Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 19, 2020 - May 14, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Prevailing outcome themes reported by people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: findings from a semi-structured interview

  • Danyal Zaman Khan; 
  • Siobhan Mairead Fitzpatrick; 
  • Bryn Hilton; 
  • Angus G.K. McNair; 
  • Ellen Sarewitz; 
  • Benjamin Marshall Davies; 
  • Mark R.N. Kotter; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) arises when arthritic changes of the cervical spine cause compression and a progressive injury to the spinal cord. It is common and potentially disabling. People with DCM (PwCM) to have amongst the lowest quality of life scores (SF-36) of chronic disease, although the drivers for this are not entirely understood. DCM research faces a number of challenges, including the heterogenous reporting of study data. The AO Spine RECODE-DCM project is an international consensus process that aims improve research efficiency through formation of a core outcome set (COS). A key part of COS development process is organizing outcomes into domains which represent key aspects of the disease.

Objective:

To facilitate this, we sought to qualitatively explore the context and impact of patient reported outcomes in DCM on people with DCM (PwCM) and their supporters. The aim was to improve understanding of patient perspective and assist the organisation of outcomes into domains for the consensus process.

Methods:

A single focus group was hosted by Myelopathy.org, a charity and support group for PwCM. The 40 minute session was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was familiarized and 2 authors performed data coding independently. Codes were grouped into themes and a thematic analysis was performed guided by Braun & Clarke’s six-phase approach. The themes were subsequently reviewed with an independent PwCM stakeholder (ES), assisting in the process of capturing the true context and importance of themes.

Results:

Five PwCM (three men and two women) and three supporters (all women) participated. The average PwCM age was 53 and the median mJOA was 11 (±IQR 2), indicating these PwCM had moderate to severe DCM. 54 codes were grouped into 10 themes that captured the impact of DCM on PwCM and their supporters. These themes included: acceptance of symptoms, anticipatory anxiety, coping mechanisms/resilience, feelings of helplessness, financial consequences, lack of recognition, mental health impact, loss of life control, social reclusiveness/isolation and social stigma

Conclusions:

This is the first study to undertake qualitative analysis of PwCM perspectives. It has highlighted a number of prevailing themes currently unmeasured in clinical research or care. The determinants of low quality of life in DCM are currently unknown, and these findings provide a novel and so far, unique perspective. These perspectives will be used to inform the development of a core outcome set for DCM which is inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, including PwCM.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Khan DZ, Fitzpatrick SM, Hilton B, McNair AG, Sarewitz E, Davies BM, Kotter MR

Prevailing outcome themes reported by people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: findings from a semi-structured interview

JMIR Preprints. 19/03/2020:18732

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.18732

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18732

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.