Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 11.10.17 in Vol 19, No 10 (2017): October

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.7638):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Van den Bulck SA, Hermens R, Slegers K, Vandenberghe B, Goderis G, Vankrunkelsven P. Designing a Patient Portal for Patient-Centered Care: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e269
    CrossRef
  2. Glattacker M, Boeker M, Anger R, Reichenbach F, Tassoni A, Bredenkamp R, Giesler JM. Evaluation of a Mobile Phone App for Patients With Pollen-Related Allergic Rhinitis: Prospective Longitudinal Field Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(4):e15514
    CrossRef
  3. Anderberg P, Eivazzadeh S, Berglund JS. A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older People’s Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e13951
    CrossRef
  4. Chattopadhyay D, Ma T, Sharifi H, Martyn-Nemeth P. Computer-Controlled Virtual Humans in Patient-Facing Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e18839
    CrossRef
  5. Kayser L, Rossen S, Karnoe A, Elsworth G, Vibe-Petersen J, Christensen JF, Ried-Larsen M, Osborne RH. Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e10377
    CrossRef
  6. Mitchell KM, Holtz BE, McCarroll A. Patient-Centered Methods for Designing and Developing Health Information Communication Technologies: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine and e-Health 2019;25(11):1012
    CrossRef
  7. Schellong J, Lorenz P, Weidner K. Proposing a standardized, step-by-step model for creating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related mobile mental health apps in a framework based on technical and medical norms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2019;10(1)
    CrossRef
  8. Tam W, Woo B, Lim TW. Questionnaires Designed to Assess Knowledge of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2019;34(3):E14
    CrossRef
  9. Bhandari NR, Payakachat N, Fletcher DA, Sung Y, Eswaran H, Benton T, Lowery CL. Validation of Newly Developed Surveys to Evaluate Patients' and Providers' Satisfaction with Telehealth Obstetric Services. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(7):879
    CrossRef
  10. Smith N, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C. From benefits idealisation to value optimisation: application in the digital health context. Australian Health Review 2020;44(5):706
    CrossRef
  11. Pérez-Alfonso KE, Sánchez-Martínez V. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evaluating Cancer Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2021;37(2):151145
    CrossRef
  12. McMaughan DJ, Lin S, Ozmetin J, Beverly JG, Brog J, Naiser E. A Provider-Facing eHealth Tool for Transitioning Youth With Special Health Care Needs From Pediatric to Adult Care: Mixed Methods, User-Engaged Usability Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(5):e22915
    CrossRef
  13. van der Windt M, van Zundert SKM, Schoenmakers S, van Rossem L, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Prototyping of a Digital Life Course Care Platform for Preconception and Pregnancy Care: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e37537
    CrossRef
  14. Nievas-Soriano BJ, García-Duarte S, Fernández-Alonso AM, Bonillo-Perales A, Parrón-Carreño T. Users evaluation of a Spanish eHealth pediatric website. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2021;212:106462
    CrossRef
  15. Goldsack J, Dowling A, Samuelson D, Patrick-Lake B, Clay I. Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint. Digital Biomarkers 2021;5(1):53
    CrossRef
  16. Burrell A, Zrubka Z, Champion A, Zah V, Vinuesa L, Holtorf A, Di Bidino R, Earla JR, Entwistle J, Boltyenkov AT, Braileanu G, Kolasa K, Roydhouse J, Asche C, Redekop K, Pfeiffer C, Le L, Janodia M, Sharkawy M, Şaylan M, Lee S, Glynn S, Ganguli A, Badawy S, Carvalho LS, Ernst F, Seal B, van Steen C, Patel N, Lee H, Doe A, Strouss L, Angelillo L, Patel C, Paul S. How Useful Are Digital Health Terms for Outcomes Research? An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report. Value in Health 2022;25(9):1469
    CrossRef
  17. Magalhães B, Fernandes C, Santos C, Martínez-Galiano JM. The Use of Mobile Applications for Managing Care Processes During Chemotherapy Treatments: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nursing 2021;44(6):E339
    CrossRef
  18. . Is the online ‘creating healthy eating and active environments survey' (CHEERS) tool reliable for early childhood educators in Alberta, Canada: a randomized crossover trial. Archives of Public Health 2023;81(1)
    CrossRef
  19. . НАУКОВЕ ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ ОПТИМІЗАЦІЇ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ В УМОВАХ РОЗВИТКУ ЕЛЕКТРОННОЇ СИСТЕМИ ОХОРОНИ ЗДОРОВ’Я. Вісник соціальної гігієни та організації охорони здоров'я України 2023;(2):119
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.7638):

  1. . Digital Services in Crisis, Disaster, and Emergency Situations. 2021. chapter 5:98
    CrossRef