Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 7, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 8, 2019 - Jul 15, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

The use of patient-facing teleconsultations in the National Health Service: A Scoping review

  • Micheal O'Cathail; 
  • Mayuran Ananth Sivanandan; 
  • Claire Diver; 
  • Judith Christian

ABSTRACT

Background:

The NHS’s Long Term Plan has set out a vision of enabling patients to access digital interactions with healthcare professionals within five years, including by video link.

Objective:

This review looks at the extent and nature of the use of patient-facing teleconsultations within a healthcare setting in the UK and what outcome measures have been assessed.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic scoping review of teleconsultation studies following the Joanna Briggs methodology. Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched for publications up to the end of December 2018 that reported on the use of patient-facing teleconsultations in a United Kingdom healthcare setting.

Results:

The search retrieved 3,132, of which 101 were included for full review. Overall the studies were heterogeneous in design, speciality assessed and in the outcome measures that were reported. The technology used for teleconsultations changed over time with earlier studies employing bespoke, often expensive, solutions. Two-thirds of the studies were conducted between 1995 and 2005 thus relied on this method with later studies transitioning to web-based commercial solutions such as Skype. There were four outcome measures that were identified as being assessed which were; 1) Technical Feasibility 2) User satisfaction 3) Clinical effectiveness 4) Cost. Due to the changing nature of technology over time there were different technical aspects of feasibility associated with later studies. Generally teleconsultations were acceptable to patients but this was less consistent amongst healthcare professionals and amongst both face-to-face was still seen as ‘the gold standard’. A wide range of clinical scenarios found teleconsultations to be clinically useful but potentially limited to more straightforward clinical scenarios. The wide array of study type and the change in technology over time makes cost difficult to draw definitive conclusions however cost savings for healthcare providers have been demonstrated by goal directed implementation of teleconsultations.

Conclusions:

Technological improvements mean that teleconsultations are now more accessible than ever. Teleconsultations appear to be safe and effective in the right clinical situations. Where offered, it is likely that patients will be supportive of such measures though they should only be offered as an option to support traditional care models rather than replace them outright. Well resourced, goal directed implementation of teleconsultations can be cost effective for healthcare providers. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

O'Cathail M, Sivanandan MA, Diver C, Christian J

The use of patient-facing teleconsultations in the National Health Service: A Scoping review

JMIR Preprints. 07/07/2019:15380

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.15380

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15380


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.