Accessibility settings

Published on in Vol 28 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/112225, first published .
JMIR Publications logo: Advancing Digital Health & Open Science

Correction: Facilitators of and Barriers to Global Digital Oral Health: Mixed Methods Study

Correction: Facilitators of and Barriers to Global Digital Oral Health: Mixed Methods Study

Corrigenda and Addenda

1Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

2Centre d’études politiques et sociales, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Corresponding Author:

Elham Emami, DDS, MSc, PhD

Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences

McGill University

2001 Av. McGill College, Montréal

Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1

Canada

Phone: 1 5143987222

Email: elham.emami@mcgill.ca



In “Facilitators of and Barriers to Global Digital Oral Health: Mixed Methods Study” [1], the authors made the following changes to the Results section.

In the Characteristics of the Study Participants subsection, the following sentence was revised:

More than three-quarters of the respondents (80/83, 84.3%) used a computer to complete the survey.

The sentence now reads:

More than three-quarters of the respondents (70/83, 84.3%) used a computer to complete the survey.

In the Barriers subsection under Study Findings, the following sentences were revised:

Among those who did have funding, 36.6% (30/82) received it from the public sector, 19.5% (16/82) received it from the private sector, 18.3% (15/82) received it from donors, and 18.3% (15/82) received it from public-private partnerships.Only 10.9% (9/82) of the participants reported all 4 types of funding.

The sentences now read:

Among all participants, 36.6% (30/82) reported having received funding from the public sector, 19.5% (16/82) from the private sector, 18.3% (15/82) from donors, and 18.3% (15/82) from public-private partnerships. As respondents could report more than one source of funding, these categories were not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, 10.9% (9/82) of the participants reported receiving all 4 types of funding.

In the same subsection, the following sentences were revised:

Public funding was the most commonly reported funding type among participants from countries in the European Region (9/30, 30%). Approximately 68.7% (11/16) of the higher-income countries had adequate financial resources through private organizations or public-private partnerships (8/15, 53.3%):

The sentences now read:

Among the participants who reported receiving public sector funding (n=30), 9 (30%) were from the European Region, representing the highest percentage among other regions. Among the participants who reported receiving financial support through private organizations (n=16) or public-private partnerships (n=15), 11 (68.7%) and 8 (53.3%) were from high-income countries, respectively.

The correction will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website together with the publication of this correction notice. Because this was made after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text repositories, the corrected article has also been resubmitted to those repositories.

  1. Emami E, Kengne Talla P, Inquimbert C, Giraudeau N. Facilitators of and barriers to global digital oral health: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. Apr 30, 2026;28:e76236. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 18.Sep.2026; accepted 23.Sep.2026; published 29.Sep.2026.

Copyright

©Elham Emami, Pascaline Kengne Talla, Camille Inquimbert, Nicolas Giraudeau. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 29.Sep.2026.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.