e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Some have combined UTAUT2 with other health behavior models to explain the continued use of technology after initial adoption, as it cannot be explained by a single model [21-23]. Wei et al [23] combined the UTAUT2 and the health belief model (HBM) to identify the predictors of adoption and continued use of a diet and fitness mobile app. Many studies of the continued use of mobile platforms have focused on satisfaction, perceived benefit, and trust [20].
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e42087
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The UTAUT2 incorporates 3 additional constructs, namely, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit [19].
JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e42178
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
DSR: design science research; SUS: System Usability Scale; UTAUT2: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology version 2.
Based on the premises presented in the “Introduction” section, the project research objective was to devise a solution, that is, a 3 D environment software simulation, to support teaching activities in vaccination rooms.
JMIR Med Educ 2022;8(4):e35712
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As this study focuses on the suitability of the UTAUT2 model for predicting m Health acceptance, Textbox 1 shows the definitions of the exogenous UTAUT2 constructs only, adapted from the study by Venkatesh et al [26].
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 model, adapted from a study by Venkatesh et al [26].
JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e34918
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Still, these factors are missing from established and widely used technology acceptance models, like the UTAUT2. Therefore, we integrated both privacy concerns and trust in the m Health app into the UTAUT2 model and empirically tested their impact on m Health app acceptance.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(1):e27095
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
These variables are performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions in the first iteration (UTAUT1), with the addition of hedonic motivation, price value, habit, and experience in the second iteration (UTAUT2) [45,51] (Figure 2).
Conceptual model of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT, first and second iterations) (adapted from Venkatesh et al [50]).
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e25447
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The extended version of the unified theory of acceptance and usage of technology (UTAUT), UTAUT2, is a tailor-made model of acceptance and use of technology. UTAUT2 was adapted from the UTAUT to a more consumer-centered context, with the main differences including the introduction of three new constructs, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit, with moderators of age, gender, and experience.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e17588
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
UTAUT2 also introduces three new constructs (ie, specific consumer adoption constructs): hedonic motivation, price value, and habit. Hedonic motivation and price value explain behavioral intention, while habit explains behavioral intention and use behavior [18]. Compared to UTAUT, the extensions proposed in UTAUT2 that are consumer specific produced a substantial improvement in the variance explained in behavioral intention (from 56% to 74%) and technology use (from 40% to 52%) [18].
J Med Internet Res 2016;18(3):e49
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS