JMIR Publications

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 10.04.12 in Vol 14, No 2 (2012): Mar-Apr

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2005):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Paul MJ, Dredze M. Social Monitoring for Public Health. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 2017;9(5):1
    CrossRef
  2. Fan Z, Che Y, Chen Z. Product sales forecasting using online reviews and historical sales data: A method combining the Bass model and sentiment analysis. Journal of Business Research 2017;74:90
    CrossRef
  3. Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Fuller G, Black JT, Kim HL, Spiegel B. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2017;
    CrossRef
  4. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275
    CrossRef
  5. Vu AF, Espinoza GM, Perry JD, Chundury RV. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2017;33(6):466
    CrossRef
  6. Lu SF, Rui H. Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida. Management Science 2017;
    CrossRef
  7. Okike K, Peter-Bibb TK, Xie KC, Okike ON. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(12):e324
    CrossRef
  8. Wang Z, Li H, Ye Q, Law R. Saliency effects of online reviews embedded in the description on sales: Moderating role of reputation. Decision Support Systems 2016;87:50
    CrossRef
  9. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e217
    CrossRef
  10. Kelly EC, Winick-Ng J, Welk B. Surgeon Experience and Complications of Transvaginal Prolapse Mesh. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016;128(1):65
    CrossRef
  11. Wiley MT, Rivas RL, Hristidis V. Provider attributes correlation analysis to their referral frequency and awards. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16(1)
    CrossRef
  12. Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4):e257
    CrossRef
  13. Li S, Feng B, Chen M, Bell RA. Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor. Journal of Health Communication 2015;20(4):453
    CrossRef
  14. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  15. Wallace BC, Paul MJ, Sarkar U, Trikalinos TA, Dredze M. A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014;21(6):1098
    CrossRef
  16. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  17. Watkins I, Xie B. eHealth Literacy Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(11):e225
    CrossRef
  18. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269
    CrossRef
  19. Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, Millett C. Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(5):e146
    CrossRef
  20. Tzarnas CD. Advice to a Graduating Surgical Resident; Some New “A”s. Journal of Surgical Education 2012;69(5):676
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2005)

:
  1. Taylor J, Xu T, Makary MA. Surgical Quality Improvement. 2017. Chapter 13:125
    CrossRef