JMIR Publications

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 23.02.15 in Vol 17, No 2 (2015): February

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Twitter Sentiment Predicts Affordable Care Act Marketplace Enrollment

    1Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    2Penn Medicine Social Media and Health Innovation Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    3Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    4Computer & Information Science Department and Positive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    5The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    6National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, United States

    7Penn Law School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    8Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Charlene A Wong, MD

    Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program

    University of Pennsylvania

    1303 Blockley Hall

    423 Guardian Dr

    Philadelphia, PA, 19104

    United States

    Phone: 1 215 573 2583

    Fax:1 215 573 2742

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Traditional metrics of the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and health insurance marketplaces in the United States include public opinion polls and marketplace enrollment, which are published with a lag of weeks to months. In this rapidly changing environment, a real-time barometer of public opinion with a mechanism to identify emerging issues would be valuable.

    Objective: We sought to evaluate Twitter’s role as a real-time barometer of public sentiment on the ACA and to determine if Twitter sentiment (the positivity or negativity of tweets) could be predictive of state-level marketplace enrollment.

    Methods: We retrospectively collected 977,303 ACA-related tweets in March 2014 and then tested a correlation of Twitter sentiment with marketplace enrollment by state.

    Results: A 0.10 increase in the sentiment score was associated with an 8.7% increase in enrollment at the state level (95% CI 1.32-16.13; P=.02), a correlation that remained significant when adjusting for state Medicaid expansion (P=.02) or use of a state-based marketplace (P=.03).

    Conclusions: This correlation indicates Twitter’s potential as a real-time monitoring strategy for future marketplace enrollment periods; marketplaces could systematically track Twitter sentiment to more rapidly identify enrollment changes and potentially emerging issues. As a repository of free and accessible consumer-generated opinions, this study reveals a novel role for Twitter in the health policy landscape.

    J Med Internet Res 2015;17(2):e51

    doi:10.2196/jmir.3812

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), often referred to as Obamacare, established health insurance marketplaces in 2013 to extend coverage to more Americans. The health insurance marketplaces, also known as “exchanges”, are Web-based platforms where consumers can compare and purchase health insurance plans [1]. In the marketplaces’ first year, the majority of US states used the federal marketplace on HealthCare.gov (eg, federally facilitated marketplace), while 17 states set up their own health insurance exchange websites (eg, state-based marketplace) [2]. However, the ACA has been publicly debated, and the marketplaces struggled with technical issues in the first open enrollment period from October 2013 to April 2014, which was the time period designated for consumers to purchase a new health insurance plan in the marketplaces [3-10].

    With such monumental and sometimes controversial changes, both supporters and opponents awaited measures of success or failure that included surveys of public support for the ACA and reports of marketplace enrollment, meaning the number of people purchasing health insurance plans in the marketplace (eg, marketplace plans) by state [11-14]. The release of these traditional metrics, however, lagged weeks to months. This delay was particularly relevant for the marketplaces as federal and state agencies worked to understand what was happening and address issues as they arose. In this rapidly changing environment, a real-time barometer of public opinion with a mechanism to identify emerging issues would have been valuable.

    Twitter, an online micro-blogging social media outlet that allows for measure of public sentiment, is a potential new tool to monitor the rollout of major health policy. Twitter sentiment (the positivity or negativity of tweets) has previously been used to measure public perception on a range of health topics, from disease outbreaks and disaster response to health care quality and health reform [15-18]. In the debate around the ACA, Twitter became a prominent platform for scrutiny and praise. Twitter members used hashtag terms #ACA and #Obamacare to track these conversations. In this study, we sought to evaluate Twitter’s role as a real-time barometer of public sentiment on the ACA and to determine if Twitter sentiment could be predictive of state-level marketplace enrollment.


    Methods

    Overview

    To evaluate the relationship between Twitter sentiment and marketplace enrollment, we retrospectively collected ACA-related tweets by state and then tested a correlation of Twitter sentiment with marketplace enrollment by state.

    Twitter Data Collection

    We collected ACA-related tweets from March 1-31, 2014, using the Twitter Search Application Programming Interface [19]. Specifically, we selected all tweets containing the terms “ACA”, “#ACA”, “Obamacare”, and “#Obamacare” (a total of 977,303 tweets) as well as those that were directed toward the Twitter account handles for HealthCare.gov (eg, @HealthCaregov) and the 17 state-based marketplace Twitter accounts (an additional 34,605 tweets; see Multimedia Appendix 1). Additionally, we collected a random sample of 977,303 tweets from March 2014 to use as a comparison group for the sentiment of ACA and Obamacare tweets.

    Tweet content and geolocation data, when available, were extracted. Twitter provides latitude and longitude coordinates or the self-reported location of the Twitter user. For the self-reported location, we matched the location text with state names, state abbreviations, and the 60 most populated cities in the United States. To verify this automatic technique, we manually examined 400 randomly selected mappings and found 99% accuracy.

    Twitter Sentiment

    Twitter sentiment was measured using the National Research Council (NRC) sentiment lexicon [20]. The lexicon contains a list of 54,120 words along with sentiment weights ranging from positive values for positive sentiment to negative values for negative sentiment (eg, the word “excellent” has a positive sentiment weight, while “awful” is negative). The NRC lexicon was created in a data-driven fashion by analyzing tweets with positive and negative sentiment hashtags. Specifically, Mohammad et al use the point-wise mutual information metric to find an association between words and their being a part of a tweet with a positive or negative sentiment hashtag [20]. The lexicon was validated against a hand-annotated set of tweets as part of the SemEval-2012 sentiment task and was found to perform with an F1 value of 0.65. We are not aware of any lexicon achieving better accuracy over a standard set of Twitter data.

    To apply the lexicon to a tweet, we computed the relative frequency for each word in the tweet (eg, the word frequency divided by total number of words in the tweet) and word sentiment scores per tweet by multiplying the sentiment weight by the relative frequency of each word. A single sentiment score for each tweet was produced by summing all word sentiment scores for the tweet. This is illustrated in the following equation where sentiment(word) is the NRC lexicon sentiment score for the word, frequency is the number of times the word occurred in the tweet, and frequency_all_words gives the number of (non unique) word instances in the tweet:

    sentiment score(tweet) = Σ wordεtweet sentiment(word) * frequency(word, tweet)/frequency_all_words(tweet)

    These scores were then standardized by Z scores, and a state’s sentiment score was calculated as the average sentiment of tweets in the state.

    The NRC sentiment lexicon has been used to produce state-of-the-art accuracies for general domain tweets [20]. However, because our ACA corpus of tweets is biased compared to general tweets, we validate the NRC sentiment lexicon over our tweets. We randomly sampled 300 tweets from our corpus and had 2 raters score the sentiment from -3 (extremely negative) to 0 (neutral) to 3 (extremely positive); interrater reliability was strong (intraclass correlation=.72). We found the NRC sentiment lexicon was significantly correlated with the mean of the human ratings (r=.26; P<.001).

    Marketplace Enrollment Data

    We used health insurance marketplace enrollment data by state from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and the Kaiser Family Foundation, which provides the number of people who selected a new health insurance plan in the marketplaces through March 31 and the special extended enrollment period through April 19, 2014 [12,21]. The total number of consumers eligible to enroll in a marketplace plan included legally residing individuals who were uninsured or purchased non-group coverage, had incomes above Medicaid/CHIP eligibility levels, and who did not have access to employer-sponsored coverage. The estimate excluded uninsured individuals with incomes below the federal poverty level in states that did not expand Medicaid [12,22]. The percent eligible who selected a plan represented the number of participants who selected a marketplace plan (with or without receipt of the first premium payment) divided by the total number of consumers eligible to enroll in a marketplace plan.

    Data Analysis

    Descriptive statistics and paired t tests were used to assess Twitter sentiment for ACA and Obamacare tweets, tweets directed to (eg @) the HealthCare.gov handle and state-based marketplace handles, and the random sample of comparator tweets. State Twitter sentiment for tweets containing ACA, #ACA, Obamacare, or #Obamacare were mapped using ArcGIS version 10.1.

    The correlation between sentiment for ACA and Obamacare tweets and the percent of eligible individuals who selected a marketplace plan was assessed using a linear regression with robust standard errors. Adjusted analysis controlling for state Medicaid expansion [22] and if a state had a state-based or federally facilitated marketplace [2] were also conducted. Vermont was excluded as an outlier since their enrollment rate was over 2.5 standard deviations above the mean.

    All analyses were conducted using STATA 13.1. The study was deemed exempt by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board.


    Results

    Sentiment for ACA and Obamacare tweets was significantly more negative compared to the random sample of tweets (0.44 standard deviations [SD] lower, P<.001). Tweets containing ACA or #ACA had a higher sentiment compared to those with Obamacare or #Obamacare (0.46 SD higher; P<.001). The sentiment of tweets at the HealthCare.gov handle was 0.20 SD lower than tweets at the state-based marketplace handles (P<.001). Table 1 provides examples of positive and negative sentiment tweets.

