Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study
Participants’ characteristics.
a Website 1: website about chemotherapy.
b Website 2: website for Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital.
c Website 3: website for Gastrointestinal Oncology Center Amsterdam.
d QPL 1: QPL on www.chemotherapie.nl.
e QPL 2: QPL of the Dutch Breast Cancer Association.
f QPL 3: developed by researchers of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam for patients with esophageal cancer.
g Values clarification tool: a values clarification tool developed by researchers at the Leiden University Medical
J Med Internet Res 2016;18(7):e208
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, there were no differences in identifying with the younger and older actor (F
1,245=0.06, P=.86, ηp
2=0.00), regardless of participants’ own age (F
1,245=0.13, P=.72, ηp
2=0.00). Therefore, this additional design factor was not considered while analyzing the data.
J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e104
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS