An Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for Skin Picking (SaveMySkin): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background In spite of the psychosocial burden and medical risks associated with skin picking disorder, the health care system does not provide sufficient treatment for affected individuals to date. Therefore, an internet-based self-help program for skin picking was developed to offer easily accessible support for this population. Objective This pilot study evaluated the internet-based self-help program SaveMySkin. The 12-week program is based on cognitive-behavioral therapy and contains comprehensive information and exercises, a daily supportive monitoring system, and dermatological and psychological counseling via internet chat. Primary objectives were the investigation of attitudes and expectations toward the program, intervention effects on skin picking severity, user satisfaction, adherence, and willingness to participate. Secondary outcomes included the feasibility of study procedures, adequacy of assessment instruments, effects on skin picking–related impairment, dimensions of skin picking, and general psychological impairment. Methods A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a sample of 133 participants (female: 124/133, 93.2%; mean age 26.67 [SD 6.42]) recruited via the internet. Inclusion required a minimum age of 17 years and at least mild skin picking severity. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (64/133, 48.1%) or waitlist control group (69/133, 51.9%). All assessments were conducted online and based on self-report. Results The willingness to participate was very high in the study, so the initially planned sample size of 100 was exceeded after only 18 days. Participant expectations indicate that they believed the program to be beneficial for them (131/133, 98.5%) and provide a feeling of support (119/133, 89.5%). Reasons for study participation were insufficient outpatient health care (83/133, 62.4%) and flexibility regarding time (106/133, 79.7%) and location (109/133, 82.0%). The post-assessment was completed by 65.4% (87/133) of the sample. The majority of the intervention group who completed the entire post-assessment were satisfied with SaveMySkin (28/38, 74%) and agreed that the program is an appropriate support service (35/38, 92%). On average, participants viewed 29.31 (SD 42.02) pages in the program, and 47% (30/64) of the intervention group used the monitoring at least once a week. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group displayed substantial improvements in the skin picking severity total score (Cohen d=0.67) and especially on the subscale Symptom Severity (Cohen d=0.79). No effects on secondary outcomes were found. Conclusions This study confirms the need for easily accessible interventions for skin picking disorder and the high interest in internet-based self-help within the target population. It provides important insights into the attitudes toward online support and actual user experiences. Participant feedback will be used to further enhance the intervention. Our results point to the preliminary efficacy of SaveMySkin and may lay the foundation for future research into the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the program in a multicenter clinical trial. Trial Registration German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00015236; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015236 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1016/j.conctc.2018.100315

Is this a full powered effectiveness trial or a pilot/feasibility trial? * Manuscript tracking number * If this is a JMIR submission, please provide the manuscript tracking number under "other" (The ms tracking number can be found in the submission acknowledgement email, or when you login as author in JMIR. If the paper is already published in JMIR, then the ms tracking number is the fourdigit number at the end of the DOI, to be found at the bottom of each published article in JMIR) https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfZBSUp1bwOc_OimqcS64RdfIAFvmrTSkZQL2-3O8O9hrL5Sw/viewform?hl=en_US&formkey=dGl… 8/50 1a) TITLE: Identi cation as a randomized trial in the title 1a-i) Identify the mode of delivery in the title Identify the mode of delivery. Preferably use "web-based" and/or "mobile" and/or "electronic game" in the title. Avoid ambiguous terms like "online", "virtual", "interactive". Use "Internet-based" only if Intervention includes non-web-based Internet components (e.g. email), use "computer-based" or "electronic" only if o ine products are used. Use "virtual" only in the context of "virtual reality" (3-D worlds). Use "online" only in the context of "online support groups". Complement or substitute product names with broader terms for the class of products (such as "mobile" or "smart phone" instead of "iphone"), especially if the application runs on different platforms.
Does your paper address subitem 1a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "SaveMySkin: An Internet-based self-help intervention for skin picking. Results of a randomized controlled pilot study."

