Open Peer-Review: Consistently increasing numbers of online ratings of healthcare in England, and other submissions


 

A new feature on the JMIR website, open peer review articles, allows JMIR users to sign themselves up as peer reviewers for specific articles currently considered by the Journal (in addition to author- and editor-selected reviewers). The list below shows recently submitted articles where submitting authors have not opted-out of the open peer-review experiment and where the editor has not made a decision yet. (Note that this feature is for reviewing specific articles - if you just want to sign up as reviewer (and wait for the editor to contact you if articles match your interests), please sign up as reviewer using your profile).
To assign yourself to an article as reviewer, you must have a user account on this site (if you don't have one, register for a free account here) and be logged in (please verify that your email address in your profile is correct). Add yourself as a peer reviewer to any article by clicking the '+Peer-review Me!+' link under each article. Full instructions on how to complete your review will be sent to you via email shortly after. Do not sign up as peer-reviewer if you have any conflicts of interest (note that we will treat any attempts by authors to sign up as reviewer under a false identity as scientific misconduct and reserve the right to promptly reject the article and inform the host institution).
The standard turnaround time for reviews is currently 2 weeks, and the general aim is to give constructive feedback to the authors and/or to prevent publication of uninteresting or fatally flawed articles. Reviewers will be acknowledged by name if the article is published, but remain anonymous if the article is declined.

The abstracts on this page are unpublished studies - please do not cite them (yet). If you wish to cite them/wish to see them published, write your opinion in the form of a peer-review!

Tip: Include the RSS feed of the JMIR submissions on this page on your iGoogle homepage, blog, or desktop RSS reader to stay informed about current submissions!

JMIR Submissions under Open Peer Review

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


If you follow us on Twitter, we will also announce new submissions under open peer-review there.


Titles/Abstracts of Articles Currently Open for Review


Consistently increasing numbers of online ratings of healthcare in England

Text of letter: In a recent JMIR article, Gao and colleagues demonstrated the growing number of internet-based ratings of physicians on a commercially-owned website in the USA [1]. In England, in keeping with our National Health Service, we have a government run website that allows patients to rate and comment on their care online in a similar way, but at the level of healthcare provider organisations rather than individuals. The website is called NHS Choices [2]. Gao suggests that their results demonstrate a positive correlation between online ratings and physician quality. We have similarly demonstrated how better online ratings at the organisational level are associated with better clinical outcomes [3], and patient experience measured by surveys [4] in England. In a new analysis to allow comparison with Gao’s results, we looked at the number of ratings of hospitals posted on the NHS Choices website over the period since it started (August 2008) to the end of 2011. There were 20,996 ratings of hospitals over the 40 month period, fewer than in the US. We found a more gradual, linear increase in ratings in England (Figure 1) compared with the accelerating growth in ratings seen on commercial sites in the US [1]. We hope this adds to the work of our American colleagues, and demonstrates that the increasing number of online ratings of healthcare is an international phenomenon, even if England is perhaps at an earlier stage on the curve than the US.
 
Date Submitted: May 4, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 16, 2012 - Jul 11, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Feasibility and Usability Testing of an Electronic Symptom Diary for Adolescents with Cancer

Background: The delivery of optimal supportive care depends on accurate communication between patients and clinicians regarding untoward symptoms. Documentation of patients’ symptoms necessitates reliance on recall, which is often imprecise. We developed an electronic diary (eDiary) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer to record symptoms. The objectives of this project were to: 1) determine the reliability of the application, the reasons for any missing data, and patients’ adherence with daily symptom queries; and 2) determine patients’ perceptions of the usefulness and acceptability of data collection via mobile phones. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to describe the feasibility of an eDiary designed for AYAs with cancer, including reliability of the mobile application, the reasons for any missing data, patients’ adherence rates to daily symptom queries, and patients’ perceptions of the usefulness and acceptability of symptom data collection via mobile phones. Methods: Our team developed an electronic symptom diary based on interviews conducted with AYAs with cancer and their clinicians. This diary included daily severity ratings of pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and sleep. The occurrence of other selected physical sequelae was assessed daily. Additionally, patients selected descriptors of their mood. Ten AYA cancer patients participated in a 3 week trial of the eDiary. Mobile phones with service plans were loaned to patients who were instructed to report their symptoms daily. Patients completed a brief usability questionnaire and were interviewed to elicit their perceptions of the eDiary and any technical difficulties encountered. Results: Overall adherence to daily symptom reports exceeded 90%. Young people experienced few technical difficulties and reported benefit from daily symptom reports. Symptom occurrence rates were high and considerable inter-patient and intra-patient variability was noted in symptom and mood reports. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility of an eDiary that may contribute insight into patients’ symptom patterns to promote effective symptom management.
 
