This paper is in the following e-collections/theme issues:

Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers  Medicine 2.0'11 (Stanford)  Medicine 2.0'11 (Full Paper of Conference Presentation) 


Advertisement: Preregister now for the Medicine 2.0 Congress

Works citing "Analysis of 4999 Online Physician Ratings Indicates That Most Patients Give Physicians a Favorable Rating"

Bassam Kadry, Larry F Chu, Bayan Kadry, Danya Gammas, Alex Macario
J Med Internet Res 2011 (Nov 16); 13(4):e95 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1960):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

 
1. Ferrara S, Hopman WM, Leveridge M. Diagnosis, Bedside Manner and Comment Style Are Predictive Factors in 3,288 Patients’ Online Ratings of Urologists. Urology Practice 2014; [CrossRef]
 
2. Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Röttl J. Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e97 [CrossRef]
 
3. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56 [CrossRef]
 
4. Emmert M, Meier F, Heider A, Dürr C, Sander U. What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy 2014; [CrossRef]
 
5. Emmert M, Meier F, Pisch F, Sander U. Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e187 [CrossRef]
 
6. Emmert M, Meier F. An Analysis of Online Evaluations on a Physician Rating Website: Evidence From a German Public Reporting Instrument. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e157 [CrossRef]
 
7. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(2):e24 [CrossRef]
 
8. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269 [CrossRef]
 
9. Mueller MA, Glassett TS, Burke SM, Nichter LS. Protecting a Plastic Surgeonʼs Reputation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2013;131(4):670e [CrossRef]
 
10. Kordzadeh N, Warren J. Toward a typology of health 2.0 collaboration platforms and websites. Health and Technology 2013;3(1):37 [CrossRef]
 
11. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(4):e85 [CrossRef]
 
12. Mccallum ML, Bury GW. Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodiversity and Conservation 2013;22(6-7):1355 [CrossRef]
 
13. Belle JM, Feld KA, Feld AD. Internet Liability for Gastroenterologists: Select Issues From Social Networking to Doctor Rating Sites. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2013;11(8):883 [CrossRef]
 
14. Zusman EE. Managing an Online Reputation. Neurosurgery 2013;72(4):N11 [CrossRef]
 
15. Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, Millett C. Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(5):e146 [CrossRef]
 
16. Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e38 [CrossRef]
 
17. Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, Thurston I, Brooks K, Puccia R. Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(2):e50 [CrossRef]
 
18. Strech D. Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;13(4):e113 [CrossRef]