Pokémon GO (PoGo), launched in 2016 by Niantic, Inc, is a groundbreaking augmented reality (AR) mobile game that integrates virtual gameplay with real-world exploration. The game met with instant popularity, with over 508.31 million downloads globally in the quarter of its launch and more than 1 billion downloads globally as of 2025 [1]. PoGo also maintains a monthly global active user base of approximately 60 million players, attesting to its continued appeal across the world, as of August 2025 [2]. Players navigate their surroundings to capture virtual Pokémon, battle in gyms, and interact with in-game features tied to real-world locations, such as PokéStops and community events. Over the years, PoGo has evolved through regular updates, introducing new features such as multiplayer raid battles, AR snapshots, team-based competition, and seasonal events [3]. These updates have expanded the game’s functionality, increased player engagement, and fostered a dynamic global community. PoGo was designed primarily for entertainment, but with an intentional integration of physical activity (PA) and social interaction elements as part of its game design [4].

Unlike traditional PA programs that incorporate social gamification, PoGo’s unique game design and Pokémon’s worldwide appeal could have significant public health impacts by increasing PA and enhancing social connectivity [5-7]. There is an increasing trend in the prevalence of sedentary lifestyles along with its associated health risks, and gamified health interventions are being recommended as an innovative method to engage large numbers of people in PA at a low cost [2,8]. A deeper insight into PoGo’s potential to promote even low- to moderately-intensity PA can be crucial for informing public health interventions and gamification designs targeting reduction in sedentary behaviors [2]. Questions also remain about how its game features drive behavior change and whether such changes can be sustained through long-term engagement as an integration into a more physically active daily living.

Gleaning from the most recent systematic and scoping reviews on the effects of PoGo, research on PoGo has primarily examined its ability to promote PA, showing that the game encourages low- to moderate-intensity PA, such as walking, particularly among sedentary individuals [9,10]. Although increases in step counts have been observed, these gains are typically short-lived and of low intensity, limiting their long-term health impact [10,11]. PoGo’s location-based features also foster social interactions and community engagement by bringing players together in shared spaces. While these aspects enhance its appeal, the influence of socialization on sustained gameplay and associated health outcomes is not well understood, highlighting the need for further exploration of its broader societal impact, including its role in fostering community well-being.

In addition to physical and social outcomes, PoGo has demonstrated potential benefits for mental and cognitive health. Studies included in the most recent systematic review suggest that the game enhances life satisfaction, reduces psychological distress, and supports well-being, while also improving cognitive functions such as working memory and attention [11]. However, the mechanisms driving these effects remain unclear, and little research has been conducted to identify which specific features of the game contribute to positive or negative health and social impacts. This gap is particularly relevant as PoGo continues to evolve and introduce increasingly complex features, potentially shaping player behavior and outcomes in new ways. Given that the most recent systematic review assessing the effects of playing PoGo on PA and psychosocial outcomes was in 2021, these impacts from the game’s development and progression over the past 5 years have not been documented or assessed [11]. In addition, the year 2026, when this scoping review was written, marked the tenth year since PoGo was released. Understanding the psychosocial factors that motivate players to start, continue, or stop playing the game, as well as assessing its broader societal and economic impacts, remains critical to fully realizing its potential as a public health tool and informing future gamified health interventions.

This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of PoGo research until 2025 as a health behavior change tool by examining its holistic impact on physical and mental health, well-being, and societal engagement after nine years of operation. In addition to synthesizing existing research, this review aimed to explore the motivational factors that drive individuals to start, continue, or stop playing PoGo and evaluate the specific game features that contribute to its positive or negative health and societal impacts. By analyzing the successes and limitations of PoGo from a public health perspective, this scoping review seeks to offer valuable insights into optimizing gamification strategies for future public health initiatives and behavior change interventions.

Given the broad spectrum of knowledge on the effects of playing PoGo and analyses of its numerous game features, as well as widespread media coverage of the game, a scoping review was chosen to provide an overview of the literature. A scoping review allows researchers to explore a research topic comprehensively by identifying literature gaps, including diverse study designs and sources, maintaining flexibility, and maximizing time and resource efficiency [12]. In this review, we adopted the 5-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley [13]. We reported findings according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines [14], thus ensuring the quality of this review [15]. However, our team did not perform a formal quality appraisal on the included sources, as the objective of scoping reviews is to map the extent of knowledge in the literature, as Arksey and O’Malley [13] suggested.

The primary research question guiding this review was: “Have the areas of further research from game-launch era identified by the latest reviews been covered in more recent studies?” The research questions were also formulated with reference to the findings and comments on research gaps highlighted by the 3 recent reviews mentioned above [9-11]. Six secondary questions were further formulated to delve into specific areas of the primary question and served as a structure for collating the results:

All database searches were last conducted on April 15, 2026, according to the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Search Reporting Extension) [16]. We identified subject-specific databases most suited to our research question based on a timeline from August 2016 to December 2025, since PoGo officially launched in August 2016. Quantitative and qualitative studies, as well as gray literature on PoGo, were included in this review. The search was conducted in the following seven databases: Web of Science, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Theses and Dissertations. The databases selected and key search terms were informed by a prior systematic review [11]. This scoping review used relevant keywords pertaining to PoGo, physical and mental health and well-being, social relatedness and community, and search terms for motivation and needs satisfaction.

To identify studies on PoGo play and its impact on physical and mental health, well-being, and societal engagement, we formulated search strategies with our research team (Multimedia Appendix 1). The key search terms were also informed by a prior systematic review [11]. We tested the derived search strategy in PubMed and Web of Science and found the keywords and index terms suitable for use in the other databases. A gray literature search using the same search strategy was conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the review’s aims and objectives [17].

Papers were deemed eligible for title and abstract screening if they had discussed PoGo use or its applications, as well as its benefits or adverse impacts on physical, mental, or social health and well-being. Only publications in English or officially translated to English were included. From the included papers, this scoping review mapped outcomes related to PoGo’s impacts on overall health and well-being, PoGo engagement and disengagement, and societal impacts globally. Conversely, review papers, such as scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, were excluded. Analyses solely on the technological aspects of PoGo or the general potential of AR were also excluded, as they did not assess the impact on health and social aspects from playing PoGo.

Where appropriate, we applied Boolean terms and truncation to maximize the retrieval of relevant papers. Salient aspects considered for study inclusion were as follows: PoGo’s impact on PA and physical health; PoGo’s impact on psychological or mental health and well-being; analysis or discussion on key aspects and in-game features that led to continued playing of PoGo; social or commercial impact of PoGo that maintained interest and success for continued playing, including financial or business reviews; how PoGo has been or can be applied or adapted in health interventions and its limitations; aspects of PoGo that make it successful, considering newer features in recent years; and potential health risks or other risks.

Upon retrieval from the databases, the studies were uploaded to EndNote (version 20, developed by Clarivate), where duplicates were electronically removed. Thereafter, the studies were exported to the Covidence platform for further manual checking and removal of remaining duplicates. This was followed by title and abstract screening of the remaining studies by 3 independent reviewers in our team (GKK, HSC, and SHA). Studies not meeting the eligibility criteria were removed, while those deemed eligible by at least 2 reviewers (GKK and HSC) were passed to the third reviewer (SHA) for further examination and decision. Any discrepancies in study selection were resolved through consensus with the senior author monthly during the entire review period. Additional studies with eligible titles and abstracts were retrieved for similar full-text screening, and discrepancies were likewise addressed by consulting the senior author.

A data-extraction table was developed iteratively on Microsoft Excel based on the research questions of this review. The tabulated information included the authors, countries, year of publication, study designs, paper types, date of data collection, study population, methodology, interventions, comparisons, outcome measures, key findings, and the main category of the findings according to the research questions. Pilot testing of the table was conducted independently by the first and senior authors based on the first five papers. Subsequently, GKK independently extracted, summarized, and charted data for the individual included sources of evidence. SHA checked all data, and then it was counter-checked by GKK. Key extracted data are provided in Multimedia Appendix 2 [2-7,11,18-188].

Once the data had been extracted from all the included papers, thematic analyses were conducted [13]. Through thematic organization, the impacts of playing PoGo were grouped into various intervention types and subtypes. Based on the extracted data from the included studies, main findings were identified and grouped accordingly. Guided by the primary and secondary research questions, themes and subthemes for the results section were formed through further in-depth analysis and categorization of each study’s findings. The finalized subthemes and themes were rearranged to ensure that the research questions were answered and the overall findings were coherent. GKK undertook the synthesis of extracted data, and KMYL collated the themes and subthemes into writing. Themes, subthemes, syntheses, and writing were discussed with all authors throughout the process.

As this study is a scoping review of publicly available literature and does not involve human participant recruitment or identifiable private data, ethics approval was not required in accordance with the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board. In accordance with current methodological guidance (eg, PRISMA-ScR, JBI Manual), prospective registration is not required for scoping reviews. Any included gray literature will be handled in accordance with applicable copyright and access conditions, and sources will be cited appropriately.

As provided in Figure 1, the systematic search yielded 2354 publications. These publications were uploaded to Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation) for assessment of eligibility [189]. Covidence is a web-based collaboration software platform that streamlines the production of systematic and other literature reviews. Duplicates and corrigenda were removed, leading to a remainder of 1054 papers. Upon title and abstract screening, 409 papers were sought for retrieval of their full texts. Another 223 publications were removed during full-text review due to ineligibility based on the criteria, or because their full texts were unable to be retrieved. Finally, 186 papers were identified as papers for inclusion in this systematic review. Table 1 is a tabular presentation of the overall characteristics of included studies. The third section “types of studies” and final section “domains of analysis” contain categories that are not mutually exclusive.

In addition, Figure 2 provides a gap map, which visualizes gaps in the literature from the included sources of evidence. The size of each “bubble” represents the number of sources for each type of study in a particular year and for a particular domain. The sources of evidence can be classified as more than one type of study and/or covering more than one domain of analysis. For type of study, the “Others” label includes diary study, grounded theory, interrupted time-series design, mixed methods analysis, video analysis, brief report, and internet user analytics. For domain of analysis, the “Others” label includes cognition, public health, and societal impact.

Since the launch of PoGo, player demographics (ie, gender, age, socioeconomic status, personality traits, and so on) have grown in diversity over the years, influenced by factors including but not limited to trends, peer influence, and launch of new game features. Nevertheless, across various geographical locations and studies, ongoing active players were most consistently found to be predominantly males living in urbanized cities [18-20]. Younger players aged around 18-25 years tended to be students or individuals who were more likely to play a game while walking [21-24], and the majority of adult players, aged around 25-60 years, were educated, employed, secular, and possessed middle to higher incomes [23,25].

Significant variability was observed in the aspect of players’ personality traits across gender and age groups. For example, a study in Italy revealed that early users (ie, players who have remained active since shortly after PoGo’s release) tended to be more introverted and identified more strongly as “video-gamers” instead of “social-network or mobile users.” These players also displayed higher levels of agreeableness, resilience, perseverance, and conscientiousness compared to the broader PoGo player population [26-28]. Contrastingly, Kaczmarek et al [20] and Marquet et al [24] highlighted players who demonstrated extraverted traits, as they were particularly curious and enjoyed social opportunities brought about by PoGo. Interestingly, active players had diverse gaming experiences, ranging from individuals with no prior exposure to gaming or AR games, or both [22], to long-time fans of Pokémon card and video games [24], which in turn may have affected their playstyles.

