JMIR Publications

Select Journals for Content Updates

When finished, please click submit.

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 25.11.02 in Vol 4, No 2 (2002): Theme Issue: Disease Management and the Internet

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Editorial

    Internet use in disease management for home care patients: A call for papers

    1University of Missouri-Columbia, Health Management and Informatics, Missouri, USA

    2University of Toronto, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada

    Corresponding Author:

    George Demeris, PhD

    Assistant Professor

    Guest Editor, J Med Internet Res, Theme Issue "Disease Management and the Internet"

    Health Management and Informatics

    Email:


    J Med Internet Res 2002;4(2):e6)

    doi:10.2196/jmir.4.2.e6



    Disease Management and the Internet

    Disease Management refers to "a set of coordinated healthcare interventions and communications for populations with conditions in which patient self-care efforts are significant." [1] Disease management supports the care plan and enhances the provider-patient relationship. It emphasizes prevention of deterioration and/or complications using evidence-based practice guidelines. It aims to improve the patient's overall health by continuously assessing clinical and economic outcomes. The goals of disease management are to manage medical conditions over time, improve outcomes, lower costs, and support patient-provider interaction, patient education and monitoring.

    Patients with chronic illnesses account for a great portion of healthcare costs. An efficient disease management system should dramatically reduce medical and administrative costs, while enriching the physician-patient communication and improving health outcomes.

    Earlier efforts in utilizing information technology demonstrated the barriers of attempting to integrate systems without a common protocol and developing systems with a long implementation cycle and at increased overall costs. However, the diffusion of the Internet has the potential to empower patients and address these barriers by providing the means for technically flexible applications with shorter implementation cycles.

    Internet technologies are being utilized for disease management in many clinical areas in the last few years. In Textbox 1 some examples of web-based disease managementapplications are provided, grouped by clinical area. Internet technologies allow to connect patients with providers, link home-care with hospital and ambulatory care, facilitate information exchange, communication, and collaboration between and among patients, caregivers, and health care providers. Patient self-management education is a central component of disease management, and the Internet supports this by enabling the transmission of tailored health information or automated reminders to patients or their caregivers. Web-based electronic health records are another avenue of enhancing communication among stakeholders to coordinate care, and patient accessible records empower patients to improve self-care in the age of consumer health informatics [2]. The convergence of the Internet with everyday household items such as TV sets, refrigerators, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) and mobile phones [3] opens up new channels of communicating with patients through information technology and empowering them to manage their disease.


    Challenges for web-based disease management systems

    Factors that will be critical for the diffusion of Internet based disease management systems include design; privacy and confidentiality; patient and provider acceptance; costs and reimbursement structures; and access to and ownership of data.

    Usability

    A great number of home care patients who require disease management are elderly and/or have functional limitations. A functional limitation describes a "reduced sensory, cognitive or motor capability associated with human aging, temporary injury, or permanent disability that prevents a person from communicating, working, playing or simply functioning in an environment where other people in the population can function." [11]. Although the Internet seems to have the potential to revolutionize the process of health care delivery and empower patients to become more active in the care process, the fastest growing segment of the US population — i.e., people over the age of 50 years — are at a disadvantage because designers of both software and hardware technology fail to consider them as a potential user group. Usability and accessibility issues are important quality criteria for web-based interventions, but are frequently ignored by designers and evaluators [12]. The design of a usable web-based information system for healthy users who are familiar with computer technology is a challenge. When a system needs to address age-related constraints and the functional limitations of inexperienced users, it becomes even more difficult. Designers of a system for home care patients should aim to increase its functional accessibility [13] and employ rigorous usabiliy testing methods.


    Textbox 1. Examples of web-based disease management applications
    View this box

    Privacy and Confidentiality

    The healthcare sector worldwide is facing a great number of challenges and regulations in regard to the confidentiality, availability and integrity of individual health information. In the United States, the Notice of the Proposed Rule from the Department of Health and Human Services concerning Security and Electronic Signature Standards was introduced in 1998 [14]. The Proposed Rule falls under the umbrella of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) that was passed in 1996. This Proposed Rule became law in 2000 in the United States and suggests standards for the security of individual health information and electronic signature use for health care providers, systems and agencies. These will use the Security Standards to develop and maintain the security of all electronic health information. Similar frameworks exist in the European Union and Canada [15].

    Patient and provider acceptance

    The diffusion of an innovation depends to a great extent to the attitudes of the population to which it is being introduced to. This of course applies to web-based disease management applications as well where users (patients, caregivers, family members, providers) have to accept the use of technology and be willing to receive training and integrate the application into the care delivery process.

    Costs and reimbursement

    While there is some evidence demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of traditional disease management (e.g., a retrospective analysis of 7,000 patients found a $50 per member, per month savings in diabetes treatment costs over twelve months and eighteen percent decrease of admissions [16]) there is little evidence as of yet of the cost-effectiveness or even possible long term cost reduction through utilization of Internet in disease management. Cost analysis and/or cost-effectiveness studies will contribute to discussions about possible reimbursement issues of web-based monitoring services and the question of which party will bear the costs of implementing and maintaining such a web-based system.

    Access to and ownership of the data

    In many web-based applications in home care, patients enter or record monitoring data and transmit them daily to a web server owned and maintained by a private third party that allows providers to log in and access the data of their patients. The question of patients' rights to access parts or all of their record, the physical storage and access rights and the issue of data ownership become even more essential when monitoring data are stored physically at a separate location controlled by a private company. The implications are not only possible threats to data privacy but extend to ethical and political debates about restructuring the care delivery process and introducing new key players.


    Call for papers

    The Journal of Medical Internet Research is pleased to announce a theme issue on Internet utilization for disease management in home care. We invite researchers in this field to submit papers that focus on this area such as:

    • Studies (preferably randomized controlled trials) that demonstrate the impact of Internet utilization in disease management on
      • health outcomes
      • patient self-management education
      • cost of care
    • Papers that describe the development and evaluation of web-based disease management applications
    • Studies that address design issues for such applications
    • Studies that describe innovative web-based patient monitoring systems and/or devices (an evaluation component is strongly encouraged)
    • Studies that propose a sustainable and cost-effective model for web-based disease management
    • Manuscripts that address the issues of privacy and confidentiality of patient data (e.g. the impact of final HIPAA privacy rule on disease management via Internet for the US)
    • Critical comments and opinion papers
    • Systematic reviews synthesizing our current state of knowledge in this field

    All papers will undergo a normal peer-review process. Papers received before June 1st, 2003 will have the best chances for publication. The theme issue is planned to appear in late 2003. We will be actively looking for a sponsor of this theme issue, which will enable us to waive our usual article processing fee for papers published in this theme issue. The theme issue will be Medline-indexed and be made freely accessible on the web and possibly in a printed version.

    George Demiris, PhD

    Assistant Professor, Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri-Columbia

    DemirisG@health.missouri.edu

    Guest Editor, J Med Internet Res, Theme Issue "Disease Management and the Internet"

    Gunther Eysenbach, MD

    Associate Professor, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto

    Editor, J Med Internet Res

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    References

    1. Definition of Disease Management. Disease Management Association of America.   URL: http://www.dmaa.org/definition.html [accessed 2002 Sep 25] [WebCite Cache]
    2. Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1713-1716 [FREE Full text] [Medline] [CrossRef]
    3. Neville R, Greene A, Mcleod J, Tracy A, Surie J. Mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 2002 Sep 14;325(7364):600 [FREE Full text] [Medline] [CrossRef]
    4. Finkelstein J, O'connor G, Friedmann RH. Development and implementation of the home asthma telemonitoring (HAT) system to facilitate asthma self-care. Medinfo 2001;10(Pt 1):810-814. [Medline]
    5. Baker AM, Lafata JE, Ward RE, Whitehouse F, Divine G. A Web-based diabetes care management support system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001 Apr;27(4):179-190. [Medline]
    6. Mckay HG, Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Brown JE. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ 1998 Apr;24(2):174-179. [Medline]
    7. Riva A, Bellazzi R, Stefanelli M. A Web-based system for the intelligent management of diabetic patients. MD Comput 1997;14(5):360-364. [Medline]
    8. Bellazzi R, Larizza C, Montani S, Riva A, Stefanelli M, D'annunzio G, et al. A telemedicine support for diabetes management: the T-IDDM project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2002 Aug;69(2):147-161. [Medline] [CrossRef]
    9. Morlion B, Knoop C, Paiva M, Estenne M. Internet-based home monitoring of pulmonary function after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 Mar 1;165(5):694-697 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    10. Demiris G, Speedie S, Finkelstein SM. The nature of communication in virtual home care visits. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:135-138. [Medline]
    11. Resource guide for accessible design of consumer electronics-linking product design to the needs of people with functional limitations: a joint venture of the electronic industries alliance and the lectronic industries foundations. Telecommunications Industry Association Web site.   URL: http://www.tiaonline.org/access/guide.html [WebCite Cache]
    12. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002 May 22;287(20):2691-2700. [Medline] [CrossRef]
    13. Demiris G, Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM. Considerations for the design of a Web-based clinical monitoring and educational system for elderly patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8(5):468-472. [PMC] [Medline]
    14. Human S. Office of the Secretary Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information; proposed rule. Fed Regist 1999 Nov 3;64(212):59917-60016.
    15. Ilioudis C, Pangalos G. A framework for an institutional high level security policy for the processing of medical data and their transmission through the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2001 Apr 6;3(2):e14 [FREE Full text] [Medline] [CrossRef]
    16. Rubin RJ, Dietrich KA, Hawk AD. Clinical and economic impact of implementing a comprehensive diabetes management program in managed care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998 Aug;83(8):2635-2642 [FREE Full text] [Medline] [CrossRef]

    Edited by G. Eysenbach; This is a non-peer-reviewed article. published 25.11.02

    © George Demeris, Gunther Eysenbach. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.11.2002. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.