Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 27.09.11 in Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Jul-Sep

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1241):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Mowforth OD, Davies BM, Kotter MR. Quality of Life Among Informal Caregivers of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2019;8(4):e12381
    CrossRef
  2. O'Brien KK, Solomon P, Worthington C, Ibáñez-Carrasco F, Baxter L, Nixon SA, Baltzer-Turje R, Robinson G, Zack E. Considerations for Conducting Web-Based Survey Research With People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e81
    CrossRef
  3. Koitsalu M, Eklund M, Adolfsson J, Grönberg H, Brandberg Y. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  4. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen MB. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e24
    CrossRef
  5. Berman DM, Tan L, Cheng TL. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics in Review 2015;36(8):364
    CrossRef
  6. Brasel K, Haider A, Haukoos J. Practical Guide to Survey Research. JAMA Surgery 2020;155(4):351
    CrossRef
  7. Anderson AH, Carter M, Stephenson J. Perspectives of University Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2018;48(3):651
    CrossRef
  8. De Rosis S, Cerasuolo D, Nuti S. Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy. BMC Health Services Research 2020;20(1)
    CrossRef
  9. Huppelschoten AG, Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Cohlen BJ, Kremer JA, Nelen WLM. Feedback to professionals on patient-centered fertility care is insufficient for improvement: a mixed-method study. Fertility and Sterility 2013;99(5):1419
    CrossRef
  10. . Unpacking the black box of survey costs. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 2021;17(7):1342
    CrossRef
  11. Sjetne IS, Iversen HH, Holmboe O, Helgeland J. Response probabilities and response-mode preferences in a self-administered survey. BMC Research Notes 2019;12(1)
    CrossRef
  12. Movsas TZ, Yechieli R, Movsas B, Darwish-Yassine M. Partner’s Perspective on Long-term Sexual Dysfunction After Prostate Cancer Treatment. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016;39(3):276
    CrossRef
  13. Huppelschoten AG, van Duijnhoven NT, van Bommel PF, Kremer JA, Nelen WL. Do infertile women and their partners have equal experiences with fertility care?. Fertility and Sterility 2013;99(3):832
    CrossRef
  14. Balachandran A, Monga A, Duckett J. Management of female urinary incontinence: A survey of urogynaecologists’ view on the NICE guideline. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2016;36(4):487
    CrossRef
  15. Daikeler J, Bošnjak M, Lozar Manfreda K. Web Versus Other Survey Modes: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2020;8(3):513
    CrossRef
  16. Briet JP, Bot AG, Hageman MG, Menendez ME, Mudgal CS, Ring DC. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Validation of an Abbreviated Two-Item Questionnaire. Psychosomatics 2014;55(6):578
    CrossRef
  17. Yang M, Tan EC. Web-Based and Telephone Surveys to Assess Public Perception Toward the National Health Insurance in Taiwan: A Comparison of Cost and Results. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2015;4(2):e9
    CrossRef
  18. Faleiros F, Käppler C, Pontes FAR, Silva SSDC, Goes FDSND, Cucick CD. USE OF VIRTUAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND DISSEMINATION AS A DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY IN SCIENTIFIC STUDIES. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem 2016;25(4)
    CrossRef
  19. Helsten DL, Ben Abdallah A, Avidan MS, Wildes TS, Winter A, McKinnon S, Bollini M, Candelario P, Burnside BA, Sharma A. Methodologic Considerations for Collecting Patient-reported Outcomes from Unselected Surgical Patients. Anesthesiology 2016;125(3):495
    CrossRef
  20. Horevoorts NJ, Vissers PA, Mols F, Thong MS, van de Poll-Franse LV. Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(5):e111
    CrossRef
  21. Moody CM, Dewey CE, Niel L. Cross-sectional survey of cat handling practices in veterinary clinics throughout Canada and the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2020;256(9):1020
    CrossRef
  22. Mauz E, Hoffmann R, Houben R, Krause L, Kamtsiuris P, Gößwald A. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e64
    CrossRef
  23. Ernst SA, Brand T, Lhachimi SK, Zeeb H. Combining Internet‐Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial. Health Services Research 2018;53(2):879
    CrossRef
  24. Melnikov S, Ashkenazi T, Amara M, Peles Bortz A. Transcendental Spirituality and Acquaintance With the Activities of the Domestic National Transplant Center as Factors Shaping Attitudes Toward Organ Donation. Progress in Transplantation 2017;27(2):139
    CrossRef
  25. Schougaard LMV, Larsen LP, Jessen A, Sidenius P, Dorflinger L, de Thurah A, Hjollund NH. AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases. Quality of Life Research 2016;25(3):525
    CrossRef
  26. Gagné T, Agouri R, Cantinotti M, Boubaker A, Frohlich KL. How important are paper copies of questionnaires? Testing invitations modes when studying social inequalities in smoking among young adults. International Journal of Public Health 2014;59(1):207
    CrossRef
  27. Hjollund NHI, Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Riiskjær E, Schougaard LM. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2014;3(1):e5
    CrossRef
  28. Roos L, Taube W, Tuch C, Frei KM, Wyss T. Factors That Influence the Rating of Perceived Exertion After Endurance Training. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2018;13(8):1042
    CrossRef
  29. Hagan TL, Belcher SM, Donovan HS. Mind the Mode: Differences in Paper vs. Web-Based Survey Modes Among Women With Cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2017;54(3):368
    CrossRef
  30. Nakano H, Ishii K, Goto A, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Fujimori K. Development and Implementation of an Internet Survey to Assess Community Health in the Face of a Health Crisis: Data from the Pregnancy and Birth Survey of the Fukushima Health Management Survey, 2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(11):1946
    CrossRef
  31. Bot AGJ, Menendez ME, Neuhaus V, Mudgal CS, Ring D. The Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Questionnaires in Patients with Hand and Upper Extremity Illness. HAND 2013;8(2):210
    CrossRef
  32. Weigl K, Tikk K, Hoffmeister M, De Toni EN, Hampe J, Kolligs F, Klug SJ, Mansmann U, Nasseh D, Radlovic J, Schwab M, Schweigler D, Stephan A, Brenner H. A Web-based survey among adults aged 40–54 years was time effective and yielded stable response patterns. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;105:10
    CrossRef
  33. Feldman SF, Lapidus N, Cosnes J, Tiret E, Fonquernie L, Cabane J, Chazouilleres O, Surgers L, Beaussier M, Valleron A, Carrat F, Hejblum G. Comparing Inpatient Satisfaction Collected via a Web-Based Questionnaire Self-Completion and Through a Telephone Interview: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e293
    CrossRef
  34. Albers LF, Haj Mohammad SF, Husson O, Putter H, Pelger RC, Elzevier HW, Manten-Horst E. Exploring Communication About Intimacy and Sexuality: What Are the Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Health Care Professionals?. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology 2020;9(2):222
    CrossRef
  35. Rutherford C, Costa D, Mercieca-Bebber R, Rice H, Gabb L, King M. Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research 2016;25(3):559
    CrossRef
  36. Bjertnaes O, Iversen HH, Skrivarhaug T. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  37. Zhou WS, Wilson JF. Questionnaire with Acupuncturists to Investigate the Relationship Between the Governor Vessel and Dementia. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2020;13(2):53
    CrossRef
  38. Mlikotic R, Parker B, Rajapakshe R. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(3):e70
    CrossRef
  39. Huppelschoten AG, van Dongen AJCM, Philipse ICP, Hamilton CJCM, Verhaak CM, Nelen WLDM, Kremer JAM. Predicting dropout in fertility care: a longitudinal study on patient-centredness. Human Reproduction 2013;28(8):2177
    CrossRef
  40. Kilsdonk E, Wendel E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van Leeuwen F, van den Berg M, Jaspers M. Participation rates of childhood cancer survivors to self-administered questionnaires: a systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care 2017;26(6):e12462
    CrossRef
  41. Sa J, Samuel T, Chaput J, Chung J, Grigsby-Toussaint DS, Lee J. Sex and racial/ethnic differences in sleep quality and its relationship with body weight status among US college students. Journal of American College Health 2020;68(7):704
    CrossRef
  42. Krouwel EM, Albers LF, Nicolai MPJ, Putter H, Osanto S, Pelger RCM, Elzevier HW. Discussing Sexual Health in the Medical Oncologist’s Practice: Exploring Current Practice and Challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 2020;35(6):1072
    CrossRef
  43. Ito H, Tamura K, Wada T, Yamamoto T, Morita S, Abu-Raddad LJ. Is the network of heterosexual contact in Japan scale free?. PLOS ONE 2019;14(8):e0221520
    CrossRef
  44. Arafa A, Anzengruber F, Mostafa A, Navarini A. Perspectives of online surveys in dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2019;33(3):511
    CrossRef
  45. Hohwü L, Lyshol H, Gissler M, Jonsson SH, Petzold M, Obel C. Web-Based Versus Traditional Paper Questionnaires: A Mixed-Mode Survey With a Nordic Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e173
    CrossRef
  46. Braekman E, Drieskens S, Charafeddine R, Demarest S, Berete F, Gisle L, Tafforeau J, Van der Heyden J, Van Hal G. Mixing mixed-mode designs in a national health interview survey: a pilot study to assess the impact on the self-administered questionnaire non-response. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019;19(1)
    CrossRef
  47. Jang M, Vorderstrasse A. Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(4):e11865
    CrossRef
  48. Saramunee K, Krska J, Mackridge A, Richards J, Suttajit S, Phillips-Howard P. General public's views on pharmacy public health services: current situation and opportunities in the future. Public Health 2015;129(6):705
    CrossRef
  49. Huppelschoten AG, van Duijnhoven NT, Hermens RP, Verhaak C, Kremer JA, Nelen WL. Improving patient-centeredness of fertility care using a multifaceted approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13(1)
    CrossRef
  50. van Beusekom I, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer NF, Dongelmans DA, van der Schaaf M. Lessons learnt during the implementation of a web-based triage tool for Dutch intensive care follow-up clinics. BMJ Open 2018;8(9):e021249
    CrossRef
  51. Zhang C, Sun Z, Yang J, Xu T, Zhu L, Lang J. Comparative validity and reliability of the WeChat-based electronic and paper-and-pencil versions of the PISQ-12 for collecting participant-reported data in Chinese. Menopause 2021;28(3):318
    CrossRef
  52. Kuusio H, Seppänen A, Somersalo L, Jokela S, Castaneda AE, Abdulhamed R, Lilja E. Response Activity in Mixed-Method Survey Data Collection—The Methods Used in a Survey among the Foreign-Born Population in Finland (FinMonik). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(6):3300
    CrossRef
  53. Gandhi A, Duxbury P, Murphy J, Foden P, Lalloo F, Clancy T, Wisely J, Kirwan C, Howell A, Evans D. Patient reported outcome measures in a cohort of patients at high risk of breast cancer treated by bilateral risk reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2022;75(1):69
    CrossRef
  54. Wong HZ, Brusseleers M, Hall KA, Maiden MJ, Chapple LS, Chapman MJ, Hodgson CL, Gluck S. Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial. Australian Critical Care 2022;35(3):286
    CrossRef
  55. Oliveri S, Lanzoni L, Petrocchi S, Janssens R, Schoefs E, Huys I, Smith MY, Smith IP, Veldwijk J, de Wit GA, Pravettoni G. Opportunities and Challenges of Web-Based and Remotely Administered Surveys for Patient Preference Studies in a Vulnerable Population. Patient Preference and Adherence 2021;Volume 15:2509
    CrossRef
  56. Berman DM, Tan L, Cheng TL. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics In Review 2015;36(8):364
    CrossRef
  57. Riiskjær E, Schougaard LMV, Larsen LP, Hjøllund NH. Hvordan kan patientrapporterede oplysninger (PRO) bruges i klinisk praksis? – belyst med udgangspunkt i fire forskellige konsultationsmodeller. Nordisk sygeplejeforskning 2014;4(3):189
    CrossRef
  58. Haupt J, Shah N, Fifolt M, Jorge E, Glaeser P, Zisette J, Pruitt C. Pain Assessment in Pediatric Emergency Departments. Pediatric Emergency Care 2021;37(12):e1145
    CrossRef
  59. Berman DM, Tan L, Cheng TL. Surveys and Response Rates. Pediatrics In Review 2015;36(8):364
    CrossRef
  60. Nicholas HL, Halfacree KH, Mabbett I. Public Perceptions of Faecal Sludge Biochar and Biosolids Use in Agriculture. Sustainability 2022;14(22):15385
    CrossRef
  61. Morris AC, Ibrahim Z, Heslin M, Moghraby OS, Stringaris A, Grant IM, Zalewski L, Pritchard M, Stewart R, Hotopf M, Pickles A, Dobson RJB, Simonoff E, Downs J. Assessing the feasibility of a web‐based outcome measurement system in child and adolescent mental health services – myHealthE a randomised controlled feasibility pilot study. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2023;28(1):128
    CrossRef
  62. Myles L, Church TD. An industry survey of implementation strategies for clinical supply chain management of cell and gene therapies. Cytotherapy 2022;24(3):344
    CrossRef
  63. Hagström J, Woodford J, von Essen A, Lähteenmäki P, von Essen L. Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e056758
    CrossRef
  64. Neupert E, Gupta L, Holder T, Jobson SA. Athlete monitoring practices in elite sport in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sports Sciences 2022;40(13):1450
    CrossRef
  65. Stahl K, Groene O, Mockridge J. ASK ME!—Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey. PLOS ONE 2021;16(12):e0259252
    CrossRef
  66. Xu AL, Dunham AM, Enumah ZO, Humbyrd CJ. Patient understanding regarding opioid use in an orthopaedic trauma surgery population: a survey study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2021;16(1)
    CrossRef
  67. Frederigue-Lopes NB, Soldera DP, Silva JDM, Medina C, Moret ALM, de Souza Jacob RT. Caderno de experiências: um recurso terapêutico na audiologia educacional. CoDAS 2022;34(1)
    CrossRef
  68. Hermans L, Braekman E, Drieskens S, Demarest S. Organizing the health interview survey at the local level: design of a pilot study. Archives of Public Health 2022;80(1)
    CrossRef
  69. Elis J, Goerres A, Mayer S, Spies D. Mobilising Immigrant-Origin Voters into Survey Participation: The Effect of In-Person Canvassing Versus Postal Reminders on Response Rates in a Longitudinal Election Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022;
    CrossRef
  70. Vimalananda VG, Wormwood JB, Sitter KE, Fincke BG, Qian S, Tait MN, Meterko M. Adaptations for remote research work: a modified web-push strategy compared to a mail-only strategy for administering a survey of healthcare experiences. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2023;23(1)
    CrossRef
  71. Marilac Soalheiro L, de Jesus Brandão B, Paiva RVN, Dias Carvalho L, Menezes Paranhos RD, Ribeiro Barbosa PC, Guerrero-Vargas NN, Tamura EK. Familiarity of Brazilian psychologists with basic concepts in sleep science and chronobiology. Chronobiology International 2023;40(8):1072
    CrossRef
  72. Disher N, Scott J, Tyzik A, Golden S, Baker G, Hynes DM, Slatore CG. Evaluation of survey delivery methods in a national study of Veteran’s healthcare preferences. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2023;
    CrossRef
  73. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11)
    CrossRef
  74. Klee B, Costa D, Frese T, Knoechelmann A, Meyer G, Meyer T, Purschke O, Schildmann J, Steckelberg A, Mikolajczyk R. To Remind or Not to Remind During Recruitment? An Analysis of an Online Panel in Germany. International Journal of Public Health 2024;69
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1241):

  1. Mutepfa MM, Tapera R. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. 2018. Chapter 89-1:1
    CrossRef
  2. Mutepfa MM, Tapera R. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. 2019. Chapter 89:541
    CrossRef
  3. . Health Services Research. 2020. Chapter 20:237
    CrossRef
  4. Luzzi A, Fleischman A, Parvizi J. Rapid Recovery in Total Joint Arthroplasty. 2020. Chapter 19:295
    CrossRef
  5. Stoyanova R, Dimova R, Doykov I. Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors. 2019. Chapter 17:142
    CrossRef