
    CrossRef
  21. Krull S, Boecker L, Loschelder DD. The Power and Peril of Precise vs. Round Health Message Interventions to Increase Stair Use. Frontiers in Psychology 2021;12
    CrossRef
  22. Paige SR, Wilczewski H, Casale TB, Bunnell BE. Using a computer-tailored COPD screening assessment to promote advice-seeking behaviors. World Allergy Organization Journal 2021;14(11):100603
    CrossRef
  23. Vromans RD, Tillier CN, Pauws SC, van der Poel HG, van de Poll-Franse LV, Krahmer EJ. Communication, perception, and use of personalized side-effect risks in prostate cancer treatment-decision making: An observational and interview study. Patient Education and Counseling 2022;105(8):2731
    CrossRef
  24. Ancker JS, Benda NC, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2024;31(2):525
    CrossRef
  25. Auger N, Brousseau , Fraser WD. Reply: when the clinical point gets lost in the decimal point. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;230(4):e65
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1656):

  1. Waters EA, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Handbook of Health Decision Science. 2016. Chapter 19:265
    CrossRef
  2. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Mayman G, Fagerlin A. Numerical Reasoning in Judgments and Decision Making about Health. 2014. 4:80
    CrossRef