e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 589 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 149 JMIR Formative Research
- 134 JMIR Human Factors
- 75 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 48 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 30 JMIR Research Protocols
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 21 JMIR Aging
- 19 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 15 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 11 JMIR Cancer
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 Iproceedings
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
This pilot study, conducted in 2 phases, evaluated the digital dose tracker, co-designed by users, by assessing its feasibility, validity, and usability. Phase 1 focused on a usability study (n=9) conducted in a research setting. Phase 2 involved a clinical trial to assess the trackers’ feasibility and validity (n=15). The primary outcome for Phase 1 was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI).
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68129
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Next, we describe user and usability testing, which informed the final content and functionality of My Cancer Gene.
Summary of the 5 steps, methods, and outputs involved in the development of My Cancer Gene. Each step included feedback and input from both patients and genetic providers (N=395).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56282
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Before evaluating the effectiveness of a digital adaptation, it is critical to examine its use and sustainability [48,49], including usability, acceptability, and feasibility with end users. Usability is characterized by how well specific users achieve a predetermined goal with efficiency and satisfaction in a particular context [50]. Acceptability relates to how end users think and feel about a digital intervention, while feasibility relates to how well it can be deployed with end users [51-53].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e67685
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this regard, related concepts, such as usability, UX, or user-centered design (UCD), all of which contribute to physician satisfaction, need to be investigated. HCI assists in identifying system requirements, including text style, fonts, layout, graphics, and color. Meanwhile, usability focuses on efficiency, effectiveness, utility, ease of learning, and ease of assessment.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69333
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In contrast, usability, defined as the extent to which users can use an app to achieve specific objectives with efficiency, satisfaction, and effectiveness in a specified usage context, is crucial to reflect the quality and efficacy of digital health apps [8,9]. Therefore, a rigorous and validated usability evaluation tool is urgently warranted to produce objective usability results for digital health apps before their release.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67948
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For instance, the 21st Century Cures Act identified the following three goals for reducing clinician burden: (1) reduce the time and effort needed to document health information, (2) reduce the time and effort needed to meet regulatory requirements, and (3) improve usability [8]. Similarly, in 2021, the AMIA Task Force aimed to reduce clinician documentation burden by 25% within 5 years [5,9].
JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e69651
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The PEAK-m AAP usability assessment was conducted over two months, spanning January and February 2019, before the formal enrollment of research participants in the subsequent RCT. Usability assessment is a widely applied method across various industries, including aviation, automotive, and software development, aimed at enhancing system functionality by assessing an app’s effectiveness and efficiency.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64212
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Research on VR for depression treatment and assessment is limited, with even fewer studies focusing on its acceptability, usability, and tolerability. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, evaluating the acceptability and usability of diagnostic tools is crucial, particularly when involving individuals with mental health conditions, like depression.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68132
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
While the potential of mobile CBT apps is evident, there is a lack of research on their usability and effectiveness among adolescents, particularly in regions like Iraq. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the usability, engagement, and outcomes of a mobile CBT app tailored specifically for adolescents in Iraq. The findings will provide valuable insights into how digital mental health tools can be optimized to better serve this vulnerable population in low-resource settings.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e67137
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evaluating User Experience and Satisfaction in a Concussion Rehabilitation App: Usability Study
The usability study consisted of a two-week, community-oriented, prospective single-arm observational pilot study involving adults aged 18 years and older with a physician-diagnosed concussion. Participants were engaged in an active, home-based rehabilitation program accessed through the mobile app.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67275
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS