This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Policy and Policy Proposals 

Advertisement: Preregister now for the Medicine 2.0 Congress

Works citing "e-Health Code of Ethics (May 24)"

Helga Rippen, Ahmad Risk
J Med Internet Res 2000 (May 24); 2(2):e9 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2.2.e9):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

1. Allam A, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. The Impact of Search Engine Selection and Sorting Criteria on Vaccination Beliefs and Attitudes: Two Experiments Manipulating Google Output. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(4):e100 [CrossRef]
2. Eysenbach G. The New Health-Related Top-Level Domains Are Coming: Will Go to the Highest Bidder?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e73 [CrossRef]
3. Forgie SE, Duff JP, Ross S. Twelve tips for using Twitter as a learning tool in medical education. Medical Teacher 2013;35(1):8 [CrossRef]
4. Abdel-Karim RI, Abdel-Halim AW, El-Elemi AH, Hagras AM, Ali NM. Evaluation of ethical and legal perspectives of physician–patient relationship on Arabic Health Websites. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012;2(2):73 [CrossRef]
5. Oh S, Yi YJ, Worrall A. Quality of health answers in social Q&A. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012;49(1):1 [CrossRef]
6. Soobrah R, Clark SK. Your patient information website: how good is it?. Colorectal Disease 2012;14(3):e90 [CrossRef]
7. Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. The quality of mental disorder information websites: A review. Patient Education and Counseling 2011;85(2):e16 [CrossRef]
8. Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P, Lange A, Ritterband L, Andersson G. Establishing Guidelines for Executing and Reporting Internet Intervention Research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2011;40(2):82 [CrossRef]
9. Strech D. Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;13(4):e113 [CrossRef]
10. Verhoeven F, Steehouder MF, Hendrix RM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. How nurses seek and evaluate clinical guidelines on the Internet. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010;66(1):114 [CrossRef]
11. Landman MP, Shelton J, Kauffmann RM, Dattilo JB. Guidelines for Maintaining a Professional Compass in the Era of Social Networking. Journal of Surgical Education 2010;67(6):381 [CrossRef]
12. Verhoeven F, Steehouder MF, Hendrix RM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Factors affecting health care workers’ adoption of a website with infection control guidelines. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(10):663 [CrossRef]
13. Hanif F, Read JC, Goodacre JA, Chaudhry A, Gibbs P. The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2009;34(4):231 [CrossRef]
14. Buhi ER, Daley EM, Fuhrmann HJ, Smith SA. An Observational Study of How Young People Search for Online Sexual Health Information. Journal of American College Health 2009;58(2):101 [CrossRef]
15. Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, Campo E. A review of smart homes—Present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2008;91(1):55 [CrossRef]
16. OWAIMRIN A, STEINBECK K. Accessibility for parents of weight management information on the Internet. Nutrition Dietetics 2006;63(2):117 [CrossRef]
17. Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Acar A, Calgan Z. What Is Missing on Their Web Sites? An Evaluation of National and International Pharmaceutical Companies in Turkey. Telemedicine and e-Health 2005;11(6):684 [CrossRef]
18. Martin-Facklam M, Kostrzewa M, Martin P, Haefeli WE. Quality of drug information on the World Wide Web and strategies to improve pages with poor information quality.  An intervention study on pages about sildenafil. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2003;57(1):80 [CrossRef]
19. Klischewski R, Wetzel I. Serviceflow management for health provider networks. Logistics Information Management 2003;16(3/4):259 [CrossRef]
20. Eysenbach G. An Ontology of Quality Initiatives and a Model for Decentralized, Collaborative Quality Management on the (Semantic) World Wide Web. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(4):e34 [CrossRef]
21. Dyer KA. Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Health on the Internet: A Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(2):e23 [CrossRef]
22. Mayer Pujadas M. Acreditar webs de contenido sanitario, ¿necesidad imposible?. Medicina Clínica 2001;116(13):496 [CrossRef]
23. Risk A, Dzenowagis J. Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(4):e28 [CrossRef]
24. Boulos MK, Roudsari A, Gordon C, Gray JM. The Use of Quality Benchmarking in Assessing Web Resources for the Dermatology Virtual Branch Library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(1):e5 [CrossRef]
25. Tatsumi H, Mitani H, Haruki Y, Ogushi Y. Internet Medical Usage in Japan: Current Situation and Issues. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(1):e12 [CrossRef]

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2.2.e9):

1. Remmers H, Hülsken-Giesler M. Human-Centered Design of E-Health Technologies. 2010. chapter:154 [CrossRef]