This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
In “Content and Dynamics of Websites Shared Over Vaccine-Related Tweets in COVID-19 Conversations: Computational Analysis” ([JMIR Res 2021;23(12):e29127) the authors made one clarification.
The sentences:
Whereas the exact identity of the alternative media that was documented in this study (e.g., Raw Story) might not necessarily be important in a historical perspective, these processes of agenda setting have both theoretical and practical implications for public health efforts. Unfortunately, in this context, prominence of these fringe sources is also associated with misinformation, conspiracy theories, and vaccine-opposing messages.
Have been clarified to read:
Agenda setting by non-legacy media sources has both theoretical and practical implications for public health efforts. Unfortunately, in this context, these sources are also used by Twitter users associated with misinformation, conspiracy theories, and vaccine opposing messages.
The correction will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website on January 9, 2023, together with the publication of this correction notice. Because this was made after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text repositories, the corrected article has also been resubmitted to those repositories.