Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Aug 8, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 12, 2019 - Oct 7, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Developing and Evaluating the Quality of a New Patient Education Video on Colonoscopy Preparation
Although several patient education materials on colonoscopy preparation exist, few studies have evaluated or compared them, and hence no professional consensus on recommended content or media to use.
We aimed to address this need by developing and evaluating a new video on colonoscopy preparation.
We developed a new video explaining split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Of similar content videos on the Internet (n=20), the most favourably reviewed video among patient and physician advisors was used as the comparator for the study. 232 individuals attending gastroenterology or urology clinics reviewed the new and comparator videos. The order of administration of the new and comparator videos was randomly counterbalanced to assess the impact of presentation order. Respondents rated each video along the following dimensions: information amount, clarity, trustworthiness, understandability, new or familiar information, reassurance, information learned, understanding from patient’s point of view, appeal, and likelihood to recommend the video to others.
Overall, 71.6% preferred the new video, 25.0% preferred the comparator video, and 3.4% were not sure. 64% of those who viewed the new video first, preferred it, while 78% who viewed the new video second preferred it. Multivariable logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that participants were more likely to prefer the new video if they had viewed it second. Participants who preferred the new video rated it as more clear and trustworthy compared with those who preferred the comparator video.
This study developed and assessed the strengths of a newly developed colonoscopy educational video.
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.