Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 1, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 31, 2019 - Feb 25, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

How the use of a patient-accessible health records contributes to patient-centered care: Scoping Review.

  • Janine Benjamins; 
  • Annemien Haveman; 
  • Marian Gunnink; 
  • Annemieke Goudkuil; 
  • Emely de Vet; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although worldwide implementation of patient accessible health records (PAEHR) as an instrument in patient-centered care (PC) is expanding, its advantages and disadvantages do not seem to be structurally evaluated to date.

Objective:

The objective is to review whether and how the use of a PAEHR contributes to PC both in general and among specific patient groups.

Methods:

Adapted PRISMA reporting guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. Literature was identified in five databases, using the terms ‘patient-accessible medical records’, ‘patient experiences’ and ‘professional experiences’ as key concepts. A total of 49 articles were included and analyzed with a charting code list containing 10 elements of PC.

Results:

Studies were diverse in design, country of origin, functionalities of the investigated PAEHR and target population. Respondents in all studies were adults. The effect of PAEHRs on PC was evaluated as moderately positive: patient accessible health records were appreciated for their opportunity to empower patients, to inform them about their health, and to involve them in their own care. There were mixed results for the extent to which PAEHR affected the relation between patients and clinicians. Professionals and patients in mental healthcare held opposing views concerning the impact of transparency, professionals appearing more worried about potential negative impact. Their worries seemed to be influenced by a reluctant attitude toward PC. Disadvantaged groups appeared to have less access to and make less use of patient-accessible records than the average population, but experienced more benefits than the average population when they actually used a PAEHR.

Conclusions:

The review indicated that PAEHRs bear potential to contribute to patient-centered care. However, concerns from professionals about the impact of transparency on the therapeutic relationship as well as the importance of a patient-centered attitude need to be addressed. Potentially high benefits for disadvantaged groups will be achieved only through easy-accessible and user-friendly PAEHRs. Ultimately, future research needs to address the question how PAEHRs affect PC among youths.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Benjamins J, Haveman A, Gunnink M, Goudkuil A, de Vet E

How the use of a patient-accessible health records contributes to patient-centered care: Scoping Review.

JMIR Preprints. 01/01/2020:17655

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.17655

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17655

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.