Published on in Vol 24 , No 7 (2022) :July

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/27310, first published .
A Google Trends Approach to Identify Distinct Diurnal and Day-of-Week Web-Based Search Patterns Related to Conjunctivitis and Other Common Eye Conditions: Infodemiology Study

A Google Trends Approach to Identify Distinct Diurnal and Day-of-Week Web-Based Search Patterns Related to Conjunctivitis and Other Common Eye Conditions: Infodemiology Study

A Google Trends Approach to Identify Distinct Diurnal and Day-of-Week Web-Based Search Patterns Related to Conjunctivitis and Other Common Eye Conditions: Infodemiology Study

Original Paper

1Francis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

2Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

3School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

4Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

5Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

6Stanford University, San Mateo, CA, United States

7The Nueva School, San Mateo, CA, United States

8Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

9Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

Corresponding Author:

Travis C Porco, MPH, PhD

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics

University of California San Francisco

490 Illinois St, Floor 2, Box 0944

San Francisco, CA, 94158

United States

Phone: 1 415 476 4101

Email: travis.porco@ucsf.edu


Background: Studies suggest diurnal patterns of occurrence of some eye conditions. Leveraging new information sources such as web-based search data to learn more about such patterns could improve the understanding of patients’ eye-related conditions and well-being, better inform timing of clinical and remote eye care, and improve precision when targeting web-based public health campaigns toward underserved populations.

Objective: To investigate our hypothesis that the public is likely to consistently search about different ophthalmologic conditions at different hours of the day or days of week, we conducted an observational study using search data for terms related to ophthalmologic conditions such as conjunctivitis. We assessed whether search volumes reflected diurnal or day-of-week patterns and if those patterns were distinct from each other.

Methods: We designed a study to analyze and compare hourly search data for eye-related and control search terms, using time series regression models with trend and periodicity terms to remove outliers and then estimate diurnal effects. We planned a Google Trends setting, extracting data from 10 US states for the entire year of 2018. The exposure was internet search, and the participants were populations who searched through Google’s search engine using our chosen study terms. Our main outcome measures included cyclical hourly and day-of-week web-based search patterns. For statistical analyses, we considered P<.001 to be statistically significant.

Results: Distinct diurnal (P<.001 for all search terms) and day-of-week search patterns for eye-related terms were observed but with differing peak time periods and cyclic strengths. Some diurnal patterns represented those reported from prior clinical studies. Of the eye-related terms, “pink eye” showed the largest diurnal amplitude-to-mean ratios. Stronger signal was restricted to and peaked in mornings, and amplitude was higher on weekdays. By contrast, “dry eyes” had a higher amplitude diurnal pattern on weekends, with stronger signal occurring over a broader evening-to-morning period and peaking in early morning.

Conclusions: The frequency of web-based searches for various eye conditions can show cyclic patterns according to time of the day or week. Further studies to understand the reasons for these variations may help supplement the current clinical understanding of ophthalmologic symptom presentation and improve the timeliness of patient messaging and care interventions.

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(7):e27310

doi:10.2196/27310

Keywords



Infodemiology is a relatively young discipline within health informatics studying the science of distribution and determinants of information within an electronic medium, specifically the internet or in a population, with the aim of informing public health and policy [1-3]. Applications of this form of health informatics have included predicting coronavirus outbreaks based upon queries of web-based search engines, syndromic surveillance by analysis of status updates or tweets on Twitter, tracking the disparities in access to health care information, and mining search engine data to cluster query click data to estimate prevalence of certain conditions that patients seek to address themselves outside of clinical settings or hours or to study prevalence of factors in typically unobserved locations [2,4-6]. One key advantage proffered by these approaches to public health analytics compared to collating and probing large data sets is the ability to conduct real time predictive analysis of health-related behaviors [2,7,8]. For example, one study found that the number of clicks on a keyword-triggered link in Google demonstrated a strong correlation with the following week of influenza cases during the 2004-2005 Canadian influenza season [9]. Similarly, another study found that social media–based surveillance for foodborne diseases were 66% as effective, rapid, and cheaper than standard database surveillance systems [10].

