e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 2074 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 816 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 247 JMIR Formative Research
- 244 JMIR Research Protocols
- 185 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 113 JMIR Human Factors
- 89 JMIR Mental Health
- 52 JMIR Cancer
- 50 JMIR Aging
- 45 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 36 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 24 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 23 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 22 JMIR Cardio
- 20 JMIR Diabetes
- 19 JMIR Medical Education
- 17 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 12 JMIR Nursing
- 8 Iproceedings
- 8 JMIR Dermatology
- 6 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 5 JMIR Infodemiology
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In this review, the term digital health will refer to all digital, electronic, and computer technologies to improve health, including e Health, mobile health, telemedicine, or telehealth [14,15]. As definitions of digital health are continuously evolving and there is no universally accepted nomenclature, such terms are often used interchangeably in the literature [14,15].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66457
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In turn, digital health can be subcategorized into a variety of dimensions. e Health (and its subset m Health) serves as a foundational category, in which health information technology plays a critical role, focusing on the management and exchange of health information through electronic health records and interoperability systems [2,3]. In the following, these definitions will be assumed for this study.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60779
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
In terms of use, engagement is a significant challenge in the e Health field, with research consistently showing high attrition and low engagement rates [11]. For example, studies indicate that retention rates for mental well-being apps are as low as 3.9% after 15 days and 3.3% after 30 days [39]. In our study, we observed a particularly striking trend on the first day of use, with only 18.8% (59/314) of the users continuing to engage with the platform after the first day.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e66558
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reference 14: Educating the future eHealth professional nurseehealth
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e53887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The insights gained from this review will serve as a foundation for guiding empirical ethical evaluation research in the e Health context for future studies.
The review questions are as follows:
Are ethical aspects of e Health implicitly or explicitly addressed in original e Health evaluation research? (Ethical aspects—general overview)
Which ethical aspects (eg, process or outcome domain) are addressed?
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A recent evaluation of a Danish e Health app focusing on stroke rehabilitation revealed that family members of stroke survivors appreciated having information about stroke readily available in the app and used it to prepare for meetings [43]. Future development of the F@ce 2.0 intervention could include a module for family members, along with a structured approach to ensuring family involvement.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e69878
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS