JMIR Publications

Select Journals for Content Updates

When finished, please click submit.

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 27.05.14 in Vol 16, No 5 (2014): May

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Do Cancer Patients Tweet? Examining the Twitter Use of Cancer Patients in Japan

    1Yamagata University Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamagata University, Yonezawa, Japan

    2Medical Informatics focus, Environmental Life Science major, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan

    3Department of Public Health, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan

    Corresponding Author:

    Hiroto Narimatsu, MD, PhD

    Department of Public Health

    Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine

    Yamagata University

    2-2-2

    Iida-nishi

    Yamagata, 990-9585

    Japan

    Phone: 81 (0)23 628 5260

    Fax:81 (0)23 628 5261

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Twitter is an interactive, real-time media that could prove useful in health care. Tweets from cancer patients could offer insight into the needs of cancer patients.

    Objective: The objective of this study was to understand cancer patients’ social media usage and gain insight into patient needs.

    Methods: A search was conducted of every publicly available user profile on Twitter in Japan for references to the following: breast cancer, leukemia, colon cancer, rectal cancer, colorectal cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer, stomach cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. We then used an application programming interface and a data mining method to conduct a detailed analysis of the tweets from cancer patients.

    Results: Twitter user profiles included references to breast cancer (n=313), leukemia (n=158), uterine or cervical cancer (n=134), lung cancer (n=87), colon cancer (n=64), and stomach cancer (n=44). A co-occurrence network is seen for all of these cancers, and each cancer has a unique network conformation. Keywords included words about diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments for almost all cancers. Words related to social activities were extracted for breast cancer. Words related to vaccination and support from public insurance were extracted for uterine or cervical cancer.

    Conclusions: This study demonstrates that cancer patients share information about their underlying disease, including diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments, via Twitter. This information could prove useful to health care providers.

    J Med Internet Res 2014;16(5):e137)

    doi:10.2196/jmir.3298

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Twitter: A Novel Social Media

    Twitter is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that enables its millions of users to send and read each other’s “tweets”, or short messages limited to 140 characters. The users themselves determine whether their tweets can be read by the general public or should be restricted to preselected “followers”. As of March 2012, the service had more than 200 million registered users and processed about 400 million tweets per day [1,2].

    A recent analysis of the “Twitter stream” revealed that a substantial proportion of tweets contain general chatter, that is, user-to-user conversations that are of interest only to the parties involved, links to interesting pieces of news, or spam and self-promotion [1]. Despite the high level of noise, the Twitter stream does contain useful information. Recently, we and other researchers demonstrated that Twitter is emerging as an important channel for communicating about cancer [3-7]. Many recent news events or scientific issues have been documented and discussed via Twitter directly from users on the site in real time [8]. Although the information that one tweet includes is limited, Twitter can convey more immediacy with interactivity than website homepages or blogs [1,9-12], such as the Association of Cancer Online Resources [9]. Thus, Twitter has the potential to play a different role in sharing medical information among patients.

    Twitter in Cancer Patients

    In a recent case study, we demonstrated that Twitter networks of cancer patients centered on active users and that these networks could provide psychological support for cancer patients [4]. Because of certain restrictions of the search tool, the study was not able to conduct a large-scale comprehensive qualitative analysis. Therefore, in the present study, we examine cancer patients’ social media usage by analyzing the data with a text mining method using an application programming interface (API) [2]. Thus, we were able to comprehensively analyze the Twitter data of cancer patients on a large scale.


    Methods

    Search for Twitter Accounts of Cancer Patients

    A search was conducted of every publicly available user profile on Twitter in Japan. We examined the number of user accounts in which the names of cancers are described in the profile. The search terms included breast cancer, leukemia, colon cancer, rectal cancer, colorectal cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer, stomach cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. These names were alternatively searched using “cancer” in the Japanese hiragana and katakana writing system and in Chinese characters. The site used for the profile search was “16 (one-six) Profile Search β Version for Twitter” [13], which enabled us to search, in addition to profiles, the number of follows, followers, tweets, lists, registered dates, and last posted dates. The search was conducted on August 18, 2013. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine (H24-133).

    Content Analysis of Tweets

    Using Twitter API, the latest tweets (maximum 200 tweets) from each account, found after the above search, were gathered. Twitter API is a function officially provided by the organization that operates Twitter to Twitter application developers in order to provide useful and convenient functions to Twitter users. By incorporating Twitter API into an application, the application developer can add Twitter functions such as Twitter search results or obtaining tweets from Twitter accounts [14].

    First, tweets obtained from each account through Twitter API were separated onto different lines with a period “.”. Subsequently, these were broken down into morphemes (“words”) using the Japanese language morpheme analysis software ChaSen (from the Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan). Here, the words were represented in their original forms. Nouns were then extracted from these words and were listed on separate lines. These nouns (“noun group”) listed in separate lines were then grouped together by account. Occasionally, verbs and adjectives are also extracted with text mining. However, in the present study, we did not extract verbs and adjectives for the following reasons: (1) difficulties in dealing with negative sentences, and (2) low percentage of the part of speech of the extracted word. In addition, nouns obtained that were synonyms were integrated into one noun. Synonyms were determined by the authors by referring to WordNet Web search services [15]. Dictionaries that contained words obtained from the descriptions on websites were used as the default for ChaSen (“cancer information services” [16] and “good health care” [17]).

    Tweets were obtained during the following dates and times: 0:39–2:52 on August 19, 2012, for stomach cancer, colon and colorectal cancer, and leukemia tweets; 14:40–17:24 on August 20, 2012, for uterine cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer tweets.

    Generation of Co-Occurrence Networks

    The procedure of generating the co-occurrence network is shown in Figure 1. Co-occurrence is the relation between the keywords that appear together in each tweet; thus, co-occurrence means a close relationship between words. In this study, we demonstrate the features of tweets by cancer patients by analyzing the co-occurrence of keywords.

    To accomplish this, we created co-occurrence networks using the following procedure: (1) the tweets from the cancer-related accounts were broken down into words using ChaSen, (2) from the noun groups that were combinations of two words, we counted the number of accounts where the words co-occurred at least once on the same line of a tweet, and (3) from the word combinations that co-occurred on the same line of a tweet, the top 100 most frequent combinations (the top 100 in number of accounts) were illustrated as a network with words depicted as nodes and combinations as links. Network analysis software Cytoscape [18] was used for the illustration. We first used the spring model as a node placement rule and subsequently made adjustments such that each word and each link overlapped as little as possible. The spring model is a method that can illustrate networks from the perspective of evenness of side length as well as uniformity and symmetry of node distribution. It regards each side as a spring that follows Hooke’s law and each node as an electrically charged particle that follows Coulomb’s law, and the layout is established by determining the equilibrium state [19].

    In the method we used to create co-occurrence networks in this study, as a way to handle the high frequency of extremely specialized tweets, the co-occurrence frequency of co-occurrence networks was defined as the number of accounts where words co-occurred in tweets, rather than the number of co-occurrences of words, which is typically done when creating co-occurrence networks. This then prevented extremely specialized words completely unrelated to cancer from appearing in the co-occurrence networks.

    Figure 1. Procedure for generating the co-occurrence network.
    View this figure

    Results

    The accounts we searched included references to breast cancer (n=313), leukemia (n=158), uterine and cervical cancer (n=134), lung cancer (n=87), colon cancer (n=64), and stomach cancer (n=44). The co-occurrence networks of those cancers are shown in Figure 2-7. Table 1 summarizes the keywords from tweets related to different types of cancer. Each cancer has a unique network conformation. The keywords included words about diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments for almost all cancers.

    Table 1. Summary of keywords in tweets according to cancer type.
    View this table
    Figure 2. Co-occurrence network of cancers: breast cancer.
    View this figure
    Figure 3. Co-occurrence network of cancers: leukemia.
    View this figure
    Figure 4. Co-occurrence network of cancers: uterine and cervical cancer.
    View this figure
    Figure 5. Co-occurrence network of cancers: lung cancer.
    View this figure
    Figure 6. Co-occurrence network of cancers: stomach cancer.
    View this figure
    Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of cancers: colon and colorectal cancer.
    View this figure

    Discussion

    Comprehensive Analysis of Tweets

    In this study, we used an information technology procedure to comprehensively analyze the content of cancer patients’ tweets. In previous studies, researchers verified each individual tweet, but this method restricted the range of Twitter information that could be obtained [4]. Moreover, a notable point of this analysis method was that we were able to exclude tweets unrelated to the diseases of interest. Using our method, information on tweets related to specific diseases can now be collected efficiently. Although we used this method to evaluate tweets from cancer patients, in the future, we plan to apply this method to the study of other diseases, for example, lifestyle-related diseases.

    Twitter data can be obtained from a variety of sources. In this study, we used Twitter API because it uses an automated approach to data retrieval and is free of charge. However, the number of tweets retrieved through Twitter API is capped at approximately 1% of all tweets, with no assurance of a random or representative sample [2]. Thus, retrieving Twitter’s full data stream through automated dashboard vendors or a Twitter data reseller may provide further findings.

    Tweets Related to the Cancers

    This study found that information related to cancer, such as treatment, diagnosis, and symptoms, is shared among cancer patients on Twitter (Table 1). Furthermore, the extracted keywords were considered to be medically important for that specific disease, reflecting the fact that cancer patients use Twitter as a tool for sharing medical information. Additionally, depending on the type of cancer, it was clear that there were specific characteristics to the tweet content. For example, in uterine or cervical cancer and breast cancer, there were keywords not related to immediate medical care, for example, “cervical cancer vaccine” for uterine or cervical cancer and “pink ribbon” for breast cancer. These most likely indicate that patients are also affected by the heightened social interest in a cervical cancer vaccine [20] and the social excitement of the pink ribbon movement. These topics were also covered by regular news media, such as TV or newspaper. This indicates that the content of tweets can be affected by those media.

    Conclusions and Future Directions

    We indicated in a previous study [4] that Twitter is useful for cancer patients to exchange ordinary information. As industries obtain and utilize tweet information from Twitter as marketing tools, health care will be able to retrieve, study, and make use of tweet information. In this study, we comprehensively and efficiently collected tweet information related to diseases, demonstrating that information about cancer patients can be collected on social media. Effective use of this information will be helpful in developing cancer care that better suits the patients’ needs. For example, health care providers can more effectively give information or medical services to patients, resulting in an increase in patient satisfaction.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by a Research Grant (H24-26, 24200701 to Dr Narimatsu) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    References

    1. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One 2011;6(5):e19467 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Kim AE, Hansen HM, Murphy J, Richards AK, Duke J, Allen JA. Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2013 Dec;2013(47):140-146. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. De la Torre-Díez I, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Antón-Rodríguez M. A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on Facebook and Twitter. Telemed J E Health 2012;18(6):404-408. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, Shao L, Otani K, Fukao A. Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:699 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Keim-Malpass J, Steeves RH. Talking with death at a diner: young women's online narratives of cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2012 Jul;39(4):373-8, 406. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Lyles CR, López A, Pasick R, Sarkar U. "5 mins of uncomfyness is better than dealing with cancer 4 a lifetime": an exploratory qualitative analysis of cervical and breast cancer screening dialogue on Twitter. J Cancer Educ 2013 Mar;28(1):127-133. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Grajales FJ, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Mandavilli A. Peer review: Trial by Twitter. Nature 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):286-287. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Association of Cancer Online Resources.   URL: http://www.acor.org/ [accessed 2014-04-02] [WebCite Cache]
    10. Narimatsu H, Matsumura T, Morita T, Kishi Y, Yuji K, Kami M, et al. Detailed analysis of visitors to cancer-related web sites. J Clin Oncol 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4219-4223. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Morita T, Narimatsu H, Matsumura T, Kodama Y, Hori A, Kishi Y, et al. A study of cancer information for cancer patients on the internet. Int J Clin Oncol 2007 Dec;12(6):440-447. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Huerta TR, Hefner JL, Ford EW, McAlearney AS, Menachemi N. Hospital website rankings in the United States: expanding benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e64 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. 16 (one-six) Profile Search β Version for twitter (in Japanese).   URL: http://www.16ps.jp/ [accessed 2014-02-04] [WebCite Cache]
    14. Twitter API.   URL: https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1.1 [accessed 2014-05-23] [WebCite Cache]
    15. Weblio.   URL: http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/ [accessed 2014-05-23] [WebCite Cache]
    16. ganjoho.   URL: http://ganjoho.jp [accessed 2014-05-23] [WebCite Cache]
    17. Health Goo.   URL: http://health.goo.ne.jp/ [accessed 2014-05-23] [WebCite Cache]
    18. Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Lotia S, et al. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods 2012 Nov;9(11):1069-1076 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Kamada T, Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters 1989 Apr;31(1):7-15. [CrossRef]
    20. Gilmour S, Kanda M, Kusumi E, Tanimoto T, Kami M, Shibuya K. HPV vaccination programme in Japan. Lancet 2013 Aug 31;382(9894):768. [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    API: application programming interface


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 03.02.14; peer-reviewed by Y Nakata, B Rimer; comments to author 14.03.14; revised version received 03.04.14; accepted 13.04.14; published 27.05.14

    ©Atsushi Tsuya, Yuya Sugawara, Atsushi Tanaka, Hiroto Narimatsu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 27.05.2014.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.