e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 241 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 94 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 48 JMIR Infodemiology
- 39 JMIR Formative Research
- 20 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 10 JMIR Dermatology
- 9 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In the HPV antivaccine network, the main traits of social media misinformation messages included mentioning #Gardasil, claiming to reveal a lie, conspiracy theories, and risk of vaccine injury [22].
Previous research has documented the amount of misinformation about the HPV vaccine on social media, the most prevalent misinformation, and it has documented the ways that vaccine misinformation impacts vaccination attitudes and behavior.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e54657
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Infodemic Versus Viral Information Spread: Key Differences and Open Challenges
It started from being an “epidemic of information,” as defined by Rothkopf in 2003 [1] in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, to then include the element of misinformation [2-4], especially when the concept gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e57455
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by an “infodemic,” characterized by the rapid spread of misinformation and disinformation, significantly undermining public health efforts [1]. Misinformation refers to the unintentional spread of incorrect or misleading information [2], while disinformation involves deliberately disseminating false information to deceive [3].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66098
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Addressing these barriers in resource-limited countries requires targeted strategies such as improving health literacy, offering culturally sensitive health care education, increasing access to technology, and combating misinformation [21].
Among these targeted strategies, social media has gained the most attention in the high-income world [20]. Health care education through social media has become an increasingly effective method for reaching diverse audiences with health information.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65745
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This sentiment analysis focuses on Twitter discussions about ivermectin, showing public opinion that, while not devoid of misinformation risks, these discussions offer an alternative lens to understand the societal pulse on this contentious topic [6]. By examining the sentiments expressed on Twitter, we aim to add nuance to the ongoing discourse, acknowledging the platform's influence on public perception and its implications for health communication strategies.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e50536
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As of April 2022, 24% of COVID-19 mortality, or 234,000 deaths, was vaccine-preventable [2], and misinformation and disinformation cost the United States between US $50,000,000 and US $300,000,000 each day during the pandemic in health care spending and economic losses [3]. These impacts demonstrated the necessity of addressing misinformation as part of public health responses [4].
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e67119
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The growing dominance of social media as a news source has resulted in not only widespread engagement with science but also a perpetuation of medical misinformation in fields ranging from dementia [1] to cardiology [2] and cancer [3,4] and beyond.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64679
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health organizations worldwide experienced difficulties with the “infodemic” of misinformation on social media [17]. Before the pandemic, researchers had recognized the importance of management of misinformation and studied countermeasures [18-21]. However, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the inexperience of public health agencies in dealing with the influence of misinformation during an emergency [22,23].
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e66524
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A moderate positive correlation discovered between BM-C and BM-U supports our hypothesis, indicating that a significant number of individuals believing in COVID-19 misinformation have also adopted ideological misinformation regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e62913
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
With their increased usage, LLMs are gaining user trust [3], partly due to the anthropomorphic responses produced by models such as GPT-4o, even though they can generate misinformation at scale [4,5]. Recent reports highlight the inability of differentiating truth from misinformation, and the potential collapse of health care systems, as major disruptors on the horizon [6]. This emphasizes the urgent need to develop solutions to ensure the delivery of factual information.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66207
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS