This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Retrieval 

Advertisement: Preregister now for the Medicine 2.0 Congress

Works citing "Retrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches"

Salimah Z Shariff, Shayna AD Bejaimal, Jessica M Sontrop, Arthur V Iansavichus, R Brian Haynes, Matthew A Weir, Amit X Garg
J Med Internet Res 2013 (Aug 15); 15(8):e164 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2624):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

1. Maroto Martín S, Casado Pardo J, Ávila de Tomás JF. Herramientas de búsqueda de información sanitaria de calidad. Más allá de los buscadores tradicionales. FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria 2014;21(3):176 [CrossRef]
2. Dodou D, de Winter J. Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 2014;36:487 [CrossRef]
3. Dodou D, de Winter J. Agreement between self-reported and registered colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Cancer Care 2014;:n/a [CrossRef]
4. Boeker M, Vach W, Motschall E. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13(1):131 [CrossRef]
5. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson P. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2013;2(1):115 [CrossRef]