Google Trends has become a popular tool for infodemiologic studies in predicting disease occurrence and outbreaks, so much so that standardized approaches seeking to strengthen validity of such analyses have been proposed, and commonly used data access tools have been developed [11,12]. However, limitations when using Google Trends must also be considered. For example, for COVID-19, media coverage can affect web searches [13,14], and search volume values can vary depending on the date of data collection [15,16]. Applications in this field are vast (eg, use of Google Trends for public health planning regarding marginalized populations or birth control, to name a few [17,18]) and can adapt rapidly to current events [3]. Recent Google Trends studies have explored, for example, the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health behavior and child mistreatment [19-22] on ocular and other communicable and noncommunicable disease [23,24] and on treatment and misinformation related to COVID-19 itself [25-27].

Cyclic patterns of Google Trends search interest as related to human health, often seasonal but also to a letter extent diurnal, are an area of extensive research. Clinical study has identified cyclic occurrence of health conditions in humans, including diurnal eye-related conditions, and the results may facilitate chronopreventive and chronotherapeutic care [28-35]. Web-based search behavior regarding nonocular disease symptoms has been shown to reflect seasonal and diurnal clinical cyclicity as well as aspects of disease not typically observed in clinics at all (for example, coronary heart disease and depression) [36,37]. Web-based search or social media data also can reflect seasonal or emerging clinical eye disease patterns and conjunctivitis epidemics on relatively long timescales, including the impact of other factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic [8,23,38-43]. This suggested that, as with other health conditions [36,37], there is the potential to add to our knowledge about diurnal and day of week aspects of eye disease outside of the days and times that patients are typically seen in clinics, using web-based hourly search data. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that the public is likely to search about different aspects of eye health at different (but predictable) hours of the day or days of week. Specifically, we conducted an observational study investigating if US hourly web-based search data for terms related to conjunctivitis or other common eye conditions and treatments could demonstrate diurnal or day-of-week cyclic patterns and if those patterns were distinct from each other. For example, daily occurrence peaks may occur at different times, or the difference between the peak and the trough may differ.


Google Search Data

We queried Google Trends for conjunctivitis terms and other common eye conditions and treatments for comparison. Search terms included “conjunctivitis,” “blurry eyes,” “cataracts,” “pink eye,” “dry eyes,” “watery eyes,” “glaucoma,” “contact lenses,” “visine,” and “lasik.” A positive control term that would likely exhibit hourly and day-of-week variation (“drunk”) was included. Data were obtained using a Python (Python Software Foundation) script we developed to apply using Pytrends (a commonly used application programming interface to access Google Trends data) to obtain Historical Hourly Interest data, using the pytrends.get_historical_interest application programming interface [4,6,12]. Each term and state combination were queried individually. Each request retrieved 1 week of hourly data. The results were combined for analysis. Using this method, no categories were specified in the query, quotes were not used, and terms were queried individually as terms and not as topics. Relative search volume (RSV) of hourly search frequency data for these terms for the year 2018 (the most recent complete year of data available at the time of our query) from the 10 most populous US states (CA, FL, GA, IL, MI, NC, NY, OH, PA, and TX) were downloaded. Data were queried and downloaded twice for each state-term pair to account for random sampling during the week of August 26, 2019 [36,37]. Universal Coordinated Times were adjusted to the predominant time zone for each state (only FL, MI, and TX include multiple time zones). The resulting time series represented hourly RSV for a given location, time period, and term. Data for all states were then combined for analysis.

Diurnal and Day of Week Analysis and Comparison of Cyclic Strength and Peak Times

Using the hourly RSV for each search term as an outcome variable, we conducted Serfling regression adjusting for trend, as follows [44-46]. We adjusted for overall trend using third-order orthogonal polynomials in the number of days since January 1, 2018. Diurnal effects were modeled by terms of the form sin nωt and cos nωt, where ω=2π/24, t is the time measured on a 24-hour clock, and n=1,…,4. We estimated separate diurnal effects for weekend days and for weekdays.

