This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine 

Advertisement: Preregister now for the Medicine 2.0 Congress

Works citing "Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?"

Jeffrey Segal, Michael Sacopulos, Virgil Sheets, Irish Thurston, Kendra Brooks, Ryan Puccia
J Med Internet Res 2012 (Apr 10); 14(2):e50 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2005):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

1. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56 [CrossRef]
2. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269 [CrossRef]
3. Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, Millett C. Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(5):e146 [CrossRef]
4. Tzarnas CD. Advice to a Graduating Surgical Resident; Some New “A”s. Journal of Surgical Education 2012;69(5):676 [CrossRef]