According to the World Health Organization, respiratory diseases are medical conditions affecting the airways and other structures of the lungs. Three of these include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea syndrome (SAS), [1] and COVID-19 [2]. COPD is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes persistent and progressive airflow limitation [3,4]. Patients with COPD often experience dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and exacerbation, defined as a worsening of the previously cited symptoms. The global prevalence of COPD in 1990 was 10.7% of persons aged at least 30 years, with 227.3 million cases, and it rose to 11.7% in 2010, with 384 million reported cases. By 2030, COPD is predicted to be one of the most common specific causes of death worldwide [5]. COPD is generally caused by tobacco smoke and exposure to outdoor and indoor pollution [3]. COPD is not a life-threatening condition but is associated with multiple comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporosis, all of which increase the risk of mortality [4,6]. SAS is a sleep disorder in which pauses in breathing or periods of shallow breathing during sleep occur more often than normal [1]. Each pause can last for a few seconds to a few minutes, and this occurs many times per night [1]. SAS affects 1%-6% of adults and 2% of children [7]. It affects males approximately twice as often as females [7]. Although people can be affected at any age, SAS occurs most commonly among those aged 55-60 years [7]. The prevalence of SAS is highly underestimated, as 80% of patients are undiagnosed [8]. SAS increases risks of hypertension and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. SAS also negatively affects patients’ quality of life by causing daytime sleepiness and impairing cognitive function, which can lead to accidents [8,9]. COVID-19 is a contagious coronavirus disease that was first detected in 2019, caused by SARS-CoV-2, and has led to an ongoing pandemic. As of December 23, 2020, 76 million cases and 1.7 million deaths linked to COVID-19 had been confirmed, straining health care systems throughout the world [3].

Detecting SAS, COPD, and COVID-19 earlier in people can help reduce potential damage from these diseases, and accomplishing this requires a more thorough examination of oxygen levels. Oxygen saturation, defined as the fraction of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin relative to total blood hemoglobin, is measured either through an invasive method by sampling arterial blood to analyze the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂) via a co-oximeter or with readings collected noninvasively using a pulse oximeter to measure the peripheral or pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) level [10]. A pulse oximeter measures oxygen saturation in peripheral arterial blood by illuminating the skin and measuring the light absorption of oxygenated (oxyhemoglobin) and deoxygenated (reduced hemoglobin) blood using two light wavelengths: 660 nm (red) and 940 nm (infrared). The ratio of light absorbance between oxyhemoglobin and the sum of oxyhemoglobin plus deoxyhemoglobin is calculated and compared with previously calibrated direct measurements of SaO₂ to establish an estimated measure of SpO₂ [11,12]. Physiologically, oxygen saturation levels range from 95%-100% in a healthy person, and a decrease, also referred to as oxygen desaturation, can be suggestive of a respiratory disease [12]. Indeed, SpO₂ levels drop to less than 90% in patients with COPD and COVID-19 as they experience extensive periods of hypoxemia and in patients with SAS when they endure repetitive oxygen desaturation events [12-14]. Although spirometry and polysomnography (PSG) are the gold standards for diagnosing COPD and SAS, respectively, these medical devices are intrusive and are not suitable for long-term monitoring and mass screening because of their high cost and lack of accessibility [15]. In the case of COVID-19, it has been observed that some patients experience oxygen levels below 90% without dyspnea, a condition termed “silent hypoxemia;” therefore, the detection of low SpO₂ levels is even more useful for early detection and monitoring of COVID-19 [16]. Furthermore, during a pandemic that has caused a worldwide health crisis, pulse oximeters are a low-cost and easy-to-use solution to identify problems at an early stage and monitor patients at home after hospitalization [17].

Smartwatches exhibit a high degree of satisfaction and growing popularity among the general population for health monitoring [18]. These wrist-worn devices provide a wide range of personalized health features for users, such as heart rate monitoring, sleep quality control, and oxygen saturation measurements, which can assist the prevention and long-term monitoring of diseases [19]. The Withings ScanWatch is a high-end watch with an embedded heart rate sensor that uses a reflective pulse oximeter on its caseback. The device is worn as a regular watch and is connected to a smartphone through the Withings Health Mate application. Its software, the Withings Scan Monitor, measures, transfers, records, and displays the wearer’s functional SpO₂ level. The Withings ScanWatch is intended for intermittent measurements and can be used in hospital, sleep laboratory, long-term care, and home use environments. Therefore, the Withings ScanWatch is an alternative option to finger pulse oximeters and offers several advantages to users. It enables the user to avoid the discomfort of wearing a finger pulse oximeter (especially during sleep), and it is more firmly attached to the user’s wrist than the finger pulse oximeter, which can slip on the finger. Therefore, the Withings ScanWatch has the potential to ensure better compliance than a finger oximeter.

In particular, because the ScanWatch is a wrist-worn watch that can measure SpO₂ continuously along with heart rate and, potentially, breathing rate [20,21], it could provide a less costly and time-consuming alternative to PSG. More specifically, due to the high cost of and lack of access to PSG, a subject cannot be monitored by PSG over the long term, although night-to-night variability of the apnea-hypopnea index has been found [22]. ScanWatch would enable physicians to follow patients over several weeks, at home, and in a way that does not disturb their sleep, as can occur with intrusive PSG devices. Withings ScanWatch may therefore be an alternative for screening, diagnosing, and monitoring SAS.

Pulse oximetry relies on the differential absorption by blood of red and infrared light. Figure 1 shows the absorption spectra of these two dominant forms of hemoglobin, namely oxygenated (HbO₂) and deoxygenated (Hb).

Two wavelengths are chosen so that the ratios of the absorption rates of Hb and HbO₂ are respectively maximal and minimal. Thus, customary choices are red light (at 660 nm) and infrared light (at 940 nm). From the intensities of the transmitted or reflected light at these two wavelengths, one can deduce the concentrations of both forms of hemoglobin, [HbO₂] and [Hb], and the functional oxygen saturation of arterial blood (neglecting carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin).

In practice, a ratio of ratios (also called modulation ratio), R, is computed as follows [23]:

Alternating current (AC) refers to the amplitude of the pulsatile component of the PPG signal, and direct current (DC) refers to the value of its baseline. The ratio of AC/DC is commonly called the perfusion ratio.

An analytical relationship between the perfusion index R and the fraction of oxygenated hemoglobin SpO₂ can be obtained with a model based on the Beer-Lambert law and a simplified model for the light path taken by both wavelengths. This simple model, which neglects the multiple scattering events of light in the skin, applies to some extent to pulse oximeters operating in transmission where tissues are located between the light-emitting diode (LED) and photodiode (PD). However, the model is unable to explain how reflective pulse oximeters operate, where the LED and PD are on the same side. Therefore, an experimental calibration of R to SpO₂ during a hypoxia study is necessary.

Measuring SpO₂ with a reflective sensor is more challenging on the wrist than on the fingertip. Due to the thickness of the wrist and the presence of bones, it is impossible to measure SpO₂ in transmission. In reflectance mode, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is smaller than typically found in transmission-mode finger pulse oximeters for two reasons. First, the light emitted by the LEDs penetrates the various layers of the skin, but only a small fraction will find its way back (upward) to the PD adjacent to the LED after multiple scattering events inside the skin. Second, blood perfusion is dramatically lower on the back of the wrist than on the finger. During our calibration studies, we compared blood perfusion on the wrist and on the finger using ScanWatch sensors, and we found empirically that the SNR for the measurements taken at the finger was approximately 10 times as high as the SNR for the measurements taken at the wrist.

A second challenge is that optical measurements on the wrist are more prone to artifacts. Motion artifacts are much more frequent than on the fingertip because of the presence of tendons and bones. Light-skin coupling of finger pulse oximeters is robust due to the clamp design. In the absence of a clamp, the optical sensor can lose contact with the skin more easily, both breaking the optical coupling and letting ambient light in; this tends to unpredictably modify the DC levels.

The main objective of this study was to clinically test and validate the accuracy of the reflective pulse oximeter function of the Withings ScanWatch to measure SpO₂ levels during mild, moderate, and severe hypoxia compared to a co-oximeter, the ABL90 hemoximeter (Radiometer Medical ApS), in accordance with the ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard and US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. The secondary objective was to confirm the safety of the device when used as intended.

This monocentric and prospective clinical study with a double-blind analysis was conducted on 14 healthy participants in a hypoxia laboratory at the University of California San Francisco in March 2020 at an altitude of 122 m and at a room temperature of 25 °C. Inclusion criteria were being between the ages of 18 and 50 years, having a healthy status with no evidence of any medical problems, and having both wrist circumferences between 14 and 22 cm. Current smokers, women who were pregnant, lactating, or trying to get pregnant, and participants with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²) or who had an injury, deformity, or abnormality at the sensor sites and piercings that might cause air leaks during the test were excluded from the study. Participants with a known history of heart, lung, kidney, or liver disease; diabetes; clotting disorder; hemoglobinopathy or history of anemia; sensitivity to local anesthesia; or fainting or vasovagal response or any other serious systemic illness were also excluded, as well as those diagnosed with asthma, sleep apnea and Raynaud disease. Exclusion criteria also included participants with a resting heart rate of over 120 beats per minute, a systolic blood pressure over 150 mm Hg, a diastolic blood pressure over 90 mm Hg, a room air SpO₂ under 94%, and a carboxyhemoglobin level over 3%.

All selected participants in the study met the inclusion criteria. Before starting the study, two Withings ScanWatch units were placed on each participant’s wrist to measure their SpO₂, while a 22-gauge catheter was placed in their left radial artery to measure their SaO₂. In addition, two reference finger pulse oximeters were placed on each participant to facilitate the identification of plateaus and any discrepancies between the hands. Each participant was then asked to lie in a semisupine position, to remain still, and to breathe a mixture of gas through a mouthpiece while a nose clip blocked their nose. After a 5-minute rest period, they were instructed to hyperventilate 2-3 times deeper and faster than normal during the runs to speed alveolar gas equilibration. The target SpO₂ at each run was chosen to be evenly balanced over the 70%-100% SpO₂ range.

On the initial step of the run, two blood samples of 1-2 mL were first collected 30 seconds apart from the participant at the same oxygen saturation level as the room air. Then, approximately 10 seconds later, the inspired oxygen was abruptly changed to reduce oxygen saturation to the next SpO₂ target level. On the next steps of the run, two blood samples were collected 30 seconds apart from the participant when the reference finger pulse oximeters both measured a stabilized level of oxygen saturation, with less than 1% of difference for 35 seconds. Note that the second sampling was not performed if the oxygen saturation level was destabilized between measurements. Then, approximately 10 seconds later, inspired oxygen was abruptly changed again to reach the next SpO₂ target level. Overall, these 75-second periods of stable oxygen saturation were defined as “plateaus,” and every participant was subjected to 5 plateaus (typically 92%, 87%, 82%, 77%, and 70%) before being brought back to a high oxygen saturation level (100% O₂) by breathing oxygen-enriched air for 2 minutes. After this run was repeated a second time, the collected blood samples (approximately 20-25 samples per participant) were immediately analyzed with the co-oximeter (ABL90 multiwavelength hemoximeter), then compared to the data recorded with the Withings ScanWatches (Figure 2).

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04380389).

A statistical analysis of the collected data was performed with the software Python 3.6.9 on a frozen database. A separate analysis was conducted for each wrist. The bias (mean error) and root mean square error (RMSE) between the SpO₂ and SaO₂ values were calculated for each range of SpO₂ values (SpO₂≤80%, 80%<SpO₂≤90%, and 90%<SpO₂) and for the whole range of 70%-100%. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the strength of the association between the SpO₂ values collected from the Withings ScanWatch and the ABL90 hemoximeter. We used Bland-Altman plots to measure the agreement between the Withings ScanWatch and the ABL-90 hemoximeter.

Because a time offset exists between the Withings ScanWatch and the blood sample measured by the co-oximeter, due in part to physiological considerations (eg, distance between the arms, the wrists, and the depth of the arteries) and in part to the delay inherent to the Withings ScanWatch algorithm, we applied a plateau-matching algorithm in accordance with the recommendations of the ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard before comparing the readings. We used a cross-correlation method to determine the delay between the measurements collected by the devices on each patient’s wrists and the blood samples. Table 1 provides an overview of the mean, median, and standard deviation values of the time offsets applied on the Withings ScanWatch measurements for plateau matching.

The 14 participants in our study included 8 men and 6 women aged 23-39 years with various skin tones: fair, medium, and dark skin (Table 2). Their body mass index and blood pressure values before and after the study are also reported in this table.

Of the 322 oxygen saturation measurements collected by the Withings ScanWatches placed on the participants’ right and left wrists, 275 (85.4%) and 244 (75.8%) samples, respectively, were classified as conclusive measurements and were subsequently included for further data analysis. The remaining samples, 47/322 (14.6%) and 78/322 (24.2%) taken from the participants’ right and left wrists, respectively, were classified as inconclusive measurements (poor signal quality, motion detected, or watch not worn) and were excluded.

The SpO₂ levels collected from the conclusive measurements ranged from 70% to 100% and were evenly distributed into 3 groups: SpO₂≤80%, 80%<SpO₂≤90%, and 90%<SpO₂ (Table 3). In the SpO₂≤80%, 80%<SpO₂≤90%, and 90%<SpO₂ groups, we found biases of 0.75%, 2.02%, and 0.14% and RMSEs of 3.29%, 3.24%, and 2.41%, respectively, when the Withings ScanWatch was placed on the participants’ right wrists, and biases of 2.25%, 2.41%, and 0.31% and RMSEs of 3.74%, 3.21%, and 1.90%, respectively, when the Withings ScanWatch was placed on the participants’ left wrists. Overall, we found RMSEs of 3.00% and 2.97% and a bias of 0.98% (95% CI 0.65-1.32) and 1.56% (95% CI 1.24-1.87) from the participants’ right and left wrists, respectively (Table 4).

The correlation plots show a positive strong correlation between the SpO₂ values collected from the participants’ right and left hands, with high Pearson correlation coefficients of r=0.944 and r=0.954, respectively (Figure 4). The Bland-Altman plots show a high level of agreement, with Pearson correlation coefficients of r=0.083 (P=.17) and r=0.23 (P=.001) for the devices on the right and left wrists, respectively, and 95% lower and upper limits of agreement of –4.66% to 6.62% and –3.46% to 6.58%, respectively (Figure 5).

No undesirable effects or adverse events were reported during the study.

Since 2014, the popularity of smartwatches has grown considerably, particularly in the health care and biomedical industries [18]. With their integrated biosensors, these wrist-worn devices have the potential to provide valuable health care data to users, thus opening new opportunities for clinical applications. Indeed, instead of going to medical facilities, which is time-consuming, costly, and requires highly trained personnel, users can now monitor their physiological conditions themselves and report any abnormalities to physicians [18,19]. The Withings Scan Monitor is the software embedded in the Withings ScanWatch, a smartwatch that displays a reflective pulse oximeter function to measure, transfer, record, and display SpO₂ levels. Here, we tested this functionality according to the ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard and FDA guidelines to validate its accuracy in measuring SpO₂ levels at a clinical-grade level [27,28]. To this end, we compared the performance of the Withings ScanWatch with that of the ABL90 hemoximeter, a co-oximeter routinely used in the medical field for measuring SaO₂ levels in blood samples, to measure the SpO₂ levels of 14 participants who underwent plateaus of oxygen desaturation in the laboratory.

In this study, we observed an inequality in the distribution of the 325 measurements collected, with a higher rate of inconclusive measurements taken from the participants’ left wrists (78/322, 24.2%) than from their right wrists (47/322, 14.6%). This imbalance was mainly caused by unwanted movements when taking blood from the participants’ left arms. We also observed that the interactions between the catheter and the device on the left wrist interfered with the collection of the conclusive measurements when SpO₂ levels were below 90% (Table 3). Indeed, the distribution of the samples was slightly unbalanced, with 38% of measurements collected in the 90%<SpO₂ group. However, this difference was not significant. Thus, the ratio between the measurements distributed among the three SpO₂ groups is acceptable. Overall, we obtained sufficient conclusive measurements to meet one of the requirements set by the ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard and FDA guidelines, which requires at least 200 paired samples from 10 participants to validate the reflective pulse oximeter function of a device.

Next, we examined the strength of the association and the agreement between the conclusive measurements taken from the reflective pulse oximeter function of the Withings ScanWatch and the ABL90 hemoximeter. We found high Pearson correlation coefficients of r=0.944 and r=0.954 on the correlation plots and r=0.083 (P=.17) and r=0.23 (P=.001) on the Bland-Altman plots, as well as RMSEs of 2.97% and 3.00% on the participants’ right and left hands, respectively (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Taken together, these results indicate a strong association and a high level of agreement between the measurements collected from the devices. Therefore, we have demonstrated that the reflective pulse oximeter function of the Withings ScanWatch is adequate to measure the SpO₂ levels at different stages of hypoxia.

In addition to the accuracy of 3% found in the hypoxia study, the ScanWatch SpO₂ algorithm possesses adequate resolution and dynamics to identify apnea and hypopnea events when worn during sleep (Figure 6). Indeed, when used in a continuous monitoring mode, the ScanWatch can detect short SpO₂ variations that occur in apneic patients, paving the way for automatic sleep apnea detection for patients at home without using intrusive and costly polysomnography setups.

The clinical study was conducted in a controlled environment with a well-established protocol and methodology to collect SpO₂ measurements during stable plateaus of SpO₂ in healthy participants aged 23-39 years. Its design may limit the generalizability of the results to real-world situations. Indeed, the ability of the Withings ScanWatch reflective pulse oximeter to dynamically monitor the evolution of SpO₂ in a subject is unknown in the real world because participants were exposed to stable plateaus of SpO₂ between 70% and 100% in this study. Finally, given the risks induced by hypoxia on older subjects or patients with respiratory conditions, we were unable to test the ability of the Withings ScanWatch to measure SpO₂ in these populations. In future work, the accuracy of the Withings ScanWatch reflective pulse oximeter should therefore be tested in real-life conditions (including in the home, at a hospital ward, and during rehabilitation), on a specific population such as patients with COPD or obstructive sleep apnea, or to diagnose and monitor patients with respiratory diseases.

FDA guidance and the ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard require RMSEs below 3.5% and 4% for reflectance pulse oximeter approval, respectively [27,28]. These criteria were recently fulfilled by a wrist-sensor pulse oximeter, the Oxitone 1000, in a study in which its precision and accuracy were tested and an RMSE of 3% was reported [29]. Here, out of the conclusive measurements collected from the 14 participants, we have shown that the Withings ScanWatch exhibited acceptable RMSE levels for SpO₂ that were below the thresholds defined by these authorities. According to our data, we have thereby demonstrated that the Withings ScanWatch fulfills the requirements set by both the FDA guidelines and the ISO 80601-2-61 standard. The reflective pulse oximeter function of the Withings ScanWatch is thus validated and is accurate in measuring SpO₂ levels at a clinical-grade level. No undesirable effects or adverse events were reported during the study.