1a-ii) Non-web-based components or important co-interventions in title
Mention non-web-based components or important co-interventions in title, if any (e.g., "with telephone support").
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 1b) ABSTRACT: Structured summary of trial design, methods, results, and conclusions NPT extension: Description of experimental treatment, comparator, care providers, centers, and blinding status.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 1a-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 1a-iii) Primary condition or target group in the title Mention primary condition or target group in the title, if any (e.g., "for children with Type I Diabetes") Example: A Web-based and Mobile Intervention with Telephone Support for Children with Type I Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial Does your paper address subitem 1a-iii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "SaveMySkin: An Internet-based self-help intervention for skin picking. Results of a randomized controlled pilot study."

1b-i) Key features/functionalities/components of the intervention and comparator in the METHODS section of the ABSTRACT
Mention key features/functionalities/components of the intervention and comparator in the abstract. If possible, also mention theories and principles used for designing the site. Keep in mind the needs of systematic reviewers and indexers by including important synonyms. (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 1b-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The present pilot study evaluated the Internet-based self-help program 'SaveMySkin'. The 12-week program is based on cognitive-behavioral therapy, and contains comprehensive information and exercising materials, a daily supportive monitoring system, and dermatological and psychological counseling via Internet-chat." "Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (N=64) or waitlist control group (N=69)." 1b-ii) Level of human involvement in the METHODS section of the ABSTRACT Clarify the level of human involvement in the abstract, e.g., use phrases like "fully automated" vs. "therapist/nurse/care provider/physician-assisted" (mention number and expertise of providers involved, if any). (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study 1b-iii) Open vs. closed, web-based (self-assessment) vs. face-toface assessments in the METHODS section of the ABSTRACT Mention how participants were recruited (online vs. o ine), e.g., from an open access website or from a clinic or a closed online user group (closed usergroup trial), and clarify if this was a purely web-based trial, or there were face-to-face components (as part of the intervention or for assessment). Clearly say if outcomes were self-assessed through questionnaires (as common in web-based trials). Note: In traditional o ine trials, an open trial (open-label trial) is a type of clinical trial in which both the researchers and participants know which treatment is being administered. To avoid confusion, use "blinded" or "unblinded" to indicated the level of blinding instead of "open", as "open" in web-based trials usually refers to "open access" (i.e. participants can self-enrol). (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 1b-iv) RESULTS section in abstract must contain use data Report number of participants enrolled/assessed in each group, the use/uptake of the intervention (e.g., attrition/adherence metrics, use over time, number of logins etc.), in addition to primary/secondary outcomes. (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-iv?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study  Keijsers, & Rinck, 2011), and combined approaches (e.g., acceptance-enhanced CBT) (Capriotti, Ely, Snorrason, & Woods, 2015;Flessner, Busch, Heidemann, & Woods, 2008). But it needs to be noted that most of these studies included severe methodological shortcomings (e.g., small sample sizes, lack of control conditions), and were commonly conducted before the o cial DSM 5 criteria for skin picking were available. One of these studies also investigated an Internet-and CBT-based self-help intervention for skin picking, and reported substantial improvements in symptom severity for 63 % of the sample (Flessner et al., 2007). However, the study was uncontrolled, and only 4 % of the initial sample (N = 372) completed the entire intervention, so that the results should be interpreted cautiously. So far, two meta-analyses suggest an overall bene cial effect of behavioral treatments on skin picking severity, but these studies must also be seen as preliminary due to the small number of included original studies and their limited validity (Schumer, Bartley, & Bloch, 2016;Selles, McGuire, Small, & Storch, 2016). Despite the poor quality and overall scarcity of previous studies, CBT seems to be a promising approach for the treatment of skin picking disorder. Behavioral interventions have for example also demonstrated e cacy (Bloch et al., 2007;McGuire et al., 2014), and are currently considered as the method of choice in the treatment of trichotillomania (Flessner, Penzel, & Keuthen, 2010), which shows substantial overlap in clinical characteristics and a high co-occurrence with skin picking disorder (Snorrason, Belleau, & Woods, 2012)." A waitlist control group seems justi ed, because there is no gold-standard treatment available for skin picking disorder yet.
METHODS 3a) Description of trial design (such as parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio 3b) Important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility criteria), with reasons Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 2b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Within the present trial, the authors developed an Internet-based self-help program for skin picking, and conducted a randomized controlled pilot trial to investigate the adequacy of the intervention SaveMySkin, and the feasibility of the study procedures. Primary objectives of the present study were the investigation of attitudes and expectations towards SaveMySkin before randomization, as well as intervention effects on skin picking severity, user satisfaction. Further outcomes were program adherence (intervention utilization), and the willingness to participate.
The feasibility of study procedures (e.g., recruitment, randomization), the appropriateness of applied questionnaires, as well as effects on skin picking related impairment, dimensions of skin picking (focused vs. automatic skin picking), and general psychological impairment were investigated as secondary outcomes." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 3a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The current pilot study followed a 2-arm randomized controlled design with a 1:1 allocation to either intervention or waiting list control group." subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 4a) Eligibility criteria for participants Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 3b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "No essential changes have been made to the study protocol after study commencement. The actual sample size exceeded the initial aim due to a very fast recruitment via Internet, so that the original plan to expand recruitment to dermatological clinics was not pursued." 3b-i) Bug xes, Downtimes, Content Changes Bug xes, Downtimes, Content Changes: ehealth systems are often dynamic systems. A description of changes to methods therefore also includes important changes made on the intervention or comparator during the trial (e.g., major bug xes or changes in the functionality or content) (5-iii) and other "unexpected events" that may have in uenced study design such as staff changes, system failures/downtimes, etc. [2].
Does your paper address subitem 3b-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study