Nostalgia emerged as a primary motivation for many players to initially engage in PoGo, as identified and analyzed in 36.2% (n=17) of the 47 studies that investigated the motivations and intention to play among PoGo players. This was particularly relevant for those with prior exposure to the Pokémon franchise, especially those aged 20‐26 years in 2024, stemming from positive experiences with the franchise’s related animations, video games, and card games, which peaked in popularity during the late 1990s and early 2000s [23,29]. For others, commonly reported drivers were curiosity and excitement sparked by the novelty and popularity of PoGo, expectations of enjoyment, fun, and pleasure derived from both the nature and mechanics of the game [21,29-35], keeping up with the trends to stay connected, as well as social influences through peer recommendation to play or a perceived common activity for family bonding [36,37].

Notably, gender and prior gaming experience were covariates found to influence an individual’s motivation and intention to play. Females were more likely to engage in PoGo with the intention of exploring new physical locations, contributing to both health benefits and pleasure [23]. Males were often more driven by nostalgia; they desired to unlock more achievements in the game and be seen as competent and successful in-game, as well as to increase opportunities for social interaction [23]. Moreover, individuals with less or no experience in PoGo gaming were more inclined to play if they believed they could achieve satisfaction in aspects of autonomy and competence through gameplay [38].

Some of the motivations to engage in PoGo also served as facilitators to continue gameplay, albeit in a different order of priority and relevance across time and types of players [39]. For example, factors relevant to nostalgia, such as franchise and brand loyalty, and fulfilling childhood fantasies, were still positively associated with gameplay continuance across the diverse player base [40-42]. However, this motivation was found to generally weaken within 3 months after the global launch of the game [31,43]. Instead, a significantly greater number of studies (n=35) highlight the lasting importance of both positive and negative motivations for gameplay continuance to be demonstrated.

For many, disengagement from PoGo resulted from the gradual erosion and eventual disappearance of initial motivations that had driven gameplay. Common indicators included waning of interest and increasing sense of boredom experienced by the player and within player networks [37,70], along with a sense of stagnation in gameplay and consequently diminishing intrinsic motivations [66]. The game had also grown to be too complex and unenjoyable for some players who lacked a sense of competence, which was key to intrinsic motivation, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial in a dissertation [71]. According to Vaterlaus et al [35], this decline could be attributed to failure to derive gratification from aspects of nostalgia, novelty, pleasure, achievement, and social recognition, which, when unmet, led to negative feelings and ultimately deterred continued play. Additional deterrents included technical issues such as device compatibility problems, missing in-game features, unreliable navigation and step-tracking, which impacted PoGo’s perceived functionality as a fitness application and its playability [4,35,66,72,73], data privacy and safety concerns [7,35,47,61,74,75], as well as frustrations regarding the high operating demand PoGo placed on players’ devices, namely excessive, large consumption of battery, data, and phone storage requirements [76-78]. Finally, a minority of players attributed disengagement to situational reasons, such as lack of time and personal circumstances beyond the game [7,29,72].

An overview of the findings from the included sources of evidence, as well as the discussion of the future interventions and implementations based on these findings, are provided in Figure 3. The findings from the included studies span across various theories and models of understanding motivation in the context of gamified health intervention. Motivation for PA has been found to increase with motivation to engage with PoGo use while being physically active. As such, findings include perspectives from individual needs with reference to the self-determination theory, satisfaction with the game with reference to uses and gratification theory, behavioral concepts such as FOMO, as well as analyses on individual differences based on personality and traits. Figure 3 endeavors to visualize these findings holistically and allow consideration of how findings based on various theoretical backgrounds may be interlinked, providing a resource for further exploration of these concepts in relation to one another. The innermost white ring highlights the features and combination of some or all unique features that may contribute to the impacts highlighted in the outer gray ring. The red and white halves further expand on these impacts and are organized into those relating to the individual-level physical and mental health and those relating to broader public health and societal levels.

Based on the scoping review’s objectives to assess PoGo as a health behavior change tool, the findings reveal a consistent profile of typical players and mixed outcomes across physical and mental health, well-being, and societal engagement. Active players were predominantly males in urban areas [18-20] and adults with middle-to-higher incomes and education levels [23]. They were reportedly driven by nostalgia for the Pokémon franchise [122], although motivations also differed by gender [49]. PoGo also successfully designed game features to satisfy a diverse range of needs for continued interest in the game [42-50]. While PoGo was found in numerous included studies to be positively associated with increased PA [79-81,156], particularly among sedentary individuals [81,100], its effectiveness as a sustained PA intervention is limited. Players often paused exercise for gameplay, and PA gains frequently diminished after stopping play [95,124,128,129]. One of the game’s strongest impacts lay in its association with increased social connections and community engagement through cooperative features and large-scale events [55-57,62]. However, significant concerns emerged around public safety risks from distracted play and traffic accidents arising from playing PoGo in public [143-145], as well as potential gaming addiction driven by competitive features and FOMO [63].

Key to PoGo’s notable success in gamification of PA is the game’s ability to increase the user’s PA subconsciously while they move around through enjoying the game [60,83]. However, PoGo functions as a game more than a gamified health application, and ultimately, players may find less strenuous means of playing the game efficiently. From the included sources of evidence, players have been found to prioritize gameplay over consistent PA [95,124,128,129]. In recent updates, the extended ability to use “Remote Raid Passes” in more types of raids—allowing players to participate in these raid events from the comfort of their homes—potentially results in little to no impact on PA while playing the game [193]. Ironically, PoGo’s greatest increase in uptake occurred during the COVID-19 lockdown, where the game rose in popularity by adapting to isolated and stationary gaming [59,194]. The need to collect rare Pokémon may end up fueling maladaptive gaming motivations and physical strain from extensive gaming, without any physical health benefits gained, making PoGo no different from other mobile games [68,69,146]. While simply playing the game might be effective in nudging sedentary or overweight adults into engaging in some walking while playing outdoors [81,100], PoGo’s heavy focus on being a game likely impedes its effectiveness as a gamified health intervention tool for sustained increases in PA of various intensities.

PoGo has been understood from the included studies to be a social game designed around cooperation and competition, often in seasonal events involving large groups of players [57,62]. Of the studies included, 25 studies [3,20,24,37,54,61,91,96,98,101,104,105,107,108,111,117,119,127,130,156,162-166] mentioned how PoGo facilitated more interactions between acquaintances and even strangers, potentially enhancing the sense of community, which can improve social well-being. Social support for PA has been found to be a cost-effective public health strategy [195]. The World Health Organization [8] emphasizes community-based recreation as being central to PA promotion across all countries, stating that health policies and programs have a key role in facilitating community-based PA. These findings are also supported by a 6-week field study conducted by Tong et al [196], where social interaction and communication were found to be the most effective gamification features in increasing step count. Those designing new interventions could consider the double benefits of improving social well-being and physical health as encouraged by PoGo’s social features.

Regardless of gender-specific or individually unique motivations, the included studies have shown that various aspects of PoGo, be it competitive, cosmetic, social elements, or simply a desire to “catch them all,” have helped to sustain the interest of PoGo players through meeting their various needs [42-51]. However, time-limited events and the need for the newest rare Pokémon to stay competitive in-game can stimulate a sense of FOMO [62,65], placing players at greater risk of losing self-control and becoming addicted to gaming [63]. Furthermore, PoGo’s video game characteristics, such as sociability features, elements of the flow experience, and general happiness, accounted for 49.2% of the total variance in Game Addiction Scale levels [197]. Increased engagement with PoGo, while associated with higher PA levels and improvements in mental and social well-being, may also result in problematic screen time [2]. As such, even the seemingly positively successful features of PoGo in eliciting more PA, such as increased sociability and enjoyment, should be carefully considered. PoGo use was still found by the included studies to reduce levels of anxiety, loneliness, and negative affect [59,69,110-113]; therefore, the extent of its benefits and potential harms with prolonged use should be further assessed.

PoGo has shown the massive influence of brand loyalty and nostalgia in the adoption of a behavioral change app. This phenomenon has not been replicated by other population-level gamification efforts globally, which highlights the potential of leveraging popular brands in gamified health interventions [1,2]. A successful population-wide incentive-based mobile health PA program is the National Steps Challenge in Singapore, implemented by the Health Promotion Board under the Ministry of Health [198]. Season 3 of the program reached over 14% of Singapore’s adults from 2017 to 2018, engaging 60% of participants for a median of 74 days and increased their step count by 1500 steps daily [198]. In fact, Season 5 of the National Steps Challenge featured Pokémon-themed collectible kits at their roadshows, which attests to the drawing power of Pokémon’s brand [167]. Another 12-week loyalty points-based program implemented in Canada among 32,229 participants saw an increase of more than 6511 steps on average, indicating the effectiveness of incentives in increasing PA [199]. A potential collaboration between governments and PoGo may be able to incentivize increased PA through more PA-focused, cooperative game modes. PoGo’s app can also be enhanced to sync PA from other fitness apps more accurately and comprehensively. The rewards provided could be government-funded, such as retail vouchers, to make participation more meaningful for general or target populations.

Over the years, PoGo has had various successful partnerships and tie-ins with global franchises, such as Starbucks, McDonald’s, and Circle K [200-202]. Companies and even countries have benefited from increased footfall generated by crowds of players who move and gather around commercial and public spaces to play the game, especially when participating in game events. PoGo has also been known to hold numerous events every year in selected cities across the world, such as PoGo Fest, which attract hundreds of thousands of people each time [203,204]. These events encourage not only outdoor movement, but also overseas travel and social interactions beyond national borders. This demonstrates not just PoGo’s value as an effective tourism product, but also its global influence through its appeal and inclusiveness. However, for locations in cities with heavy traffic, such as Los Angeles, significant delays and restricted participation at venues can occur [205]. This may deter PoGo players from participating in country-specific events, thereby reducing the PA impact of such game modes. For cities or countries looking to host such PoGo global events, policymakers may consider investing in long-term infrastructure enhancements to facilitate walkability and smooth exploration of public areas, which will benefit both local and tourist pedestrians. Given that PoGo revenue has maintained above US $557 million after nine years, compared with slightly more than US $550 million in 2016 when it first launched [194], longer-term health and economic impacts can still be leveraged from PoGo. The way these raid events gather masses of people, including tourists, demonstrates PoGo’s effectiveness in gathering physically active and inactive people through a shared interest in the game. However, further long-term research into sustained increases in PA because of playing PoGo is necessary when considering PoGo as a health intervention or when using its successful brand in novel health interventions.

PoGo’s large-scale global events can attract crowds gathering in hundreds, notably in recent Max Battles that can host up to 100 players per virtual lobby [206]. The risks of accidents due to distractions from intense focus on playing the game on mobile phones, unsafe traffic-crossing behaviors, or tourists’ unfamiliarity with foreign public spaces may increase sharply during game event periods [145,147,148]. As such, PoGo may not be suitable as a public health tool in regions that remain unsafe for interacting with strangers [149]. Even in countries that are safe for public social interactions, reducing the risk of serious injuries due to distraction while playing PoGo should be a priority. To leverage community-based PA and encourage tourism, state laws and infrastructure should adapt to accommodate large-scale events, facilitating safe spaces for social interactions and physical activity in public spaces.

This scoping review sought to assess the effects of playing PoGo over the years that the game has been in operation to provide a comprehensive understanding of PoGo’s sustainability and suitability as a gamification tool, as well as its socioeconomic impacts. There are limitations to the extent of our endeavor to understand PoGo’s effects over the years. One key caveat is that the majority (44.1%) of the included studies were published based on player populations and data from the first 3 years of the game’s operation since 2016. Regarding longer-term studies, only 5 [19,60,155,168,169] included studies had a duration of 6 months and above, with only 1 study [169] spanning across 3 years. The longer-term effects of PoGo across its 8-year lifetime cannot be fully understood through studies involving players who have played for more than 3 years, except through comparisons across different player populations examined in later studies. Future studies should focus on longitudinal designs or long-term players with more than 3 years of gameplay experience to better understand changes in health and well-being from playing PoGo.

Another notable observation is the large number of findings being based on cross-sectional surveys. As shown in Table 1, cross-sectional surveys were used in 107 of the 186 included sources. Surveys were also the main mode of data collection consistently used in PoGo research [2]. A large portion of psychosocial outcomes were based upon self-reported scores from questionnaires and online surveys, and study findings were largely correlational among the included studies. While these studies have revealed the depth of PoGo’s impact on players and the larger society, there remains a lack of understanding of how specific elements of PoGo can have causal impact on various areas of a player’s well-being, as well as specific features of the game that can lead to increased motivation for positive health behaviors. Further research studies designed to test the theoretical framework generated from this scoping review would help with better understanding of how to translate the successes and failures of PoGo to gamified health interventions. In addition, this paper only included studies published in English and may have omitted the possibility of useful findings from studies published in other languages. No research librarian or information scientist was consulted for input on the search strategy, which may have limited potential refinements.

Despite the limitations, this scoping review has achieved its aim of being a novel and comprehensive assessment of existing PoGo knowledge pertaining to promoting and sustaining overall health impacts, as well as the current understanding of its potential as a tool or model for increasing PA at a population level. This scoping review sought to expand the understanding of PoGo’s impact from the most recent findings related to increasing overall health and well-being among its players, which can be applied to designing more effective health intervention tools in the future. Given that the most recent systematic review on a similar topic was in 2021, a review of new PoGo research in the past 4 years was also crucial to understand the impact of newer game features. This scoping review is also the first of its kind that synthesizes outcomes across PA, mental well-being, social connectivity, socioeconomic effects, risks, as well as motivational features and game mechanisms that drive initiation, continuance, and disengagement. This review brings to the field a consolidated and thematically organized understanding of the health aspects whereby benefits appeared most consistently (eg, walking and step increases for some demographics, self-reported improvements to social well-being and reduced loneliness or distress among players), where the evidence is inconclusive or short-lived, and which features (eg, supporting social play, individual needs satisfaction, and game content updates) plausibly explain maintenance vs drop-off. Simultaneously, the review also identified potentially maladaptive complications (eg, gaming disorder risk, distraction injuries, and data privacy trade-offs) that can impede the viability of PoGo or game-based PA tools in general.

In summary, PoGo has been found to relate positively to physical and mental health, as well as social well-being, for various demographics. PoGo also had successful features that motivated players to continue playing, thereby promoting an increase in their PA through enjoying the game. This shows that a strong media franchise and easy-to-play mechanics, together with the right gamified features and AR functionality, can encourage engagement in outdoor PA. The potential cognitive benefits among adolescents also suggest a holistic improvement in overall health from playing PoGo that warrants further investigation. Nevertheless, PoGo functions primarily as a game before being a health intervention tool. Caution should also be exercised against the maladaptive motivations discussed and the playability of PoGo without being physically active. Certain personal and public safety concerns should also be considered due to the AR nature of the game. PoGo certainly has value as a tourism product and the mass appeal to encourage PA within and across countries that policymakers can use in suitable adaptations or partnerships, but its long-term impact on PA and promotion of more vigorous PA remain inconclusive. At the very least, PoGo use has been shown to motivate people who are sedentary, isolated, or experiencing stress and anxiety to go outdoors and engage in some walking and social interactions, which can have a significant impact on improving their physical and mental health, even at a low level of PA intensity.