Because an outlier occurring at a single time could produce biased estimates of diurnal coefficients, we include additional terms to control for potential outliers (nuisance terms). We potentially include a large number of such terms of varying lengths, avoiding nonidentifiability by use of cross-validated LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) to select only a small number of such terms [47]. This provides a simple regression-based filter for removing apparent epidemics and other irregular outliers. Specifically, outliers and localized (nonperiodic) departures were modeled by terms that take the value 1 on given intervals and are 0 otherwise. Specifically, we chose terms of the form 1x[km,k(m+1)-1), where m=0,1,…, x is the number of hours elapsed since midnight, January 1, 2018, and k takes values 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128, as well as 168 (the latter corresponding to the number of hours in a week). We also chose other intervals in a sensitivity analysis, finding that the choice of these regressors had little effect on the results; specifically, we chose the set k=7, 14, 28, 56, 112, and 168 hours, as well as the set 9, 18, 36, 72, 144, and 168 hours. Other choices for filtering outliers could have been chosen instead of this regression procedure.

For statistical analyses, following model selection for these nuisance terms, ordinary least squares estimation was used to estimate the trend, outlier, and trigonometric coefficients. From the trigonometric coefficients and intercept, we estimated the circular median occurrence time and the amplitude-to-mean ratio (in a similar fashion as our previous analyses and using the R [R Foundation for Statistical Computing] package “circular”) [39-41]. Because diurnal and day of week occurrence data are angular data, we used the circular median time to summarize the central tendency; the circular median reflects the peak occurrence (when the data are approximately unimodal). The amplitude-to-mean ratio measures the cyclicity, with values near zero indicating small cyclic variability. Standard errors and P values were determined using time series bootstrap, with a fixed width of 20 hours [48-50]. For diurnal cyclic patterns, P values less than .001 were considered significant.

For data visualizations, mean hourly results of the filtered time series data for each term were normalized for visual comparison in polar plots (R package “ggplot” [51]). In order to optimally demonstrate cyclic patterns per terms in the plots, hourly RSVs for each term were normalized by dividing the mean per each hour per term by the value of the hour having the smallest mean value such that the hours with the least RSV are plotted closest to the center with a value of 1.0, while hours of higher relative search interest were plotted further from the center. Since values have been normalized, plots do not represent total search interest for one term vs another—but instead represent the relative amount of search interest between terms (Figure 1), between days for an individual term (Figure 2), or between seasons and weekday vs weekend day for an individual term (Figure 3).

Figure 1. Average hourly cyclic pattern from 2018 for 10 US states combined.
View this figure

Ethics Approval

University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board approval (14-14743) was obtained for this study.


Overall, we found that each search term exhibited cyclic diurnal patterns of search interest (P<.001 for all terms). However, cyclic strength and central tendency differed between search terms, as described below.

Hourly, Weekly, and Seasonal Patterns

To visualize cyclic diurnal patterns for each term, mean RSV at each time of day is represented in normalized polar 24-hour plots (see Methods) in Figure 1. Note that despite most terms exhibiting diurnal patterns, scale bars in Figure 1 indicate that not all terms exhibited similar diurnal strength. In Figure 2, cyclic diurnal patterns for each term on each day of the week are presented as normalized polar 24-hour plots. These plots suggested some terms had diurnal cyclic features with patterns that varied between weekdays and weekends. Terms shown to have statistically significant day-of-week patterns, mean peak day values, and other day-of-week characteristics for all terms are shown in Table 1. In Figure 3, normalized polar 24-hour plots indicate cyclic diurnal patterns for each term for each season for weekday and weekends. Weekday group results are shown as solid lines, and weekend day group results as dashed lines. Seasons are indicated by color. These plots suggested that although most terms had similar diurnal and weekday search patterns per season, in some cases, features varied by season. For example, “dry eyes” tended to have more RSV overall throughout the hours of winter and spring, but also exhibited a strong morning peak seen in summer weekends, as did “watery eyes” in winter and spring weekends.”

Figure 2. Average hourly cyclic pattern per weekday from 2018 for 10 US states combined.
View this figure
Table 1. Cyclical diurnal or day-of-week characteristics of relative search values.
Search termsCircular median timesaAmplitude-to-mean ratio

WeekdayWeekendDifference, hrsWeekdaybWeekendDifferencec
“blurry eyes”00:39 (00:18, 00:59)01:09 (00:40, 01:37)0-20.37 (0.33, 0.47)0.42 (0.39, 0.59)0.02 (–0.04 to 0.08)
“cataracts”15:28 (15:11, 15:45)18:35 (17:12, 20:15)2-40.26 (0.24, 0.3)0.18 (0.15, 0.25)–0.05 (–0.08 to –0.02)
“conjunctivitis”06:11 (06:02, 06:21)05:54 (05:46, 06:03)0-20.62 (0.59, 0.66)0.77 (0.72, 0.84)0.04 (0 to 0.07)
“contact lenses”23:16 (22:59, 23:32)02:29 (01:57, 03:02)2-40.43 (0.41, 0.47)0.38 (0.35, 0.43)–0.03 (–0.06 to –0.01)
“dry eyes”02:13 (02:07, 02:20)03:38 (03:28, 03:48)0-20.61 (0.58, 0.66)0.85 (0.79, 0.95)0.12 (0.08 to 0.17)
“glaucoma”13:24 (13:14, 13:34)00:13 (21:41, 02:52)4-60.38 (0.36, 0.41)0.15 (0.12, 0.19)–0.15 (–0.17 to –0.13)
“lasik”11:51 (11:33, 12:09)06:00 (05:10, 06:51)4-60.28 (0.25, 0.31)0.24 (0.2, 0.28)–0.03 (–0.06 to –0.01)
“pink eye”04:35 (04:33, 04:38)05:38 (05:33, 05:43)0-21.6 (1.56, 1.64)1.08 (1.04, 1.11)–0.26 (–0.29 to –0.24)
“visine”00:37 (00:17, 00:56)00:37 (00:08, 01:04)0-20.41 (0.35, 0.5)0.43 (0.38, 0.55)0.03 (–0.03 to 0.09)
“watery eyes”01:49 (01:41, 01:56)03:50 (03:35, 04:07)2-40.67 (0.63, 0.74)0.48 (0.45, 0.58)–0.07 (–0.12 to –0.03)

aThe average filtered and detrended circular median time (and 95% CI) for each term for weekdays and weekend days. We found evidence that the CIs of the coefficients measuring diurnality excluded zero, indicating statistically significant diurnal variation (P<.001 for all values).

bPeak-to-trough divided by mean value to normalize the scalar difference. A larger average daily amplitude-to-mean ratios value indicates a more pronounced diurnal pattern.

cAllows a comparison of weekday to weekend diurnal cycle amplitude-to-mean ratios (ie, a comparison of cyclic strengths), providing the average difference (and 95% CI) between weekday vs weekend amplitude-to-mean ratios. Negative values indicate stronger weekday cyclic strength, and positive values indicate stronger weekend cyclic strength. Values further from 0 indicate a larger difference between weekdays and weekend days. This column is a difference in amplitudes divided by the average of the weekend and weekday means, not a difference between the previous two columns.

Figure 3. Average hourly cyclic pattern per season for weekdays (solid) and weekend days (dashed) from 2018 for 10 US states combined.
View this figure

Statistical Analysis of Cyclic Patterns

Following smoothing and detrending, the resulting data set was used for all subsequent statistical analyses and data visualizations. The results for all terms are presented in Table 1. Columns 2-3 provide weekday and weekend circular median times, and column 4 provides differences between weekday and weekend for the peak times. Columns 5-6 provide amplitude-to-mean ratios. Column 7 provides a comparison of weekend to weekday cyclic ratios (values further from zero indicate larger differences, negative values indicate stronger weekday cyclic strength, and confidence intervals crossing zero indicate no significant difference).

For all terms, diurnal cyclic patterns were significant on weekdays and on weekends (P<.001 for all terms). Characteristics differed by search terms. Of the eye-related terms, “pink eye” had the strongest diurnal cyclic patterns based on amplitude-to-mean ratios, with stronger signal restricted to a narrow time window and peaking all mornings within the same 1-hour period. This showed a higher amplitude on weekdays (Table 1, columns 5-7; Figures 2 and 3). “Conjunctivitis” also had one of the stronger diurnal cyclic patterns, but lower than “pink eye,” with a slightly later morning circular median time and less cyclic strength difference between weekend and weekday. In contrast to “pink eye,” “dry eyes” exhibited a stronger diurnal pattern on weekends, with stronger signal occurring over a broader evening-to-morning time window, peaking in early morning and most significantly on Sunday mornings (Table 1, columns 5-7; Figure 2 and 3). Similar to “pink eye” though, “dry eyes” circular median times were nearby on weekday compared to weekend. By contrast, weekday vs weekend circular median times for “cataracts,” “glaucoma,” and “lasik” were less aligned, and weekday RSV was larger than weekend overall for these terms (Table 1, column 4; Figures 2 and 3). As a positive control, the term “drunk” exhibited a strong amplitude-to-mean ratio that was strongest from late evening through early morning on weekends (data not shown), reflecting late-evening alcohol consumption.


Principal Findings

Web-based search behavior patterns for terms related to common eye conditions and treatments exhibited significant unique cyclic diurnal variation. This suggests that leveraging infodemiological approaches such as those demonstrated in this study can add information to our understanding of the times of day and night when different ocular conditions may be of the most or least perturbance or concern to patients. This may help augment our traditional understanding of ocular conditions, which has been based predominantly upon assessing patients with ophthalmology conditions during typical clinic hours. We observed that features occurring outside of typical clinic hours can differ between ophthalmologic condition–related search terms. For example, “pink eye” showed larger diurnal amplitude-to-mean ratios over a short daily weekday morning time period, while other terms such as “dry eyes” had a larger amplitude diurnal pattern on weekends, with stronger signal occurring over a broader evening-to-morning period compared to “pink eye.”

For some individual search terms, we also found significant differences in diurnal search patterns on weekdays vs weekends for that term. This suggests infodemiological approaches can provide new understanding of specific days of the week, and hours of those days, on which particular ophthalmologic conditions are most affecting patients. Such approaches can add to the ongoing research studies to understand critical times or days for severity or treatment of symptoms and conditions outside of standard clinic hours for ocular conditions, as has also been studied for other disease [28,31-37,52-57]. We also observed that diurnal search patterns can differ by time of year for some terms, suggesting unique seasonal factors may affect the diurnal cycle of specific ocular conditions and raising the potential value of the approaches such as ours for enhancing the study of seasonal eye disease [29].

Limitations

Our study has potential for outliers, bias, and confounders. For example, an isolated event, such as a celebrity contracting conjunctivitis, could trigger an unusual search for “pink eye” at the time that the news story was reported. Similarly, an event such as a power outage could trigger temporary changes in search patterns. Furthermore, it is known that media coverage can impact search for COVID-19–related terms [13,14], and daily RSV can vary with data collection date [15,16]. To account for such aberrancies, we used a model with a regression-based filter to remove unusual surges or decreases such as isolated events and other irregular outliers (see Methods) and used averages from repeated queries and from multiple states and days to reduce potential imprecision. The results appeared stable in sensitivity analyses of the model. Although not incorrect, our approach used search keyword terms and did not allow query of search topics or health category; thus, the study of our health topics may not be fully complete. Future approaches comparing results from multiple years, and optimally using search topics and health categories for refinement in preliminary and final analyses, could provide additional model validation. Future applications of machine learning also has potential to improve the sensitivity and specificity of our model [11,58].

Despite these limitations, we found evidence in support of our model. For example, the results identified in our analyses often reflected components of known clinical understanding. The observed increase in hourly RSV from late night to early morning for “dry eyes” and “blurry eyes” is consistent with clinical reports of the symptoms [31,34]. Stronger amplitude for “dry eyes” observed on weekend mornings might represent elevated prior evening exposure to irritants such as smoke or alcohol, which have been reported to increase these symptoms [32,33]. The observed increase in hourly RSV from evenings to early mornings for “blurry eye,” “contact lenses,” “visine,” and “watery eye” may reflect increased evening and nighttime symptoms of contact lens wearers [35]. Similarly, observed increases in hourly RSV in mornings for “conjunctivitis” and “pink eye” may reflect clinical findings as well [28]. In comparison, diurnal search for “cataracts,” “glaucoma,” and “lasik” occurred more during weekdays at daytimes. This suggests information-seeking behavior related to ocular procedures or chronic conditions not associated with acute symptoms may be more likely to occur during the regular workday.

Conclusions

In this study, we establish evidence from web-based hourly search patterns that suggest there are distinct diurnal and weekly patterns undergirding web-based information-seeking behavior related to a variety of ophthalmologic symptoms and conditions. More precise temporal understanding of clinical eye disease presentation, hygiene, and health maintenance behaviors among patients outside of the clinic may be ascertained in the future through analysis of complementary data sources such as using web-based search data. This in turn could lead to improved approaches for diurnal eye disease monitoring and timing of resource allotment for ocular telemedicine, timely health care messaging, and clinical interventions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grant 1R01EY024608-01A1 (Lietman, PI) from the National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute (NIH-NEI), grant EY002162 (Core Grant for Vision Research—Ullian, PI) from the NIH-NEI, grants EY013124 and EY021558 (Chodosh, PI) from the National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute (NIH-NEI), and an Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (McLeod, PI). The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. E-collection 'Infodemiology and Infoveillance'. JMIR Publications.   URL: https://www.jmir.org/collection/view/69 [accessed 2021-08-10]
  2. Mavragani A. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020 Apr 28;22(4):e16206 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Mackey T, Baur C, Eysenbach G. Advancing Infodemiology in a Digital Intensive Era. JMIR Infodemiology 2022 Feb 14;2(1):e37115. [CrossRef]
  4. Samaras L, Sicilia M, García-Barriocanal E. Predicting epidemics using search engine data: a comparative study on measles in the largest countries of Europe. BMC Public Health 2021 Jan 21;21(1):100 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2009 Mar 27;11(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Hall J, Lo F, Saha S, Vaidyanathan A, Hess J. Internet searches offer insight into early-season pollen patterns in observation-free zones. Sci Rep 2020 Jul 09;10(1):11334 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance tracking online health information and cyberbehavior for public health. Am J Prev Med 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S154-S158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Tran HTT, Lu S, Tran HTT, Nguyen BV. Social Media Insights During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemiology Study Using Big Data. JMIR Med Inform 2021 Jul 16;9(7):e27116 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology: tracking flu-related searches on the web for syndromic surveillance. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:244-248 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  10. Bernardo TM, Rajic A, Young I, Robiadek K, Pham MT, Funk JA. Scoping review on search queries and social media for disease surveillance: a chronology of innovation. J Med Internet Res 2013 Jul 18;15(7):e147 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Mavragani A, Ochoa G. Google Trends in Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Methodology Framework. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019 May 29;5(2):e13439 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Pytrends: unofficial api for google trends. GitHub.   URL: https://github.com/GeneralMills/pytrends/blob/master/README.md [accessed 2019-02-16]
  13. Rovetta A. Reliability of Google Trends: Analysis of the Limits and Potential of Web Infoveillance During COVID-19 Pandemic and for Future Research. Front Res Metr Anal 2021 May 25;6:670226 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Sousa-Pinto B, Anto A, Czarlewski W, Anto JM, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Assessment of the Impact of Media Coverage on COVID-19-Related Google Trends Data: Infodemiology Study. J Med Internet Res 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e19611 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Sato K, Mano T, Iwata A, Toda T. Need of care in interpreting Google Trends-based COVID-19 infodemiological study results: potential risk of false-positivity. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021 Jul 18;21(1):147 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Rabiolo A, Alladio E, Morales E, McNaught AI, Bandello F, Afifi AA, et al. Forecasting the COVID-19 Epidemic by Integrating Symptom Search Behavior Into Predictive Models: Infoveillance Study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e28876 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Card KG, Lachowsky NJ, Hogg RS. Using Google Trends to Inform the Population Size Estimation and Spatial Distribution of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: Proof-of-concept Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021 Nov 29;7(11):e27385 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Prata N, Weidert K, Zepecki A, Yon E, Pleasants E, Sams-Abiodun P, et al. Using Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to Access Google Data and Gain Insights Into Searches on Birth Control in Louisiana and Mississippi, 2014-2018: Infoveillance Study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e25923 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Riem MME, De Carli P, Guo J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH, Lodder P. Internet Searches for Terms Related to Child Maltreatment During COVID-19: Infodemiology Approach. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021 Jul 13;4(3):e27974 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Zitting K, Lammers-van der Holst HM, Yuan RK, Wang W, Quan SF, Duffy JF. Google Trends reveals increases in internet searches for insomnia during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic. J Clin Sleep Med 2021 Feb 01;17(2):177-184 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Wang A, McCarron R, Azzam D, Stehli A, Xiong G, DeMartini J. Utilizing Big Data From Google Trends to Map Population Depression in the United States: Exploratory Infodemiology Study. JMIR Ment Health 2022 Mar 31;9(3):e35253 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Lekkas D, Gyorda JA, Price GD, Wortzman Z, Jacobson NC. Using the COVID-19 Pandemic to Assess the Influence of News Affect on Online Mental Health-Related Search Behavior Across the United States: Integrated Sentiment Analysis and the Circumplex Model of Affect. J Med Internet Res 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e32731 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Deiner MS, Seitzman GD, Kaur G, McLeod SD, Chodosh J, Lietman TM, et al. Sustained Reductions in Online Search Interest for Communicable Eye and Other Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Infodemiology 2022 Mar 16;2(1):e31732 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Xu C, Cao Z, Yang H, Gao Y, Sun L, Hou Y, et al. Leveraging Internet Search Data to Improve the Prediction and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases: Retrospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2020 Nov 12;22(11):e18998 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Rovetta A. The Impact of COVID-19 on Conspiracy Hypotheses and Risk Perception in Italy: Infodemiological Survey Study Using Google Trends. JMIR Infodemiology 2021;1(1):e29929 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Chejfec-Ciociano JM, Martínez-Herrera JP, Parra-Guerra AD, Chejfec R, Barbosa-Camacho FJ, Ibarrola-Peña JC, et al. Misinformation About and Interest in Chlorine Dioxide During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico Identified Using Google Trends Data: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Infodemiology 2022 Jan 27;2(1):e29894 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. An L, Russell DM, Mihalcea R, Bacon E, Huffman S, Resnicow K. Online Search Behavior Related to COVID-19 Vaccines: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Infodemiology 2021 Nov 12;1(1):e32127 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Smolensky MH, Portaluppi F, Manfredini R, Hermida RC, Tiseo R, Sackett-Lundeen LL, et al. Diurnal and twenty-four hour patterning of human diseases: acute and chronic common and uncommon medical conditions. Sleep Med Rev 2015 Jun;21:12-22. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Qassim A, Viki M, Ng SK, Jersmann H, Casson RJ. Climate and season: the effects on ophthalmic diseases. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017 May;45(4):385-392. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Sié A, Diarra A, Millogo O, Zongo A, Lebas E, Bärnighausen T, et al. Seasonal and Temporal Trends in Childhood Conjunctivitis in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018 Jul;99(1):229-232 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. Guillon M, Shah S. Rationale for 24-hour management of dry eye disease: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019 Apr;42(2):147-154. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Thomas J, Jacob GP, Abraham L, Noushad B. The effect of smoking on the ocular surface and the precorneal tear film. Australas Med J 2012;5(4):221-226 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Kim JH, Kim JH, Nam WH, Yi K, Choi DG, Hyon JY, et al. Oral alcohol administration disturbs tear film and ocular surface. Ophthalmology 2012 May;119(5):965-971. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Walker PM, Lane KJ, Ousler GW, Abelson MB. Diurnal variation of visual function and the signs and symptoms of dry eye. Cornea 2010 Jun;29(6):607-612. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Dumbleton KA, Guillon M, Theodoratos P, Patel T. Diurnal Variation in Comfort in Contact Lens and Non-contact Lens Wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2016 Aug;93(8):820-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Tana JC, Kettunen J, Eirola E, Paakkonen H. Diurnal Variations of Depression-Related Health Information Seeking: Case Study in Finland Using Google Trends Data. JMIR Ment Health 2018 May 23;5(2):e43 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Senecal C, Widmer RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Association of Search Engine Queries for Chest Pain With Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiology. JAMA Cardiol 2018 Dec 01;3(12):1218-1221 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Leffler CT, Davenport B, Chan D. Frequency and seasonal variation of ophthalmology-related internet searches. Can J Ophthalmol 2010 Jun;45(3):274-279. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Deiner MS, Lietman TM, McLeod SD, Chodosh J, Porco TC. Surveillance Tools Emerging From Search Engines and Social Media Data for Determining Eye Disease Patterns. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016 Sep 01;134(9):1024-1030 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Deiner MS, McLeod SD, Chodosh J, Oldenburg CE, Fathy CA, Lietman TM, et al. Clinical Age-Specific Seasonal Conjunctivitis Patterns and Their Online Detection in Twitter, Blog, Forum, and Comment Social Media Posts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018 Feb 01;59(2):910-920 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Berlinberg EJ, Deiner MS, Porco TC, Acharya NR. Monitoring Interest in Herpes Zoster Vaccination: Analysis of Google Search Data. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018 May 02;4(2):e10180 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Deiner MS, McLeod SD, Wong J, Chodosh J, Lietman TM, Porco TC. Google Searches and Detection of Conjunctivitis Epidemics Worldwide. Ophthalmology 2019 Sep;126(9):1219-1229 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Deiner MS, Seitzman GD, McLeod SD, Chodosh J, Hwang DH, Lietman TM, et al. Ocular Signs of COVID-19 Suggested by Internet Search Term Patterns Worldwide. Ophthalmology 2021 Jan;128(1):167-169 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Serfling RE. Methods for current statistical analysis of excess pneumonia-influenza deaths. Public Health Rep 1963 Jun;78(6):494-506 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  45. Serfling RE, Sherman IL, Houseworth WJ. Excess pneumonia-influenza mortality by age and sex in three major influenza A2 epidemics, United States, 1957-58, 1960 and 1963. Am J Epidemiol 1967 Sep;86(2):433-441. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Wang X, Wu S, MacIntyre CR, Zhang H, Shi W, Peng X, et al. Using an adjusted Serfling regression model to improve the early warning at the arrival of peak timing of influenza in Beijing. PLoS One 2015 Mar 10;10(3):e0119923 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. Variable selection - A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biom J 2018 May 02;60(3):431-449 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Kreiss J, Lahiri S. Bootstrap methods for time series. In: Time Series Analysis: Methods and Applications. Oxford, UK: El-Sevier; 2012:3-26.
  49. Vanalli C, Casagrandi R, Gatto M, Bevacqua D. Shifts in the thermal niche of fruit trees under climate change: The case of peach cultivation in France. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2021;300:108327 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  50. Deiner MS, Fathy C, Kim J, Niemeyer K, Ramirez D, Ackley SF, et al. Facebook and Twitter vaccine sentiment in response to measles outbreaks. Health Informatics J 2019 Sep 17;25(3):1116-1132 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Wickham H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Houston, Texas, USA: Springer; 2016.
  52. de Jong B, Brandi-Dohrn F, van der Meulen IJE, van den Berg TJTP, Wacker K. Diurnal Variation in Straylight in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy and Controls. Cornea 2022 Feb 05. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Yang Y, Zhang X, Chen Z, Wei Y, Ye Q, Fan Y, LiGHT China Trial Study Group. Intraocular pressure and diurnal fluctuation of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a baseline report from the LiGHT China trial cohort. Br J Ophthalmol 2022 Jan 27:bjophthalmol-2021-320128 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  54. Alenezi H, Ozkan J, Willcox M, Parnell G, Carnt N. Differential gene expression of the healthy conjunctiva during the day. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021 Jul 24:101494. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  55. Zander DB, Böhringer D, Fritz M, Grewing V, Maier PC, Lapp T, et al. Hyperosmolar Eye Drops for Diurnal Corneal Edema in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy: A Double-Masked, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology 2021 Nov;128(11):1527-1533 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. McGlumphy EJ, Mihailovic A, Ramulu PY, Johnson TV. Home Self-tonometry Trials Compared with Clinic Tonometry in Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2021 Nov;4(6):569-580. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Chakraborty R, Micic G, Thorley L, Nissen T, Lovato N, Collins M, et al. Myopia, or near-sightedness, is associated with delayed melatonin circadian timing and lower melatonin output in young adult humans. Sleep 2021 Mar 12;44(3):zsaa208. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. E-collection 'Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management'. JMIR Publications.   URL: https://publichealth.jmir.org/collection/view/304 [accessed 2021-08-10]


LASSO: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
RSV: relative search volume


Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 22.01.21; peer-reviewed by A Rovetta, A Mavragani; comments to author 26.03.21; revised version received 18.08.21; accepted 06.05.22; published 05.07.22

Copyright

©Michael S Deiner, Gurbani Kaur, Stephen D McLeod, Julie M Schallhorn, James Chodosh, Daniel H Hwang, Thomas M Lietman, Travis C Porco. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.07.2022.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.