JMIR J Med Internet Res Journal of Medical Internet Research 1438-8871 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v22i8e17686 32857060 10.2196/17686 Original Paper Original Paper An Image-Based Mobile Health App for Postdrainage Monitoring: Usability Study Eysenbach Gunther Ciptaningtyas Ratri Zink Alexander Hung Chi-sheng Kaczmarczyk Robert Liao Chien-Hung MD, FACS, FICS 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2812-9773 Wu Yu-Tung MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2145-8710 Cheng Chi-Tung MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2697-4642 Ooyang Chun-Hsiang MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5359-7547 Kang Shih-Ching MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-9296 Fu Chih-Yuan MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-7169 Hsu Yu-Pao MD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7682-3850 Hsieh Chi-Hsun MD, PhD 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-9555 Chen Chih-Chi MD 2
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chang Gang University 5, Fuxin street, Kweishiang district Taoyaun, 333 Taiwan 886 33281200 ext 3651 Claudia5477@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-5289 Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chang Gang University Taoyaun Taiwan Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chang Gang University Taoyaun Taiwan Corresponding Author: Chih-Chi Chen Claudia5477@gmail.com 8 2020 28 8 2020 22 8 e17686 4 1 2020 12 6 2020 16 7 2020 19 7 2020 ©Chien-Hung Liao, Yu-Tung Wu, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chun-Hsiang Ooyang, Shih-Ching Kang, Chih-Yuan Fu, Yu-Pao Hsu, Chi-Hsun Hsieh, Chih-Chi Chen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.08.2020. 2020

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 Background

The application of mobile health (mHealth) platforms to monitor recovery in the postdischarge period has increased in recent years. Despite widespread enthusiasm for mHealth, few studies have evaluated the usability and user experience of mHealth in patients with surgical drainage.

 Objective

Our objectives were to (1) develop an image-based smartphone app, SurgCare, for postdrainage monitoring and (2) determine the feasibility and clinical value of the use of SurgCare by patients with drainage.

 Methods

We enrolled 80 patients with biliary or peritoneal drainage in this study. A total of 50 patients were assigned to the SurgCare group, who recorded drainage monitoring data with the smartphone app; and 30 patients who manually recorded the data were assigned to the conventional group. The patients continued to record data until drain removal. The primary aim was to validate feasibility for the user, which was defined as the proportion of patients using each element of the system. Moreover, the secondary aim was to evaluate the association of compliance with SurgCare and the occurrence of unexpected events.

 Results

The average submission duration was 14.98 days, and the overall daily submission rate was 84.2%. The average system usability scale was 83.7 (SD 3.5). This system met the definition of “definitely feasible” in 34 patients, “possibly feasible” in 10 patients, and “not feasible” in 3 patients. We found that the occurrence rates of complications in the SurgCare group and the conventional group were 6% and 26%, respectively, with statistically significant differences P=.03. The rate of unexpected hospital return was lower in the SurgCare group (6%) than in the conventional groups (26%) (P=.03).

 Conclusions

Patients can learn to use a smartphone app for postdischarge drainage monitoring with high levels of user satisfaction. We also identified a high degree of compliance with app-based drainage-recording design features, which is an aspect of mHealth that can improve surgical care.

 telemedicine smartphone surgical drainage postdrainage care, mHealth Introduction

Surgical drainage is a therapeutic procedure with multiple purposes, including relieving symptoms, bypassing occlusions, and monitoring postoperative conditions [1-4]. In patients with acute biliary diseases, such as acute cholecystitis or cholangitis, drainage can relieve symptoms and stabilize the patient’s condition [5-7]. Drainage can also postpone emergency surgery, undergoing interval surgery instead [8,9]. Sometimes, patients need to monitor their own drains because of a prolonged therapeutic course. Traditional postdischarge drainage care depends on medical professionals asking patients to record the amount and characteristics of the fluid drained. However, these self-report measures are not only unreliable in elderly adults and those with impaired cognition [10,11], but also time-consuming with regard to processing the data [12]. Inadequate monitoring and care might prolong drainage insertion, delay recovery, reduce quality of life, and induce sequential complications such as an electrolyte imbalance, dehydration, sepsis, or physical injury related to disruption of the drain placement [13,14]. Therefore, proper monitoring of the drainage status is a critical issue.

In the last decade, apps for mobile devices have radically changed modern lifestyles. Additionally, the healthcare sector has been enriched by numerous apps [15,16]. Because of the increase in popularity of this new technology, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined these tools as electronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) applications. As the ownership of mobile devices has become more common [17], patients and their caregivers are increasingly willing to use technology to access health care [18,19]. Several studies have demonstrated that mHealth technology improves the control of cardiac function and glycemic hemostasis, enhances medication compliance, and shortens hospital stays [20-24]. Additionally, prior research on app protocols for surgical patients has focused on routine procedures that already have a low baseline rate of postoperative and discharge complications [25-27]. Although the experience with using mHealth apps in surgical care is limited, it has been suggested that surgical patients benefit from this new technological mode of support [28,29].

We developed an internet-based remote app to monitor drainage and conducted a study to investigate the adequacy of the remote app with regard to helping patients and caregivers properly manage drains at home. This study focused on the feasibility and clinical value of the remote app for patients with percutaneous or surgical drainage.

 Methods Study Population

Patients who were eligible to participate in this study were adult inpatients (aged ≥20 years) in the acute care surgery department of a medical center. We enrolled patients who were undergoing percutaneous or surgical drainage of the biliary tract or peritoneal cavity at our department from May 2019 to October 2019. All patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were approached to participate in this study. Notably, patients were excluded if they had neurologic or cognitive disorders prohibiting their usage of the app or ability to give informed consent. To calculate the sample size, we used the following parameters: α=.05, a power of 80%, an enrollment ratio of 1.6, and a complication decreasing rate of 18%. We recruited 50 patients to participate in the app group and 30 patients to participate in the conventional group.

The institutional review board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study protocol (201900495B0). A research assistant helped the enrolled patients and caregivers install the app on their smartphones and instructed them how to use the app before the operation. Before patients were enrolled in this study, the research assistant evaluated their familiarity with wearable devices and smartphones. If the patients were not confident about using these devices, we provided further instructions to their caregivers.

 SurgCare App

SurgCare (Figure 1) is an iOS/Android app that facilitates the recording of postprocedural clinical variables (drainage amount, discharge color, associated discomfort, body weight, and analgesic ingestion) by patients who have had drains placed.

The app transmits digital images of the surgical wound and drainage to the medical staff as shown in Figure 2.

SurgCare was developed by surgical professionals and software programmers to fulfill the needs of patients caring for drains at home and was only used by patients who were followed in our institute. Figure 3 presents the system architecture. Once the user inputs the data into the app, the information is synchronized with the server when internet access is available on the smartphone. This interdevice data transmission worked well, with no abnormal events reported by the patients.

Furthermore, the research assistant monitored the synchronizing of the data on weekdays and called the patients if their information was missing. If there was a change in fluid color, persistent changes in vital signs or abnormal drainage, this information was provided by smart devices to the medical doctors who then arranged further management. Patients continued to transmit data until their drains were removed. The research assistant did not have contact with the conventional group when patients were at home. Another medical staff member who did not participate in designing this system independently reviewed and analyzed the data.

Screenshots of the SurgCare app showing the records of date, drain method, drainage amount, color, and image of drained material and wound status.

Image of drainage-inserted wound and drainage content. A: wound with percutaneous gallbladder drainage; B: wound with percutaneous biliary drainage; C: yellowish bile drainage; D: mucus-like white bile drainage.

System architecture of the mobile device for recording postdrainage care.

 User Tasks

We formally tested the usability and feasibility of the app with postdischarge drainage patients at a major academic medical center. The app was loaded onto an iOS or Android smartphone or tablet. We assessed patients’ baseline familiarity with smartphones prior to testing. User tasks included waking up the device, launching the app, inputting information (including drainage amount, color, and the presence of discomfort), capturing an image, reviewing and retaking or accepting captured images, responding to questions, and submitting the data.

 Measures and Analysis Feasibility: Protocol Completion

Following usability testing of the app, participants were asked to rate their performance and to provide feedback on the app. Participants also used a system usability scale to evaluate their satisfaction with the app [30].

We evaluated the compliance of the patients with the use of SurgCare. If patients submitted data on more than 80% of days on which they had a drain, they were classified in the good compliance group. If the number of days on which data were submitted was less than 80% of the total number of days for which they had the drains, we classified them in the poor compliance group.

In this study, the feasibility was assessed as in past studies [31]. The feasibility was defined as the proportion of participants using each element of the system for at least 70% of the period. “Definitely feasible,” “possibly feasible,” and “not feasible” were defined as ≥70%, 50%-69%, and <50% of the participants meeting that criterion, respectively.

 Clinical Value: Association of App Usage With Early Complication Rate

The clinical outcome of interest was validation that the use of the app leads to fewer complications and a lower incidence of unexpected hospital return. We compared the high compliance group with the poor compliance group and conventional group with regard to the total compliance rate, incidence of drain dysfunction, incidence of drain dislodgement, and rate of infection. We also analyzed the rates of unexpected hospital return and readmission in these groups.

 Statistical Analysis

Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Quantitative variables were compared with Student’s t test. Levene’s test was used to correct for intergroup variations before the application of Student’s t test. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v 20.0 for Macintosh (SPSS Inc). A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

 Results Participant Characteristics

In total, 105 patients underwent 108 procedures during the study period. Out of these 105 patients, 3 patients with repeated procedures were excluded. After being approached, 8 patients refused to participate in this project, and another 14 patients had cognitive problems and were excluded from this study. Of the 80 patients who were approached, were eligible, and agreed to participate, 6 patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 47 participants completed the usability testing, 26 of whom had caregiver assistance or proxy participation. Another 27 patients were included in the conventional group; these patients used the traditional hand recording method to track the drainage amount and color. The study flow diagram is shown in Figure 4.

Demographics and basic clinical information of SurgCare group are presented in Table 1. The average duration of app use was 14.5 (SD 3.2) days. The common termination of follow-up was drainage removal and wound closure, followed by a lack of satisfaction and complications.

Flow diagram of the study design.

Demographic characteristics of SurgCare participants with surgical and percutaneous drainage (N=47).

Characteristics Value
Age, mean (SD) 61.4 (15.9)
Gender, n (%)
Male 29 (62)
Female 18 (38)
Underlying disease, n (%)
Hypertension 21 (45)
Diabetes mellitus 16 (34)
Renal insufficiency 7 (15)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 3 (6)
Malignancy 3 (6)
Drainage site, n (%)
Biliary drainage 25 (53)
Peritoneal drainage 22 (47)
Method of participation, n (%)
Independent 21 (45)
Caregivers 26 (55)
System usability scale, mean (SD) 83.7 (3.5)
Feasibility test, n (%)
Definite feasible 34 (72)
Possibly feasible 10 (21)
Not feasible 3 (6)
Overall daily compliance
Total drainage days, N 836
Day submitted, n (%) 704 (84)
Day missed, n (%) 132 (16)
Complication, n (%)
Dysfunction 1 (2)
Dislodge 0 (0)
Infection 2 (4)
Unexpected return 3 (6)
Unexpected readmission 2 (4)

To compare SurgCare group with the conventional group, we identified gender, age, underlying chronic disorders, drainage site, and method of participation for both the groups. Total occurrence of complication was lower in SurgCare group (6%) than in the conventional group (26%) with statistical significance of P=.03. The incidence of drainage dislodge was lower in SurgCare group (2%) than in the conventional group (11%) with statistical significance of P=.045. Moreover, the unexpected hospital return was lower in SurgCare group (6%) than in the conventional group (26%) with significant difference of P=.03 (Table 2).

Comparison of the characteristics and prognosis of patients within the SurgCare and conventional groups.

Characteristics SurgCare Conventional P value
Patients, n 47 27 —a
Age, mean (SD) 60.2 (17.1) 63.6 (13.4) .36
Gender, n (%) .60
Male 29 (62) 15 (56)
Female 16 (38) 12 (44)
Underlying disease, n (%)
Hypertension 21 (45) 8 (30) .23
Diabetes mellitus 16 (34) 6 (22) .43
Renal insufficiency 7 (15) 5 (19) .75
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 3 (6) 2 (7) >.99
Malignancy 3 (6) 3 (11) .66
Drainage site, n (%) .08
Biliary drainage 25 (53) 20 (74)
Peritoneal drainage 22 (47) 7 (26)
Method of participation, n (%) .37
Independent 21 (45) 15 (56)
Caregivers 26 (55) 12 (44)
Complication, n (%) 3 (6) 7 (26) .03b
Dysfunction 1 (2) 3 (11) .14
Dislodge 0 (0) 3 (11) .045b
Infection 2 (4) 1 (4) >.99
Unexpected hospital return 3 (6) 7 (26) .03b
Unexpected readmission 2 (4) 4 (15) .11

aNot applicable.

bFisher Exact test.

 Feasibility and Usability Evaluation of SurgCare

After evaluation, there were 34 patients for whom it was definitely feasible to use this app. For 10 patients, use of the app might be feasible, although they needed more support from the research assistant to help them operate the system. Another 3 patients were in the infeasible group because they completed less than 30% of the elements. The overall system usability score for the app was 83.3, which is considered good in usability testing.

 Association of SurgCare App Usage Compliance and Early Complication Rate

In the good compliance group, we found that the rate of complications related to drainage was 3%, which was much lower than that in the poor compliance group (11%). With regard to unexpected hospital return (3% vs 11%) and readmission (3% vs 11%), the good compliance group had better results than the poor compliance group and the conventional group as shown in Table 3.

Comparison of the prognosis of patients with SurgCare with good and poor compliance.

Characteristics Good compliance Poor compliance P value
Patients, n 38 9 —a
Age, mean (SD) 60.3 (18.1) 60.0 (13.1) .96
Gender, n (%) .27
Male 22 (58) 7 (78)
Female 16 (42) 2 (22)
Underlying disease, n (%)
Hypertension 16 (42) 5 (56) .47
Diabetes mellitus 15 (40) 1 (11) .11
Renal insufficiency 7 (18) 0 (0) .32
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1 (3) 2 (22) .09
Malignancy 2 (5) 1 (11) .48
Drainage site, n (%) .87
Biliary drainage 20 (53) 5 (56)
Peritoneal drainage 18 (47) 4 (44)
Method of participation, n (%) .14
Independent 15 (40) 6 (67)
Caregivers 23 (61) 3 (33)
Complication, n (%)
Dysfunction 1 (3) 0 (0) >.99
Dislodge 0 (0) 0 (0) >.99
Infection 1 (3) 1 (11) .32
Unexpected hospital return 2 (5) 1 (11) .52
Unexpected readmission 1 (3) 1 (11) .26

aNot applicable.

 Discussion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of using a mobile app to monitor the recovery status of patients with drains and to assist patients and caregivers in detecting abnormalities in a timely manner. Remote apps could support self-care and allow close follow-up [32-34]. We also identified an unexpected reduction in the rates of hospital return and readmission in the SurgCare group (6.4%) compared with the conventional group (25.9%) (P=.02). We found that the occurrences of complications such as dislodgement (0%), infection (4%), and dysfunction (2%) were relatively fewer in the SurgCare group. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first innovative studies focusing on the development of comprehensive app functions to assist surgical patients with drain care and monitoring. With the evaluation of uploaded image of wound and drainage content, the health care team can identify the abnormalities earlier to prevent the sequential complications, which is one of the causes to reduce unexpected hospital return. The current standard of care for the majority of surgical patients following hospital discharge involves little formal communication between patients and their care team until their routine clinic follow-up 2-3 weeks after discharge [35,36]. Some mHealth protocols have been developed to improve patient monitoring or replace routine postoperative clinic visits [37-39]. In addition to this trend, the national policy priority mandates improving transitions of care following hospital discharge and reducing hospital readmissions [40,41]. We created an image-based mobile app aimed at increasing communication between patients and health care personnel after discharge from the hospital as part of an effort to detect drainage complications in an early stage and reduce hospital readmissions.

The compliance with using apps is generally high. Apps for surgical patients must be developed carefully, keeping in mind that the users are very vulnerable [42,43]. In this study, we find that compliance with using the SurgCare was acceptable. Most participants found the app easy to use (%), though the questions that did not elicit an unanimously positive response indicate that there is a degree of tentativeness regarding participants’ ability to independently perform the functions in the SurgCare. The SurgCare can provide assistance not only by facilitating monitoring but also by providing psychological support [44,45]. For patients and caregivers who are not familiar with postoperative wound care, remote support helps them detect the early dislodgement or dysfunction of the drain, and it can reduce the subsequent occurrence of infections and other complications. Self-report questionnaires are the most common method of monitoring drainage because of their cost-effectiveness and ease of administration [46]. However, the disadvantages of self-report questionnaires include a lack of reliability and the influences of social desirability, age, questionnaire complexity, and recall ability [47,48]. Therefore, an easily used mobile app can solve these problems. With immediate recording and image capture, the app is an excellent tool for close monitoring. Moreover, SurgCare can offer a rapid response to help patients psychologically, as patients and caregivers can receive responses from healthcare personnel before returning to the clinic. The daily monitoring messages are delivered via mobile messaging (eg, short message service) instead of email to facilitate more immediate communication. These adjustments are expected to improve user satisfaction and compliance and may ultimately further enhance the efficacy of the intervention.

Furthermore, 4 key categories of age-related barriers are associated with the use of mHealth by older adults, namely, barriers related to cognition, motivation, physical ability, and perception [26]. As surgical drainage patients are usually older adults (median age >60 years) who have the potential to develop cognitive or memory impairments, it is crucial to select an easy-to-follow app to use in clinical research with this population. We noticed that if the patients were well trained, they were able to input their health data by themselves without any dependence on a physician’s assistant, study nurse, or other caregivers [49,50]. After the interview, we also noticed that the surgeons were interested in the electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes rather than the conventional manual reporting of the drainage amount and status. Previous studies have suggested that the electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes was as accurate as the conventional method of manual recording [51,52]. Another survey of 108 health care personnel showed a high level of acceptance (84.3%) of app-assisted recording [53]. Digital medicine is unstoppable, and patient empowerment plays a new and growing role in disease management. With support from both patients and health providers, we can determine the impact of mHealth on the postprocedural care of surgical drains.

