JMIR Publications

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 16.11.11 in Vol 13, No 4 (2011): Oct-Dec

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Analysis of 4999 Online Physician Ratings Indicates That Most Patients Give Physicians a Favorable Rating"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1960):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Rastegar-Mojarad M, Ye Z, Wall D, Murali N, Lin S. Collecting and Analyzing Patient Experiences of Health Care From Social Media. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(3):e78
    CrossRef
  2. Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4):e257
    CrossRef
  3. Hao H. The Development of Online Doctor Reviews in China: An Analysis of the Largest Online Doctor Review Website in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(6):e134
    CrossRef
  4. Emmert M, Halling F, Meier F. Evaluations of Dentists on a German Physician Rating Website: An Analysis of the Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(1):e15
    CrossRef
  5. &NA; . Committee Opinion No. 622. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2015;125(2):516
    CrossRef
  6. Lewis P, Kobayashi E, Gupta S. An Online Review of Plastic Surgeons in Southern California. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2015;74:S66
    CrossRef
  7. Grabner-Kräuter S, Waiguny MK. Insights Into the Impact of Online Physician Reviews on Patients’ Decision Making: Randomized Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(4):e93
    CrossRef
  8. Li S, Feng B, Chen M, Bell RA. Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor. Journal of Health Communication 2015;20(4):453
    CrossRef
  9. Griffis HM, Kilaru AS, Werner RM, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Hill S, Ha YP, Sellers A, Mahoney K, Merchant RM. Use of Social Media Across US Hospitals: Descriptive Analysis of Adoption and Utilization. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(11):e264
    CrossRef
  10. Wong CA, Merchant RM, Moreno MA. Using social media to engage adolescents and young adults with their health. Healthcare 2014;2(4):220
    CrossRef
  11. Stewart Loane S, D'Alessandro S. Empowered and knowledgeable health consumers: The impact of online support groups on the doctor–patient relationship. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 2014;22(3):238
    CrossRef
  12. Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Röttl J. Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e97
    CrossRef
  13. Emmert M, Meier F, Heider A, Dürr C, Sander U. What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy 2014;118(1):66
    CrossRef
  14. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  15. Ferrara S, Hopman WM, Leveridge M. Diagnosis, Bedside Manner and Comment Style are Predictive Factors in Online Ratings of Urologists. Urology Practice 2014;1(3):117
    CrossRef
  16. Kordzadeh N, Warren J. Toward a typology of health 2.0 collaboration platforms and websites. Health and Technology 2013;3(1):37
    CrossRef
  17. Emmert M, Meier F, Pisch F, Sander U. Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e187
    CrossRef
  18. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(4):e85
    CrossRef
  19. Zusman EE. Managing an Online Reputation. Neurosurgery 2013;72(4):N11
    CrossRef
  20. Belle JM, Feld KA, Feld AD. Internet Liability for Gastroenterologists: Select Issues From Social Networking to Doctor Rating Sites. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2013;11(8):883
    CrossRef
  21. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(2):e24
    CrossRef
  22. Emmert M, Meier F. An Analysis of Online Evaluations on a Physician Rating Website: Evidence From a German Public Reporting Instrument. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e157
    CrossRef
  23. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269
    CrossRef
  24. Mccallum ML, Bury GW. Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodiversity and Conservation 2013;22(6-7):1355
    CrossRef
  25. Mueller MA, Glassett TS, Burke SM, Nichter LS. Protecting a Plastic Surgeonʼs Reputation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2013;131(4):670e
    CrossRef
  26. Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e38
    CrossRef
  27. Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, Millett C. Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(5):e146
    CrossRef
  28. Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, Thurston I, Brooks K, Puccia R. Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(2):e50
    CrossRef
  29. Strech D. Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;13(4):e113
    CrossRef