JMIR Publications

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 17.10.12 in Vol 14, No 5 (2012): Sep-Oct

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2280):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Vu AF, Espinoza GM, Perry JD, Chundury RV. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2017;33(6):466
    CrossRef
  2. Lu SF, Rui H. Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida. Management Science 2017;
    CrossRef
  3. Hao H, Zhang K, Wang W, Gao G. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;99:37
    CrossRef
  4. McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e387
    CrossRef
  5. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275
    CrossRef
  6. Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Fuller G, Black JT, Kim HL, Spiegel B. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2017;
    CrossRef
  7. Ricciardi BF, Waddell BS, Nodzo SR, Lange J, Nocon AA, Amundsen S, Tarity TD, McLawhorn AS. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites. Orthopedics 2017;40(5):304
    CrossRef
  8. Baxter S, Johnson M, Payne N, Buckley-Woods H, Blank L, Hock E, Daley A, Taylor A, Pavey T, Mountain G, Goyder E. Promoting and maintaining physical activity in the transition to retirement: a systematic review of interventions for adults around retirement age. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2016;13(1)
    CrossRef
  9. Emmert M, Meszmer N, Sander U. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(9):e254
    CrossRef
  10. Trehan SK, DeFrancesco CJ, Nguyen JT, Charalel RA, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):98
    CrossRef
  11. Hao H, Zhang K. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(5):e108
    CrossRef
  12. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129
    CrossRef
  13. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e217
    CrossRef
  14. Trehan SK, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316
    CrossRef
  15. Hao H. The Development of Online Doctor Reviews in China: An Analysis of the Largest Online Doctor Review Website in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(6):e134
    CrossRef
  16. Emmert M, Halling F, Meier F. Evaluations of Dentists on a German Physician Rating Website: An Analysis of the Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(1):e15
    CrossRef
  17. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  18. Emmert M, Adelhardt T, Sander U, Wambach V, Lindenthal J. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1)
    CrossRef
  19. Lewis P, Kobayashi E, Gupta S. An Online Review of Plastic Surgeons in Southern California. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2015;74:S66
    CrossRef
  20. King D, Zaman S, Zaman SS, Kahlon GK, Naik A, Jessel AS, Nanavati N, Shah A, Cox B, Darzi A. Identifying Quality Indicators Used by Patients to Choose Secondary Health Care Providers: A Mixed Methods Approach. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2015;3(2):e65
    CrossRef
  21. Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Röttl J. Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e97
    CrossRef
  22. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  23. Atkinson S. Current status of online rating of Australian doctors. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2014;20(3):222
    CrossRef
  24. Greaves F, Laverty AA, Cano DR, Moilanen K, Pulman S, Darzi A, Millett C. Tweets about hospital quality: a mixed methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014;23(10):838
    CrossRef
  25. Greaves F, Millett C, Nuki P. England’s Experience Incorporating “Anecdotal” Reports From Consumers into Their National Reporting System. Medical Care Research and Review 2014;71(5_suppl):65S
    CrossRef
  26. Lagu T, Goff SL, Hannon NS, Shatz A, Lindenauer PK. A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Reviews of Hospital Care in England: Implications for Public Reporting of Health Care Quality Data in the United States. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2013;39(1):7
    CrossRef
  27. Greaves F, Ramirez-Cano D, Millett C, Darzi A, Donaldson L. Use of Sentiment Analysis for Capturing Patient Experience From Free-Text Comments Posted Online. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(11):e239
    CrossRef