In contrast to the generally rapid growth of mHealth in medical fields, research on surgical topics has been limited. Among studies focusing on the application of mHealth to surgical issues, several have investigated wound care and pain scaling to validate the clinical usefulness of mHealth [54-57]. A recent study used another wearable device to track the step counts of patients who had undergone various abdominal surgeries for 1 month after discharge and showed that the mHealth app could effectively track recovery [24,58]. Because drain care is an issue that is unique to surgical patients, and telephone conversations and questionnaires cannot be used to access the visual component. In this study, we developed an app that can improve compliance with postdischarge drainage care and monitoring and reduce the risk of drainage complications.

Limitations

This study had several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, all assessments were conducted online, and inclusion relied exclusively on self-reported data. Therefore, the internal validity and generalizability to a larger clinical population might have been compromised. Second, there was a rather low postassessment response rate. The lack of data from approximately one-fifth of the sample limits the validity of our findings since it remains unclear how satisfied the nonresponders were and how they differed in terms of symptomatology. Third, the sample size was limited, and the sample did not represent all surgical patients. Subsequent research should, therefore, investigate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of SurgCare in a fully powered randomized control trial. The study provided valuable information about the feasibility and adequacy of an internet-based intervention for the management of drains, which can be used to guide subsequent research.

 Conclusion

In this study, we present a remote app that can improve patient compliance with postdischarge drainage care and monitoring and reduce the rate of major complications. The patients were enthusiastic about partnering with their health providers in novel ways to optimize their healthcare. Although mHealth will certainly not replace physician contact, it will serve as a digital assistant for diagnostic, therapeutic, and follow-up purposes, supporting patient recovery.

 Abbreviations eHealth

electronic health

 mHealth

mobile health

 WHO

World Health Organization

None declared.

 Kortram K de Vries Reilingh TS Wiezer MJ van Ramshorst B Boerma D Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis Surg Endosc 2011 11 25 11 3642 6 10.1007/s00464-011-1771-5 21638173 Chousleb E Szomstein S Podkameni D Soto F Lomenzo E Higa G Kennedy Colleen Villares Alexander Arias Fernando Antozzi Priscila Zundel Natan Rosenthal Raul Routine abdominal drains after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective review of 593 patients Obes Surg 2004 10 14 9 1203 7 10.1381/0960892042387101 15527635 Wallace MJ Chin KW Fletcher TB Bakal CW Cardella JF Grassi CJ Grizzard JD Kaye AD Kushner DC Larson PA Liebscher LA Luers PR Mauro MA Kundu S Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous drainage/aspiration of abscess and fluid collections J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010 04 21 4 431 5 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.398 20346880 S1051-0443(10)00006-0 Swan MC Oliver DW Cassell OCS Coleman DJ Williams N Morritt DG Giele HP Randomized controlled trial of fibrin sealant to reduce postoperative drainage following elective lymph node dissection Br J Surg 2011 07 98 7 918 24 10.1002/bjs.7462 21456091 Pessa ME Hawkins IF Vogel SB The treatment of acute cholangitis. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage before definitive therapy Ann Surg 1987 04 205 4 389 92 10.1097/00000658-198704000-00008 3566375 PMC1492730 Sartelli M Viale P Catena F Ansaloni L Moore E Malangoni M Moore FA Velmahos G Coimbra R Ivatury R Peitzman A Koike K Leppaniemi A Biffl W Burlew CC Balogh ZJ Boffard K Bendinelli C Gupta S Kluger Y Agresta F Di Saverio S Wani I Escalona A Ordonez C Fraga GP Junior GAP Bala M Cui Y Marwah S Sakakushev B Kong V Naidoo N Ahmed A Abbas A Guercioni G Vettoretto N Díaz-Nieto Rafael Gerych I Tranà Cristian Faro MP Yuan K Kok KYY Mefire AC Lee JG Hong S Ghnnam W Siribumrungwong B Sato N Murata K Irahara T Coccolini F Segovia Lohse HA Verni A Shoko T 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections World J Emerg Surg 2013 01 08 8 1 3 10.1186/1749-7922-8-3 23294512 1749-7922-8-3 PMC3545734 Miura F Okamoto K Takada T Strasberg SM Asbun HJ Pitt HA Gomi H Solomkin JS Schlossberg D Han H Kim M Hwang T Chen M Huang WS Kiriyama S Itoi T Garden OJ Liau K Horiguchi A Liu K Su C Gouma DJ Belli G Dervenis C Jagannath P Chan ACW Lau WY Endo I Suzuki K Yoon Y de Santibañes Eduardo Giménez Mariano Eduardo Jonas E Singh H Honda G Asai K Mori Y Wada K Higuchi R Watanabe M Rikiyama T Sata N Kano N Umezawa A Mukai S Tokumura H Hata J Kozaka K Iwashita Y Hibi T Yokoe M Kimura T Kitano S Inomata M Hirata K Sumiyama Y Inui K Yamamoto M Tokyo Guidelines 2018: initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018 01 25 1 31 40 10.1002/jhbp.509 28941329 Kim KH Sung CK Park BK Kim WK Oh CW Kim KS Percutaneous gallbladder drainage for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis Am J Surg 2000 02 179 2 111 3 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00247-6 10773145 S0002-9610(00)00247-6 Bickel A Hoffman RS Loberant N Weiss M Eitan A Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis Surg Endosc 2016 03 30 3 1028 33 10.1007/s00464-015-4290-y 26139479 10.1007/s00464-015-4290-y Campbell NL Zhan J Tu W Weber Z Ambeuhl R McKay C McElwee N Self-Reported Medication Adherence Barriers Among Ambulatory Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Pharmacotherapy 2016 02 36 2 196 202 10.1002/phar.1702 26890914 Wildenbos GA Peute L Jaspers M Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US) Int J Med Inform 2018 06 114 66 75 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012 29673606 S1386-5056(18)30245-4 Pettee GK McClain JJ Schmid KK Storti KL Ainsworth BE Reliability and convergent validity of the past-week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire Public Health Nutr 2011 03 14 3 435 42 10.1017/S1368980010002612 20843404 S1368980010002612 McMillan MT Fisher WE Van Buren G McElhany A Bloomston M Hughes SJ Winter J Behrman SW Zyromski NJ Velanovich V Brown K Morgan KA Vollmer C The value of drains as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: something for everyone? Results of a randomized prospective multi-institutional study J Gastrointest Surg 2015 01 19 1 21 30; discussion 30 10.1007/s11605-014-2640-z 25183409 Wiggers JK Coelen RJS Rauws EAJ van Delden OM van Eijck CHJ de Jonge J Porte RJ Buis CI Dejong CHC Molenaar IQ Besselink MGH Busch ORC Dijkgraaf MGW van Gulik TM Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (DRAINAGE trial): design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial BMC Gastroenterol 2015 02 14 15 20 10.1186/s12876-015-0251-0 25887103 10.1186/s12876-015-0251-0 PMC4332425 Arean PA Hallgren KA Jordan JT Gazzaley A Atkins DC Heagerty PJ Anguera JA The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial J Med Internet Res 2016 12 20 18 12 e330 10.2196/jmir.6482 27998876 v18i12e330 Goyal S Lewis G Yu C Rotondi M Seto E Cafazzo JA Evaluation of a Behavioral Mobile Phone App Intervention for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol JMIR Res Protoc 2016 08 19 5 3 e174 10.2196/resprot.5959 27542325 v5i3e174 Fiordelli M Diviani N Schulz PJ Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution J Med Internet Res 2013 15 5 e95 10.2196/jmir.2430 23697600 v15i5e95 PMC3668610 Free C Phillips G Watson L Galli L Felix L Edwards P Patel V Haines A The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS Med 2013 01 10 1 e1001363 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363 23458994 PMEDICINE-D-12-00641 PMC3566926 Kessel KA Vogel MM Kessel C Bier H Biedermann T Friess H Herschbach P von ER Meyer B Kiechle M Keller U Peschel C Schmid RM Combs SE Mobile Health in Oncology: A Patient Survey About App-Assisted Cancer Care JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 06 14 5 6 e81 10.2196/mhealth.7689 28615159 v5i6e81 PMC5489709 Hung C Yu J Lin Y Chen Y Huang C Lee J Chuang P Ho Y Chen M Mortality Benefit of a Fourth-Generation Synchronous Telehealth Program for the Management of Chronic Cardiovascular Disease: A Longitudinal Study J Med Internet Res 2016 05 13 18 5 e102 10.2196/jmir.5718 27177497 v18i5e102 PMC4909389 Doocy S Paik KE Lyles E Hei TH Fahed Z Winkler E Kontunen K Mkanna A Burnham G Guidelines and mHealth to Improve Quality of Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Care for Vulnerable Populations in Lebanon: Longitudinal Cohort Study JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 10 18 5 10 e158 10.2196/mhealth.7745 29046266 v5i10e158 PMC5695979 Ahmed I Ahmad NS Ali S Ali S George A Saleem DH Uppal E Soo J Mobasheri MH King D Cox B Darzi A Medication Adherence Apps: Review and Content Analysis JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 03 16 6 3 e62 10.2196/mhealth.6432 29549075 v6i3e62 Machado SM Wilson EH Elliott JO Jordan K Impact of a telemedicine eICU cart on sepsis management in a community hospital emergency department J Telemed Telecare 2018 04 24 3 202 208 10.1177/1357633X17691862 29278979 Wu J Ho T Chang Y Hsu C Tsai CJ Lai F Lin M Wearable-Based Mobile Health App in Gastric Cancer Patients for Postoperative Physical Activity Monitoring: Focus Group Study JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 04 23 7 4 e11989 10.2196/11989 31012858 v7i4e11989 Kummerow BK Oyefule OO Phillips SE Baucom RB Holzman MD Sharp KW Pierce RA Nealon WH Poulose BK Postoperative Care Using a Secure Online Patient Portal: Changing the (Inter)Face of General Surgery J Am Coll Surg 2015 12 221 6 1057 66 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.429 26453260 S1072-7515(15)01500-8 PMC4662904 Eisenberg D Hwa K Wren SM Telephone follow-up by a midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of face-to-face clinic visit JSLS 2015 19 1 e2014.00205 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00205 25848178 JSLS.2014.00205 PMC4370039 Canon S Shera A Patel A Zamilpa I Paddack J Fisher PL Smith J Hurtt R A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children J Telemed Telecare 2014 12 20 8 427 30 10.1177/1357633X14555610 25316038 1357633X14555610 Sanger PC Hartzler A Han SM Armstrong CAL Stewart MR Lordon RJ Lober WB Evans HL Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution PLoS One 2014 9 12 e114016 10.1371/journal.pone.0114016 25436912 PONE-D-14-43247 PMC4250175 Sanger PC Hartzler A Lordon RJ Armstrong CA Lober WB Evans HL Pratt W A patient-centered system in a provider-centered world: challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 05 23 3 514 25 10.1093/jamia/ocv183 26977103 ocv183 Bangor A Kortum P Miller J Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale Journal of Usability Studies 2009 4 3 114 123 Meyer N Kerz M Folarin A Joyce DW Jackson R Karr C Dobson R MacCabe J Capturing Rest-Activity Profiles in Schizophrenia Using Wearable and Mobile Technologies: Development, Implementation, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Remote Monitoring Platform JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 10 30 6 10 e188 10.2196/mhealth.8292 30377146 v6i10e188 PMC6234334 Arostegui I Legarreta MJ Barrio I Esteban C Garcia-Gutierrez S Aguirre U Quintana JM IRYSS-COPD Group A Computer Application to Predict Adverse Events in the Short-Term Evolution of Patients With Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease JMIR Med Inform 2019 04 17 7 2 e10773 10.2196/10773 30994471 v7i2e10773 PMC6492058 Yongping L Juan Z Zhou P Yongfeng Z Liu W Shi Y Evaluation of the Quadri-Planes Method in Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Lesions by Ultrasonography: Prospective Single-Center Study JMIR Med Inform 2020 05 05 8 5 e18251 10.2196/18251 32369039 v8i5e18251 PMC7238092 Dittrich F Beck S Harren AK Reinecke F Serong S Jung J Back DA Wolf M Landgraeber S Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack" JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 05 07 8 5 e17085 10.2196/17085 32379054 v8i5e17085 PMC7319594 Hwa K Wren SM Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program JAMA Surg 2013 09 148 9 823 7 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672 23842982 1710512 Gurjar SV Kulkarni D Khawaja HT Outpatient general surgical follow-up: are we using this resource effectively? Int J Surg 2009 02 7 1 62 5 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.10.014 19095510 S1743-9191(08)00156-8 Rao R Shukla BM Saint-Cyr M Rao M Teotia SS Take two and text me in the morning: optimizing clinical time with a short messaging system Plast Reconstr Surg 2012 07 130 1 44 9 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547d63 22743872 00006534-201207000-00011 Wiseman JT Fernandes-Taylor S Barnes ML Tomsejova A Saunders RS Kent KC Conceptualizing smartphone use in outpatient wound assessment: patients' and caregivers' willingness to use technology J Surg Res 2015 09 198 1 245 51 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.011 26025626 S0022-4804(15)00579-X PMC4530044 Chen DW Davis RW Balentine CJ Scott AR Gao Y Tapia NM Berger DH Suliburk JW Utility of routine postoperative visit after appendectomy and cholecystectomy with evaluation of mobile technology access in an urban safety net population J Surg Res 2014 08 190 2 478 83 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.028 24880202 S0022-4804(14)00428-4 Wiseman JT Guzman AM Fernandes-Taylor S Engelbert TL Saunders RS Kent KC General and vascular surgery readmissions: a systematic review J Am Coll Surg 2014 09 219 3 552 69.e2 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.05.007 25067801 S1072-7515(14)00408-6 PMC4243160 Goldstein MM Thorpe Jane Hyatt The First Anniversary of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act: the regulatory outlook for implementation Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010 09 01 7 1c 20808607 PMC2921301 Scott AR Alore EA Naik AD Berger DH Suliburk JW Mixed-Methods Analysis of Factors Impacting Use of a Postoperative mHealth App JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 02 08 5 2 e11 10.2196/mhealth.6728 28179215 v5i2e11 PMC5322201 Zhu Z Zhang H Li Y Meng X Jiao Y Qin Y Li Y Han J Liu K Liu C Establishment of a New Platform for the Management of Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Descriptive Study JMIR Med Inform 2019 04 01 7 2 e13123 10.2196/13123 30932865 v7i2e13123 PMC6462895 Dahlberg K Jaensson M Nilsson U Eriksson M Odencrants S Holding It Together-Patients' Perspectives on Postoperative Recovery When Using an e-Assessed Follow-Up: Qualitative Study JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 05 25 6 5 e10387 10.2196/10387 29802094 v6i5e10387 PMC5993971 Jaensson M Dahlberg K Eriksson M Grönlund � Nilsson U The Development of the Recovery Assessments by Phone Points (RAPP): A Mobile Phone App for Postoperative Recovery Monitoring and Assessment JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015 3 3 e86 10.2196/mhealth.4649 26362403 v3i3e86 PMC4704964 Sylvia LG Bernstein EE Hubbard JL Keating L Anderson EJ Practical guide to measuring physical activity J Acad Nutr Diet 2014 02 114 2 199 208 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.018 24290836 S2212-2672(13)01426-3 PMC3915355 Jacobs DR Ainsworth BE Hartman TJ Leon AS A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993 01 25 1 81 91 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00012 8423759 Shephard RJ Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires Br J Sports Med 2003 06 37 3 197 206; discussion 206 10.1136/bjsm.37.3.197 12782543 PMC1724653 Quinn CC Staub S Barr E Gruber-Baldini A Mobile Support for Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Dyad Usability Study JMIR Aging 2019 05 23 2 1 e12276 10.2196/12276 31518271 v2i1e12276 PMC6715004 Or CK Liu K So MKP Cheung B Yam LYC Tiwari A Lau YFE Lau T Hui PSG Cheng HC Tan J Cheung MT Improving Self-Care in Patients With Coexisting Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension by Technological Surrogate Nursing: Randomized Controlled Trial J Med Internet Res 2020 03 27 22 3 e16769 10.2196/16769 32217498 v22i3e16769 PMC7148548 Rosner BI Gottlieb M Anderson WN Accuracy of Internet-Based Patient Self-Report of Postdischarge Health Care Utilization and Complications Following Orthopedic Procedures: Observational Cohort Study J Med Internet Res 2018 07 20 20 7 e10405 10.2196/10405 30030212 v20i7e10405 PMC6076369 Coons SJ Gwaltney CJ Hays RD Lundy JJ Sloan JA Revicki DA Lenderking WR Cella D Basch E Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report Value Health 2009 06 12 4 419 29 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x 19900250 VHE470 Kessel KA Vogel MM Schmidt-Graf F Combs SE Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps J Med Internet Res 2016 11 24 18 11 e312 10.2196/jmir.6399 27884810 v18i11e312 Gunter R Fernandes-Taylor S Mahnke A Awoyinka L Schroeder C Wiseman J Sullivan S Bennett K Greenberg C Kent KC Evaluating Patient Usability of an Image-Based Mobile Health Platform for Postoperative Wound Monitoring JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 09 28 4 3 e113 10.2196/mhealth.6023 27683059 v4i3e113 PMC5062001 Fernandes-Taylor S Gunter RL Bennett KM Awoyinka L Rahman S Greenberg CC Kent KC Feasibility of Implementing a Patient-Centered Postoperative Wound Monitoring Program Using Smartphone Images: A Pilot Protocol JMIR Res Protoc 2017 02 22 6 2 e26 10.2196/resprot.6819 28228369 v6i2e26 PMC5343214 Gunter RL Fernandes-Taylor S Rahman S Awoyinka L Bennett KM Weber SM Greenberg CC Kent KC Feasibility of an Image-Based Mobile Health Protocol for Postoperative Wound Monitoring J Am Coll Surg 2018 03 226 3 277 286 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.013 29366555 S1072-7515(17)32152-X Lalloo C Shah U Birnie KA Davies-Chalmers C Rivera J Stinson J Campbell F Commercially Available Smartphone Apps to Support Postoperative Pain Self-Management: Scoping Review JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 10 23 5 10 e162 10.2196/mhealth.8230 29061558 v5i10e162 PMC5673880 Symer MM Abelson JS Milsom J McClure B Yeo HL A Mobile Health Application to Track Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: Results from a Pilot Study J Gastrointest Surg 2017 09 21 9 1500 1505 10.1007/s11605-017-3482-2 28685388 10.1007/s11605-017-3482-2