Meine Antwort
Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 4a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Inclusion required at least mild self-reported skin picking severity (Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) score ≥ 7 [31, 32]) and a minimum age of 17 years.
Su cient German language skills, home access to the Internet, a smartphone, as well as literacy on Internet and computer use were applied as implicit eligibility criteria." subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 4a-i) Computer / Internet literacy Computer / Internet literacy is often an implicit "de facto" eligibility criterion -this should be explicitly clari ed.
Does your paper address subitem 4a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 4a-ii) Open vs. closed, web-based vs. face-to-face assessments: Open vs. closed, web-based vs. face-to-face assessments: Mention how participants were recruited (online vs. o ine), e.g., from an open access website or from a clinic, and clarify if this was a purely web-based trial, or there were face-to-face components (as part of the intervention or for assessment), i.e., to what degree got the study team to know the participant. In online-only trials, clarify if participants were quasi-anonymous and whether having multiple identities was possible or whether technical or logistical measures (e.g., cookies, email con rmation, phone calls) were used to detect/prevent these.
Does your paper address subitem 4a-ii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Potential participants were recruited via online advertisement (e.g., speci c forums, support groups, university mailing lists), and at a conference for skin picking and trichotillomania. In case of interest, individuals could directly access an openly available online screening questionnaire checking for eligibility. Eligible individuals were invited to register for the study and give the required informed consent for participation." "All assessments (scheduled at t0 + t1: baseline; t2: after six weeks; t3: after 12 weeks) were performed as self-report online questionnaires." subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 4b) Settings and locations where the data were collected subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 4a-iii) Information giving during recruitment Information given during recruitment. Specify how participants were briefed for recruitment and in the informed consent procedures (e.g., publish the informed consent documentation as appendix, see also item X26), as this information may have an effect on user self-selection, user expectation and may also bias results.
Does your paper address subitem 4a-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study

