Abstract
Background: Mpox has reemerged as a global public health concern. With the growing reliance on social media for health information dissemination, understanding public perception through these platforms is essential for designing effective health promotion strategies.
Objective: This study analyzes TikTok data related to mpox using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. This paper aims to extract key topics and inform targeted health promotion strategies for mpox prevention and control.
Methods: Using the “Aisou Jisou” system, we collected TikTok data containing the keyword “Mpox” from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2025. The dataset comprised 25,672 text data and associated search terms. We analyzed trends in the Search Index and Target Group Index (TGI) across time, gender, age groups, and provinces. LDA topic modeling was applied to identify latent topics within the text data, and topic evolution was examined during 4 peak months of the Search Index.
Results: A total of 4 major Search Index peaks were identified on TikTok in China, which are May 2022, July 2023, August 2024, and February 2025. These peaks aligned with key global and national mpox events, including WHO’s declaration of a global mpox outbreak in May 2022 and the detection of the clade Ib Mpox in China in January 2025. TGI analysis revealed that users aged 18‐23 years exhibited the highest engagement. Spatially, Beijing, Tianjin, and Jilin recorded the highest cumulative TGI values (5922.38, 5692.41, and 3579.90, respectively). LDA topic modeling identified 8 primary topics, including transmission and prevention, vaccine concerns, and misinformation, etc. Public attention evolved from general disease knowledge toward issues of stigmatization and vaccine distrust over time. Sankey diagrams illustrated shifts in public attention across topics at different Search Index peaks, with “Mpox Transmission and Prevention” receiving the most attention in May 2022 and “Mpox Vaccination and Infection Prevention” in February 2025.
Conclusions: TikTok provides real-time insights into public attention during mpox outbreaks, but can also propagate misinformation and stigmatizing narratives. Public health authorities should leverage these platforms for timely communication, actively address misinformation, and mitigate social bias. Tailored strategies are needed to enhance health literacy, minimize stigma, and strengthen outbreak preparedness and response. This study highlights the dual role of social media as both an information source and a potential vector for misinformation, emphasizing the necessity for active monitoring and regulation by health authorities to ensure the accuracy and reliability of disseminated health information.
doi:10.2196/77424
Keywords
Introduction
Mpox, formerly known as monkeypox, is an emerging zoonotic disease caused by the mpox virus (MPXV). The virus was first identified in monkeys in 1958 and has since been detected in various animal species. The first human case was reported in 1970 in the Republic of the Congo in Central Africa. Since then, MPXV has primarily spread within Central and West Africa through animal-to-animal (mainly rodents and nonhuman primates), animal-to-human, and human-to-human transmission pathways []. In recent years, globalization has significantly contributed to the cross-border spread of mpox, leading to outbreaks in multiple countries. By May 2022, mpox had spread to 110 countries, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in July 2022. This declaration was lifted in May 2023 as global case numbers declined []. However, on August 14, 2024, the WHO again declared a PHEIC due to an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, attributed to a previously unreported subtype, clade Ib, associated with more severe disease outcomes [,]. As of February 28, 2025, 131 countries have reported a total of 134,034 confirmed cases and 291 deaths globally. Notably, men who have sex with men constituted 86.6% of the cases reported during the preceding 12 months [].
The first imported case of mpox in mainland China was confirmed on September 16, 2022, in Chongqing []. By February 28, 2025, a total of 2849 cases had been documented nationwide, including 549 reported in the preceding year []. Although the incidence of mpox in China is lower than that in high-prevalence regions globally, the country’s large population necessitates sustained preparedness for public health challenges associated with potential mpox outbreaks. Previous studies have identified several key risk factors for mpox infection in nonendemic countries, including having multiple sexual partners, close physical contact, MSM status, contact with confirmed cases, and younger age. Vaccination has demonstrated protective efficacy []. In China, however, cultural stigma, legal considerations, and the substantial yet often underrepresented MSM population present significant challenges to identifying high-risk individuals [-]. In addition, limited public knowledge about mpox has exacerbated fear and impeded the adoption of protective behaviors [,]. Therefore, understanding public concerns and formulating targeted health education strategies based on these concerns is crucial for effective outbreak prevention and control [].
The proliferation of social media platforms represents an inevitable trend in the digital era. As of February 2025, approximately 5.24 billion people—63.9% of the global population—were active on social media []. In China, according to the 55th “Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development” released by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) in January 2025, as of December 2024, the number of Chinese internet users had reached 1.108 billion, with the internet penetration rate rising to 78.6% []. As health care communities increasingly shift online, individuals are relying more heavily on the internet for health-related information [,]. User interactions on social media platforms, such as comments and shares, reflect public concern and attitudes toward health emergencies [,]. TikTok (ByteDance), recognized for its personalized content delivery and algorithm-based recommendations, has gained substantial popularity in China and ranks among the top platforms user activity []. According to a report by a third-party research agency QuestMobile, as of December 2024, the combined number of unique active users of TikTok and its lite version reached 978 million, establishing it as a key channel for information dissemination []. Despite TikTok’s potential for health information delivery, concerns remain regarding the accuracy and reliability of its content. Some users may disseminate misinformation or incomplete content, potentially triggering unnecessary public panic [-].
In this context, this study aims to use Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to analyze mpox-related content on TikTok. LDA topic modeling is an unsupervised Bayesian statistical model widely used in text mining and natural language processing. It represents each document as a mixture of topics, and each topic as a probability distribution over words [,]. By applying LDA topic modeling to analyze mpox-related discussions and comments on TikTok, we aimed to gain insights into public information-seeking behaviors and attention toward mpox. The findings provide a scientific basis for developing targeted health communication strategies and interventions. Furthermore, LDA topic modeling can identify knowledge gaps and hotspots in public discourse on TikTok, providing valuable insights not only for mpox prevention but also to the study of public concerns about other diseases. This approach facilitates the optimization of health communication content and strategies, ultimately enhancing public health literacy and preparedness.
Methods
Ethical Considerations
All data were sourced from publicly accessible TikTok social media content. Research activities complied strictly with the platform’s terms of service and established ethical guidelines for social media research. No personally identifiable information was collected, and all analyses were conducted on aggregated data to preserve user anonymity.
Data Sources
The data used in this study were obtained from the “Aisou Jisou” Index Analysis System [], which provides TikTok-related data (including both TikTok and the “lite version” of TikTok). The system holds a Chinese software copyright registration number from the National Copyright Administration of China, with the registration number being 14092309. The keyword “Mpox” was used for data extraction. The starting point was set to a month before the first reported mpox case in the nonendemic United Kingdom in May 2022, and the endpoint was set to 2 months after the confirmation of the first clade Ib mpox case by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention in January 2025. The total duration was 3 years, covering the period from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2025.
Data retrieval involved the following steps: (1) examination of open application programming interfaces, focusing on core endpoints such as “Search Index,” “Associated Search Terms,” Target Group Index (TGI), etc; (2) development of an automated data acquisition program using Java and Python integrated with HTTP/HTTPS protocol, namely “Aisou Jisou” Index Analysis System. This system used browser automation tools (eg, Selenium) and headless browser technology to simulate user interactions for automated monthly API calls; (3) application of reverse engineering and packet analysis techniques for decryption and parsing of potentially encrypted data; and (4) implementation of rigorous data cleaning and preprocessing, including deduplication, missing value handling, data normalization, and outlier detection to ensure data integrity for subsequent analysis.
The retrieved dataset comprised: Search Index, Associated Search Terms, and the TGI stratified by gender, age group, and provinces in mainland China. The Search Index is a proprietary metric developed by TikTok to assess the popularity of specific keywords. It is derived by weighting the search volume of the keyword and its related content. It should be noted that the Search Index does not reflect the exact search volume. The TGI reflects the relative strength or weakness of the consumption behavior of a specific user demographic for a given keyword, as compared to the overall platform user base []. A TGI >100 signifies that the proportion of users within the specified demographic engaging with the keyword exceeds the platform average.
Data Cleaning
Before LDA topic modeling, data underwent preprocessing to ensure quality: removal of stopwords (eg, modal particles or meaningless symbols), standardization of synonyms (eg, uniform expressions for countries or disease abbreviations), phrase merging (eg, combining multiword terms into single tokens), and word segmentation. These procedures minimized noise and enhanced semantic clarity for topic modeling.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive analysis of the Search Index was conducted using WPS (Kingsoft Corporation). LDA topic modeling and associated workflows—including data preprocessing, word segmentation, perplexity and coherence evaluation, topic modeling, and visualization—were conducted using Python (version 3.12.0; Python Software Foundation) with the following libraries: “matplotlib,” “numpy,” “jieba,” “scipy,” “gensim,” “pandas,” “pyLDAvis,” “openpyxl,” and “pyecharts.” The “jieba” library is a robust Python tool for Chinese text processing, offering efficient word segmentation, multiple segmentation modes, custom dictionary support, part-of-speech tagging, and keyword extraction capabilities.
Determining the optimal number of topics is critical in LDA topic modeling, as both insufficient and excessive topics can compromise interpretability. Model performance was assessed using perplexity and coherence scores. Lower perplexity values indicate superior predictive performance on unseen data, whereas higher coherence scores correspond to more semantically coherent and interpretable topics [,].
For the LDA topic modeling, a corpus of 25,672 text data underwent preprocessing (stopword removal and part-of-speech-based keyword filtering). Subsequently, the LDA topic modeling was applied for topic mining with the following parameters: alpha=0.0125, beta=0.01, iterations=100, chunksize=400, and update_every=1. Model evaluation encompassed perplexity, coherence, and intertopic distance to ensure high topic coherence and interpretability.
Models with topic numbers ranging from 1 to 15 were evaluated. For each model, the top 15 words per topic were identified based on the conditional probability P(w|z) (probability of word “w” given topic “z”). Topic term distribution and overlap were visualized using “pyLDAvis.” A nonoverlapping term distribution across topics served as an additional selection criterion. Separate LDA topic modeling was conducted for peak months of public attention (identified via Search Index peaks) to track topic evolution and thematic shifts over time (see ). illustrates the study methodology.

Results
Trends in Search Index and TGI
From April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2025, the Search Index for “Mpox” on TikTok in China showed 4 significant peaks, corresponding to May 2022, July 2023, August 2024, and February 2025 (see ). These spikes aligned with major epidemic events both globally and domestically.

TGI analysis revealed fluctuating public engagement across genders without a clear long-term bias; however, male users maintained higher TGI values for extended periods as the outbreak progressed. In terms of age, younger users consistently demonstrated higher TGI, with the 18‐23 years age group exhibiting the highest and most volatile engagement, peaking in late 2024; the 24‐30 years age group followed with moderate but stable attention; while older groups (31‐40 years, 41‐50 years, and 51+ years age group) showed lower and more stable engagement. Spatially, provinces such as Beijing, Tianjin, and Jilin recorded the highest cumulative TGI values of 5922.38, 5692.41, and 3579.90, respectively; individual months also showed sharp increases in regions like Gansu (December 2023) and Tianjin (March 2025), possibly reflecting localized outbreaks or viral content amplification (see -).



LDA Topic Modeling Results
LDA topic modeling, based on perplexity and coherence evaluations (see and ), determined the optimal number of topics as 8. Topic distance mapping showed minimal overlap (see ).



To present high-frequency and high-probability associated words under each topic, we ultimately selected 15 practically significant associated words for each topic (see ), it presents the top 15 associated words ranked by P(w|z) for each topic, along with their term frequencies.
| Topic number | Topic | Top 15 related words (word frequency, P[w|z]) |
| 1 | Mpox transmission and prevention |
|
| 2 | Global mpox epidemic monitoring and control measures |
|
| 3 | Disease treatment and prevention strategies |
|
| 4 | Epidemic transmission and prevention measures |
|
| 5 | Epidemic transmission characteristics and control |
|
| 6 | Vaccination and infection prevention |
|
| 7 | Case detection and transmission research |
|
| 8 | Symptom presentation and transmission modes |
|
aP (w|z): conditional probability (probability of word “w” given topic “z”)
We’ve finalized 8 themes based on keyword associations and source text, and labeled them accordingly. For instance, Topic 1 was labeled “Mpox Transmission and Prevention” since its keywords primarily addressed transmission routes and preventive measures. Similarly, Topic 2 was designated “Global Mpox Epidemic Monitoring and Control” as its source text focused on epidemiological surveillance and containment strategies. Corresponding examples for each theme are provided in .
| Topic number | Topic | Examples |
| 1 | Mpox transmission and prevention |
|
| 2 | Global mpox epidemic monitoring and control measures |
|
| 3 | Disease treatment and prevention strategies |
|
| 4 | Epidemic transmission and prevention measures |
|
| 5 | Epidemic transmission characteristics and control |
|
| 6 | Vaccination and infection prevention |
|
| 7 | Case detection and transmission research |
|
| 8 | Symptom presentation and transmission modes |
|
Topic labels and interpretations are as follows:
- “Mpox Transmission and Prevention”: Focused on transmission routes, case distribution, and preventive measures. Keywords such as “patients,” “Mpox,” and “prevention” emphasize geographic spread and control strategies, with frequent references to locations like “Sichuan” and “Beijing.”
- “Epidemic Monitoring and Control Measures”: Centered on detection methods, diagnostic kits, and public health interventions. Keywords like “detection,” “test kit,” and “CDC” highlight the role of real-time monitoring and institutional response.
- “Disease Treatment and Prevention Strategies”: Involved topics such as treatment, recovery, and preventive interventions. Terms like “treatment,” “recovery,” and “medicine” suggested a broad discourse on disease management, with comparisons to other diseases like chickenpox and AIDS.
- “Epidemic Transmission and Prevention Measures”: Emphasized specific routes of transmission (eg, sexual transmission) and corresponding warnings. Keywords suggested a focus on visualized transmission data and international guidance.
- “Epidemic Transmission Characteristics and Control”: Addressed the dynamic nature of transmission and its severity. Keywords like “infectious,” “first case,” and “preventive measures” emphasized the urgency of outbreak control.
- “Vaccination and Infection Prevention”: Focused on vaccine efficacy and viral mechanisms. Keywords such as “vaccine,” “infection,” and “poxvirus,” along with references to “COVID” and “smallpox,” highlighted vaccine applications across pathogens.
- “Case Detection and Transmission Research”: Related to the identification and study of cases and transmission pathways. Keywords like “cases,” “discovery,” and “pathway” reflected attention on early surveillance and viral spread.
- “Symptom Presentation and Transmission Modes”: Concentrated on clinical symptoms and transmission mechanisms. Keywords like “symptoms,” “mode of transmission,” and “infectious disease” indicated a focus on symptomatology and statistical tracking.
Topic Evolution During Search Peaks
To explore public interest during peak search months, we conducted separate LDA topic modeling for the 4 significant peak months: May 2022, July 2023, August 2024, and February 2025. Perplexity and coherence metrics were recalculated for each period to determine the optimal number of topics: 2, 6, 4, and 5 topics, respectively (see -). Topic distances were also examined, and no keyword overlaps were found (see -).
presents the top 15 keywords for each topic during the 4 peak periods of public interest. In May 2022, users primarily focused on acquiring a general understanding of mpox, encompassing transmission routes, prevention methods, and global outbreak status. By July 2023, public attention had shifted toward real-time news updates, clinical features (eg, incubation period), impacts on specific groups (eg, transgender individuals), and newly reported domestic cases. In August 2024, searches reflected increasing concern regarding visual disease manifestations, medical supply availability, transmission mechanism research, and discussions on vaccine efficacy and administration procedures. By February 2025, attention shifted to China’s latest outbreak status, updated prevention strategies, the initiation of mpox vaccine clinical trials, and extensive media coverage. To visualize thematic transitions across these periods, we constructed Sankey diagrams (see ) illustrating shifts in user interest in response to evolving epidemic dynamics. Line thickness indicates the strength of thematic linkages between time points. For instance, the topic “Mpox Disease Treatment and Prevention Strategies” (July 2023) evolved from “Mpox Transmission and Prevention” and “Global Mpox Epidemic Monitoring and Control” (May 2022). It subsequently transitioned to “Mpox Outbreak Characteristics and Control in China” and “Mpox Symptom Presentation and Transmission Modes” (August 2024), and further diverged into “Mpox Case Detection and Transmission,” “News Updates on Mpox Prevention,” “Mpox Infection and Treatment in China,” and “Mpox Transmission Characteristics” (February 2025). This analysis demonstrates how mpox-related topics evolved from May 2022 to February 2025, shifting from global surveillance and prevention to regional control and practical applications, with an emphasis on case management and vaccine-based prevention within China.
Discussion
The 4 Significant Peaks of the Search Index
In this study, we analyzed the trends in the mpox-related Search Index on TikTok in China between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025. A total of 4 significant peaks were identified in May 2022, July 2023, August 2024, and February 2025. These surges corresponded closely with key global and national public health events. Specifically, in May 2022, the WHO announced the beginning of a global mpox outbreak []; in July 2023, the Chinese Center for Disease Control reported 106 newly confirmed mpox cases in June, marking the first update since the initial imported case in Chongqing in 2022 []; in August 2024, the WHO declared the mpox outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo a PHEIC []; and in January 2025, the clade Ib Mpox was detected in China. Subsequently, in February 2025, multiple major Chinese media outlets reposted the latest WHO outbreak report, drawing significant public attention. These findings suggest that public concern regarding mpox on TikTok is highly sensitive to the progression and reporting of the epidemic.
Younger Users Exhibited Higher TGI
TGI trend analysis by gender and age revealed important demographic insights. Although monthly gender-based TGI values fluctuated, no consistent gender bias was observed. However, male TGI values remained elevated longer as the outbreak evolved, potentially due to the predominance of male patients in China. Notably, age-based differences were more pronounced: younger users had higher TGI, with the 18‐23 years age group showing the most significant engagement and volatility, peaking in late 2024. The 24‐30 years age group followed, with a more stable pattern. In contrast, TGI among users aged 31‐50 years was relatively low with minimal fluctuation, and those aged ≥51 years exhibited the lowest and most stable TGI values. These differences may be attributed to younger users’ higher engagement with social media platforms and their heightened concern regarding emerging health threats. These findings highlight the need for age-targeted health communication strategies. For instance, older adults, who may have limited social media exposure, might benefit more from offline interventions to improve mpox awareness.
Mpox Epidemic and Influential Individuals May Influence Regional Health Information Dissemination
Geographically, provinces such as Beijing, Tianjin, and Jilin exhibited the highest cumulative TGI values, which could reflect better healthcare infrastructure, more efficient information dissemination, and higher public health literacy. During certain months, individual provinces such as Gansu (December 2023) and Tianjin (March 2025) showed sudden TGI spikes. These may have been triggered by local outbreak reports or intensified media coverage. For example, in December 2023, several widely circulated TikTok videos highlighted Gansu in bold text when discussing new mpox cases []. Similarly, in March 2025, a viral post featuring a Weibo screenshot of an mpox case in Tianjin’s Jing’an district gained extensive traction on TikTok []. These cases suggest that leveraging influential individuals or visual emphasis in digital communication can enhance the visibility and spread of health-related content.
Themes and Cognitive Gaps in Mpox-Related Discussions on TikTok
By selecting 8 topics based on perplexity and coherence scores, we were able to comprehensively capture the thematic structure of mpox-related discussions on TikTok. These topics spanned transmission, prevention, surveillance, treatment, vaccination, case reports, and symptomatology—indicating diverse public interests and concerns. However, certain associated keywords reflected ongoing public confusion and challenges to epidemic prevention. The presence of fundamental knowledge gaps was evident. Queries such as “What’s the difference between mpox and chickenpox?,” “Can mpox be cured?,” and “Is mpox still contagious after recovery?” suggest a general lack of understanding. Alarmingly, previous studies have shown that even some sexual health professionals had limited knowledge about mpox []. Therefore, enhancing public health literacy and empowering individuals to distinguish accurate from false information are essential to promoting risk awareness and responsible health behaviors.
Misinformation in Mpox-Related Discussions on TikTok and Responses
Misinformation poses a significant challenge in public health communication during the mpox outbreak. Our analysis identified search terms and topics propagating inaccurate or misleading information. For example, some searches suggested that mpox was spread by U.S. planes or developed by American and Jewish capital (eg, “mpox spread by U.S. planes [],” “virus developed by American and Jewish capital []”). Some search terms and topics indicating public mistrust and concerns about mpox vaccines. For instance, questions like “Why is the mpox vaccine not being promoted?” and “Adding HIV to the mpox vaccine” revealed reluctance and skepticism toward vaccination [,]. These false claims distort disease etiology and may incite xenophobic sentiment.
While platforms like TikTok facilitate timely information dissemination, they may also host misleading content. A COVID-19 study reported that 27% of TikTok videos in the early phase contained incorrect or incomplete information []. In studies on COVID-19 misinformation [,], it has been found that its spread is associated with multiple factors. On the one hand, misinformation can provide the public with an explanation of uncertain events, alleviating their anxiety and thus spreading widely. On the other hand, some groups deliberately tolerate or promote its spread for political, economic, or other vested interests. Thus, content regulation by authorities is essential. Health authorities should therefore actively monitor social media content to curb misinformation. For example, to overcome vaccine hesitancy, it is crucial to enhance public health literacy and provide accurate information about the safety and efficacy of mpox vaccines. In addition, it is imperative for the global political, business, and scientific communities to work together and take coordinated actions to preserve the integrity and credibility of professional expertise and rebuild public trust [,].
Stigma in Mpox-Related Discussions on TikTok and Responses
Stigmatization of affected populations has emerged as a notable issue in the mpox-related discussions on TikTok. Our analysis revealed that some queries and statements perpetuated harmful stereotypes, such as the notion that mpox is only transmitted between men who have sex with men or is common solely among homosexuals. Such stigmatizing discourse can marginalize affected groups, leading to self-concealment of cases and reduced vigilance among the general public. This, in turn, may hinder disease control efforts [,]. It is essential to address stigma through education and awareness campaigns that promote understanding and empathy toward affected communities.
Public Attention Shows Phased Changes at Different Stages of Mpox Epidemic
Public attention also shifted across different stages of the outbreak. In May 2022, when mpox first attracted public attention, searches focused on basic virology and global spread (eg, “What kind of disease is mpox?,” “Mpox symptoms look like smallpox,” “Which countries have outbreaks?”). These trends align with previous findings that individuals seek real-time information during health emergencies via social media platforms [,].
As public understanding of mpox improved and the outbreak evolved, public attention shifted []. In July 2023, keywords such as “expert interpretation of transmission” and “CDC’s mpox infection risk analysis” reflected the growing presence of professionals in content creation. However, stigmatizing discourse also intensified, including inflammatory posts targeting transgender individuals or referencing celebrities associated with LGBTQ+ communities [,] (Some comments have linked transgenders to mpox). In August 2024, following the WHO’s renewed declaration of a PHEIC, public discourse once again shifted, with growing expressions of fear—consistent with previous research showing increased fear-related posts during global health emergencies [,]. Keywords such as “photos of mpox pustules” and “disfigurement after recovery” exemplify this trend. In February 2025, the release of WHO’s latest mpox report and wide media dissemination reignited public interest, with a focus on domestic developments such as cluster outbreaks, case statistics, and clinical trials of mpox vaccines in China.
Collectively, mpox-related content evolution on TikTok paralleled epidemic progression and public information needs. This supports TikTok’s utility for real-time health surveillance and underscores the need for dynamic health education. Concurrently, public health efforts must counter misinformation, stigmatization, and fear to ensure effective disease control.
Limitations
Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, technical constraints prevented retrieval of all mpox-related TikTok content and more granular analyses of user subgroups. Second, our data were limited to associated search terms, preventing deeper analysis of the content behind those searches. Third, some internal algorithms (eg, TGI calculation) used by TikTok are not fully transparent, which may affect data accuracy. Fourth, TikTok data may not represent nonusers (eg, older adults with limited digital proficiency), introducing coverage bias. Finally, although comprehensive data cleaning was implemented, context-specific or emerging expressions may have been inadvertently excluded by the filtering system.
Conclusions
This study analyzed TikTok data on mpox in China using LDA topic modeling, revealing that public attention closely followed epidemic developments and varied by age and region. A total of 8 major topics were identified, ranging from transmission and prevention to misinformation and stigmatization. The findings highlight the dual role of social media as both an information source and a potential vector for misinformation. In actual epidemic prevention and control, public health agencies ought to harness TikTok actively. Collaborating with influential bloggers or opinion leaders to devise engaging health information content strategies is a recommended approach, using their sway to steer audiences toward cultivating healthy habits []. Meanwhile, establishing a swift monitoring mechanism is essential for detecting misinformation in a timely manner and issuing accurate information to rectify misconceptions []. In addition, regularly disseminating authoritative and accurate public health information, maintaining electronic communication with the public to comprehend their needs and concerns, conducting internet-based health education activities, and devising behavioral intervention projects to encourage healthy behavioral changes are also important []. Furthermore, analyzing TikTok data to formulate precise communication strategies can elevate the effectiveness of public health communication.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the “Aisou Jisou” Index Analysis System [] for providing the data used in this study. Their generous support has been invaluable to our research.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Perplexity scores for different topic counts in May 2022.
PNG File, 156 KBCoherence scores for different topic counts in May 2022.
PNG File, 151 KBPerplexity scores for different topic counts in July 2023.
PNG File, 112 KBCoherence scores for different topic counts in July 2023.
PNG File, 137 KBPerplexity scores for different topic counts in August 2024.
PNG File, 114 KBCoherence scores for different topic counts in August 2024.
PNG File, 156 KBPerplexity scores for different topic counts in February 2025.
PNG File, 118 KBCoherence scores for different topic counts in February 2025.
PNG File, 144 KBThe intertopic distance map in July 2023.
PNG File, 353 KBThe intertopic distance map in May 2022.
PNG File, 263 KBThe intertopic distance map in August 2024.
PNG File, 267 KBThe intertopic distance map in February 2025.
PNG File, 302 KBThe top 15 associated words of P(w|z) across different search index peak periods in Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling.
PNG File, 196 KBA Sankey diagram showing the evolution of mpox-related search keyword topics on TikTok across different search index peak periods. (Note: The Sankey diagram illustrates the evolution of TikTok search-query themes related to mpox from May 2022 to February 2025. The text labels summarize each theme’s core content. Ribbons connecting themes across consecutive time points indicate the persistence or shift of attention.)
PNG File, 274 KBReferences
- Brown K, Leggat PA. Human monkeypox: current state of knowledge and implications for the future. TropicalMed. Dec 20, 2016;1(1):8. [CrossRef]
- Lu J, Xing H, Wang C, et al. Mpox (formerly monkeypox): pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Sig Transduct Target Ther. Dec 27, 2023;8(1). [CrossRef]
- Mpox - Democratic Republic of the Congo. WHO. 2024. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON522 [Accessed 2025-04-15]
- WHO Director-General declares mpox outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. WHO. 2024. URL: https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2024-who-director-general-declares-mpox-outbreak-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern [Accessed 2025-04-15]
- Global mpox trends. WHO. 2025. URL: https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/ [Accessed 2025-04-15]
- Zhao H, Wang W, Zhao L, et al. The first imported case of monkeypox in the mainland of China - Chongqing Municipality, China, September 16, 2022. China CDC Wkly. Sep 23, 2022;4(38):853-854. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ugwu CLJ, Bragazzi NL, Wu J, et al. Risk factors associated with human Mpox infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. Feb 2025;10(2):e016937. [CrossRef]
- Zheng M, Chen W, Qian X, et al. Awareness of mpox-related knowledge among men who have sex with men in China. BMC Public Health. Mar 30, 2023;23(1):600. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Liu Y, Zhang J, Cai Y. Mpox-related stigma and healthcare-seeking behavior among men who have sex with men. Glob Health Res Policy. Apr 14, 2025;10(1):16. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhang Y, Zhang M, Wang Y, et al. Psychosocial correlates of free Mpox vaccination intention among men who have sex with men in China: model construction and validation. J Glob Health. Apr 2, 2025;15:04070. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Shen YH, Chang HH, Tou CY, et al. Stigmatization and preferences in monkeypox vaccine regimens. Arch Sex Behav. Nov 2024;53(10):3825-3834. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Chan ZYS, Chong SY, Niaupari S, et al. Receptiveness to monkeypox vaccines and public health communication strategies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Singapore: cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative insights. Sex Transm Infect. Aug 19, 2024;100(6):362-367. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wu X, Xu Y, Li X, Ding S, Hu Y, Zhu Z. Effectiveness of educational intervention for improving Monkeypox (Mpox) viral infection knowledge among MSM population. J Infect Public Health. Jun 2025;18(6):102726. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of february 2025. Statista. 2025. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ [Accessed 2025-04-16]
- The 55th “Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development” was released. Media Forum. 2025;(2). [CrossRef]
- Rowdhwal SSS, El Boghdady M. Exploring TikTok’s influence on surgical patient education. Surgeon. Apr 8, 2025:S1479-666X(25)00049-6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Izquierdo-Condoy JS, Arias-Intriago M, Mosquera-Quiñónez M, et al. Assessing the educational impact and quality of medical microvideos on TikTok: the case of Latin America. Med Educ Online. Dec 31, 2025;30(1). [CrossRef]
- Alomair N, Alkhaldi G, Alsadhan NM, Alkasabi R, Alageel S. Public perceptions of digital mental health awareness campaign in the Arab Gulf states: a qualitative thematic analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1477315. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Feng M, Binns S, Emery S. Exploring #MentholBan on TikTok: a thematic and semantic network analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. Jul 22, 2024;26(8):1022-1028. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sun Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Xu Q, Li A. Health information analysis of cryptorchidism-related short videos: analyzing quality and reliability. Digit Health. 2025;11:20552076251317578. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- QuestMobile 2024 china mobile internet annual report: digital intelligence rides the cloud: 1257 billion users trigger the ai singularity moment! QuestMobile; 2025. URL: https://www.questmobile.com.cn/research/report/1896846900944015361 [Accessed 2025-04-16]
- Liang J, Wang L, Song S, et al. Quality and audience engagement of takotsubo syndrome-related videos on TikTok: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. Sep 26, 2022;24(9):e39360. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Shi A, El Haddad J, Cai P, et al. Mpox (monkeypox) information on TikTok: analysis of quality and audience engagement. BMJ Glob Health. Mar 2023;8(3):e011138. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhang W, Wang M, Shu H, et al. Evaluation of the content and quality of schizophrenia on TikTok: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. Nov 2, 2024;14(1). [CrossRef]
- Barna I, Knap Á. Analysis of the thematic structure and discursive framing in articles about trianon and the holocaust in the online Hungarian press using LDA topic modelling. Natl Pap. May 2023;51(3):603-621. [CrossRef]
- Feng X, Hu Y, Pfaff H, Liu S, Wang H, Wang Y. Emotional or informational? Understanding cancer patients’ multifaceted help-seeking behaviors in online health communities. Soc Sci Med. Apr 2025;371:117902. [CrossRef]
- "Aisou jisou” index analysis system [Webpage in Chinese]. Chinese CDC. URL: https://cdc.indexsta.cnaxc.com/#/douyin/relate-word-search-item/index [Accessed 2025-07-30]
- Arithmetic index indicator description [Webpage in Chinese]. Trendinsight Help Center. 2022. URL: https://trendinsight.oceanengine.com/help?support_path=%252Fsupport%252Fcontent%252F130100%253FhideHeader%253D1%2526mappingType%253D2%2526pageId%253D303%2526spaceId%253D170%2526syncHistory%253D1%2526timestamp%253D1744876512866 [Accessed 2025-04-17]
- Lyu JC, Han EL, Luli GK. COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion on Twitter: topic modeling and sentiment analysis. J Med Internet Res. Jun 29, 2021;23(6):e24435. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kim A, Choi S, Woo K. Navigating the landscape of telemedicine research: a topic modeling approach for the present and future. Telemed J E Health. May 2024;30(5):1378-1393. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mpox outbreak. WHO. 2024. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/mpox-outbreak [Accessed 2025-04-19]
- Monkeypox epidemic monitoring situation in June 2023 [Webpage in Chinese]. China CDC. 2023. URL: https://www.chinacdc.cn/jkyj/crb2/yl/hd/gnyq/202409/t20240906_298322.html [Accessed 2025-04-19]
- China CDC: from November 1 to 30, 80 new cases of mpox were confirmed, including one in Gansu Province [Webpage in Chinese]. Douyin. 2023. URL: https://v.douyin.com/uByzrZCnEOo/ [Accessed 2025-05-13]
- When the people of Tianjin woke up, it felt like the sky had fallen [Webpage in Chinese]. Douyin. 2025. URL: https://v.douyin.com/qFSpuCGFMuw/ [Accessed 2025-05-13]
- Biesty CP, Hemingway C, Woolgar J, et al. Community led health promotion to counter stigma and increase trust amongst priority populations: lessons from the 2022–2023 UK mpox outbreak. BMC Public Health. Jun 19, 2024;24(1). [CrossRef]
- Gates Foundation’s “Project Skyfall” exposed [Webpage in Chinese]. Douyin. 2024. URL: https://v.douyin.com/RNdlePuEhas/ [Accessed 2025-05-13]
- Mpox is just a smokescreen [Webpage in Chinese]. Douyin. 2024. URL: https://v.douyin.com/MA4Fm5K1yng/ [Accessed 2025-05-13]
- Xu Y, Wen S, Zhang L, Su J. Is disinformation more likely to spread? A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of emerging infectious diseases on China’s short video platform. BMJ Open. Oct 21, 2024;14(10):e083351. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Southwick L, Guntuku SC, Klinger EV, Seltzer E, McCalpin HJ, Merchant RM. Characterizing COVID-19 content posted to TikTok: public sentiment and response during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adolesc Health. Aug 2021;69(2):234-241. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Dash S, Parray AA, De Freitas L, et al. Combating the COVID-19 infodemic: a three-level approach for low and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. Jan 2021;6(1):e004671. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Merchant RM, Lurie N. Social media and emergency preparedness in response to novel coronavirus. JAMA. May 26, 2020;323(20):2011-2012. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Feldmann H. Ebola--a growing threat? N Engl J Med. Oct 9, 2014;371(15):1375-1378. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zarocostas J. How to fight an infodemic. Lancet. Feb 29, 2020;395(10225):676. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Jaime C. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J Adolesc Med Health. Oct 1, 2022;34(5):367-369. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Witzel TC, Ghobrial A, Palich R, et al. Experiences of mpox illness and case management among cis and trans gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in England: a qualitative study. EClinicalMedicine. Apr 2024;70:102522. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- van Lent LG, Sungur H, Kunneman FA, van de Velde B, Das E. Too far to care? Measuring public attention and fear for ebola using Twitter. J Med Internet Res. Jun 13, 2017;19(6):e193. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Eghtesadi M, Florea A. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and TikTok: a proposal for health authorities to integrate popular social media platforms in contingency planning amid a global pandemic outbreak. Can J Public Health. Jun 2020;111(3):389-391. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mahl D, Schäfer MS, Voinea SA, et al. Responsible artificial intelligence in public health: a Delphi study on risk communication, community engagement and infodemic management. BMJ Glob Health. May 2025;10(5):e018545. [CrossRef]
- Watkins SL, Snodgrass K, Fahrion L, Shaw E. Contextualizing changes in e-cigarette use during the early COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying infodemic (“So Much Contradictory Evidence”): qualitative document analysis of Reddit forums. J Med Internet Res. Mar 20, 2025;27:e66010. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Yasmin S. Communication in the infodemic: building communication competencies for effective public health leadership. Eur J Public Health. Mar 1, 2025;35(Supplement_2):ii17-ii18. [CrossRef]
Abbreviations
| CNNIC: China Internet Network Information Center |
| LDA: Latent Dirichlet Allocation |
| MPXV: mpox virus |
| PHEIC: Public Health Emergency of International Concern |
| PHEIC: Public Health Emergency of International Concern |
| TGI: Target Group Index |
| WHO: World Health Organization |
Edited by Amaryllis Mavragani; submitted 13.05.25; peer-reviewed by Abayeneh Girma, Muhammad Yousaf; final revised version received 16.07.25; accepted 16.07.25; published 21.08.25.
Copyright© DongHang Luo, Jie Xu, Yaoyao Jiang, Mengnan Tan, Yaping Yao, Lin He, Jing Ma, Wei Dong, Wei Luo, Chu Zhou. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 21.8.2025.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