    Of the 977,303 tweets, 449,553 (46.00%) were geocoded to the state level. Figure 1 shows the state-level distribution of Twitter sentiment for ACA and Obamacare. The mean percent eligible enrolled across states was 23.5% (SD 11.7%).

    A 0.10 increase in sentiment score was associated with an 8.7% increase in enrollment at the state level (95% CI 1.32-16.13; P=.02) (Figure 2). The correlation remained significant when adjusting for state Medicaid expansion (P=.02) or whether states had a state-based or federally facilitated marketplace (P=.03).

    Table 1. Sample tweets with positive and negative sentiment for ACA, Obamacare, and the health insurance marketplaces.
    View this table
    Figure 1. Sentiment of tweets about the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare by state, March 2014. Twitter sentiment (the positivity or negativity of tweets with higher sentiment scores indicating more positive sentiment) are presented in quartiles.
    View this figure
    Figure 2. Correlation between Twitter sentiment and health insurance marketplace enrollment by state, March 2014. Abbreviations indicate US state. Vermont excluded due to outlier marketplace enrollment.
    View this figure

    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    In our study conducted during the first open enrollment period of the health insurance marketplaces, we identified a significant correlation at the US state level between the ACA-related Twitter sentiment and the percent of eligible individuals who enrolled in a marketplace plan under the ACA. This correlation indicates the potential for Twitter to be a real-time monitoring strategy for future health insurance marketplace enrollment periods. Marketplaces could leverage systematic tracking of Twitter sentiment through commercially available software packages to more rapidly identify signals that indicate changes in marketplace enrollment, including emerging issues [23]. For example, a down-trending Twitter sentiment may indicate a problem in the marketplace, which could be further delineated by examining the content of negatively skewed tweets.

    Strengths and Limitations

    Our study was limited by examination of a single month of Twitter and marketplace enrollment data, though March 2014 enrollment surpassed all prior months [21]. Further analyses are needed to assess if the correlation remains robust in the next open enrollment period and if content analyses could be used to address emerging issues in real time. Additionally, non-geocoded tweets that were excluded from analysis may have differed from those that were geocoded, though the absolute Twitter sentiment for each group was similar. Finally, further examination of states in which Twitter sentiment and marketplace enrollment were discordant are needed.

    Of note, some studies using social media have recently come under scrutiny for manipulating people and violating their privacy [24,25]. Concern for such research was directed toward both the use of private data and the performance of an intervention without a clear informed consent. Neither of those properties apply to this study: we used public archival data and did not attempt to intervene on Twitter users’ lives. We believe studies like ours, which simply present statically grounded observations over public data, pose no risk to individuals and present no ethical concerns. Our study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institutional Review Board under “exempt” status.

    Conclusions

    Twitter is a repository of free and accessible consumer-generated opinions [26]. Our study adds to a body of work indicating that Twitter is an emerging part of the health and health policy landscape [15,27-30]. The novel methodology used in our study linking Twitter sentiment to ACA implementation data may be an innovative way to inform how to improve the health care system in real time and may be applicable to other settings as health policy is implemented [15]. As the public debate over the ACA continues and federal and state marketplaces deal with the November 2014 open enrollment session, those managing the marketplaces and monitoring the ACA rollout may consider adding Twitter to their data and evaluation toolkit.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Marcus Bachuber, MD (Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania) for his assistance in figure preparation.

    Conflicts of Interest

    Tom Baker and Robert Town are two of the co-founders of Picwell, Inc., a health information/technology company that leverages big data and predictive analytics to help consumers optimize health plan choice.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Twitter handles for state-based health insurance marketplaces.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 3KB

    References

    1. Crowley RA, Tape TG. Health policy basics: health insurance marketplaces. Ann Intern Med 2013 Dec 3;159(11):784-786. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. The Commonwealth Fund. State Action to Establish Health Insurance Marketplaces   URL: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/interactives-and-data/maps-and-data/state-exchange-map [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    3. Hamel L, Firth J, Brodie M. Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: February 2014.   URL: http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-february-2014/ [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    4. Collins SR, Rasmussen PW, Doty MM, Garber T, Blumenthal D. Americans' experiences in the health insurance marketplaces: results from the first month. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2013 Nov;31:1-19. [Medline]
    5. Rigby E, Clark JH, Pelika S. Party politics and enactment of "Obamacare": a policy-centered analysis of minority party involvement. J Health Polit Policy Law 2014 Feb;39(1):57-95. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Oberlander J. The future of Obamacare. N Engl J Med 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2165-2167. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Jones DK, Bradley KW, Oberlander J. Pascal's Wager: health insurance exchanges, Obamacare, and the Republican dilemma. J Health Polit Policy Law 2014 Feb;39(1):97-137. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Jones DK, Greer SL. State politics and the creation of health insurance exchanges. Am J Public Health 2013 Aug;103(8):e8-e10. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. McCarthy M. Obama promises to fix troubled health insurance exchange website. BMJ 2013;347:f6429. [Medline]
    10. Bagley N, Jones DK, Jost TS. Predicting the fallout from King v. Burwell--exchanges and the ACA. N Engl J Med 2015 Jan 8;372(2):101-104. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Collins SR, Rasmussen PW, Doty MM, Garber T. What Americans think of the new insurance marketplaces and Medicaid expansion: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Marketplace Survey, 2013. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2013 Sep;27:1-20. [Medline]
    12. Marketplace Enrollment as a Share of the Potential Marketplace Population.   URL: http:/​/kff.​org/​health-reform/​state-indicator/​marketplace-enrollment-as-a-share-of-the-potential-marketplace-population/​ [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    13. Gostin LO. The Supreme Court's historic ruling on the Affordable Care Act: economic sustainability and universal coverage. JAMA 2012 Aug 8;308(6):571-572. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Bias TK, Fitzgerald MP, Gurley-Calvez T. Strategies for policy evaluation of health insurance marketplaces. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015;21(1):62-68. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. King D, Ramirez-Cano D, Greaves F, Vlaev I, Beales S, Darzi A. Twitter and the health reforms in the English National Health Service. Health Policy 2013 May;110(2-3):291-297. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Greaves F, Ramirez-Cano D, Millett C, Darzi A, Donaldson L. Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2013 Mar;22(3):251-255. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One 2011;6(5):e19467 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med 2011 Jul 28;365(4):289-291. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. The Twitter REST API.   URL: https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    20. Mohammad SM, Kiritchenko S, Zhu X. NRC-Canada: Building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. 2013 Presented at: The seventh international workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises, June; 2013; Atlanta, USA.
    21. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Department of Health & Human Services. 2014 May 01. Health Insurance Marketplace: Summary enrollment report for the initial annual open enrollment period   URL: http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2014/marketplaceenrollment/apr2014/ib_2014apr_enrollment.pdf [accessed 2015-02-14] [WebCite Cache]
    22. Status of State Action on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, 2014.   URL: http:/​/kff.​org/​health-reform/​state-indicator/​state-activity-around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable-care-act/​ [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    23. Davidson C. Captico: Technology and Marketing. 2010. 12 tools for tracking Twitter sentiment   URL: http://captico.com/12-tools-for-tracking-twitter-sentiment/2010/08 [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    24. Kramer AD, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-8790 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Conway M. Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(12):e290 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Moyer MW. Scientific American. 2014. Twitter to release all tweets to scientists   URL: http:/​/www.​scientificamerican.com/​article/​twitter-to-release-all-tweets-to-scientists-a-trove-of-billions-of-tweets-will-be-a-research-boon-and-an-ethical-dilemma/​ [accessed 2014-08-27] [WebCite Cache]
    27. McKee M, Cole K, Hurst L, Aldridge RW, Horton R. The other Twitter revolution: how social media are helping to monitor the NHS reforms. BMJ 2011;342:d948. [Medline]
    28. Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: a systematic review. Milbank Q 2014 Mar;92(1):7-33. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Harris JK, Moreland-Russell S, Choucair B, Mansour R, Staub M, Simmons K. Tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's electronic cigarette Twitter campaign. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(10):e238 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Wehner MR, Chren MM, Shive ML, Resneck JS, Pagoto S, Seidenberg AB, et al. Twitter: an opportunity for public health campaigns. Lancet 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):131-132. [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    ACA: Affordable Care Act
    NRC: National Research Council


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 26.08.14; peer-reviewed by S Mohammad, R Wilson; comments to author 24.11.14; revised version received 01.01.15; accepted 16.01.15; published 23.02.15

    ©Charlene A Wong, Maarten Sap, Andrew Schwartz, Robert Town, Tom Baker, Lyle Ungar, Raina M Merchant. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.02.2015.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.