JMIR Publications

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 06.12.11 in Vol 13, No 4 (2011): Oct-Dec

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1899):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Kool RB, Kleefstra SM, Borghans I, Atsma F, van de Belt TH. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e198
    CrossRef
  2. Trehan SK, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316
    CrossRef
  3. Kleefstra SM, Zandbelt LC, Borghans I, de Haes HJ, Kool RB. Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e201
    CrossRef
  4. Ranney ML, Peimer CA. Commentary on “Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications”. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):111
    CrossRef
  5. Samora JB, Lifchez SD, Blazar PE. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):104
    CrossRef
  6. Ranney ML, Peimer CA. Online emergency department ratings, patient satisfaction and the age-old issue of communication. BMJ Quality & Safety 2016;25(1):1
    CrossRef
  7. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129
    CrossRef
  8. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  9. Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4):e257
    CrossRef
  10. Ferrara S, Hopman WM, Leveridge M. Diagnosis, Bedside Manner and Comment Style are Predictive Factors in Online Ratings of Urologists. Urology Practice 2014;1(3):117
    CrossRef
  11. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  12. Merrell JG, Levy BH, Johnson DA. Patient Assessments and Online Ratings of Quality Care: A “Wake-Up Call” for Providers. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;108(11):1676
    CrossRef
  13. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. The Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269
    CrossRef
  14. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(2):e24
    CrossRef
  15. Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e38
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1899)

:
  1. Chiu M, Cheng W. HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: Information Systems. 2016. Chapter 3:28
    CrossRef