Date Submitted: May 15, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 15, 2012 - May 25, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Design and deployment of a new eService for the assessment of patients with acute stroke: TeleStroke

Background: Health care service based on telemedicine enables the reduction of physical and time barriers in stroke treatments. Moreover, this service connects centres specialised on stroke treatment with other centres and practitioners. As a result, it is increased accessibility to neurology specialist care and fibrinolytic treatment. Objective: Development and introduction of a new aid for the treatment of patients with acute stroke based on telemedicine (TeleStroke) at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital. Methods: The system is fundamentally based on communication between the requesting hospital where the patient is located and the referral hospital where the specialised group are based. Two different elements can be seen in the architecture of the system to be described: TeleStroke medical station and communication between medical stations. The TeleStroke medical station built into the information systems of the requesting hospital through the monitoring of standards and the medical station of the referral hospital where the neurologist receives the consultation from the requesting hospital. Communication between both stations based on the premises of speed, interoperability, security and mobility. The evaluation phase includes patients who presented acute stroke symptoms and they were examined by TeleStroke in two hospitals, which are in a distance of 16 and 110 kilometers from Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, from October 2008 to January 2011. We analyzed the number of queries telematics, the percentage of patients treated with fibrinolysis and the times. To evaluate the acceptability of the system TeleStroke by medical professionals has developed a web-based questionnaire in technology acceptance model. Results: A total of 28 patients were evaluated through queries telematic. 19 out of 28 patients (68%) received fibrinolysis treatment. The most common reasons for not treating with fibrinolysis included: clinical criteria at six out of nine patients (66%) and beyond the time window at three out of nine patients (33%). The mean “onset-to-hospital” time was 69 minutes, the mean time from admission to CT image was 33 minutes, the mean “door-to-needle” time was 82 minutes and the mean “onset-to-needle” time was 150 minutes. 34 out of 61 medical professionals completed a questionnaire to evaluate the acceptability of the system TeleStroke. The mean values for each item are higher than 6.50 so that respondents positively evaluated each item This survey was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha test to determine the reliability of the questionnaire and the obtained results showed a value of 0.97. Conclusions: The implementation of TeleStroke has made real the possibility of receiving an effective treatment for patients in acute phase of stroke, a treatment they could not access until now because of the necessary time required for transferring patients to referral hospitals.
 
Date Submitted: May 11, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 11, 2012 - Jul 6, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Recruitment, participation, and satisfaction of youth with type 1 diabetes in e-Health psycho-educational research

Background: E-health technologies, such as the internet, offer a platform for improving the dissemination and accessibility of psycho-educational programs for youth with chronic illness. Little is known, however, about the recruitment process and yield of diverse samples in internet research with youth who have a chronic illness. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on recruitment, participation, and satisfaction with two e-Health psycho-educational programs. Methods: Youth with T1D from 4 U.S. sites were invited to participate (n=518) with 320 eligible youth consenting (mean age = 12.3 + 1.1, 55% female, 62.2% white, mean A1C = 8.3 + 1.5). Data for this secondary analysis included demographic information (age, race/ethnicity, income), depressive symptoms, recruitment rates [refusal at point of contact (22%), those who consented but did not participate (i.e., passive refusals) (15%), and enrolled youth (63%)], participation (80% lessons completed), and a satisfaction survey (ie., how helpful, enjoyable). Chi-square or ANOVA analyses were used. Results: There were significant differences in recruitment rates by income and race/ethnicity such that non-white and low-income youth were more likely to refuse passively compared to white and higher income youth who were more likely to enroll (P<.001). Participation in program sessions was high, with 78% of youth completing at least 4 of 5 sessions. There were no significant differences in participation by program, age, gender, or race/ethnicity. Low-income youth were less likely to participate (P=.002). Satisfaction in both programs was also high (3.9 out of 5). There were significant gender, race/ethnicity, and income differences, in that girls (P=.001), non-White youth (P=.02), and low-income youth (P=.02) reported higher satisfaction. There were no differences in satisfaction by program or age. Conclusions: Results indicate that minority and low-income youth with T1D are less likely to enroll in internet-based research than White and higher income youth; thus, creative recruitment approaches are needed. Low-income youth were less likely to participate, possibly due to access. However, once enrolled, diverse and low-income youth with T1D were as highly satisfied with the e-Health programs as White youth and those with higher income. Results suggest that e-Health programs have the potential to reach diverse youth and be appealing to them. Clinical Trial: NCT00684658
 
Date Submitted: May 10, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 11, 2012 - Jul 6, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Influence of delivery strategy on message processing mechanisms and e-loyalty of a Dutch computer tailored smoking cessation intervention

Background: Smoking tobacco is one of the most preventable causes of illness and death. Internet computer tailored (CT) smoking cessation interventions have shown to be effective. Although these interventions have the potential to reach a large number of smokers, they often face high attrition rates, especially among lower educated smokers. A possible reason for the high attrition rates in the latter group is that the CT smoking cessation interventions may not be attractive enough as they are mainly text-based. Video-based messages might be more effective in attracting attention and stimulating comprehension in people with a lower educational level and therefore reduce attrition rates. Objective: The objective of the present study was to investigate whether differences exist in message processing mechanisms (attention, comprehension, self-reference, appreciation, processing) and e-loyalty (intention to visit the website again, recommend the website to others) according to delivery strategy (video or text based messages) and educational level toward a Dutch CT smoking cessation program. Methods: Smokers who were motivated to quit within the following six months and who were aged over 16 were included in the program. The study was a randomized control trial with two conditions (video/text CT). The sample was stratified into 2 categories, low and high educated participants. In total, 139 participants completed the first session of the web-based CT intervention and were subsequently asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing message processing mechanisms and e-loyalty. ANOVAs and regression analyses were conducted to investigate the differences in message processing mechanisms and e-loyalty with regard to delivery strategy and education. Results: No interaction effects were found between delivery strategy and educational level on message processing mechanisms and e-loyalty. Delivery strategy had no effect on e-loyalty and processing mechanisms. However, results indicated that lower educated participants showed higher attention (F(1,138)=3.97; P=.05) and processing levels (F(1,138)=4.58; P=.04). Results revealed also that lower educated participants were more inclined to visit the CT intervention website again (F(1,138)=4.43; P=.04). Conclusions: CT programs have the potential to positively influence lower educated groups as they might be more involved in the CT intervention than higher educated smokers. Longitudinal studies with a larger sample are needed to gain more insight into the role of delivery strategy in tailored information and to investigate whether the intention to visit the intervention website again results in the ultimate goal of behavior change. Clinical Trial: Nederlands Trial Register (NTR3102)
 
Date Submitted: May 2, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 8, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Internet Intervention Promotes Physical Activity by Sedentary Older Adults

Background: Background. Physical activity (PA) for older adults has well documented physical and cognitive benefits, but most seniors do not meet recommended guidelines for PA, and interventions are lacking. Objective: Objectives. This study evaluated the efficacy of a 12-week Internet intervention to help sedentary older adults adopt and maintain an exercise regimen. Methods. A total of 368 men and women over 55 years of age (x = 60.3; SD 4.9) were recruited and screened and assessed online. They were randomized into treatment and control groups and assessed at pre-test, at 12 weeks, and at six months. After treatment group participants rated their fitness level, activity goals, and barriers to exercise, the Internet intervention program helped them select exercise activities in the areas of endurance, flexibility, strengthening, and balance enhancement. They returned to the program weekly for automated video and text support and education, with the option to change or increase their exercise plan. The program also included on-going problem solving to overcome user-identified barriers to exercise. Methods: Methods. A total of 368 men and women over 55 years of age (x = 60.3; SD 4.9) were recruited and screened and assessed online. They were randomized into treatment and control groups and assessed at pre-test, at 12 weeks, and at six months. After treatment group participants rated their fitness level, activity goals, and barriers to exercise, the Internet intervention program helped them select exercise activities in the areas of endurance, flexibility, strengthening, and balance enhancement. They returned to the program weekly for automated video and text support and education, with the option to change or increase their exercise plan. The program also included on-going problem solving to overcome user-identified barriers to exercise. Results: Results. The multivariate model indicated significant treatment effects at posttest (P = .001; large effect size) and at six months (P = .001; medium effect size). At posttest, intervention participation showed significant improvement on 13 of 14 outcome measures compared to the control group. At six months, treatment group participants maintained large gains compared to the control participants on all 14 outcome measures. Conclusions: Conclusions. These results suggest that an online PA program has the potential to positively impact the physical activity of sedentary older adult participants. More research is needed to replicate the study results, which were based on self-report measures. Research is also needed to intervention effects with older populations. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01579240
 
Date Submitted: May 4, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 8, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Exploring nurses' intention to use a computerized platform in the resuscitation unit: Development and validation of a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

Background: In emergency department resuscitation units, writing down information related to interventions, physical examination, vital signs, investigations and treatments ordered is a crucial task carried out by nurses. In order to facilitate this task, a team composed of emergency physicians, nurses, and one computer engineer created a novel electronic platform equipped with a tactile screen which allows systematic collection of critical data. This electronic platform also has medical software (Reascribe+TM) which functions as an electronic medical record (EMR) and a clinical decision support system (CDSS). Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire that could help evaluate nurses' intention to use a novel computerized platform in an emergency department resuscitation unit, based on Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Methods: The population for this study was composed of 87 nurses who worked in the resuscitation unit of a tertiary trauma center. Three focus groups were held with nurses working in the resuscitation unit in order to identify the salient modal beliefs of regarding their intended use of a new electronic medical charting system for the care of trauma patients. The system included a clinical decision support tool (ReaScribe+TM, ReaEvolution, Québec, Canada). A questionnaire was developed in which salient modal beliefs were used as items in order to evaluate the TPB constructs. We also added 13 questions to evaluate nurses’ computer literacy. The final questionnaire was composed of 46 questions to be answered on a seven-point Likert scale. All nurses in the resuscitation unit and present during a regular work shift were individually contacted by the principal investigator or a research assistant (phase I). A subsample of the nurses who completed the questionnaire was invited to complete it a second time two weeks later (phase II). Results: In phase I, 62 of the 70 questionnaires administered were received (89% response rate). Of the 27 questionnaires administered in phase II (retest phase), 25 were completed (93% response rate). The questionnaire showed very good internal consistency as Cronbach’s alpha was higher than 0.7 for all constructs. Temporal stability was acceptable with intraclass correlations between 0.41 and 0.68. The intention to use ReaScribe+TM to chart the resuscitation of trauma patients was very high among the respondents. In the logistic regression model, the only construct that predicted nurses’ intention to adopt the computerized platform was the professional norm (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.41 – 7.78). Conclusions: We developed and validated a questionnaire that can now be used in other emergency departments prior to implementation of the computerized platform. The intention to adopt was very high among the respondents which suggests that the implementation of this innovation could be successful at our institution.
 
Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 1, 2012 - Jun 26, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Information theoretic approach to reduce both of information loss and sensitive data disclosure in the k-anonymity methods

Background: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) enable the sharing of patient medical data. Since EHRs include patients’ private data, access to researchers is restricted. Therefore k-anonymity is necessary to keep patients’ private data safe without damaging useful medical information. However, k-anonymity cannot prevent sensitive attribute disclosure. An alternative, l-diversity, has been proposed as a solution to this problem and is defined as: each Q-Block (i.e., each set of rows corresponding to the same value for identifiers) contains at least l well-represented values for each sensitive attribute. While l-diversity protects against sensitive attribute disclosure, it has a limitation in that it only focuses on diversifying sensitive attributes. Objective: The aim of the study is to develop k-anonymity method that not only minimizes information loss but also achieves diversity of the sensitive attribute. Methods: This paper proposes a new privacy protection method that uses conditional entropy and mutual information. This method considers both information loss as well as diversity of sensitive attributes. Conditional entropy can measure the information loss by generalization and mutual information is used to achieve the diversity of sensitive attributes. This method can offer appropriate Q-Blocks for generalization. Results: We used the adult database from UCI Machine Learning Repository and found that the proposed method can greatly reduce information loss compared with a recent l-diversity study. It can also achieve the diversity of sensitive attributes by counting the number of Q-Blocks that have leaks of diversity. Conclusions: This study provides a privacy protection method that can improve data utility and protect against sensitive attribute disclosure. The method is viable and should be of interest for further privacy protection in EHR applications.
 
Date Submitted: Apr 27, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: May 1, 2012 - Jun 26, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Architectures and Processes for Nationwide Patient-Centric Consent Management

Background: Before electronic health information can be shared, the patient’s consent must be obtained. However, the current paper-based process is insufficient at a nationwide scale. Improvements will need to be introduced gradually, in a manner compatible with an exceedingly complex system: multiple professions, islands of partial standardization, radical differences in automation and technical sophistication, autonomous players with differing motivations, refusals to participate, external data sources, an evolving and unpredictable legal landscape, and pressure groups from privacy advocates, researchers, and health providers. Objective: We propose pragmatic requirements and a highly patient-centric, Internet-based consent management architecture, based on our Kairon Consents prototype. Methods: We examine requirements for serving a wide variety of patients and providers, including their diverse incentives. We then describe a modular, incrementally adoptable system design, and illustrate its behavior and advantages via use cases. Results: Our approach lets patients specify their privacy preferences covering a variety of possible uses of their personal health information in one virtual document; emergencies and research can be included, and government defaults and mandates mixed in as additional rules. Then, we describe how a record holder uses the consent service to determine just the privacy constraints that need to be enforced for a particular request. With today’s systems, many of these constraints need to be verified manually; our architecture enables incremental automation. We illustrate our architecture through a variety of use cases that we are able to support, and examine the independent stakeholders’ incentives to participate. The approach was found able to handle an extremely wide range of requirements. Open problems were identified; while new features are needed, the architecture extends naturally. Conclusions: It appears quite feasible to implement patient-centric consent, hosted in the cloud or at an HIE. Clinical Trial: not applicable
 
Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 25, 2012 - Jun 20, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+
 

Factors that Influence the Adoption and Use of Social Media by Physicians to Share Medical Information

Background: Within the medical community there is persistent debate as to whether the information available through social media is trustworthy and valid, whether physicians are ready to adopt these technologies and ultimately, embrace these technologies as a format for professional development and life-long learning. How social media channels are the vehicles through which clinicians are exposed to emerging information that has the potential to inform or change their practice remains an open question. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence physicians’ use of social media to share and exchange medical information with other physicians as a component of their life-long learning and continuing professional development. Methods: A survey instrument was developed based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)., hypothesizing that technology usage is best predicted by a physician’s attitudes toward the technology, perceptions about the technology’s usefulness and ease of use, and individual factors such as personal innovativeness. The survey was distributed via email to a random sample of 1695 practicing oncologists and primary care physicians in the United States in March 2011. Responses from 485 physicians were analyzed (response rate = 29%). Results: Overall, 24% of physicians use social media to scan or explore medical information on a daily basis; while 15% contribute new information via social media on a daily basis. The main factors influencing a physician’s usage of social media to share medical knowledge with other physicians are perceived ease of use and usefulness. Physicians who have positive attitudes towards the use of social media are more likely to use social media, and to share medical information with other physicians through social media. Neither age nor gender had a significant impact on adoption or usage of social media. In general, physicians believe that information available through social media channels is of high quality, is up-to-date, and that the use of social media for continuing professional development improves their on-the-job performance. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the use of social media applications may be an efficient and effective method for physicians to keep up-to-date and to share newly acquired medical knowledge with other physicians within the medical community.
 
Date Submitted: Apr 16, 2012
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 20, 2012 - Jun 15, 2012
 
+Peer-review Me!+