Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 2, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 2, 2019 - Nov 27, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Do problematic internet use and perceived stress mediate health behaviors and work-life balance? - An online study with internet-users in Germany and China
Work-life balance is associated with health behaviors. In the face of digitalization, understanding this link requires investigating the roles of problematic internet use and perceived stress, which are so far unknown.
The aim of this study was to explore whether problematic internet use and perceived stress mediate health behaviors and work-life balance in two groups of internet-users from different environments (residents in Germany or China), therefore, also to see if residence was a moderator.
An online questionnaire (N=877) was launched with residents from Germany (n=374) and China (n=503) in three language versions (German, English and Chinese). Moderated mediation analyses were run with health behaviors as the independent variable, work-life balance as the dependent variable, problematic internet use and perceived stress as the mediator variables, and residence as potential moderator.
Results showed that health behaviors seem to be directly related to work-life balance in both groups. In residents of Germany, a partial mediation was revealed (β = .13, P = .01), while in residents of China, a full mediation was revealed (β = .02, P =.61). The mediation role of perceived stress was prominent compared to problematic internet use in all of the serial models, and the parallel model. Residence moderated the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance. On a mean level, individuals in Germany performed more health behaviors than individuals in China, however, have higher perceived stress. The interrelation between health behaviors and work-life balance was stronger in Germany (β = .19, P < .001), compared in China (β = .11, P =.01).
These findings are in line with the compensatory carry-over action model. To promote work-life balance, individuals should perform health behaviors to help overcome problematic internet use and perceived stress.
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.