Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 29.09.10 in Vol 12, No 3 (2010): Jul-Sep

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Consumers’ Use of Web-Based Information and Their Decisions About Multiplex Genetic Susceptibility Testing"

Kimberly A Kaphingst, Colleen M McBride, Christopher Wade, Sharon Hensley Alford, Lawrence C Brody, Andreas D Baxevanis

J Med Internet Res 2010 (Sep 29); 12(3):e41 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1587):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Hurle B, Citrin T, Jenkins JF, Kaphingst KA, Lamb N, Roseman JE, Bonham VL. What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genetics in Medicine 2013;15(8):658
    CrossRef
  2. Nasykhova YA, Barbitoff YA, Serebryakova EA, Katserov DS, Glotov AS. Recent advances and perspectives in next generation sequencing application to the genetic research of type 2 diabetes. World Journal of Diabetes 2019;10(7):376
    CrossRef
  3. Seo J, Ivanovich J, Goodman MS, Biesecker BB, Kaphingst KA. Information Topics of Greatest Interest for Return of Genome Sequencing Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2017;26(3):511
    CrossRef
  4. Madeo AC, Tercyak KP, Tarini BA, McBride CM. Effects of Undergoing Multiplex Genetic Susceptibility Testing on Parent Attitudes towards Testing Their Children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2014;47(3):388
    CrossRef
  5. Wasson K, Hogan NS, Sanders TN, Helzlsouer KJ. Primary Care Patients’ Views, Attitudes, and Decision-Making Factors Regarding Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: Results From a Qualitative Study. AJOB Primary Research 2012;3(2):24
    CrossRef
  6. Rosenfeld L, Shepherd A, Agunwamba AA, McCray AT. Iterative Evaluation of a Web-Based Health Information Resource. Journal of Health Communication 2013;18(8):974
    CrossRef
  7. Hawkins AK, Ho A. Genetic Counseling and the Ethical Issues Around Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2012;21(3):367
    CrossRef
  8. Kaphingst KA, McBride CM, Wade C, Alford SH, Reid R, Larson E, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC. Patients’ understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results. Genetics in Medicine 2012;14(7):681
    CrossRef
  9. Kim E, Gellis ZD, Bradway C, Kenaley B. Key Determinants to using Telehealth Technology to Serve Medically Ill and Depressed Homebound Older Adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 2019;62(4):451
    CrossRef
  10. Wade CH, Shiloh S, Woolford SW, Roberts JS, Alford SH, Marteau TM, Biesecker BB. Modelling decisions to undergo genetic testing for susceptibility to common health conditions: An ancillary study of the Multiplex Initiative. Psychology & Health 2012;27(4):430
    CrossRef
  11. Ye XC, Ng I, Seid-Karbasi P, Imam T, Lee CE, Chen SY, Herman A, Sharma B, Johal G, Gu B, Wasserman WW. Portal for Families Overcoming Neurodevelopmental Disorders (PFOND): Implementation of a Software Framework for Facilitated Community Website Creation by Nontechnical Volunteers. JMIR Research Protocols 2013;2(2):e25
    CrossRef
  12. . An Empirical Evaluation of Factors Influencing Patients’ Reactions to the Implementation of Health Information Exchanges (HIEs). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2019;35(13):1135
    CrossRef
  13. Bloss CS, Darst BF, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing. Human Molecular Genetics 2011;20(R2):R132
    CrossRef
  14. Syurina E, Brankovic I, Probst-Hensch N, Brand A. Genome-Based Health Literacy: A New Challenge for Public Health Genomics. Public Health Genomics 2011;14(4-5):201
    CrossRef
  15. Carere DA, Kraft P, Kaphingst KA, Roberts JS, Green RC. Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Genetics in Medicine 2016;18(1):65
    CrossRef
  16. Ray LA, Bujarski S, Grodin E, Hartwell E, Green R, Venegas A, Lim AC, Gillis A, Miotto K. State-of-the-art behavioral and pharmacological treatments for alcohol use disorder. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2019;45(2):124
    CrossRef
  17. Wade C, Shiloh S, Roberts J, Hensley Alford S, Marteau T, Biesecker B. Preferences among Diseases on a Genetic Susceptibility Test for Common Health Conditions: An Ancillary Study of the Multiplex Initiative. Public Health Genomics 2012;15(6):322
    CrossRef
  18. Hay JL, Berwick M, Zielaskowski K, White KA, Rodríguez VM, Robers E, Guest DD, Sussman A, Talamantes Y, Schwartz MR, Greb J, Bigney J, Kaphingst KA, Hunley K, Buller DB. Implementing an Internet-Delivered Skin Cancer Genetic Testing Intervention to Improve Sun Protection Behavior in a Diverse Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2017;6(4):e52
    CrossRef
  19. Hesse BW, Suls JM. Informatics-Enabled Behavioral Medicine in Oncology. The Cancer Journal 2011;17(4):222
    CrossRef
  20. . Interactive e‐counselling for genetics pre‐test decisions: where are we now?. Clinical Genetics 2015;87(3):209
    CrossRef
  21. Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O'Connor A, Skirton H. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics 2012;20(8):811
    CrossRef
  22. Laedtke AL, O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Vogel KJ. Family Physicians’ Awareness and Knowledge of the Genetic Information Non‐Discrimination Act (GINA). Journal of Genetic Counseling 2012;21(2):345
    CrossRef
  23. Celik R, Toruner EK. The Effect of Technology-Based Programmes on Changing Health Behaviours of Adolescents: Systematic Review. Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing 2020;43(2):92
    CrossRef
  24. Bernhardt BA, Roche MI, Perry DL, Scollon SR, Tomlinson AN, Skinner D. Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2015;167(11):2635
    CrossRef
  25. Kinney AY, Howell R, Ruckman R, McDougall JA, Boyce TW, Vicuña B, Lee J, Guest DD, Rycroft R, Valverde PA, Gallegos KM, Meisner A, Wiggins CL, Stroup A, Paddock LE, Walters ST. Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2018;73:123
    CrossRef
  26. . Consumers’ Perceptions of Using Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) for Research Purposes. Information Systems Management 2019;36(1):57
    CrossRef
  27. Hall TO, Renz AD, Snapinn KW, Bowen DJ, Edwards KL. Awareness and Uptake of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Among Cancer Cases, Their Relatives, and Controls: The Northwest Cancer Genetics Network. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 2012;16(7):744
    CrossRef
  28. Wessel J, Gupta J, de Groot M, Meyre D. Factors Motivating Individuals to Consider Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction. PLOS ONE 2016;11(1):e0147071
    CrossRef
  29. Bunnik EM, Janssens ACJW, Schermer MHN. A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing. European Journal of Human Genetics 2013;21(6):596
    CrossRef
  30. Ahmad N, Abdulkarim H. The Impact of Flow Experience and Personality Type on the Intention to Use Virtual World. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2019;35(12):1074
    CrossRef
  31. Tarini BA, Tercyak KP, Wilfond BS. Commentary: Children and Predictive Genomic Testing: Disease Prevention, Research Protection, and Our Future. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2011;36(10):1113
    CrossRef
  32. Nelson SC, Crouch JM, Bamshad MJ, Tabor HK, Yu J. Use of metaphors about exome and whole genome sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2016;170(5):1127
    CrossRef
  33. Zimmermann BM, Fanderl J, Koné I, Rabaglio M, Bürki N, Shaw D, Elger B. Examining information-seeking behavior in genetic testing for cancer predisposition: A qualitative interview study. Patient Education and Counseling 2021;104(2):257
    CrossRef
  34. Hughes Halbert C, Welch B, Lynch C, Magwood G, Rice L, Jefferson M, Riley J. Social determinants of family health history collection. Journal of Community Genetics 2016;7(1):57
    CrossRef
  35. Covolo L, Rubinelli S, Ceretti E, Gelatti U. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e279
    CrossRef
  36. . How Does Online Patient–Provider Communication Heal? Examining the Role of Patient Satisfaction and Communication Experience in China. Health Communication 2019;34(13):1637
    CrossRef
  37. Persky S, Kistler WD, Klein WM, Ferrer RA. Internet Versus Virtual Reality Settings for Genomics Information Provision. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2019;22(1):7
    CrossRef
  38. Nyström MB, Hassmén P, Sörman DE, Wigforss T, Andersson G, Carlbring P, Martino G. Are physical activity and sedentary behavior related to depression?. Cogent Psychology 2019;6(1)
    CrossRef
  39. Eklund C, Elfström ML, Eriksson Y, Söderlund A, Travlos AK. Development of the web application My Stress Control—Integrating theories and existing evidence. Cogent Psychology 2018;5(1):1489457
    CrossRef
  40. Hodson J, Feng GC. An ecological model of climate marketing: A conceptual framework for understanding climate science related attitude and behavior change. Cogent Social Sciences 2019;5(1)
    CrossRef
  41. Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Amendola LM, Anderson KP, Biesecker BB, Dorschner MO, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Lee SSJ, Leo MC, Liles EG, Lindberg NM, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Porter KM, Riddle LS, Rolf BA, Rope AF, Zepp JM, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KA. Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2021;106:106432
    CrossRef
  42. Bourdon JL, Dorsey A, Zalik M, Pietka A, Salyer P, Bray MJ, Bierut LJ, Ramsey AT. In-vivo design feedback and perceived utility of a genetically-informed smoking risk tool among current smokers in the community. BMC Medical Genomics 2021;14(1)
    CrossRef
  43. Haga S, Barry W, Mills R, Svetkey L, Suchindran S, Willard H, Ginsburg G. Impact of Delivery Models on Understanding Genomic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. Public Health Genomics 2014;17(2):95
    CrossRef
  44. Shickh S, Hirjikaka D, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Reble E, Sam J, Panchal S, Aronson M, Graham T, Armel SR, Glogowski E, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Shuman C, Seto E, Baxter NN, Scheer A, Shastri-Estrada S, Feldman G, Thorpe KE, Schrader KA, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Faghfoury H, Bombard Y. Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e060899
    CrossRef
  45. Hamilton J, Genoff Garzon M, Shah I, Cadet K, Shuk E, Westerman J, Hay J, Offit K, Robson M. Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test. Public Health Genomics 2020;23(1-2):6
    CrossRef
  46. . Future Forecasting for Research and Practice in Genetic Literacy. Public Health Genomics 2023;26(1):159
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1587):

  1. . Principles and Concepts of Behavioral Medicine. 2018. Chapter 37:1087
    CrossRef