Search Results (1 to 10 of 19 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 11 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 4 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Prioritization of Quality Principles for Health Apps Using the Kano Model: Survey Study
Similarly, to stay in line with Albrecht et al [19], the answer options for “very important” and “important” were summarized using the term “important,” while those for “less important” and “unimportant” were aggregated as “not important.”
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(1):e26563
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Assessment of a Mobile App by Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Pilot Evaluation
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(11):e12442
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
These, in turn, also commonly employ variable rating criteria (eg, Ministry of Health New Zealand [12], Canadian Medical Association [13], National Health Service [14], and Fraunhofer-Institut für Offene Kommunikationssysteme [15]; see Albrecht [16] for a more extensive listing of possible approaches). Many such methodologies may be appropriate depending on the context in which they are to be employed.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(11):e16442
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The study was focused on 9 quality principles (see Table 2), predominantly modeled on ISO/IEC 25010 [46] for health software, that are currently being discussed in the context of coordinating interdisciplinary quality criteria in Germany, (eg, as compiled by Albrecht [49,50]). Although it could be argued that other criteria could also have been included in this study, we explicitly chose not to do so, as these proved to be too specific to be appropriate for the assessments we had planned.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(2):e13375
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The extent to which a successful assignment to the function types, known from the study by Albrecht et al [35], by means of such an approach is possible or whether this will indeed remain a meaningful part of SARASA-based analyses in the future must also be part of future investigations.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(11):e11753
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section