Meine Antwort
Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 4b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Potential participants were recruited via online advertisement (e.g., speci c forums, support groups, university mailing lists), and at a conference for skin picking and trichotillomania. In case of interest, individuals could directly access an openly available online screening questionnaire checking for eligibility. Eligible individuals were invited to register for the study and give the required informed consent for participation." 4b-i) Report if outcomes were (self-)assessed through online questionnaires Clearly report if outcomes were (self-)assessed through online questionnaires (as common in webbased trials) or otherwise.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 5) The interventions for each group with su cient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 4b-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "All assessments […] were performed as self-report online questionnaires." 4b-ii) Report how institutional a liations are displayed Report how institutional a liations are displayed to potential participants [on ehealth media], as a liations with prestigious hospitals or universities may affect volunteer rates, use, and reactions with regards to an intervention.(Not a required item -describe only if this may bias results) Does your paper address subitem 4b-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 5-i) Mention names, credential, a liations of the developers, sponsors, and owners Mention names, credential, a liations of the developers, sponsors, and owners [6] (if authors/evaluators are owners or developer of the software, this needs to be declared in a "Con ict of interest" section or mentioned elsewhere in the manuscript).
Does your paper address subitem 5-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The center for psychotherapy research is developer, owner, and sponsor. essential 5-ii) Describe the history/development process Describe the history/development process of the application and previous formative evaluations (e.g., focus groups, usability testing), as these will have an impact on adoption/use rates and help with interpreting results.
Does your paper address subitem 5-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort

5-iii) Revisions and updating
Revisions and updating. Clearly mention the date and/or version number of the application/intervention (and comparator, if applicable) evaluated, or describe whether the intervention underwent major changes during the evaluation process, or whether the development and/or content was "frozen" during the trial. Describe dynamic components such as news feeds or changing content which may have an impact on the replicability of the intervention (for unexpected events see item 3b).
Does your paper address subitem 5-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort

5-iv) Quality assurance methods
Provide information on quality assurance methods to ensure accuracy and quality of information provided [1], if applicable.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 5-iv?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 5-v) Ensure replicability by publishing the source code, and/or providing screenshots/screen-capture video, and/or providing owcharts of the algorithms used Ensure replicability by publishing the source code, and/or providing screenshots/screen-capture video, and/or providing owcharts of the algorithms used. Replicability (i.e., other researchers should in principle be able to replicate the study) is a hallmark of scienti c reporting.
Does your paper address subitem 5-v?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort

5-vi) Digital preservation
Digital preservation: Provide the URL of the application, but as the intervention is likely to change or disappear over the course of the years; also make sure the intervention is archived (Internet Archive, webcitation.org, and/or publishing the source code or screenshots/videos alongside the article). As pages behind login screens cannot be archived, consider creating demo pages which are accessible without login.
Does your paper address subitem 5-vi?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study

5-vii) Access
Access: Describe how participants accessed the application, in what setting/context, if they had to pay (or were paid) or not, whether they had to be a member of speci c group. If known, describe how participants obtained "access to the platform and Internet" [1]. To ensure access for editors/reviewers/readers, consider to provide a "backdoor" login account or demo mode for reviewers/readers to explore the application (also important for archiving purposes, see vi).
Does your paper address subitem 5-vii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "In case of interest, individuals could directly access an openly available online screening questionnaire checking for eligibility. Eligible individuals were invited to register for the study and give the required informed consent for participation." Backdoor access cannot be provided at the moment as the software as currently adapted for the planned e cacy trial. subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 5-viii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Participants randomized to the intervention group received immediate access to the Internet-based intervention 'SaveMySkin' for 12 weeks. The program is based on CBT techniques and consists of several modules: (1) Psychoeducation: Information about skin picking disorder, treatment options and dermatological topics; (2) Self-management: A module with three sub-modules aiming at the reduction of skin picking behavior, and the enhancement of self-management skills ('Skills': information materials, and online exercises; 'Tools': downloadable o ine trainings; 'Emotions': online exercises on emotion regulation); (3) Supportive monitoring: Daily support via E-Mail including a motivational message in the morning, and a short monitoring questionnaire in the evening, which is combined with an automatically generated, tailored feedback; (4) Counseling via Internet-chat: Optional personal support in individual chat sessions with psychologists, or psychological and dermatological group chats.
Overall, the intervention follows a exible and demand-oriented design.
Participants were therefore expected to use the program depending on their individual needs. Recommendations on the use of certain program modules or exercises were given within chat sessions or in the monitoring feedback. "

5-ix) Describe use parameters
Describe use parameters (e.g., intended "doses" and optimal timing for use). Clarify what instructions or recommendations were given to the user, e.g., regarding timing, frequency, heaviness of use, if any, or was the intervention used ad libitum.
Does your paper address subitem 5-ix?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study

5-x) Clarify the level of human involvement
Clarify the level of human involvement (care providers or health professionals, also technical assistance) in the e-intervention or as co-intervention (detail number and expertise of professionals involved, if any, as well as "type of assistance offered, the timing and frequency of the support, how it is initiated, and the medium by which the assistance is delivered". It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of human involvement required for the trial, and the level of human involvement required for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21generalizability).
Does your paper address subitem 5-x?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 5-xi) Report any prompts/reminders used Report any prompts/reminders used: Clarify if there were prompts (letters, emails, phone calls, SMS) to use the application, what triggered them, frequency etc. It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of prompts/reminders required for the trial, and the level of prompts/reminders for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21 -generalizability).
Does your paper address subitem 5-xi? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study In case that participants did not activate their account or did not respond to the study assessments at t2 and t3, the program automatically sent two reminder emails. subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 6a) Completely de ned pre-speci ed primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed 5-xii) Describe any co-interventions (incl. training/support) Describe any co-interventions (incl. training/support): Clearly state any interventions that are provided in addition to the targeted eHealth intervention, as ehealth intervention may not be designed as stand-alone intervention. This includes training sessions and support [1]. It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of training required for the trial, and the level of training for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21 -generalizability. Does your paper address subitem 5-xii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The program is conceptualized as a stand-alone intervention in order to complement conventional health care for skin picking disorder." "Study participation did not include any restrictions concerning additional treatment utilization." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 6a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Attitudes and expectations Attitudes and expectations towards SaveMySkin were investigated by 10 statements, which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 'does not apply' to 'totally applies' (see Table 3). In addition, participants could report further reasons for participation. Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 6b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "No essential changes have been made to the study protocol after study commencement. The actual sample size exceeded the initial aim due to a very fast recruitment via Internet, so that the original plan to expand recruitment to dermatological clinics was not pursued." 7a) How sample size was determined NPT: When applicable, details of whether and how the clustering by care provides or centers was addressed subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 7b) When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines 8a) Method used to generate the random allocation sequence NPT: When applicable, how care providers were allocated to each trial group 7a-i) Describe whether and how expected attrition was taken into account when calculating the sample size Describe whether and how expected attrition was taken into account when calculating the sample size.
Does your paper address subitem 7a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 7b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Stopping criteria: In case of adverse effects for participants trial would have been stopped. No interim analyses were conducted. 8b) Type of randomisation; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size) 9) Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (such as sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 8a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The allocation sequence was produced with a computerized random number generator." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 8b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Participants were equally (1:1) randomized to one of the study groups by the software, based on an a priori de ned list (intervention vs. waiting list control), after they completed the registration and the following baseline questionnaire.
Randomization was strati ed by gender and followed a permuted block design." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 9? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Participants were equally (1:1) randomized to one of the study groups by the software, based on an a priori de ned list (intervention vs. waiting list control), after they completed the registration and the following baseline questionnaire.
Randomization was strati ed by gender and followed a permuted block design." 10) Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions 11a) If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (for example, participants, care providers, those assessing outcomes) and how NPT: Whether or not administering co-interventions were blinded to group assignment subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 10? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Participants were equally (1:1) randomized to one of the study groups by the software, based on an a priori de ned list (intervention vs. waiting list control), after they completed the registration and the following baseline questionnaire.
Randomization was strati ed by gender and followed a permuted block design.
The allocation sequence was produced with a computerized random number generator." The biostatistician of the study generated the random allocation sequence with a computerized random number generator.
11a-i) Specify who was blinded, and who wasn't Specify who was blinded, and who wasn't. Usually, in web-based trials it is not possible to blind the participants [1, 3] (this should be clearly acknowledged), but it may be possible to blind outcome assessors, those doing data analysis or those administering co-interventions (if any).
Does your paper address subitem 11a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Blinding was not possible in the present study.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 11b) If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions (this item is usually not relevant for ehealth trials as it refers to similarity of a placebo or sham intervention to a active medication/intervention) 12a) Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary and secondary outcomes NPT: When applicable, details of whether and how the clustering by care providers or centers was addressed 11a-ii) Discuss e.g., whether participants knew which intervention was the "intervention of interest" and which one was the "comparator" Informed consent procedures (4a-ii) can create biases and certain expectations -discuss e.g., whether participants knew which intervention was the "intervention of interest" and which one was the "comparator".
Does your paper address subitem 11a-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study

Meine Antwort
Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 11b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Not relevant for the present study.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 12a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data on attitudes, expectations, user satisfaction, and program utilization. Continuous variables were dichotomized by splitting the Likert scale (e.g., 'Agree' contains 'applies mostly' and 'totally applies'; 'Helpful' contains 'a little helpful' and 'very helpful') to analyze data with frequencies. E cacy was tested by mixed models. Intervention effects were analyzed as cross-level interactions (group x time). Control group was coded 0, and intervention group was coded 1. Assessment points were coded as follows: baseline (t0, t1) = 0; t2 = 1; t3 = 2. In accordance with the recommendations of  (time)). It has to be noted that one participant in each study group did not complete the entire post assessment. The analyses regarding user satisfaction and help-seeking at t3 therefore refer to N=38 (intervention group) and N=47 (control group)." 12a-i) Imputation techniques to deal with attrition / missing values Imputation techniques to deal with attrition / missing values: Not all participants will use the intervention/comparator as intended and attrition is typically high in ehealth trials. Specify how participants who did not use the application or dropped out from the trial were treated in the statistical analysis (a complete case analysis is strongly discouraged, and simple imputation techniques such as LOCF may also be problematic [4]).
Does your paper address subitem 12a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Data analyses followed intention-to-treat principles. All randomized subjects were analyzed. Mixed-models can handle missing data. Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 12b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study No additional analyses were conducted in the present study.

X26-i) Comment on ethics committee approval
Does your paper address subitem X26-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The present trial was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University."

RESULTS
13a) For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome NPT: The number of care providers or centers performing the intervention in each group and the number of patients treated by each care provider in each center Does your paper address subitem X26-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort X26-iii) Safety and security procedures Safety and security procedures, incl. privacy considerations, and any steps taken to reduce the likelihood or detection of harm (e.g., education and training, availability of a hotline) Does your paper address subitem X26-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 13a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study " A detailed overview of the participant ow including the number of analyzed cases for each objective is provided in the CONSORT Flow diagram in Figure 1." 13b) For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 14a) Dates de ning the periods of recruitment and follow-up Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 13b? (NOTE: Preferably, this is shown in a CONSORT ow diagram) * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Six participants of the intervention group neither logged into the program after the initial registration process, nor completed any of the daily monitoring assessments, so that they did not receive the allocated intervention. The response rate for the assessment at t2 (six weeks after randomization) was 59 % in the intervention group and 70 % in the control group. The nal assessment (t3: twelve weeks after randomization) was completed by 61 % of the intervention group and 70 % of the control group.
A detailed overview of the participant ow including the number of analyzed cases for each objective is provided in Figure 1."

13b-i) Attrition diagram
Strongly recommended: An attrition diagram (e.g., proportion of participants still logging in or using the intervention/comparator in each group plotted over time, similar to a survival curve) or other gures or tables demonstrating usage/dose/engagement. Does your paper address subitem 13b-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript or cite the gure number if applicable (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 14a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Participant enrolment started in October 2018. The planned sample size of 100 participants was already achieved after 18 days of recruitment. Advertisement was stopped then, but due to ethical considerations, screening and registration were not closed before December 2018." 14a-i) Indicate if critical "secular events" fell into the study period Indicate if critical "secular events" fell into the study period, e.g., signi cant changes in Internet resources available or "changes in computer hardware or Internet delivery resources" Does your paper address subitem 14a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 14b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This item is not applicable. The trial was stopped, because the planned sample size was achieved.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 16) For each group, number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 15? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study " Table 1 and 2 show the demographic and clinical characteristics for each study   group." 15-i) Report demographics associated with digital divide issues In ehealth trials it is particularly important to report demographics associated with digital divide issues, such as age, education, gender, social-economic status, computer/Internet/ehealth literacy of the participants, if known.
Does your paper address subitem 15-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study " 16-i) Report multiple "denominators" and provide de nitions Report multiple "denominators" and provide de nitions: Report N's (and effect sizes) "across a range of study participation [and use] thresholds" [1], e.g., N exposed, N consented, N used more than x times, N used more than y weeks, N participants "used" the intervention/comparator at speci c prede ned time points of interest (in absolute and relative numbers per group). Always clearly de ne "use" of the intervention.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 16-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "On average, participants lled in 25.81 daily monitoring assessments (SD=26.96; range=0-81). Three quarters of the sample (N=48) completed more than 3 monitorings, 50% (N=32) answered more than 9, and 25% (N=16) lled out more than 45 monitoring questionnaires. In sum, 47% (N=30) participated in the monitoring at least once a week (42% twice a week). Five individual chat sessions were booked and carried out (6%; N=4 participants;).
The psychological group chat was used by three participants (5%) and the dermatological group chat by six individuals (9 %), who participated up to three times in one of the chat types. Participants were asked why they had not used the chat. The most common answers were 'I don't really know, why I didn't use the chat' (53% N=20), 'I had no need, because I could seek advice somewhere else (e.g., psychotherapy)' (34%; N=13) and 'I had no need, because I felt good.' (32%; N=12

16-ii) Primary analysis should be intent-to-treat
Primary analysis should be intent-to-treat, secondary analyses could include comparing only "users", with the appropriate caveats that this is no longer a randomized sample (see 18-i).
Does your paper address subitem 16-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study 17a) For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% con dence interval) subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 17b) For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 17a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Table 4 contains 95% CI for the model coe cients.
17a-i) Presentation of process outcomes such as metrics of use and intensity of use In addition to primary/secondary (clinical) outcomes, the presentation of process outcomes such as metrics of use and intensity of use (dose, exposure) and their operational de nitions is critical. This does not only refer to metrics of attrition (13-b) (often a binary variable), but also to more continuous exposure metrics such as "average session length". These must be accompanied by a technical description how a metric like a "session" is de ned (e.g., timeout after idle time) [1] (report under item 6a).
Does your paper address subitem 17a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 17b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This item is not applicable. The results do not contain binary outcomes.

18-i) Subgroup analysis of comparing only users
A subgroup analysis of comparing only users is not uncommon in ehealth trials, but if done, it must be stressed that this is a self-selected sample and no longer an unbiased sample from a randomized trial (see 16-iii).
Does your paper address subitem 18-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 22-i) Restate study questions and summarize the answers suggested by the data, starting with primary outcomes and process outcomes (use) Restate study questions and summarize the answers suggested by the data, starting with primary outcomes and process outcomes (use).
Does your paper address subitem 22-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Skin picking disorder is associated with psychological distress, impairment in social life, as well as medical risks, but currently, individuals with skin picking rarely receive the required professional support due to an insu cient healthcare supply. Therefore, the present study investigated attitudes and expectations towards an Internet-based self-help program for skin picking, as well as usersatisfaction, and effects on skin picking severity and impairment.
Full recruitment of the initially targeted sample size for the present pilot trial was rapidly archieved, indicating a high willingness to participate in an Internet-based intervention for skin picking. Randomization resulted in two comparable study groups, which only differed marginally in the SPS R subscale symptom severity.
Participants reported positive expectations regarding skin picking symptoms and wellbeing. Flexibility in terms of time and location, expertise related to skin picking, and a lack of other healthcare options were further reasons for participating.
At post assessment, the majority of the intervention group reported a high satisfaction with the modules included in SaveMySkin, and the program in general (e.g., appropriateness, length, recommendation to others). About half of the sample participated in the monitoring at least once a week, and a quarter used the monitoring more than four times a week. The monitoring frequency highly varied between users, the adherence in this module was overall satisfying.
The intervention group yielded substantial reductions in skin picking severity (SPS-R total score), and speci cally in symptom severity (SPS-R subscale) compared to the control group. The size of these effects (d = 0.67; 0.79) is comparable to the overall effect of behavioral treatments reported in a metaanalysis (SMD = 0.68) [20].
The analyses did not con rm meaningful differences between groups regarding improvements in skin picking related impairment measured via the SPS R and the SPIS. Given the rather short time period covered in the present trial, this result is not surprising, since skin picking related impairment (e.g., impaired self-esteem, be appropriate for interventional studies. As the primary outcome measure, the SPS R furthermore proved to be sensitive to change. This is of special importance for subsequent studies, given the lack of interventional studies on skin picking disorder and the associated uncertainty about the adequate measurement of intervention effects. Concerning utilization of the self-help program, it turned out that the chat module was utilized only rarely, even though most participants (more than 76 %) liked the idea that different chat modules were included in the program. However, the low chat utilization is not concerning, but in accordance with previous research suggesting that a considerable number of users in online communities does not actively produce content, but rather read and browse through the platform [40]. More than half of the participants in the present study indicated that they were not sure, why they had not used the chat. A reluctance to commit to chat participation at a certain date and time might be also a reason for the rather infrequent utilization of this module."

22-ii) Highlight unanswered new questions, suggest future research
Highlight unanswered new questions, suggest future research.
Does your paper address subitem 22-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 21) Generalisability (external validity, applicability) of the trial ndings NPT: External validity of the trial ndings according to the intervention, comparators, patients, and care providers or centers involved in the trial 20-i) Typical limitations in ehealth trials Typical limitations in ehealth trials: Participants in ehealth trials are rarely blinded. Ehealth trials often look at a multiplicity of outcomes, increasing risk for a Type I error. Discuss biases due to nonuse of the intervention/usability issues, biases through informed consent procedures, unexpected events.
Does your paper address subitem 20-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The present study included several limitations, which should be considered in the interpretation of results. First, all assessments were conducted online and inclusion relied exclusively on self-reported data so that the internal validity and generalizability to a larger clinical population might be compromised. Another shortcoming results from the rather low response rate at post assessment. The lack of data from approximately one third of the sample limits the validity of the present ndings, since it remains unclear, how satis ed the non-responders were and how they changed in symptomatology. Additionally, the present study did not investigate the stability of effects, as it focused on the classical aims of a pilot study and therefore did not include extended follow-up assessments. However, the results of this study clearly demonstrated the feasibility of an Internet-based intervention in the target group. Furthermore, the study provided preliminary evidence for the e cacy of the intervention. Subsequent research should thus investigate the e cacy and cost-effectiveness of SaveMySkin in a fully powered RCT. This trial should apply a sequential enrolment procedure including a clinician-rated assessment of psychiatric conditions as well as a dermatological assessment, and documentation of the skin status. Moreover, the study period should be expanded to assess the stability of intervention effects, and to explore potential long-term effects on impairment." Generalizability to other populations: In particular, discuss generalizability to a general Internet population, outside of a RCT setting, and general patient population, including applicability of the study results for other organizations Does your paper address subitem 21-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Meine Antwort 21-ii) Discuss if there were elements in the RCT that would be different in a routine application setting Discuss if there were elements in the RCT that would be different in a routine application setting (e.g., prompts/reminders, more human involvement, training sessions or other co-interventions) and what impact the omission of these elements could have on use, adoption, or outcomes if the intervention is applied outside of a RCT setting.
Does your paper address subitem 21-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 23? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The present trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS; DRKS00015236), and approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 24? * Cite a Multimedia Appendix, other reference, or copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "The study protocol was published before recruitment was completed (Gallinat et al., 2019)." Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 25? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The present study did not receive funding.
X27-i) State the relation of the study team towards the system being evaluated In addition to the usual declaration of interests ( nancial or otherwise), also state the relation of the study team towards the system being evaluated, i.e., state if the authors/evaluators are distinct from or identical with the developers/sponsors of the intervention.