Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Research Protocols
- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

National ethics approvals have been granted for both the Danish (Regional Scientific Ethical Committee for Southern Denmark, S-20182000-24) and Norwegian (Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, 2017/923-6) sites of the RCT, including the process evaluation.
JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(10):e20308
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

The trial was approved by the national ethical committees in Denmark (S-20182000-24) and Norway (2017/923-6). Correspondingly, national review boards or data protection agencies have approved the trial. In Denmark, approval was granted from the Danish Data Protection Agency through application to the University of Southern Denmark’s legal office (201-57-0008) and in Norway from the National Data Protection Authority or the Centre for Research Data through the ethics approval.
JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(12):e14720
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Digital Support Interventions for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
The interactive elements reported in the studies included (1) keeping a log or journal of use of the intervention [29,32]; (2) simulated dialogue between the user and the system, where the user’s answer(s) was (were) used to create individualized information [28,35,37]; (3) small exercises, such as quizzes, drag-and-drop questions [28]; (4) patient’s report of outcome data and receiving feedback in the form of revised goals, for example, goals for steps per day based on pedometer data [27,33] or graphs illustrating
J Med Internet Res 2017;19(5):e179
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Excluded studies will be listed with reason(s) for exclusion. The primary outcomes are changes in mean SBP and DBP and quality of life indicators (Table 1).
Types of primary outcome measures.
Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be screened in full by 2 reviewers working independently to extract relevant population, intervention, and outcome data using the Distiller software [39]. Inter-reviewer disagreements will be resolved by seeking consensus or decision by a third party.
JMIR Res Protoc 2015;4(4):e133
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital Asthma Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e51
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS